Sustainable Use for Conservation
The ethical dimension of wildlife conservation has increasingly attracted attention during the last decades as the planet shares with it the necessity of saving wildlife species alongside supporting other human requirements. The Bahamas offers an exemplary case for the conservation of marine life and fisheries due to its extensive coral reefs, mangroves, and other ecosystems, which makes a model example for sustainable practice implementation. Sustainable use emerges from the fact that, let us say, wildlife resources can be used to generate an income, can be part of cultural beliefs and traditions, and can still be produced or provided in nature. However, ensuring their continuous existence comes with a responsibility for everybody, be it in government, the tourism industry, local communities, and others who directly or indirectly depend on wildlife resources. It concentrates on those strategies that keep populations within limits where they can reproduce and ensure that their numbers remain at the replacement level, thus preventing population depletion. The first crucial taxa around The Bahamas is actually the Queen Conch (Strombus gigas), an organism with both ecological and economic values, as well as a cultural background. Milner-Gulland and Rowcliffe (2007) have already radically reported on the variety of functions of the Queen Conch within marine ecology, where it regulates algae growth and acts as a home for many species. Additionally, the economic value of conch meat as a staple in Bahamian cuisine, the cultural significance it befits in local art, and the hallow it holds in traditional practice highlight the multidimensional relevance of this species (IPBES report, 2022).
Scheduling the Bahamen Queen Conch sustainably involves a variety of states, including creating regulations, engaging in community involvement, and conserving the environment. The federal government defines upper limits on the harvesting of conch through size limits, seasonal closures, and marine protected areas via Milner-Gulland and Rowcliffe (2007). Besides IUCN’s SULI approach, which promotes sustainable harvesting and awareness among local community members on conserving flora species, the community-based management approach has contributed significantly towards achieving Sustainability. Indeed, the Queen Conch conservation efforts produce positive results according to the success of the national conservation program. However, the challenge persists as an example of the new lionfish species still discovering the development of their habitat in the waters (Bahamas Hussain et al., 2022). Previously known as marine animals of the Indo-Pacific region, this species has been introduced into Atlantic waters, resulting in a terrible outcome for the native species in fish populations and marine ecosystems (Tham-Agyekum et al., 2024). The lionfish population control activities include measures ranging from target hunting to message campaigns where people are educated on preferences for lionfish species as food. However, the significant reproduction rate of lionfish and the ethical dilemmas of its eradication are among the critical challenges in the future (United et al., 2018).
Although successful conservation plans have been devised to divert the extinction of even the most essential species, such as the Queen Conch, managing invasive species, such as the lionfish, is more complicated; therefore, new innovative approaches and international cooperation are crucial. Suppose small island nations such as The Bahamas consider the ethical dilemmas of the problem and integrate those with sustainable development goals. In that case, they will be in a better position to balance the needs of humans and conservation in their marine ecosystem.
Argument FOR Sustainable Use
The Queen Conch: A Vital Species
The ecological value of the Strombus gigas and its role in the Bahamas is indispensable. This value is identified in the research by Allen and Edwards (1995). The queen conch is the key species that determines the dynamics of the marine ecosystem. Its grazing habits support the complexity of coral reef ecosystems, as well as controlling the algae blooms. With its food made up of algae, the Queen Conch is a crucial regulator of the amount of algae in the environment. Something that can harm the corals more than anything is algae. The more algae ensnarls them, the more their growth rates decrease and the fewer offspring they produce. Such limitation of the algae population, in turn, is fundamental to the functioning of the ecosystem of the coral reefs that is the natural place of support to myriad fish and various other water creatures.
To begin with, Queen Conchs offer suitable places where the young attain shelter from a fairly large range of fish, small size exclusion. Beady conch shells become cradles and enclaves to all species when they form their homes and abode for biodiversity that will support the whole ecosystem structure to attain the perfect state. Besides corals and anemones, Queen Conch is also part of the very food chain and it serves as a primary source of predation for several species.
