1.0 Introduction
Regulatory Environment has become one of the primary concerns in modern strategic operations management, impacting organizations from diverse industries across a spectrum. Organizations from different fields face an ever-evolving, complex web of regulations that profoundly affects operations – something compounded by concerns over sustainability, consumer expectations, and globalization (Jones et al., 2023). Failure to adhere to regulations could incur severe fines or operational disruption and reputational harm, which pose serious challenges (Jones et al., 2023).
Heavy research in operations management’s regulatory Environment has produced many valuable findings, with Van Der Vegt et al. (2015) and Weingarten et al. (2016) both noting key research themes, including compliance strategies, risk mitigation plans and integration of regulatory considerations into supply chain management practices as key topics of inquiry. Unfortunately, however, existing literature often falls short when providing solutions for effectively traversing this complex Environment.
As current literature on regulation is often fragmented and limited in scope, failing to consider all facets of it as one whole entity, an exciting research question arises: “How can organizations develop adaptive and proactive strategies that holistically manage complexities and dynamics in regulatory environments?”. This inquiry highlights a need to explore innovative approaches and frameworks beyond mere compliance, which emphasize strategic management of regulations.
This assignment will explore two primary literature streams on firm and supply chain resilience and resilience elements within regulatory management. By engaging with these streams, our goal is to gain insights into how organizations can utilize resilience strategies to navigate regulatory environments effectively without only adhering to compliance laws but also taking advantage of regulatory dynamics as strategic opportunities. Our purpose in conducting this research is to gather more in-depth information about a topic that currently substantially affects strategic operations management.
2.0Firm Resilience in Regulatory Management
2.1Introduction of Idea
Resilience, In the realm of regulatory management, refers to an organization’s power to adapt to shifts and shocks in the regulatory Environment (Walker,2020; Barasa & Gilson, 2018). This ability is measured by the organization’s ability to maintain its compliance status. When we refer to resilience, what we actually mean is the capacity of the organization to not only survive through these changes but also to thrive as a result of them (Barasa & Gilson, 2018). This is what we mean when we talk about the organization’s ability to succeed as a result of these changes. With Fiksel and Fiksel (2015), It is necessary to engage in proactive and strategic planning in order to successfully anticipate shifting regulatory environments and adapt one’s operations accordingly.
This technique takes into account the fact that the pace at which new regulations are implemented could range anywhere from a snail’s pace in legislation to a sprint in policymaking. This technique also considers that policymaking may move more rapidly than legislation. These developments will likely affect a company’s operations, legal standing, and competitiveness. Businesses that can adapt to change are resilient (Conz et al.; G., 2020). In order to accomplish this, regulatory evaluations need to be carried out on a consistent basis, investments need to be made in compliance infrastructure, and business strategies need to be designed in a way that is malleable enough to permit a prompt response to newly enacted legislation.
This resiliency may be observed throughout the firm, both in its culture and in the way that its people think about their work. It is necessary to have a group of people who are well-versed in the regulatory requirements and adaptable enough to deal with constantly shifting circumstances. If a company is able to adapt to its changing Environment, it will have a greater chance of avoiding disruptions and profiting from changes in regulatory requirements.
A company needs to have internal processes and systems that are strong enough to resist the effects of regulatory shocks in order for it to be resilient in terms of its management of regulatory requirements. Only when this condition is met can we speak of the company’s resilience. The development of information technology solutions that are responsive to regulatory requirements, as well as the diversification of supply chains, can be helpful. Both adaptability and foresight are necessary for an organization to be resilient in the face of regulatory management. Creating a corporation that complies with all applicable regulations while still having the capacity to grow and implement new ideas in spite of evolving regulatory limitations. Companies that are resilient enough to weather change are those that take the initiative to respond to it (Boh et al., 2023).
2.2 Definition and Explanation
Businesses operate in dynamic and ever-changing settings, which underpins firm resilience in regulatory management. Many reasons contribute to these situations, but regulatory changes are the most important (Fiksel & Fiksel, 2015). In a day of regulatory upheavals, adaptability and proactive reaction methods are essential to strategic operation management.
