The growth of transnational corporations’ power, influence, and resources has raised significant concerns about their influence on the sovereignty of nation-states. The opposing side in the debate argues that transnational corporations are business institutions that seek economic advancement only to help the states achieve collective economic growth (Reddy, 2012). On the other hand, the proposing side argues that these Transnational corporations are willing to reach more levels to advance their interests, which often clash with principles of states’ sovereignty. As Transnational corporations seek to penetrate new markets, achieve growth, and maximize profitability, they often interfere with the political and economic structure of different countries to serve their interests (Reddy, 2012). Their global presence also creates a loophole for setting functions in countries that suit their interests and evading taxes, human rights regulations, and fair trading practices (McCorquodale & Simons, 2007). This paper supports that the TNCs undermine the sovereignty of nation-states by undermining their power in regulation, protection of human and labor rights, promotion of fair-trade practices, democracy, political freedom, control of own resources and territories, and sustenance of social-economic equality.
Transnational corporations (TNCs) have undermined the regulatory power of nation-states. Transnational corporations operate in many countries, adopting different strategies in different countries to minimize government regulations (Kacowicz & Mitrani, 2016). For example, they strategically establish production facilities and subsidiaries in jurisdictions with favorable tax environments. This enables them to evade taxation in their home countries, thus reducing the capability of nation-states to enforce tax regulatory standards equally. Transnational corporations also enjoy flexibility that allows them to relocate operations or restructure their entities to evade compliance with various laws (Calleo, 1974). Thirdly, Transnational corporations have significant resources, including financial capital and legal expertise, to challenge regulations imposed by states. They achieve this through court battles and lobbying efforts to frustrate regulations that deviate from their interests. They can also threaten to relocate their operations due to their significant impact on the economy, forcing states to operate within the rules of Transnational corporations (Heywood, 2011). Therefore, the erosion of the regulatory power of state nations undermines nation-states’ ability to enforce laws that protect their citizens, economic stability, and social welfare.
Transnational corporations also undermine the power of nation-states to regulate human rights. They exploit realism principles by operating within different jurisdictions, which undermines the power of states to take action against human rights violations undertaken in other countries. Transnational corporations operate in different continents where their home countries have no jurisdiction to conduct investigations and charge them for international human violations (Koenig-Archibugi, 2004). For example, they establish their firms in developing countries where labor laws do not demand much remuneration and fair treatment of workers. A good example is Canadian mining multinationals, which are accused of violating human and labor rights by employing children and sponsoring murder, torture, and other war crimes (CBC, 2023). However, the Canadian government has no jurisdiction to charge them over these crimes, leaving it powerless over such acts. The absence of a comprehensive global regulatory framework has created legal ambiguities and jurisdictional disputes, which the multinational companies ensure remain intact to undermine their prosecution (McCorquodale & Simons, 2007). Therefore, Transnational corporations undermine the power of state nations to protect human rights by exploiting jurisdiction loopholes.
Transnational corporations also utilize their market dominance and monopoly power to undermine the economic power of state nations. Transnational corporations enjoy comprehensive sources due to their global presence, enabling them to source goods internationally from cheap and quality sources. This enables them to gain a competitive advantage in various markets and become the primary dominants. It also undermines the diversity of market players by limiting the ability of local entrepreneurs to succeed and become innovative. Transnational corporations also have advanced research and development resources to develop unique technologies patented and protected under trademarks (Heywood, 2011). This creates a monopoly in providing the products or services, thus increasing their power over the industry dynamics. The yielded power of dominance and monopoly increases their power and influence over the economic aspects of the country. Due to this influence, Transnational corporations often interfere with economic policies to ensure they favor their interests. This is achieved through lobbying and bribing legislators to ensure the policies are shaped to suit the corporation’s operations. Market monopoly can lead to the overexploitation of consumers, where the state has little power to control prices and quality due to a lack of competition (Cutler, 2009). Therefore, Transnational corporations enjoying market dominance and monopoly may undermine state-nations’ power to promote fair market practices and protect consumers.
