Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit From Identity Politics

Introduction

“Race is a social construct with fatal societal ramifications,” says the author. George Lipsitz contends in his book “The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit From Identity Politics” believes “investing in white privilege, to stay committed to a culture that gives them with wealth, influence, and ambition” is in whites’ best interests. Lipsitz’s chapter describes a considerable quantity of information, including verifiable events, experiences, and figures, which demonstrate America’s interest in white privilege. Even though Lipsitz’s suppositions are accused of bias and difficult to cite at times, since he provides proficient, sentimental, and rational substantiation ultimately, this will not detract from his core argument that Citizens of the united states have an incentive to invest in white supremacy and that this is the responsibility of every colored person to intervene to rid themselves of this outlay

The Possessive Investment in Whiteness, by George Lipsitz, claims both government policy plus individual bias work together to meet a proprietary commitment in white privilege that is accountable for our current societal segregated inequalities. White privilege has a monetary value: it records for the benefits that people benefit from exclusionary home prices, inequitable child’s learning of various ethnicities, influencer connections that funnel job prospects to the near and dear ones, and those who have benefited the much more from ancient and modern unequal treatment, and particularly trans-generational transmit of inheritances. White People are urged to engage in their whiteness, to stay faithful to a culture that offers them a set of benefits. Lipsitz introduces a unique overview and latest update statistical data to this twentieth-anniversary edition, and also reviews Hurricane Katrina’s characterized by persistent, nature of pro-government agitations, police violent attacks on Black females, as well as the mass murders of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, as well as Freddie Gray; Obama’s heritage and the rise of new of Trump; the Charleston Mass slaughter and other racial violence; as well as the ways wherein light-skinned fear, white brittleness, and white inability have harmed white people.

Lipsitz adds a fresh preface and updates the material in this twentieth-anniversary edition. The twentieth-anniversary edition of The Clingy Interest in White privilege is an uncompromising but important look at racial oppression, just as it was when it was first published.

“Whiteness is pervasive in US culture, but it is quite impossible to spot,” Lipsitz says in the book. The changes that accompany Bill Moore’s murder as Lipsitz was a child were a big impact on his decision to write this novel. Bill Moore was indeed a white American in 1963 who embarked on some kind of one-man walk from Chattanooga, Tennessee, to Jackson, Mississippi, to mail a message to Governor Barnett, who’d been troubled by race riots in Mississippi. He got assaulted & killed amid his walk. “Within Moore’s belongings, told newsmen fifty-one bucks in his pocket as well as a notebook.” “A pair of men who also had chatted to me as well, wandered up & challenged my spiritual and social convictions, and had been convinced I’d be murdered by them,” he stated in his final chapter. (From Lipsitz) “Floyd L. Simpson, Bill Moore’s alleged murderer, was not prosecuted, but no one was charged in his death. Lipsitz acknowledges that “The assassination of Bill Moore had a profound impact on him, much like the numerous stories of the murders of dozens of blacks during the struggle for equality.

George Liptiz tackles the issues of racism as well as sentiments toward white nationalism in an unvarnished manner. The author claims in the book’s chapter two that prejudice is a big upsetting issue of discussion. He emphasizes the devastating impacts of racial injustice. Both landowners and people of different skin colors, according to the author, symbolize and practice racism. Worse yet, racist tendencies are often shown by individual perceptions and activities (Lipitz 25). When it comes to the concept of ‘white privilege,’ According to Lipitz, it also is a barrier with several drawbacks that affects non – whites & minorities groups’ affordable healthcare, housing, and jobs. People who are just not light-skinned or who belong to the ethnic portion of the US population face additional second-value barriers.

Other key difficulties highlighted by the writer are undeserved incentives provided to the white majority and enormous disparities in judicial cases when it came to fair hearings. Lipitz illustrates how components of ‘whiteness, well beyond whiteness or black dichotomy’ function for native Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans, among other things (33). Lipsitz’s book’s chapter 2 examines how equality laws are used and abused through the implementation of racial oppression. He identifies civil rights flaws that were most evident when separation in education was combined with widespread workplace discrimination, ecological racism, including economic decline (Lipitz 35). He also represents American society and its emphasis on the idea of whiteness. Lipitz also highlights the differences between black and white customs, as well as their emphasis on individual and family standards of living from across the U.s.

It’s important noting at this juncture that throughout the U.s, ‘whiteness’ is an issue that affects nearly everyone (Lipitz 43). Poor white Americans, like some other ethnic groups that don’t really fit into the white majority’s middle income, suffer. Whiteness, per the scholar, is an issue in every element of society, including the financial, cultural, & governmental realms (Lipitz 383). Other interpretation methods back up Lipitz’s findings. He quotes Hughes, who asserts that now the white majority views the black majority as the primary source of trouble in the US (128). Due to the behavior of racism, the rights and dominance of a community are mainly overlooked in the U.s. Lipitz believes that ‘white skin’ refers to the position and authority that white folks have. It can be seen in the cultural aspects of American life. Furthermore, races that are not considered ‘whites’ are frequently viewed and rejected in a different way. The author refers to this type of behavior as having a “white outlook.”

Work cited

Lipsitz, George. Possessive investment in whiteness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2009. Print.

 

Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

APA
MLA
Harvard
Vancouver
Chicago
ASA
IEEE
AMA
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics