Overview
Infection control practices in residential care communities play a crucial role in maintaining the health and well-being of residents, especially those who are more vulnerable due to age or chronic health conditions. These communities include nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and other long-term care settings. Ensuring the effectiveness of infection control practices is essential to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, reduce healthcare-associated infections, and improve residents’ overall quality of life. Applying theoretical and conceptual frameworks can help identify factors that influence the effectiveness of infection control practices and guide the development of targeted interventions. Improving infection control practices in residential care communities can ultimately lead to better health outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and enhanced quality of life for residents (Al-Tawfiq & Memish, 2014). Some of these theoretical frameworks include; the Health Belief Model (HBM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory, Systems Theory, Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) and Implementation Science Frameworks.
Various factors can influence the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities. These include resource constraints, staff turnover, variations in staff education and training, and the complex needs of residents. Addressing the challenges requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that considers the unique characteristics of each care community. This paper seeks to explain the conceptual frameworks for the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities while highlighting Key components of infection control in residential care communities.
Theoretical Frameworks
Several theoretical or conceptual frameworks can be applied to study and understand the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities. The frameworks provide a foundation for identifying factors that influence the success of infection control practices, guide intervention development, and support evaluation efforts (Bowles et al., 2017). Some of the most relevant frameworks include the Health Belief Model (HBM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory, Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), Implementation Science Frameworks and systems theory.
Health Belief Model (HBM)
The Health Belief Model (HBM) is a crucial framework for understanding and enhancing the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities. It consists of six primary constructs influencing individuals’ engagement in preventive behaviours: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. Perceived susceptibility refers to an individual’s belief about their risk of acquiring an infection. In residential care communities, it is essential for staff, residents, and family members to understand the risks of infections and their ease of transmission in such settings. Increasing awareness of susceptibility can encourage better adherence to infection control practices. The perceived severity construct relates to an individual’s belief about the seriousness of a health condition or its consequences (Bowles et al., 2017). To motivate individuals to engage in preventive behaviours, staff, residents, and families must comprehend the potential consequences of infections, particularly for vulnerable populations. Emphasizing the severity of infections can be an effective strategy in this regard.
Perceived benefits, another fundamental construct, focus on an individual’s belief in the effectiveness of preventive measures to reduce the risk of infection. Care providers, residents, and families should know the benefits of adhering to infection control practices, such as hand hygiene and proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE). This awareness can help protect both themselves and others in the community. Addressing perceived barriers and the obstacles individuals may face when adopting preventive behaviours is essential for improving adherence and effectiveness. Strategies to overcome barriers to infection control practices include providing additional training, simplifying protocols, or offering support.
Common barriers include limited resources, time constraints, and lack of knowledge. Cues to action, factors that trigger an individual to adopt preventive traits, are vital in promoting adherence to infection control practices. In this context, cues to action might involve reminders, signage, or feedback from peers or supervisors. Creating a supportive environment that emphasizes the importance of infection control practices can make a significant difference. Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s confidence in performing preventive habits successfully. Enhancing self-efficacy among care providers, residents, and families can lead to better adherence to infection control practices. Efficacy can be achieved through training, skill development, and positive reinforcement, ultimately promoting a healthier residential care community.
The Health Belief Model (HBM) offers a valuable framework for examining infection control practices in residential care communities. By applying the HBM, researchers and practitioners can identify factors influencing infection control practices and design targeted interventions to enhance their effectiveness. There are several ways to leverage the HBM in residential care communities. Firstly, tailoring communication strategies is essential. Understanding the HBM constructs allows for developing persuasive messages that address perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, and barriers. Effective communication strategies can promote infection control practices and improve adherence. Secondly, engaging various stakeholders is crucial for creating a supportive environment for infection control. The HBM can help recognize the unique perspectives of different stakeholders, such as care providers, residents, families, and facility administrators. Addressing their concerns and fostering collaboration contribute to more effective infection control practices. The HBM can guide the development of educational materials and interventions that target the identified constructs. For instance, easy-to-understand educational materials highlighting the risks, consequences, and benefits of infection control practices can help overcome barriers related to knowledge and awareness.