Transnational corporations also undermine the power of state nations by interfering with democracy. Transnational corporations have extensive resources and global influence to exploit political platforms to advance their interests by interfering with elections or sponsoring political candidates, undermining democracy. In candidate sponsorship, Transnational corporations provide financial support during campaigns through party donations with expectations or agreements for future political benefits (Singh, 2006). Such benefits include securing favorable policies, government tenders, and access to state resources that support their business. Transnational corporations also undermine democracy through election interference through misinformation campaigns and cyber-attacks. They exploit their technological advancement and influence to interfere with elections and campaigns (Suter, 2008). For example, Vodafone Group was accused of interfering with Tanzania’s election by filtering and blocking messages with terms related to the country’s political opposition party. This undermines communication between party members, leading to rigging and unfair election practices. Blanket internet shutdowns are also experienced on election days to undermine freedom of speech during elections (Whibley, 2020). These political contributions also undermine the sovereignty of the political class as they seek to prioritize the interests of the corporations over public interests. This deters the power of the government to rule independently as the corporations shield power to control essential economic, social, and political decisions (Biersteker, 1980). Therefore, transnational corporations undermine state-nations’ sovereignty by undermining democracy and independent ruling.
Transnational corporations erode the sovereignty of affected states over their resources and territories. Transnational corporations are driven by profit motives and growth, often leading to unethical practices such as land grabbing and resource extraction. Corporates, especially in mining, agriculture, and forestry, are often affiliated with such activities. They acquire lands to exploit for the development of facilities or mining practices, which may involve the displacement of indigenous people and communities. Local governments facilitate these activities by introducing Special Economic Zones to encourage foreign direct investments but at the cost of their sovereignty (Reddy, 2012). These zones provide transnational corporations with free land, resources, and tax incentives. For example, in Congo, mining transitional companies grab land and displace communities without their consent in the quest for minerals. Therefore, Transnational corporations undermine state-nations’ sovereignty to protect their citizens and resources.
The Marxist analysis explains how transnational corporations undermine the sovereignty of states by concentrating power and wealth among a few. Transnational corporations are founded under the principles of capitalism of exploitation of uneven developments of the economy by utilizing low-wage labor and tax avoidance to maximize profit. They ensure their production facilities are in third-world countries where they pay low wages and overexploit workers to reduce costs. On the other hand, their management and other head functions are based in developed countries, with higher spending power, and are well renumerated, unlike those at the production level (Sklair, 2002). The profit sharing is unequal as the shareholders are mainly from developed countries, and thus, the business profits are plowed back into the home countries. These practices lead to economic inequalities on a global scale as third-world countries are deprived of their natural and labor resources for the benefit of the shareholders of the company. Transnational corporations also support Marxism by controlling trade policies within their industries to promote their interests over those of the economy and the locals, as discussed above. This ensures the continued profitability of the transnational corporations while suppressing the small industry players. In the long run, the shareholders of the transnational corporations accumulate wealth and reinvest it in other countries.
Similarly, the political class accumulates wealth through kickbacks and political donations by transnational corporations, while the ruled class continues to suffer in poverty and slow economic growth. Upcoming businesses are suppressed by market entry barriers and unfavorable market conditions established by the lobbied policies, undermining wealth distribution (Calleo, 1974). The increased gap between the rich and the poor undermines state-nations’ sovereignty in creating a fair and equal society.
However, opposers of the debate may argue that TNCs do not undermine the power of nation-states and instead complement them. The sole objective of businesses is to make a profit, and TNCs are no exception. Their operations are tailored to operate within suitable business environments, and decisions to establish operations globally are made to reach more customers and expand profits. They operate within the legal framework of every country they operate in and pay the required taxes, thus cementing their recognition of state power and influence in all spheres (Cutler, 2009). These contributions increase the power of the nation-state by creating jobs and providing revenue through taxes for development and power extension. Although this can appear as a justified reason, paying taxes and adhering to the law of the land does not necessarily deter TNCs from undermining the state’s powers in other sectors.
