Introduction
Against this backdrop of the US-China confrontation, the changing relationship between U.S. and Taiwan intelligence can be emphasized. This literature analysis explores the intricate aspects of the US-Taiwan intelligence deal and its impact on US-China relations. This review’s primary research topic is: What role does the US-Taiwan intelligence pact play in deteriorating US-China relations and conflict? In addition to the region’s dynamics, this strategic convergence has wide-ranging impacts on world geopolitics and economic balance.
Theory and Historical Context
An important background for understanding the intricate issues of the wider US-China conflict is given by the theoretical model and historical history of the US-Taiwan intelligence agreement. The premise of the thesis is that, given Taiwan’s possible direct opposition to China, U.S. intelligence assistance could be considered as supporting China’s enemy (Friedberg, 2005; Lawrence, 2013). In this light, Taiwan has a long history of competition with China and strong nations such as the United States that provide assistance to Taiwan because it does not have sufficient military capabilities (Bush, 2016). Besides the tactical data aimed at enhancing Taiwan’s stability and security, the available intelligence also includes arms sales. The assumption that these measures undermine diplomatic relations is based on the fact that active arms sales and intelligence support depend directly on the US-China relationship (Goldstein, 2017). Thus, the theoretical and historical background serves as a backdrop for discussing the impact of the US-Taiwan intelligence deal on the US-China war and further relations.
Geopolitical Intelligence Strategies:
Geopolitical intelligence methods used by the CIA and NSA to deal with the China-Taiwan dispute bring out the particularities of US-Taiwan relations and their broader implications for the US-China conflict. According to Herkert (2017), such intelligence institutions are integral in analyzing and navigating the new geopolitical terrain. Aside from their importance in studying the geopolitical turmoil that has stemmed from the conflict between China and Taiwan, the CIA and NSA are also necessary to analyze subtle responses informing U.S. policy in the region. These approaches, which are diverse in regional processes, diplomatic tricks and military power, enable the U.S. to respond and strategically wield its hegemony. The purpose of this chapter is to show how the U.S. views the China-Taiwan conflict by describing these intelligence techniques. This is an essential element of a significant research problem regarding the Taiwan-US intelligence treaty’s influence on the conflict between the U.S. and China and its future relations.
Economic Intelligence Operations
According to Fajgelbaum et al. (2021) and Brennan (2022), the CIA, among other bodies, is collecting economic data concerning the China-Taiwan confrontation in economic intelligence. This entails Trade effects, investment implications and financial repercussions of the war. Since economics and geopolitical stability are interrelated, the focus is mainly on economic factors. The collected economic data not only helps to understand the dynamics of the war economy but also empowers U.S. officials with an opportunity to change their approach. In the face of a potential conflict between China and Taiwan, well-informed decisions based on economic intelligence insights can help the United States establish appropriate economic policies that support its more extensive geopolitical interests and minimize risks. This shows the importance of financial intelligence in establishing the economic dynamics of US-Taiwan-China relations.
Alliance Intelligence Networks
The collaborative nature of alliances, including the Five Eyes and regional partnerships, is important when analyzing intelligence challenges within the China-Taiwan conflict through alliance intelligence networks. The intelligence-sharing protocols observed in these coalitions that collaboratively manage problems from the war are explained by O’Hanlon and Sisson (2022). The Five Eyes alliance includes the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, a multinational cooperative intelligence business. One of the important elements that strengthened the U.S. strategic response to the China-Taiwan conflict is regional alliances with countries such as Australia and Japan. From these coalitions, the intelligence cooperative provides much information on how collective resources and data increase knowledge about the geopolitical environment. Therefore, this section focuses on the relationship between intelligence networks and their practical importance in affecting U.S. policies as a response to the multidimensional issues posed by the China-Taiwan conflict within US-China relations.
Technological Intelligence Landscape
Regarding the case of the China-Taiwan conflict, a significant issue was addressed when dealing with complicated groundwork on technological intelligence by Goldstein (2017), who focused on agencies such as the NSA. This section of the intelligence’s dimensions addresses the NSA’s military strategy in addressing technological advancements, such as conflict-related cyber threats. The NSA has become more important due to its new role of enforcing American technological superiority in the modern relations between the United States, Taiwan, and China. It ensures the preservation of technological superiority, an essential element of global power for the United States, through actively monitoring technology advancements and associated cyber threats linked to the conflict. For example, case studies such as terrorist financing monitoring are everyday practices that demonstrate how these approaches work in practice (Herkert, 2017). One of the most excellent instances reflecting intelligence methods as a reaction to technological risks is the “2010 Stuxnet cyberattack”, which was jointly credited to the United States and Israel who targeted Iran’s nuclear system using intelligence designed with aggressive capabilities against it (Van Dine et al., 2017).