Firm resilience in regulatory management refers to an organization’s ability to foresee, plan for, respond to, and adapt to regulatory changes and interruptions in its operational Environment. It means being able to handle these changes and seize their chances (Karman, 2020). Understanding the dynamic nature of modern corporate contexts helps explain this topic. Today’s globalized and linked globe exposes enterprises to a wide range of local and international regulations that control their activities. These regulations cover trade, finance, Environment, labour, and technology.
These dynamic ecosystems involve unpredictable regulatory changes. To adapt to changing political, economic, social, and technological conditions, governments and regulators change their regulations. Unexpected occurrences or crises can cause incremental changes, substantial policy overhauls, or dramatic disruptions. Firm resilience acknowledges that regulatory changes can seriously impact a firm. They might change market dynamics, require additional compliance, offer innovation, or threaten company paradigms. Organizations must be proactive and strategic to manage this complex regulatory landscape (Seroka‐Stolka & Fijorek, 2020).
Resilient firms see regulatory changes as challenges and opportunities for growth and competitive advantage (Abeysekara & Kuruppuarachchi, 2019). They invest in methods to stay updated about regulatory changes, conduct detailed impact assessments, and establish compliance strategies to minimize operational disruption. They urge staff to accept change as an opportunity for progress and promote adaptation and agility throughout the firm.
For instance, assume a worldwide car manufacturer. This company must comply with safety, pollution, trade tariffs, and labour rules. A rapid change in emission rules may require costly industrial process changes. A resilient corporation would use this transformation to invest in innovative, environmentally friendly technologies to acquire a competitive edge and meet changing consumer desires. Firm resilience in regulatory management captures today’s dynamic business contexts. It emphasizes the need for firms to adapt to regulatory changes and use them strategically. In a changing regulatory context, firms may prosper with this approach, assuring their long-term sustainability and competitiveness.
2.3 Evidence and Argument
Empirical facts, along with solid arguments, support firm resilience in regulatory management. Research regularly shows that enterprises with flexible regulatory tactics outperform their peers. These longitudinal research and cross-sector evaluations demonstrate the relevance of proactive regulatory management in improving financial performance and promoting innovation in firms.
Longitudinal studies help explain how adaptive regulatory tactics affect company performance. These studies examine performance metrics trends by collecting data from the same organizations across time. Longitudinal studies show that adaptive regulatory strategies improve financial success (Ong et al., 2019). Actively engaging with regulatory changes rather than reacting to them improves financial stability and resilience. A study of pharmaceutical companies found that those with proactive regulatory strategies, such as early engagement with regulatory authorities and efficient compliance processes, had higher revenue growth and profitability (Shashi, 2022). Longitudinal studies show that these benefits last. Firms that adapt to changing legislation gain short-term gains and a long-term competitive edge. In today’s unpredictable business environment with continual regulatory changes, sustainability is essential.
Cross-sector analysis shows how adaptive regulatory tactics affect different businesses. These evaluations show that resilience in regulatory management benefits many organizations. (Dentoni and Lubberink 2021) Cross-sector assessments suggest that firms with adaptive regulatory strategies are better positioned to innovate from regulatory changes. They see legislative changes as opportunities to create new goods, services, and business models. Companies that invest in renewable energy technology in response to changing environmental requirements not only comply with the law but also generate new revenue and support sustainability goals. Cross-sector assessments show that investors and stakeholders prefer organizations with strong regulatory management. These firms are considered safer because they can negotiate complex regulations. They frequently have cheaper capital costs and better funding, which can boost their financial success(Affes & Jarboui, 2023).
The evidence also links adaptive regulatory mechanisms to innovation. Actively engaging with regulatory changes helps firms innovate to meet new standards or acquire a competitive edge. This innovation can involve new technologies, business structures, or markets. Firm resilience in regulatory management is supported by strong evidence and arguments. Longitudinal and cross-sector assessments reveal that adaptive regulatory policies improve financial performance and innovation. These findings demonstrate that proactive regulatory engagement is a strategic need for firms seeking long-term success in dynamic and uncertain business settings.
2.4 Relation to question
Organizational strategic imperatives and firm resilience in regulatory management are crucial and multifaceted in strategic operation management (Richey et al., 2013). Learning and adapting to the regulatory Environment is a strategic imperative that can give companies a competitive edge. This relationship fundamentally shapes an organization’s operations.
