Recently, the Horn of Africa has been an essential place for countries to compete over who is more powerful. In particular, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and other Gulf States are trying hard to become more influential there. This paper examines why these countries want control over the Red Sea area, how their actions could affect peace in that region, and what it means for America. We’ll look at history, changes after the Cold War ended, and times when these states have influenced events from behind the scenes. The goal is to understand possible problems that come up and give ideas about what American officials can do about it. This study focuses on how the UAE and Gulf States secretly get involved in the Horn of Africa’s business. They want to be in charge around the Red Sea area because they see Western power getting smaller there. There are different issues because of what the UAE does – like making conflicts worse, causing trouble with how local areas govern themselves, and pushing America’s influence away. At last, this work suggests ways American policymakers could respond. Hence, they deal with those challenges better and help bring back stability while keeping a strong presence in that part of Africa.
The Strategic Ambitions of the UAE and Gulf States
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and countries around the Gulf of Arabia have strong historical links with the Horn of Africa, returning to old trade paths and friendly talks. These ties have grown into essential partnerships that affect what happens in their region. For example, there’s a long history between the UAE and Somalia, which has turned into many types of cooperation involving military things, business stuff, and working together on government levels.
Somalia is right at an important spot where Africa meets the Arabian Peninsula. This place is very significant for what the UAE wants to achieve in the area. Years ago, the two places used to do a lot of trade with each other, which set up how they work together today. Since way back in the early 1900s, people from the Emirates would go to Somali shores to trade and set up shops along their coastlines; this allowed both sides to share cultures and better understand one another. Nowadays, what goes on between them isn’t just about trading goods but also includes bigger plans like safety at sea aims or flexing regional muscles. They’ve built military spots up north in Somaliland as well as Puntland so they can keep an eye out on who passes by through Red Sea waters or near Gulf Aden parts – it helps fight off pirates, stopping bad guys from causing trouble while also protecting boats that carry cargo all-around these seas.
The UAE is also working to help Somalia by supporting projects to improve its people’s lives. The UAE helps build roads, hospitals, and schools, improving Somalia’s life. They give aid to those who are suffering because of fighting or natural disasters. The UAE has a long history of working closely with Somalia. It shows how it wants to become more influential in an essential part of Africa called the Horn of Africa. The UAE uses its money and military strength as tools to increase its power there and protect what matters most to it. Finally, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has big goals for being a leader around the Red Sea area because they want to keep sea routes safe and grow their business interests there, too. One fundamental way they do this is by using their military base at Assab port in Eritrea, which lets them have more control over activities near both the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
The military base of the UAE in Assab is in a critical spot to keep an eye on ships that go through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. This narrow sea lane connects the Red Sea with the waters near Yemen and further into the immense Indian Ocean. The UAE uses this place to look after its trade by sea and make sure pirates or other dangers do not threaten it. Having soldiers there also makes the UAE more assertive in Africa’s Horn area, giving them more say over what happens there. Besides having soldiers there, the UAE also works with local rulers and spends money to grow its business influence around these seas. A good example is how DP World from the UAE runs a prominent shipping port in Djibouti, making them essential for shipping worldwide. By putting money into things like ports, which are vital for moving goods around, they want to use their prime location at this crossroads between continents to boost trading.
Also, when you see where else they’re doing business along these shores, it’s clear that they have bigger plans—including facing off against other countries nearby who compete with them—to increase how much sway they have everywhere. Being present in strategic spots like Eritrea and Djibouti, their goal is to set up their preferred way forward for all economic and political matters within this region by land and sea. The main thing behind why such control over access points along marine routes here means so much comes down mainly because it ties into what are more significant ideas from back home—being seen as more robust globally while finding new ways beyond just oil-related stuff, all ultimately creating better security plus chances via various methods including those involving armies or building projects—all aimed squarely at achieving leading roles concerning tomorrow’s Red Sea zone trends.