Secondly, TNCs promote international relations between nation-states, which enhances their power on the global platform. TNCs increase the national GDP and also output for export to other countries. This increases the power and significance of a state-nation on the international platform, which could enhance its power in diplomatic and trade negotiations. Most countries, including developed countries, welcome foreign direct investments brought by TNCs because of the economic advancements they bestow into the countries’ economies. Additionally, TNCs bring in new technologies, skills, and techniques to promote efficiency in economic production, thus boosting the state’s power to promote economic growth among its people. Therefore, TNCs play a significant role in promoting the power of nation-states on the international platform. However, opposers of the debate may argue that TNCs do not undermine the power of nation-states and instead complement them. The sole objective of businesses is to make a profit, and TNCs are no exception. Their operations are tailored to operate within suitable business environments, and decisions to establish operations globally are made to reach more customers and expand profits. They operate within the legal framework of every country they operate in and pay the required taxes, thus cementing their recognition of state power and influence in all spheres. These contributions increase the power of the nation-state by creating jobs and providing revenue through taxes for development and power extension.
Secondly, TNCs promote international relations between nation-states, which enhances their power on the global platform. TNCs increase the national GDP and also output for export to other countries. This increases the power and significance of a state-nation on the international platform, which could enhance its power in diplomatic and trade negotiations. Most countries, including developed countries, welcome foreign direct investments brought by TNCs because of the economic advancements they bestow into the countries’ economies. Additionally, TNCs bring in new technologies, skills, and techniques to promote efficiency in economic production, thus boosting the state’s power to promote economic growth among its people (McCorquodale & Simons, 2007). Therefore, TNCs play a significant role in promoting the power of nation-states on the international platform.
In conclusion, transnational corporations have undermined state-nations’ sovereignty in the last 50 years by undermining their authority in various domains. For one, they have undermined the regulatory power of nation-states by using their global presence to establish their facilities in areas that provide suitable terms for their operations, such as tax exemptions. Transnational corporations also undermine the power of nation-states to regulate human rights. They operate in areas with few government regulations on human and labor rights as long as they generate profits, thus, the power of state nations to protect human rights by exploiting jurisdiction loopholes. Thirdly, Transnational corporations enjoying market dominance and monopoly may undermine the power of state nations to promote fair market practices and protect consumers. They suppress small industry players while establishing market entry barriers to suppress free trade in markets. Transnational corporations also undermine the power of state nations by interfering with democracy by interfering with elections or sponsoring political candidates. Transnational corporations erode the sovereignty of affected states over their resources and territories. Lastly, transnational corporations undermine the sovereignty of states by concentrating power and wealth among a few. However, TNCs also boost the positives in promoting and recognizing the power of nation-states by paying taxes and adhering to legal frameworks. They also promote the power of state nations globally by increasing GDP and exports, which gives more power to the states in international matters.
References
Biersteker, T. J. (1980). The Illusion of State Power: Transnational Corporations and the Neutralization of Host Country Legislation. Journal of Peace Research, 17 (3), pp. 207-221
Calleo, D. P. (1974). Business Corporations and the National State. Social Research, 41 (4), pp. 702-718.
CBC. (2023, June 4). Extracting Justice: The human rights impact of Canadian mining around the world. CBC.ca. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/canadian-mining-abuses-1.6854852
Cutler, A. C. (2009). Constituting Capitalism: Corporations, Law, and Private Transnational Governance. St Antony’s International Review, 5 (1), 99–115.
Heywood, A. (2011). Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, Chapters 3 and 4.
Kacowicz, A. M. and Mitrani, M. (2016). Why don’t we have coherent theories of international relations about globalization? Global Governance, 22 (2), pp. 189-208.
Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2004). Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability. Government and Opposition, 39 (2), pp. 234-259.
McCorquodale, R. & Simons, P. (2007). Responsibility beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law. The Modern Law Review, 70 (4), 598–625.
Reddy, C. S. (2012). Globalization and the Sovereignty of the Nation-State. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 16 (4), 60–77.
Sklair, L. (2002). The Transnational Capitalist Class and Global Politics: Deconstructing the Corporate: State Connection. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, 23 (2), pp. 159-174.
Whibley, J. (2020, November 16). How Western companies undermine African democracy. The Africa Report.com. https://www.theafricareport.com/50500/how-western-companies-undermine-african-democracy/
write