Laws and regulations governing businesses change constantly. These realities present organizations with challenges and opportunities. Changes may cost and disrupt those who view regulatory management solely as compliance. Organizations that see it as a strategic imperative see regulatory changes as competitive advantages (Mishra & Yadav, 2021; Hassan & Mahrous, 2019).
Strategically adapting to regulations helps companies stay ahead. To become industry leaders, firms must anticipate regulatory changes and adjust their operations and strategies. By actively monitoring and complying with evolving drug safety regulations, a pharmaceutical company can avoid compliance issues and build a reputation for product safety and quality, which can attract more customers and investors.
In strategic operation management, internal processes are optimized for efficiency and effectiveness. The regulatory Environment shapes these processes. Regulatory considerations can boost efficiency and lower operational risks for firms.
Regulatory compliance in financial operations streamlines reporting reduces errors, and prevents costly penalties. Compliance and operational efficiency are improved.
Regulatory changes can spur innovation, which is important for strategic operations management. Innovative regulatory responses give companies an edge. Automakers that develop electric vehicles in response to environmental regulations show technology and market responsiveness (Khan et al., 2021). Additionally, firms that understand regulatory changes’ strategic implications can seize emerging market opportunities. New regulations drive demand for compliance products and services. Early detection and fulfilment of these needs can boost market share and revenue.
Strategic operation management involves working with customers, investors, and regulators. Active regulatory oversight builds trust and reputation. Company integrity and reliability are earned by consistent regulatory compliance and ethical business conduct(Hassan & Mahrous, 2019). A good reputation can boost customer loyalty, investor confidence, and regulatory relations. These factors help the company succeed and compete.
Strategic operation management requires understanding and adapting to regulatory environments for competitiveness and long-term success. Organizations that embrace this imperative can adapt to regulatory changes, improve efficiency, innovate, and build stakeholder trust. In changing business environments, they can seize opportunities, overcome obstacles, and gain a sustainable competitive advantage.
2.5 Framework/Model/Theory
Regulatory management frequently employs the firm’s Resource-Based View (RBV) to define firm resilience. This paradigm holds that regulatory expertise and adaptive capability are unique, valuable, and hard to replicate, giving organizations a competitive edge. The RBV provides a theoretical framework for firms to use internal resources to negotiate difficult regulations (Björndahl & Nilsson, 2023)
The RBV strategic management paradigm emphasizes firms’ internal resources and competencies as competitive advantages. The VRIN framework says organizations can gain and maintain a competitive edge by having and using resources that match particular criteria.
Resources must help a company take advantage of opportunities or fight against threats. Regulatory skills and adaptability are invaluable in regulatory management (Keskin et al., 2021). They help organizations anticipate regulatory changes, capture compliance opportunities, and reduce risk.
Additionally, resources must be scarce compared to competition. Not all firms have regulatory competence and adaptability. Building a culture of adaptation, understanding regulatory standards, and implementing efficient compliance systems take time and money. This uniqueness distinguishes firms’ regulatory management. Furthermore, resources must be hard to copy. Complex regulatory expertise and adaptive capability are context-specific (Novianti, 2019). They include deep-rooted organizational knowledge, processes, culture, and relationships; competitors cannot easily copy them. Lastly, resources must be distinct. Some organizations may replace these resources with external consultants or compliance tools. Still, the actual advantage is an organization’s ability to integrate regulatory considerations into its operations and strategy smoothly.
The RBV illuminates how firms can use their internal resources to compete in a complicated and changing regulatory environment, making it important to regulatory management. (Truong et al 2023) Organizations that invest in regulatory knowledge gain a comprehensive awareness of the regulatory landscape beyond compliance. They can foresee regulatory changes, understand their effects, and plan responses. This information helps them spot regulatory alterations that create product innovation or market expansion chances.
An organization’s adaptability is its capacity to adapt to new regulations or unanticipated developments quickly. Firms with an adaptable culture and efficient processes can respond to regulatory problems with minimal interruption and operational continuity. This agility might provide you with an edge during regulatory changes. By using RBV for regulatory management, firms can position themselves strategically. They can outperform competitors by using their rare, hard-to-copy regulatory expertise and adaptive capabilities. This advantage goes beyond compliance to shape the regulatory landscape to meet the organization’s aims.