Diminishing Western Influence and Its Impacts
In the Horn of Africa, a complicated area, Western countries like America are less potent than they used to be. It has made room for other new players who want to become essential and push their goals. When the Cold War ended, America had to think again about its ways with other nations. It made them shift their approach to the Horn of Africa. They started to give less military help and financial aid than before. One big reason things changed was that what mattered for global safety differed. The old fights between big countries were fading, and other dangers started popping up instead. When Russia stopped being part of the Soviet Union, and people didn’t care so much about whether you were on this side or that side politically, this place—called the Horn of Africa—didn’t seem so crucial for American plans like during Cold War times. After things like the September 11 attacks, America started focusing more on stopping terrorism. It made them pay less attention to places like Africa’s Horn because they were busy with other areas that seemed more important for their safety.
Because America wasn’t as involved in Africa’s Horn anymore, new groups saw a chance and moved in quickly to take over. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is one of these groups and has been working hard to get stronger in this part of Africa since there was less competition from Western countries. The fact that big powers from the West, especially America, aren’t as present in Africa’s Horn anymore has changed how countries behave there and who holds power. As friends from the West step back, we see more fighting for control between local nations and others coming from outside. One significant change is how non-Western places like the UAE are becoming bold about making decisions affecting African politics and security now that American soldiers are around a little and America isn’t talking or meeting as much with local leaders. These new players use their money, strength, and friendships to push what they want for themselves within this region.
The Western countries are losing their influence. This shift has caused nations in the Horn of Africa to seek new friends and partners. They see America as less dependable now and are getting closer to other powerful countries like China, Turkey, and Iran. These countries want a more significant role in the region. As Western power gets weaker, it opens doors for others to stir trouble by supporting fighting groups, increasing tension, and stopping peace from happening. It keeps violence going around in circles, making things unstable there. In brief, as big Western powers step back in the Horn of Africa, new players come forward looking out for their interests. There’s more competition because everyone wants a piece of control or influence there. Solving these problems means we need intelligent plans that understand what’s politically changing while encouraging talks between people so they can work together better towards peace in this part of Africa.
Proxy Involvement and Regional Stability
The UAE uses other groups to help control what happens in this region and to have more power. The UAE’s actions, especially in countries with lots of conflict like Yemen, Somalia, and Libya, have made things worse there. For example, they support a group in southern Yemen that wants its own country. The UAE gives them weapons, money, and help, which makes it harder for everyone to come together and stop fighting peacefully. Because of what the UAE is doing in Yemen by supporting different fighting groups, it’s making everything more complicated. It keeps going on because these groups keep causing violence, leading to many people suffering without enough food or safety, as well as making it hard for world leaders to try to end all fights through talks.
The UAE has been involved in Yemen, affecting safety in the area. The fight there is also starting to impact nearby countries and could cause more significant problems for Africa near the Red Sea. Guns have spread across borders, and many people have had to flee their homes. It makes it hard for the countries next to each other because it adds more tension on top of old fights, leading to new disagreements. In places around Africa by the sea called the Horn of Africa, how powerful a country is now looks different because of what the UAE is doing there, both with its army and money-wise. In a critical water path where ships pass by called the Red Sea corridor, they set up military spots and are working closely with some countries like Eritrea and Djibouti. This changes who’s friends with whom, which can lead to competition between those areas’ leaders. Like take Assab in Eritrea: It’s near a narrow part of the sea everyone wants control over, named Bab el-Mandeb Strait; having a base there means that UAE can be intense at sea where big ships carry stuff we use daily around world trade routes. By being able, most importantly, to control these tight squeezes in seas’ paths or key bits like ports or airfields, the UAE shows off its power as serious about playing a significant role when making decisions about peace or risks here locally.
In the same way, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has spent money on harbors and extensive building projects in countries around the Horn of Africa. They have done this to grow their economy and meet some crucial goals. The UAE works with governments there and big companies like DP World to take charge of essential places by the sea and other large buildings. It helps them play a big part in controlling trade. However, only some people are happy about how bold the UAE is becoming in this part of Africa. Some older powers who used to be more influential there are worried. They’re uneasy because they think the UAE wants too much energy for itself, which makes things uncertain for these countries’ own decisions as independent nations. What the UAE is doing from a distance – using others to represent its interests – significantly changes peace and safety around those regions. It can worsen fights or cause tension between groups while changing who holds power over whom across different areas nearby. To solve these problems, all involved – local leaders from nearby places and others from afar – must work closely together through talking it out, helping each other out when needed so everyone feels included—aiming towards bringing peace back into that corner of Africa.