Consequently, using the HBM constructs as a basis for evaluation allows for assessing the effectiveness of interventions to improve infection control practices. This process can identify areas of success and those requiring further improvement, ensuring that efforts remain focused and efficient. Furthermore, the HBM can assist in identifying cultural and social factors that may influence infection control practices. Understanding these factors enables the development of culturally sensitive interventions that cater to the unique needs and beliefs of various population groups within the residential care community. Lastly, integrating the HBM with other theoretical or conceptual frameworks, such as the Theory of Planned Behavior or the Socio-Ecological Model, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of factors influencing infection control practices. This approach can guide the development of multi-level interventions that target individual, interpersonal, organizational, and environmental factors, ultimately promoting more effective infection control practices in residential care communities.
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is a psychological framework that aims to predict and explain human actions within specific contexts. It suggests that an individual’s attitudes and subjective norms influence their actions and perceived control over those actions. TPB has been applied in various fields, including healthcare and infection control practices. In residential care communities, the Theory of Planned Behavior can be utilized to comprehend and enhance the effectiveness of infection control practices by examining and addressing its three core components. One of the main elements of this theoretical framework is attitudes, which pertain to an individual’s positive or negative evaluation of a particular action. In the context of infection control practices, attitudes include the beliefs held by healthcare workers, residents, and their families regarding the significance and effectiveness of these practices. To promote positive attitudes, it is essential to provide education and training highlighting the importance of infection control and its benefits to residents and staff.
Another component of the Theory of Planned Behavior is subjective norms which refer to the perceived social pressure to act in a particular manner. These norms may stem from peers, supervisors, or the organization’s policies in residential care communities. Promoting a culture of infection prevention and control in which everyone assumes responsibility for maintaining a clean and safe environment can foster positive subjective norms. Support from management and continuous communication about the importance of these practices can also strengthen these norms. Additionally, perceived behavioural control, another component of this theory, relates to an individual’s belief in their capability to perform a specific task. In the case of infection control practices, it centres on the confidence of healthcare workers, residents, and their families in effectively implementing these practices. Ensuring all individuals possess the necessary resources, knowledge, and skills to implement infection control practices is vital to bolstering perceived behavioural control. Providing hands-on training and ongoing support can aid in building confidence in their abilities. Addressing these three components of the Theory of Planned Behavior can improve the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities. This approach contributes to better health outcomes and ensures a safer living environment for residents and staff.
Another crucial element of TPB is the concept of intention, which is the motivational factor influencing actions. The intention is influenced by an individual’s attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control over their actions. It is important to foster positive attitudes, supportive subjective norms, and enhance perceived control to strengthen the intention to engage in proper infection control practices. Effective implementation of infection control practices requires supportive organizational policies. This involves developing clear guidelines, procedures, and protocols regularly reviewed and updated based on best practices and evidence-based research. Making these policies easily accessible and understandable to all staff members can further promote a culture of infection prevention.
Regularly monitoring and evaluating infection control practices is crucial for maintaining their effectiveness. Implementing a system for tracking compliance, pinpointing areas for improvement, and providing feedback can help uphold high standards of practice. Feedback should be constructive, and staff members be encouraged to share their experiences and challenges to nurture a collaborative learning environment. Involving residents and their families in infection control practices can prove advantageous in fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility. Providing education on hand hygiene, respiratory etiquette, and other infection prevention measures also allows residents and families to contribute to a safer living environment. A collaborative approach to infection control practices can help create an environment where everyone feels responsible for maintaining a clean and safe community. Regular meetings, interdisciplinary teamwork, and open communication channels can facilitate collaboration and problem-solving, ultimately improving infection control outcomes. By considering these additional factors and strategies alongside TPB’s core components, a more effective framework for understanding and improving infection control practices in residential care communities can be achieved.
Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory
The Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) Theory is a model developed by Everett Rogers in 1962 to explain how new ideas, practices, or technologies spread through a population. DOI Theory has been widely applied to various fields, including public health and infection control practices. In the context of infection control practices in residential care communities, the principles of the DOI Theory can be leveraged to enhance the effectiveness of infection control practices. One key element of DOI Theory is innovation. In infection control practices, innovations are defined as new or improved practices that can reduce the risk of spreading infectious diseases. Examples of innovations in infection control practices include hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), regular disinfection of surfaces, and staff training on infection prevention and control. Healthcare professionals and administrators can leverage the latest research to identify and implement innovative practices that can help prevent the spread of infectious diseases in residential care communities.
Another critical element of DOI Theory is communication channels. Effective communication is essential for adopting new infection control practices in residential care communities. Communication channels can include formal training sessions, newsletters, social media, staff meetings, and one-on-one interactions with staff, residents, and family members. It is essential to use a variety of communication channels to ensure that information about infection control practices reaches all stakeholders.
Time is also critical in DOI Theory. Adopting new infection control practices is a gradual process that can take time. Healthcare professionals and administrators must be patient and consistent in promoting new practices and continuously evaluate their effectiveness. It is essential to track the adoption progress over time and adjust communication and training strategies as necessary. The social system in which individuals operate is also a critical element of DOI Theory. Adopting new infection control practices is influenced by the social system in which individuals operate, including staff, residents, and their families. This system’s social norms, values, and beliefs can either encourage or hinder the adoption of new practices. Healthcare professionals and administrators can create a culture of infection prevention by promoting the value of hand hygiene, PPE use, and other infection control practices. Peer-to-peer support and positive reinforcement can help encourage staff and residents to adopt new practices.
Finally, the adopter categories in DOI Theory describe the different rates at which individuals adopt new practices. Healthcare professionals and administrators can tailor communication and training strategies to each adopter category to help promote adoption. For example, early adopters may be more receptive to new practices if they see how they benefit them personally. In contrast, late adopters may need more time and reassurance before they are willing to change their behaviour.
The principles of DOI Theory can be leveraged to enhance the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities. Healthcare professionals and administrators can identify and implement innovative practices using a variety of communication channels to promote adoption. By doing so, they can promote the widespread and sustained adoption of effective infection control practices, ultimately improving residents’ health outcomes. Healthcare professionals and administrators must take a strategic approach to effectively leverage the principles of Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) theory principles in the context of infection control practices in residential care communities. Firstly, identifying and engaging key opinion leaders (KOLs) and engaging them can help promote adopting new infection control practices. KOLs could be senior staff members, resident council members, or residents’ family members. They can help disseminate information about infection control practices, provide training and support, and encourage peer-to-peer support.
Caregivers could also leverage DOI by developing clear, concise communication messages tailored to different stakeholder groups’ needs. This is essential for consistent and accurate dissemination of information. Using a variety of communication channels, such as formal training sessions, newsletters, social media, and posters, ensures that all stakeholders receive the information. Thirdly, providing ongoing training and support to staff members is crucial to promoting, adopting and maintaining new infection control practices. Regular training sessions, refresher courses, on-the-job support, and opportunities for staff to share best practices can help integrate new practices into daily routines.
Similarly, monitoring progress and adjusting strategies based on stakeholder feedback can help improve infection control practices’ effectiveness. Finally, evaluating the impact of new infection control practices on health outcomes can help healthcare professionals and administrators adjust communication and training strategies to address any barriers to adoption. By taking this strategic approach, healthcare professionals and administrators can promote the widespread and sustained adoption of effective infection control practices in residential care communities, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes for residents and a higher quality of care provided in these settings.
Systems Theory
Infection control practices are essential in residential care communities to prevent the spread of infectious diseases and maintain a healthy environment for residents and staff. Applying Systems Theory to these practices provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing, designing, and implementing effective interventions considering residential care communities’ interconnectedness and dynamic nature. A fundamental principle of Systems Theory is the holistic perspective, which emphasizes the importance of considering all aspects of the residential care community, including the physical environment, staffing, training, policies, protocols, and residents’ behaviour. Adequate ventilation, cleanliness, handwashing facilities, staffing levels, continuous training and education, clear policies and protocols, and promoting proper hygiene practices among residents are essential to an effective infection control strategy.