Scenario Analysis and Strategic Forecasting:
As Fravel (2023) states, intelligence agencies employ advanced techniques like satellite imagery analysis and OSINT in scenario analysis and strategic forecasting to anticipate future events regarding a China-Taiwan conflict. This section emphasizes the role of intelligence that provides decision-makers with essential information upon which U.S. strategies are formulated in a dynamic international relations environment. The past cases illustrate the importance of intelligence foresight, as shown in instances where accurate predictions and assessments have influenced important decisions. For example, during the “Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962,” intelligence agencies such as the CIA were instrumental in detecting the presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba through aerial reconnaissance primarily conducted by U-2 spy planes and photographic intelligence (Weaver, 2014). This knowledge was essential for formulating U.S. strategies and reactions, which helped to avert nuclear war between the United States and the Soviet Union. Considering what intelligence specialists, policymakers and analysts from the “ODNI” have to say on these matters raises our understanding of intelligence concerns (Karachi, 2023).
Risk Assessment in Intelligence Operations:
This section will address risk assessment within intelligence operations, highlighting the possible obstacles and intricacies of collecting and analyzing intelligence in an ever-shifting geopolitical landscape, as Nam (2020) observes. The literature, moreover, not only addresses modern challenges but also relies on historical sources and thus reveals the adaptability of intelligence operations. The intelligence agencies in the Cold War period had to find the true position of Soviet military strength. The “U-2 spy plane incident in 1960,” where a U.S. reconnaissance aircraft was shot down over Soviet territory, showed how risky and difficult intelligence gathering can be (Baker, 2023). This event led to an assessment of the effectiveness of the different approaches used for such activities and the need for more sophisticated surveillance methods. Similarly, the inability to correctly forecast Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait proved the shortcomings of intelligence in predicting rapid geopolitical shifts. This adds to a holistic understanding of intelligence operations risks, guiding the development of viable risk mitigation strategies within the intellectual community.
Conclusion
This broad literature review has discussed different aspects of the US-Taiwan Intelligence Treaty and its ramifications for the larger US-China conflict. The discussion of geopolitical intelligence strategies, economic intelligence operations, alliance intelligence networks, technological intelligence landscapes, scenario analysis, strategic forecasting and risk assessment has shed light on the complexity of such dynamics in this multidimensional geopolitical setting. Leveraging reliable sources and practical cases, the review has shown how intelligence strategies have evolved over time in response to changing challenges. Since intelligence agencies are involved in collecting, processing, and predicting data, it becomes clear that their scope of action is not limited to national security but rather influences broader diplomatic and economic policies. The subtlety of the insights generated from this review adds to the discussion about the consequences of US-Taiwan intelligence treaty, providing a starting point for policymakers, intelligence professionals, and analysts in dealing with complex international politics.
References
Aagachi. (2023, June 15). US-China lessons from Ukraine: Fueling more dangerous Taiwan tensions. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/us-china-lessons-from-ukraine/
Baker, P. (2023, February 6). A Foreign Spy Craft. Superpowers on Edge. However, It Was 1960, Not 2023. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/05/us/politics/balloon-china-u2-soviet-union.html
Brennan, S. W. (2022). Assessing the Legal Framework for Potential U.S. Conflict with China Over Taiwan. U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol99/iss1/38/
Bush, R. (2016). “The United States Security Partnership with Taiwan.” https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/fp_20160713_taiwan_alliance.pdf
Fajgelbaum, P., Khandelwal, A., Princeton, N., & Columbia, N. (2021). The Economic Impacts of the US-China Trade War *. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-110410
Friedberg, A. L. (2005). The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable? International Security, 30(2), 7–45. Lawrence, S. (2013). CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S.-China Relations: An Overview of Policy Issues Specialist in Asian Affairs. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R41108.pdf
Goldstein, L. (2017). The U.S.–China Naval Balance in the Asia-Pacific: An Overview. The China Quarterly, 232, 904–931. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030574101700131x
Herkert, A. (2017). U.S. Intelligence and Cross-Strait Relations: Intelligence Failures and U.S. Policy Toward the “Two Chinas.” American Intelligence Journal, 34(1), 102–110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26497124
- Taylor Fravel. (2023). China’s Potential Lessons from Ukraine for Conflict over Taiwan. The Washington Quarterly, 46(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660x.2023.2260141
Nam, K. K. (2020). U.S. Strategy and Role in Cross-Strait Relations: Focusing on U.S.-Taiwan Relations. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 33(1), 155–176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45441015
O’Hanlon, M. E., & Sisson, M. W. (2022). Managing the risks of US-China war: Implementing a strategy of integrated deterrence. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/managing-the-risks-of-us-china-war-implementing-a-strategy-of-integrated-deterrence/
Van Dine, A., Conant, C. M., Dunnmon, J., Ensley, D., Green, A. E., Lissner, R. F., Menke, H., Shirazyan, S., Washington, B., Wellington, T.-A., & Wiener, R. (2017). After Stuxnet: Acknowledging the Cyber Threat to Nuclear Facilities. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23162.11
Weaver, M. E. (2014). The Relationship between Diplomacy and Military Force: An Example from the Cuban Missile Crisis. Diplomatic History, 38(1), 137–181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26376538
write