The media shapes American politics as a powerful information source and political narrative generator. Current citizens are “mediated citizens,” getting information through numerous media outlets. This transition increases accessibility but also risks bias and disinformation. The dual role of mediated citizens highlights the media landscape’s complexity. This article will examine the many facets of media influence using Chapter 9 of the AmGov textbook. It will investigate the media’s business motive and role in reporting news, journalists’ behavior and trustworthiness, how it affects political narratives, and how governments and citizens control the information. Media and American politics are intertwined, and this article seeks to explain the power relationships.
The term’ mediated citizen’ describes how people today get information from the media (Barbour, 2022). Mediated citizens get news and political information from intermediaries, mostly the media. The phrase “mediated citizen” emphasizes that citizens no longer directly participate in events but receive information from platforms. This change is due to the development of media outlets, including television, radio, newspapers, and, more recently, digital platforms and social media. The number and variety of information sources have changed how people view politics and current events. Information availability is a major benefit of being a mediated citizen. Citizens can virtually instantly learn about global, national, and local happenings. Accessing so much information can lead to information overload and difficulty identifying trustworthy sources. The mediated citizen highlights the media’s interpretation and mediation power. The media emphasizes some facts and downplays others. Framing can dramatically impact public perception and political discourse. The mediated citizen encounters diverse ideas and viewpoints, making the media landscape pluralistic. Diversity can create echo chambers and filter bubbles that reinforce biases by showing only information that supports them.
Accessibility can also overload information, making it hard to identify reliable sources. The media’s interpretive role risks bias and framing, affecting event perception. Filter bubbles and echo chambers on social media may reinforce current opinions and polarize public conversation. Mediated citizens must balance information access with misinformation and polarization in the complicated world of media consumption. Modern Americans get their information from several media sources. Citizens have become’ mediated citizens,’ utilizing various media sources, including TV, radio, newspapers, and digital platforms (García-Perdomo, 2021). Social media helps spread news quickly by giving real-time updates. Accessibility can lead to disinformation and echo chambers. The chapter emphasizes the necessity for critical media literacy to comprehend current American politics.
The media’s business motive and news reporting are intertwined (Barbour, 2022). Media companies seek financial success and sustainability through advertising income and audience involvement. Due to the requirement to attract viewers and sustain profitability, editorial decisions and content selection may conflict. Sensationalism and attention-grabbing stories may be prioritized over substantive reporting to satisfy audiences and enhance ratings. This disagreement casts doubt on the media’s ability to provide reliable, impartial information to the public. Media outlets may prioritize entertainment over journalistic accuracy as they battle for audience attention in a crowded information world. The chapter also admits that media outlets may balance profit and journalistic duties differently. This analysis highlights the media industry’s struggle to balance its commercial needs with its social responsibility to inform and educate the public, emphasizing the need for media consumers to be selective.
The link between media freedom and reporting restrictions is complex. A ‘free’ media is essential to democracy, but that does not mean it is immune to restraints. In a democracy, the media monitors power and holds leaders accountable (Barbour, 2022). Legal restrictions, ethical standards, and economic pressures can limit this freedom. Libel laws and national security concerns limit reporting. Responsible journalism must balance public interest and privacy under ethical rules. Economic forces like advertising and ownership can also affect editorial decisions. The chapter emphasizes that restrictions limit media operations even in a press-free society. Media outlets must recognize and navigate these limits to effectively fulfill their democratic function and enlighten citizens while complying with journalistic ethics and law.
Journalists shape political narratives. Journalists filter and distribute news, shaping political events and issues. Beyond reporting, they do investigative journalism, analysis, and agenda-setting. Journalistic activities help inform citizens, which is crucial for democracy. Journalists reveal truths, analyze power, and educate the public about civic engagement through investigative reporting. Today, journalist trustworthiness is challenged. Digital media and social media have sped information dissemination, undermining journalistic norms. Concerns about sensationalism, bias, and the 24-hour news cycle have cast doubt on journalistic content. Journalists must act ethically, verify information thoroughly, and report transparently to gain and keep public trust. The integrity of journalists is crucial to the media’s symbiotic relationship with democracy, influencing political narratives and keeping citizens informed and involved in today’s complicated media environment.
Journalists, editors, and media executives shape stories, choose events, and choose angles (Zhang & Jenkins, 2023). Their choices shape public views and political discourse by emphasizing specific topics. The media can also’ spin’ a story using headlines, words, and visuals. This power to frame news articles might prioritize specific perspectives, adding to prejudice and influencing public opinion. In the digital age, where information circulates quickly and competes for attention, the media’s capacity to create the agenda and narrative is greater. Recognizing these interactions helps media consumers critically evaluate political narratives, creating a more informed and discerning citizenry that can navigate media influence’s complex impact on politics.
Politicians can create the narrative through selective disclosure, smart press releases, and media events that benefit them. Politicians influence news cycles, cultivate journalist relationships, and use social media. Citizens may determine the political narrative. Social media allows people to exchange diverse views, fact-check information, and join grassroots initiatives. Active civic participation, critical media literacy, and independent journalism empower informed voters to challenge political narratives. A strong democracy requires balancing political authority and citizen empowerment (Krick, 2022). An involved public can prevent political manipulation with information and the means to express their views. This delicate balance highlights the constant conflict between those in power shaping public discourse and citizens, ensuring a broad and educated political narrative that defines democratic governance’s health and vigor.
In conclusion, concerns over the media’s business motive and role in reporting news highlighted the delicate balance required for responsible journalism. Journalists’ roles in constructing political narratives, their importance, and trustworthiness issues were discussed. Examining how media figures shape political narratives and spinning tales showed how much media entities shape public perceptions. The essay also examined how politicians manage news and how citizens might empower themselves in politics through media literacy and active engagement. Finally, the essay emphasizes the role of media in American politics in generating narratives, informing individuals, and developing democratic debate. The changing interaction between media, politics, and citizens requires continual inspection, highlighting the joint obligation to sustain a robust and informed public sphere.
References
Barbour, C. (2022). AmGov: Long Story Short. ISBN-13978-1071808979
García-Perdomo, V. (2021). Re-digitizing television news: The relationship between TV, online media and audiences. Digital journalism, 9(2), 136-154.https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1777179
Krick, E. (2022). Participatory governance practices at the democracy-knowledge-nexus. Minerva, 60(4), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09470-z
Zhang, X., & Jenkins, J. M. (2023). Journalism Idealists: Influences on Freelancers in the Foreign News-gathering Process. Journalism Practice, 17(6), 1214-1231.https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1981152
write