3.0 Supply Chain Resilience in Regulatory Management
3.1 Introduction
Supply chain resilience in regulatory management enables supply chains to survive, adapt, and prosper in changing regulatory situations (Singh et al., 2023). International supply chains make businesses subject to trade, environmental, and health and safety regulations in today’s globalized world. Stability, continuity, and competitiveness require resilient regulatory management supply chains.
First, regulatory changes can drastically impact supply chains. They can disrupt workflows, change markets, and add compliance. Here, supply chain resilience goes beyond regulatory shocks. (Richey et al 2023) It also involves proactive regulatory monitoring, risk assessment, and mitigation. Resilient regulatory management is adjusting swiftly to new regulations, changing processes, or finding new suppliers and ways to operate.
Supply chain resilience demands transformation, not adaptation. Companies can innovate and succeed with regulatory reforms (Wieland & Durach, 2021). Stringent environmental regulations may drive sustainable supply chain practices, cutting costs and boosting brand reputation. Legislation promotes sustainability, agility, and competitiveness in resilient supply chains.
Regulatory supply chain resilience requires technology, data analytics, and solid risk assessment frameworks. They must work with regulators, industry peers, and supply chain partners to anticipate and respond to changes. Supply networks can react quickly to regulatory shocks via scenario planning and contingency measures.
3.2 Definition and Explanation
Regulatory management through supply chain resilience maintains operations and service standards by enabling an organization’s supply chain to adapt swiftly and efficiently to changes in the law. This concept acknowledges the ability of trade agreements, safety regulations, environmental standards, and legislative amendments to alter regulatory settings quickly.
In regulatory management, supply chain resilience refers to the ability to swiftly adjust supply chain arrangements, tactics, and procedures in response to changes in regulations (Aigbogun et al., 2022). The objective is to minimize disruptions and adverse effects on products and services while adhering to evolving legal and regulatory requirements.
Resilience requires agility. Agile supply chains can quickly adapt to regulation changes, allowing them to keep serving clients. This may involve changing manufacturing, shipping, or sourcing techniques to avoid fresh tariffs or compliance requirements (Calvo et al., 2020). Thus, the supply chain may maintain efficiency while meeting client requests despite regulatory uncertainties. The strategy that is used by regulatory management to ensure the resilience of the supply chain includes risk assessment and mitigation. Organizations have an ongoing need to evaluate regulatory environments for vulnerabilities and risks. They can examine the regulatory environment and be ready for any situation. By taking a proactive stance, the supply chain may minimize disruption and cost impact and react to regulatory changes promptly and effectively.
Regulatory management supply chain resilience is crucial in the increasingly regulated, multinational corporate environment of today. It assists businesses in anticipating and preparing for regulatory changes, enabling them to sustain service levels and operational effectiveness in the face of a complex and constantly shifting regulatory Environment.
3.3 Evidence and Argument
Case studies and surveys have both indicated that resilient supply chains improve regulatory management. It is crucial to construct and maintain reliable supply networks that are able to adapt to ever-changing regulations.
First, efficient supply chains cut down on the amount of downtime caused by regulatory changes. The failure of non-resilient supply networks to adapt to shifting requirements can result in significant and expensive disruptions (Linkov et al., 2020). Strong supply networks are able to foresee regulatory concerns and act swiftly in response to them. According to Azadegan and Dooley (2021), supply networks that have emergency plans in place can quickly adjust to new circumstances. Costs can be cut, and regulatory management supply chain resilience can be improved by lowering the amount of downtime that occurs.
Empirical research has shown that resilient supply networks lessen the risk associated with regulatory transitions. The dangers posed by regulations can be identified and reduced by supply chains(Leisen et al., 2019). Diversifying the suppliers, purchasing goods from other regions, and modifying business practices in response to shifting requirements are some examples. As the case studies demonstrate, risk management has the potential to significantly lessen the impact of regulatory changes on the operations of supply chains. Through the use of resilient supply chains, both financial and operational losses can be avoided.
In addition, the results of the empirical study indicate that the resilience of regulatory management supply chains is critical to the satisfaction of consumers. Customers place a higher value on dependability and timely delivery regardless of legislation(Wicaksono & Illés, 2022). Even in the face of shifting regulations, robust supply chains are able to satisfy client expectations. Orders and commitments are kept when supply chains are strong, which results in satisfied customers who remain loyal to the company. Industries that are demand-driven stand to profit the most from the competitive edge that supply chain resilience offers.