Understanding the interconnectedness of different elements within the residential care community is critical for designing comprehensive interventions. Components such as hand hygiene practices, training, and facility design are closely linked, and their effectiveness depends on their synergy. Moreover, Systems Theory highlights the significance of feedback loops in any system, which can either reinforce or mitigate particular behaviours. Identifying these loops in the context of infection control can help guide targeted interventions. Maintaining a dynamic equilibrium in residential care communities is vital for system resilience. These settings constantly change due to staff turnover, new residents, evolving pathogens, and updated guidelines. Infection control measures should be adaptable and responsive to these changing conditions and regularly reviewed and updated based on current evidence and best practices.
Leveraging Systems Theory in the effectiveness of infection control practices in residential care communities involves a comprehensive approach that accounts for the interconnectedness of various components. It also fosters adaptability and embraces continuous learning and improvement. The first step in applying Systems Theory is conducting a system analysis by mapping the critical components of the residential care community system, such as the physical environment, staffing, training, policies, protocols, and residents’ behaviour. This holistic view helps identify areas for improvement and potential vulnerabilities within the care setting. Recognizing and analyzing feedback loops in the system, both positive and negative, is crucial for understanding their impact on infection control practices. Identifying these loops allows for targeting interventions and designing measures that break harmful loops and reinforce beneficial ones. Comprehensive and adaptive interventions should be developed to address multiple interconnected aspects of infection control. The measures must be flexible and adaptable to the changing conditions within the care setting, such as staff turnover, new residents, evolving pathogens, and updated guidelines.
By incorporating diverse approaches, including hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, and environmental cleaning, multiple hurdles to transmission can be established. Nurturing a culture of continuous learning and progress is crucial to uphold effective infection control practices. Staff members’ ongoing education and training should be encouraged to ensure they stay abreast of the latest evidence-based practices and guidelines. Regular monitoring and evaluation of infection control practices, using feedback from staff, residents, and external audits, facilitate the identification of areas for improvement and inform necessary adjustments.
Engaging all stakeholders, including staff, residents, families, and regulatory agencies, in designing, implementing, and evaluating infection control practices is vital for ensuring that the measures are comprehensive, effective, and responsive to the community’s needs. Clear and consistent communication of infection control policies, protocols, and expectations among staff, residents, and families promotes an understanding of individual roles in preventing the spread of infections. It fosters a sense of shared responsibility (Ayala et al., 2015). It is also crucial to regularly review the effectiveness of infection control practices and adjust them based on feedback, new knowledge, and changing conditions within the care setting. This iterative process helps maintain a dynamic equilibrium and ensures that the residential care community remains resilient and adaptive to the evolving landscape of infectious diseases and care settings.
Socio-Ecological Model (SEM)
The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) is a conceptual framework that helps us understand the factors influencing health outcomes and behaviours by examining the interplay between individuals and their environments. The model identifies multiple levels of influence: individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy. Applying the SEM to infection control practices in residential care communities can help identify and address the factors contributing to these practices’ effectiveness.
At the individual level, factors influencing infection control practices include knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours. For example, residents may have limited mobility or cognitive impairment, making it challenging to follow infection prevention protocols. Staff members may also have different levels of education or training, affecting their ability to implement proper infection control practices. To address these factors, residential care communities can offer ongoing education and training to residents and staff to improve their understanding of infection prevention and control (Huis et al., 2013). Interpersonal relationships can also influence infection control practices. For example, staff may be more likely to adhere to infection prevention protocols if they feel supported by their colleagues and supervisors. Family members and visitors can promote infection prevention and control by adhering to the residential care community’s policies and procedures. To encourage positive interpersonal relationships, residential care communities can create a supportive and respectful work environment and offer residents opportunities for social interaction and engagement.