Implications for US Policy
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is involved in the Horn of Africa, making things tricky for those who make decisions for America. They must think hard about what matters most strategically and what’s happening in this area. This section looks at how the UAE’s involvement from afar affects America’s safety concerns and suggests ways to deal with these problems. The fact that the UAE supports certain groups from a distance makes it challenging for America, especially when trying to stop terrorism and keep peace in places like Yemen. In Yemen, support from the UAE to some fighting groups has made an already bad situation worse, hurting efforts by Americans there. This aid causes more trouble and breaks up the country even further. With all this fighting comes more chances for terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and Islamic State (IS). These groups get stronger because of it, which is dangerous locally and far away where American interests are concerned.
Also, the United Arab Emirates (UAE’s) actions in Yemen have not helped with international attempts to find a peaceful solution through talks. The UAE has chosen sides and looked after its own goals only, which keeps things from moving toward peace. It adds to the problems of people in Yemen and makes their suffering worse because it adds to the big crisis where they need help. To deal with how the UAE is getting involved by using other groups or proxies in Africa near Arabia, U.S. leaders should use many ways at once. It includes talking diplomatically, making intelligent partnerships, and putting just enough pressure on them so that we influence what the UAE does for more stability there. First of all, America must talk before anything else directly with both UAE itself and others close by who also matter when it comes down to sorting out fights and unsteady times around this part of Africa, like the Horn of Africa region. By starting conversations and encouraging fair leadership styles where everyone gets heard, the USA might get the UAE to think about helping make everything peaceful instead of focusing solely on power games. On top of that, critical relationships the USA already holds within those areas need usage effectively as well if trying to push especially hard to influence other countries’ choices – including stopping backing up proxy fighters ruining chances secure environment anybody surrounds place such nations Saudi Arabia and Egypt do play critical roles alongside larger world bodies to United Nations supporting these sort moves boosting changes happen Yemen wherever else conflicts currently exist tensions run high.
In brief, what the UAE is doing through others in this part of Africa is unsuitable for American safety interests—it needs an answer that covers all bases. The US should use careful conversation with other countries, strong partnerships when needed, innovative pressure where appropriate., Examining how punishments can prevent further destabilizing activities by promoting resilience within communities holds fundamental importance since such measures serve as deterrents preventing adverse impacts upon regional stability, thus encouraging a reevaluation of adopting different approaches. Moreover, substantial investments into developmental programs aimed at securing improvements in governance quality alongside combating radicalization promise the establishment of a durable peaceful environment effectuating lasting resolutions confronting challenges posed by external influences including, among others also, UAE, Therefore necessitating deployment of different strategies encompassing utilizations diplomatic channels fostering alliances exertions principled stands coupled promotion capacity enhancements thereby facilitating achievement overriding objectives entailing assurances safeties accords prosperities involving engaged parties concerned stakeholders alike.
Strategic Recommendations for US Policymakers
It’s essential for people making decisions in the United States to create a complete plan that deals with troubles coming from how countries like the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and others around it get involved in East Africa. They need this plan to protect Africa’s interests and help keep peace. The ideas we’re giving here say that these decision-makers should focus on building good relationships, working together with different countries, and taking steps early on to stop other outside places from having too much power there. One key thing they can do is talk more with local partners. For example, improving friendships with important nations like Ethiopia, Kenya, and Djibouti will strengthen trust and let them work together better regarding safety and money matters. Take Ethiopia as an instance: The U.S. has been friends with them for a long time, so they could support each other more, which would help bring calmness into East Africa. Suppose the US gives diplomatic backing along with some specific advice or assistance. In that case, they might help Ethiopia deal better with local challenging situations, especially those caused by outsiders trying to stir up trouble.