According to Aldrighetti et al. (2021), the findings of empirical studies show that investments in regulatory management supply chain resilience result in cost savings over time. Downtime can be reduced by making early investments in technology, process adjustments, and contingency planning, which can result in cost savings. Inventory management can also be improved. Case studies and surveys both reveal that resilient supply chains are able to use legislative changes to implement cost-effective innovations and optimize their operations. These supply networks may achieve compliance and success if they are able to adjust to the various changes in regulations.
Firms can profit from regulatory management that is focused on supply chain resilience. In shifting regulatory contexts, supply networks that can quickly and effectively adapt to new requirements perform better than their competitors. According to Azadegan and Dooley (2021), supplier resilience enables businesses to weather changes in regulatory policies and cultivate growth by capitalizing on emerging market opportunities and regulatory trends. Increasing one’s ability to transform challenges into opportunities boosts one’s market position, innovation, and overall growth.
There is a large amount of evidence and reasoning in favour of regulatory management’s resilience in supply chain management. A resilient supply chain will result in less downtime, fewer dangers, greater customer satisfaction, greater cost savings, and increased competitive advantage. The ability of a company to traverse regulatory frameworks and become stronger, more adaptable, and more robust is assisted by a resilient supply chain.
3.4 Relation to Question
Supply chain robustness within regulatory management is becoming an increasingly important part of strategic operation management for enterprises in many industries. Regulatory oversight is becoming more complicated. Supply chains are often long and complex in today’s worldwide economy. These networks may span multiple nations and involve many suppliers and stakeholders. This intricacy makes negotiating the multiple regulatory systems of different locations, which often conflict, difficult.
Firms face regulatory pressures from labour laws, environmental rules, international trade agreements, and safety standards (Aragòn-Correa et al., 2020). These requirements are necessary to ensure ethical and safe firm operations, but they may cause supply chain bottlenecks and vulnerabilities. A nation’s stricter environmental regulations may require a company to change its manufacturing methods or source its supplies, which will affect lead times and costs. Lead times and prices will remain the same if the company does not change its production procedures or materials.
The supply chain’s resilience to regulatory demands is one of the most critical criteria in assessing a firm’s operational performance. This skill is shown by resilient supply networks’ ability to quickly adjust to new regulatory requirements while reducing product and service delivery disruptions. Diversifying suppliers, investing in predictive analytics to anticipate regulatory changes, and building strong connections with all key stakeholders are often necessary for proactive supply chain management. This adaptability usually requires proactive supply chain management (Han et al., 2020).
Strong supply chains can help companies capitalize on regulatory changes. These firms can better predict and respond to market changes. Regulations to reduce carbon emissions may spur innovation in green materials and processes. Organizations that plan can gain a competitive edge. Taking use of invention and competitive differentiation is crucial to supply chain resilience in the face of regulatory constraints. Firms can increase operational efficiency, reputation, and bottom line by maintaining this equilibrium.
3.5 Framework/Model/Theory
Strategic operations management is seeing an increase in the use of supply chain resilience in regulatory oversight. This approach is essential in today’s global economy, where supply chains are intricate and governed by several regulations. The concept of the Adaptive Supply Chain Network clarifies and enhances resilience.
The concept of an Adaptive Supply Chain Network emphasizes collaboration, visibility, and adaptability in order to build a supply chain that is resistant to changes in regulatory requirements (Leończuk et al., 2019). Due to its adaptability, a supply chain may rapidly modify its operations in response to shifting regulations, shifting consumer preferences, and shifting environmental conditions. This adaptability can be demonstrated by utilizing modular production methods that are capable of being rapidly modified to conform to newly enacted regulations or by diversifying one’s supply chain in order to lower one’s exposure to risk.
However, visibility involves understanding the entire supply chain. This includes knowing where supplies come from, how things are made, and each supply chain country’s regulations (Sodhi & Tang, 2019). Advanced analytics and digital technologies like IoT and AI are improving visibility helping organizations forecast and prepare for regulatory changes.