Organizational factors influencing infection control practices include leadership, policies, procedures, staffing levels, and available resources. Residential care communities can implement infection control policies and procedures that are evidence-based and tailored to the community’s needs. They can also ensure adequate staffing levels and proper training for staff members to implement effective infection control practices. Additionally, providing necessary resources such as PPE, cleaning supplies, and hand sanitizing stations can facilitate adherence to infection control practices. Residential care communities can also collaborate with other healthcare organizations and public health agencies to promote infection prevention and control (Gralton & McLaws, 2015). For example, they can participate in community-wide initiatives to promote infection prevention and control, such as hand hygiene campaigns or educational events. They can also share resources and expertise with other healthcare organizations in their community to ensure that best practices are being implemented.
Public policies and regulations can shape the context in which residential care communities operate, influencing their ability to implement effective infection control practices. Advocating for policies and regulations prioritizing infection control in residential care settings can help ensure that the necessary resources, support, and oversight are available to promote safe and effective care. For example, regulatory bodies can require that residential care communities meet specific infection control standards to maintain their licensure.
Effective infection control practices are crucial for maintaining the health and safety of residents in residential care communities. Stakeholders can leverage the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) to ensure good infection control practices. The first step in this process is conducting a needs assessment, which should identify the current infection control practices and the factors influencing their effectiveness. The assessment should consider the different levels of influence identified in the SEM, including individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy factors. Based on the needs assessment, stakeholders can develop an action plan addressing the identified gaps and challenges (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020). The plan must also include strategies targeting each level of the SEM, such as education and training programs for residents and staff, policies and procedures prioritizing infection prevention and control, and collaborations with other healthcare organizations and public health agencies.
The next step is to implement the action plan in a phased approach, prioritizing the strategies that most impact infection control practices. This approach may include rolling out education and training programs for staff and residents, establishing policies and procedures that align with best practices, and ensuring that necessary resources are available to support infection prevention and control efforts. Monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the strategies implemented regularly is essential. The evaluation must consider the different levels of influence identified in the SEM and involve ongoing assessment and adjustment of the action plan as needed. Results should be communicated to stakeholders, including staff, residents, family members, and regulatory bodies (Pittet, 2017). The communication should highlight the progress in improving infection control practices and the ongoing efforts to maintain and enhance these practices.
Implementation Science Frameworks
Implementation science is a field of study that focuses on understanding how to implement evidence-based practices in real-world settings effectively. Several implementation science frameworks can guide research and practice regarding infection control practices in residential care communities. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a comprehensive framework that encompasses five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, individual characteristics, and process. Each of these domains includes several constructs that can be used to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementing infection control practices in residential care communities. In the intervention characteristics domain, factors such as the intervention’s complexity, adaptability, and relative advantage can affect its implementation (Goldmann & Weinstein, 2018). For example, using personal protective equipment (PPE), hand hygiene protocols, and surface cleaning protocols could be considered interventions in the context of infection control practices in residential care communities.
The outer setting domain considers the external factors that can affect implementation, such as patient needs and resources. In the context of residential care communities, examples of external factors could be the availability of PPE, funding for infection control measures, and community support. On the other hand, the inner setting domain considers the internal factors that can affect implementation, such as organizational culture and leadership. In residential care communities, examples of internal factors could be staff attitudes toward infection control, leadership support for infection control measures, and communication channels (Cohen & Olson, 2016). The individual characteristics domain considers the characteristics of the individuals implementing the intervention, such as their skills and attitudes. In residential care communities, examples of individual characteristics could be staff training on infection control practices, prior experience with infection control, and motivation to implement infection control measures. Finally, the process domain considers the processes involved in implementing the intervention, such as planning, executing, and monitoring. In residential care communities, examples of processes could be developing an infection control plan, training staff on infection control measures, and monitoring adherence to infection control protocols.