Talking to countries like Kenya and Djibouti helps us work together against dangers we all face, such as terrorist attacks and sea pirates. This teamwork also helps everyone’s businesses grow and brings the region closer together. When the US talks with these nations, they agree on how to deal with new problems. Talking one-on-one and working within bigger groups through organizations already set up is essential for American leaders. They should use groups like the African Union (AU), the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), and the United Nations (UN) to plan together and make sure everyone in those regions has a say when tackling significant issues. For example, America could support plans by AU aimed at keeping peace in Africa’s Horn area—like making sure their Peace Council or backup forces are ready to go into action if needed. The US could also teach them skills to prepare them for fights or emergencies nearby. In the same way, America can get involved with IGAD when dealing with things like stopping terrorists, protecting sea travel routes near coasts, or helping people who need urgent aid because of disasters or wars. By matching what it does with IGAD’s goals, America gets stronger by using resources from every country in that group, making everything more stable around Africa’s Horn.
The United States government should not only work with other countries and use diplomacy to deal with problems but also take active steps to reduce the power of outside countries like the UAE and Gulf States in Africa’s Horn region. It means watching out for and stopping actions that disturb the peace, such as outsiders supporting groups with weapons or messing with local leaders’ decisions. For instance, America could get better at gathering information on what these foreign powers are doing there—looking at their money exchanges, when they send soldiers, or how they talk diplomatically. By sharing this knowledge with nearby friends, America can spot dangers early on and act before things worsen. Also, America can discourage those outside forces from causing trouble by using strict rules against them, like freezing their bank accounts, banning travel for certain people who support violence indirectly, or making it hard for local stability. These challenging moves will cost those bad actors money and time, leading them to follow international rules. In short, American officials need a firm plan that does many different things well to solve issues caused by UAE’s involvement through others acting on its behalf in Africa’s Horn region. Suppose America works well with allies around there while being ready to step up quickly against any negative influence from abroad. In that case, it can protect interests vital to Americans and help bring peace locally, even amidst competition between big world powers. Building innovative alliances and choosing where exactly help is needed lets America guide what happens next towards more lasting peace plus wealth shared among all neighbors there.
Conclusion
To sum up, the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE’s) indirect role in the Horn of Africa is a big problem for peace in that area and for what the US wants to achieve. This research looks at why the UAE and Gulf countries are involved there and how it changes things locally. It shows that it’s essential for those who make decisions in the US to develop sound plans in response. If American leaders talk more with other countries and take steps early on, they can balance out outside influences and protect American interests over there.
Sources
ACLED. (2018, October 10). Exporting (In)Stability: The UAE’s Role in Yemen and the Horn of Africa. Retrieved from https://acleddata.com/2018/10/10/exporting-instability-the-uaes-role-in-yemen-and-the-horn-of-africa/
Brookings Institution. (n.d.). Red Sea Rivalries: The Gulf, the Horn, and the new geopolitics of the Red Sea. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/red-sea-rivalries-the-gulf-the-horn-and-the-new-geopolitics-of-the-red-sea/
Clapham, C. (2017). The Horn of Africa: State Formation and Decay. Hurst.
Foreign Policy Research Institute. (2022, July). Separatists and Spoilers: The UAE’s Way of Proxy Warfare. Retrieved from https://www.fpri.org/article/2022/07/separatists-and-spoilers-the-uaes-way-of-proxy-warfare/
International Crisis Group. (n.d.). A Dangerous Gulf in the Horn: How the Inter-Arab Crisis is Fuelling Regional Tensions. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/dangerous-gulf-horn-how-inter-arab-crisis-fuelling-regional-tensions
International Crisis Group. (n.d.). The United Arab Emirates in the Horn of Africa. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/united-arab-emirates/b65-united-arab-emirates-horn-africa
Jackson, D. (n.d.). US Foreign Policy in The Horn of Africa: From Colonialism to Terrorism. JSTOR. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43663303
Middle East Monitor. (2021, January 31). UAE: The scramble for the Horn of Africa. Retrieved from https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210131-uae-the-scramble-for-the-horn-of-africa/
Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. 1st ed. New York: Public Affairs, pp. 3-49.
Shaw, I. G. R. (2017). Robot Wars: US Empire and geopolitics in the robotic age. Security Dialogue, 48(5), 451-470.
Ulrichsen, K. C. (2015). The Gulf States in International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
United States Institute of Peace. (2018, December). In Red Sea Region, Competing Outside Powers Complicate US Interests. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/publications/2018/12/red-sea-region-competing-outside-powers-complicate-us-interests
write