Suppliers, distributors, and regulators must work together, according to the third pillar (Kumar et al., 2015). Collaboration can improve regulatory understanding and risk mitigation techniques. Collaborative planning can enable alternative sourcing options if a regulation change disrupts a vital supply chain section. Including these factors in a supply chain, resilience strategy helps organizations withstand and capitalize on regulatory challenges. It promotes proactive thinking, turning interruptions into opportunities for innovation, progress, and competitive advantage. This model recognizes that resilience in complicated supply chains is a strategic necessity that can determine a firm’s long-term performance, not just risk management.
These literature streams offer insights, but they have limitations. Most research uses retrospective studies, which may only partially capture regulatory environments’ dynamic and evolving effects on company and supply chain resilience. More industry-specific studies are needed to identify sector differences. Finally, the relationship between technical advances and regulatory changes needs further investigation to determine its effects on strategic operation management.
4.0 Conclusion
According to “The Regulatory Environment: A Strategic Imperative for Strategic Operations Management,” firm resilience and supply chain resilience within regulatory management provide crucial insights into modern businesses’ strategic operations. This synergy emphasizes the regulatory Environment’s centrality in strategic operations management.
The first literature stream on company resilience shows how organizations can adapt to changing regulations. This requires compliance with current laws and strategic planning for future changes. Firms can turn regulatory challenges into opportunities for innovation and competitive differentiation by integrating them into their strategy. This proactive approach improves a firm’s ability to adapt, ensuring its long-term success.
The second stream examines regulatory-pressured supply chain resilience. This emphasizes the need for flexible, visible, and collaborative supply networks. This resilience depends on the ability to quickly and efficiently adapt to regulatory changes, reducing disruptions and maintaining operational efficiency. The Adaptive Supply Chain Network shows how flexibility, enhanced analytics, and stakeholder collaboration help achieve this goal.
These literature streams demonstrate the necessity of regulatory management in strategic operations. They stress that enterprises and their supply chains must manage regulatory hurdles and capitalize on their possibilities to survive and thrive. In a complicated global business environment with ever-changing regulations, knowing and proactively addressing these factors is essential for any organization seeking competitive advantage and operational excellence.
Research should continue in numerous areas. First, organizations’ regulatory change management methods and technology should be examined. Investigating cultural and organizational elements in regulatory resilience may reveal the human aspects of this process. Finally, as regulatory environments evolve, studying how emerging technologies like blockchain affect regulatory compliance and stability is intriguing.
References
Abeysekara, N., Wang, H. and Kuruppuarachchi, D., 2019. Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage: A study of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), pp.1673-1695.
Affes, W. and Jarboui, A., 2023. The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a cross-sector study. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, pp.1-21.
Aigbogun, O., Xing, M., Fawehinmi, O., Ibeabuchi, C., Ehido, A., Ahmad, R. and Abdullahi, M., (2022). A supply chain resilience model for business continuity: The way forward for highly regulated industries. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 1–12.
Aldrighetti, R., Battini, D., Ivanov, D. and Zennaro, I., 2021. Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: a review and future research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 235, p.108103.
Aragòn-Correa, J.A., Marcus, A.A. and Vogel, D., 2020. The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), pp.339-365.
Azadegan, A. and Dooley, K., 2021. A typology of supply network resilience strategies: complex collaborations in a complex world. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), pp.17-26.
Azadegan, A. and Dooley, K., 2021. A typology of supply network resilience strategies: complex collaborations in a complex world. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), pp.17-26.
Barasa, E., Mbau, R. and Gilson, L., 2018. What is resilience, and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. International journal of health policy and management, 7(6), p.491.
Björndahl, A. and Nilsson, V., 2023. Strategic Management of Organizational Resilience in SMEs: A multiple case study of SMEs from a Resource-based view and Dynamic capabilities view.
Boh, W., Constantinides, P., Padmanabhan, B. and Viswanathan, S., (2023). Building digital resilience against major shocks. MIS Quarterly, 47(1), 343–360.
Calvo, J., Olmo, J.L.D. and Berlanga, V., 2020. Supply chain resilience and agility: a theoretical literature review. International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience, 4(1), pp.37-69.
Conz, E. and Magnani, G., 2020. A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research. European Management Journal, 38(3), pp.400-412.
Dentoni, D., Pinkse, J. and Lubberink, R., 2021. Linking sustainable business models to socio-ecological resilience through cross-sector partnerships: A complex adaptive systems view. Business & Society, 60(5), pp.1216-1252.
Fiksel, J. and Fiksel, J.R., 2015. Resilient by design: Creating businesses that adapt and flourish in a changing world. Island Press.
Han, Y., Chong, W.K. and Li, D., 2020. A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 58(15), pp.4541-4566.
Hassan, S. & Mahrous, A.A. (2019). Nation branding: the strategic imperative for sustainable market competitiveness. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 1(2), 146–158.
Jones, M.D., Smith-Walter, A., McBeth, M.K. and Shanahan, E.A., (2023). The narrative policy framework. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 161–195). Routledge.
Karman, A., (2020). Flexibility, coping capacity and resilience of organizations: between synergy and support. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(5), 883–907.
Keskin, H., Ayar Şentürk, H., Tatoglu, E., Gölgeci, I., Kalaycioglu, O. and Etlioglu, H.T., 2021. The simultaneous effect of firm capabilities and competitive strategies on export performance: the role of competitive advantages and competitive intensity. International Marketing Review, 38(6), pp.1242-1266.
Khan, S.J., Kaur, P., Jabeen, F. & Dhir, A. (2021). Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3273–3296.
Kumar, S., Heustis, D. and Graham, J.M., 2015. The future of traceability within the U.S. food industry supply chain: A business case. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(1), pp.129-146.
Leisen, R., Steffen, B. and Weber, C., 2019. Regulatory risk and the resilience of new sustainable business models in the energy sector. Journal of cleaner production, 219, pp.865-878.
Leończuk, D., Ryciuk, U., Szymczak, M. and Nazarko, J., 2019. We are measuring the performance of adaptive supply chains. SMART Supply Network, pp.89-110.
Linkov, I., Carluccio, S., Pritchard, O., Ní Bhreasail, Á., Galaitsi, S., Sarkis, J. and Keisler, J.M., 2020. The case for value chain resilience. Management Research Review, 43(12).
Mishra, P. & Yadav, M. (2021). Environmental capabilities, proactive environmental strategy and competitive advantage: A natural-resource-based view of firms operating in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, p.125249.
Novianti, K.R., 2019. Achieving competitive advantage through knowledge management practices: Knowledge-based view (KBV) strategy on Indonesia electricity sector. APMBA (Asia Pacific Management and Business Application), 7(3), pp.163-176.
Ong, T.S., Lee, A.S., Teh, B.H. and Magsi, H.B., 2019. Environmental innovation, environmental performance and financial performance: Evidence from Malaysian environmental proactive firms. Sustainability, 11(12), p.3494.
Richey Jr, R.G., Chowdhury, S., Davis‐Sramek, B., Giannakis, M. and Dwivedi, Y.K., (2023). Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research. Journal of Business Logistics.
Richey Jr, R.G., Chowdhury, S., Davis‐Sramek, B., Giannakis, M. and Dwivedi, Y.K., (2023). Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research. Journal of Business Logistics.
Seroka‐Stolka, O. and Fijorek, K., 2020. Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Proactive environmental strategy, stakeholder pressure and the moderating effect of firm size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), pp.2338-2354.
Shashi, M., (2022). Digital Strategies to Improve the performance of pharmaceutical supply chains (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Singh, G., Singh, S., Daultani, Y. and Chouhan, M., (2023). Measuring the influence of digital twins on the sustainability of manufacturing supply chain: A mediating role of supply chain resilience and performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, p.109711.
Sodhi, M.S. and Tang, C.S., 2019. Research opportunities in supply chain transparency. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), pp.2946-2959.
Truong, B.T.T., Nguyen, P.V., Vrontis, D. and Ahmed, Z.U., (2023). Unleashing corporate potential: The interplay of intellectual capital, knowledge management, and environmental compliance in enhancing innovation and performance. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Van Der Vegt, G.S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M. and George, G., (2015). Managing risk and resilience. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 971–980.
Walker, B., (2020). Resilience: what it is and is not. Ecology and Society, 25(2).
Wicaksono, T. and Illés, C.B., 2022. From resilience to satisfaction: Defining supply chain solutions for agri-food SMEs through quality approach. PloS one, 17(2), p.e0263393.
Wieland, A. and Durach, C.F., 2021. Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(3), pp.315-322.
Weingarten, F., Humphreys, P., Gimenez, C. & McIvor, R. (2016). Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, pp.361–370.
write