The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework emphasizes the importance of context, evidence, and facilitation in successful implementation. Effective implementation requires a supportive organizational culture, strong leadership, and active involvement of stakeholders. The context element refers to the setting where the intervention is implemented, including the organizational culture, leadership, and available resources (Quan et al., 2019). The evidence element refers to the quality and strength of the evidence supporting the intervention. The facilitation element refers to the strategies used to support the implementation of the intervention, such as leadership support, staff training, and communication channels.
The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework emphasizes evaluating interventions’ reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Researchers and practitioners can develop practical, feasible, and sustainable interventions to improve infection control practices in residential care communities (Abolfotouh et al., 2017). The proportion of the target population reached by the intervention is evaluated in the reach element. In assessing interventions, there are four key elements to consider. Firstly, the effectiveness element evaluates the intervention’s impact on relevant outcomes. Secondly, the adoption element considers the extent to which the target population adopts the intervention. The implementation element also evaluates the extent to which the intervention is implemented as intended. Finally, the maintenance element assesses the degree to which the intervention is sustained over time.
References
Abolfotouh, M. A., Al-Assiri, M. H., Alshahrani, A. M., & Almutairi, Z. M. (2017). Infection control practices among Saudi dentists and dental assistants. International journal of infectious diseases, 56, 61-64.
Al-Tawfiq, J. A., & Memish, Z. A. (2014). Infection control measures for the prevention of MERS coronavirus transmission in healthcare settings. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 12(9), 1107-1115.
Ayala, E. E., Carle, A. C., & Divaris, K. (2015). Infection control practices among North Carolina dentists: a statewide survey. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 146(10), 742-752.
Bowles, C. C., Gibson, K. R., & Wofford, M. M. (2017). Infection control in the long-term care facility: evaluation of a training program. American Journal of Infection Control, 45(11), 1210–1214.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/index.html
Cohen, C. C., & Olson, V. A. (2016). Addressing infection control in the long-term care facility: raising the bar. American Journal of Infection Control, 44(9), 1088–1092.
Doron, S., Davidson, L. E., & Perl, T. M. (2019). Guidance for infection prevention and control in acute care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(9), 2199–2203.
Edmond, M. B., Diekema, D. J., & Perencevich, E. N. (2018). Infection control: the importance of process measures. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 31(4), e00066-17.
Goldmann, D. A., & Weinstein, R. A. (2018). Worrying about the next major outbreak. Annals of Internal Medicine, 168(4), 278-279.
Gralton, J., & McLaws, M. L. (2015). Protecting healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: N95 or surgical masks? Critical care medicine, 43(2), 492–499.
Huis, A., van Achterberg, T., de Bruin, M., Grol, R., & Schoonhoven, L. (2013). Implementation science: what is it, and why should I care? Nursing in critical care, 18(5), 223-225.
Lee, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., Kim, Y. J., & Kim, K. H. (2018). A systematic review on the causes and prevention of healthcare-associated infections in long-term care facilities. Epidemiology and health, 40.
Mody, L., Krein, S. L., Saint, S., & Min, L. C. (2018). Beyond hand hygiene: a qualitative study of the everyday work preventing cross-contamination on hospital wards. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 39(3), 293-299.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment guidelines
Olmsted, R. N. (2017). Hand hygiene and infection prevention: an overview. The Journal of Hospital Infection, 95(2), 137-142.
Pittet, D. (2017). Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisciplinary approach. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 23(1), 13–15.
Quan, V. M., Chiem, K., Tisherman, P. L., & Dwyer, K. (2018). A model for sustainable healthcare innovation in low-resource settings: using co-creation to develop a culturally appropriate and locally-sustainable infection control intervention for neonatal intensive care units in Vietnam. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 3.
Rock, C., Shorman, M., & Bissell, R. A. (2019). The role of social and cultural factors in the transmission of infectious diseases. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25(1), 23-27.
Smith, P. W., & Larson, E. L. (2018). Infection prevention and control in long-term care facilities. OUP Oxford.
Verbeek, J. H., Rajamaki, B., Ijaz, S., & Sauni, R. (2020). To mask or not to mask, that is the question: How to maintain the safety of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic? Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 64(4), 337-339
write