Ecological Importance:
The significance of the natural community by Queen Conch (Strombus gigas) in the ecological contribution of the marine ecosystem within the Bahamas Islands, as attested by Baleta et al. (2019) study, cannot be overstated. The Queen Conch can rightfully be called an outstanding animal, which shows the extent to which its vital activity defines the diversity of coral reef communities and is the key to reflecting the integrity of the entire ecosystem. Alongside its multiple ecological functions, grazing has been one of the most accepted tools for fast, safe, and, most importantly, ecologically sound algae control. Another cataclysm that this infamous eater creates is that algae cannot grow, and the corals under them may be suffocated as they do not consume a lot of algae, and hence, their life is on hold.
The main function of the algae grazers is that they stabilize the algae population, which is a sort of guarantor of the overall health and vibrancy of the coral reefs’ ecosystems. In essence, the fit conservation place in the marine environment nature is a healthy coral reef, and the reason for that is the provision of living space and food sources. This means that queen conchs perform the vital role of maintaining algae populations and the corals, which benefit from the conditions created by the mollusks. It increases the biodiversity and ecological stability.
The coral of the Queen Conch, therefore, isn’t just a cover or home for itself; it hosts many other species, too, within its host animal’s marine regime. The existence of the coral reef serves as the sole sanctuary for the small fishes and invertebrates on the floor of the ocean, and it is part of the complicated and diversified group of organisms on the sea floor that has contributed to overall the existence of biodiversity in the marine ecosystem. The dead skeletons of the old conchs will have use of remaining structures recolonized by algae and corals that avail of it to provide substrates to the small fishes and invertebrates that will raise its biodiversity. However, it is shown in this study by Baleta et al. (2019) that there is more nuance than just the intimate association between the queen conch and the algae. It is one of the most crucial creatures that the coral reefs are so rich and so diverse. The Queen’s Conch population maintenance following the sound rules is as important as it. Organizing our marine lives prevents the loss of their identity and also protects nature and biodiversity in the Bahamas. It also contributes to the biodiversity security of marine ecosystems beyond these islands.
Economic Significance:
The ECO value of Queen Conch (Strombus gigas) is tremendous for agriculture and fishery in The Bahamas, where the human input of the species is a significant part of the local economy. According to a report by IPBES (2022), conch meat – a primary Bahamian cuisine item – is the foundation of Bahamian cuisine. The conch-eating tradition, an art of filling local people’s appetites, supports local fisher folks and seafood business people who make a living only due to the conch-based trade. Also, the shell industry accompanying Queen Conch fishing creates additional economic value in Bahamas countries. To the IUCN SULI (n.d.), conch shells have high appreciative value and make a range of crafts and souvenirs possible. These merchandise serve as items that tourists purchase before departing internationally or domestically, while tourism is also harbored by the products showcasing the Bahamanian experience.
The catering for tourism purposes and the health benefits derived from many conch dishes contribute to the direct increase in the income of local communities while disseminating socioeconomic indigenous culture. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature-Society for Underwater Livelihoods Programme proposal, there is a concerted effort to develop sound exploitation of the resource for the economic benefits would be sustained over time and are necessary for the survival of livelihoods and national resilience in The Bahamas. However, the economic influences of the Queen Conch in The Bahamas, expressed by the IPBES report (2022) and IUCN SULI, manifest the need for balanced management strategies that ensure that short-term use is maintained by medium and long-term conservation. A sustainable and efficient recipe for the commercial use of marine resources will benefit The Bahamas, resulting in its long-term protection and favorable economic effects within the country.
Cultural Value:
The significance of cultural tradition to the Bahamians in Queen Conch (Strombus gigas) is profound because of its close relationship to the primitive traditions and the sense of Being Bahamian among these people. Bloor (2024) asserts that the Queen Conch is a vital part of the Bahamas culture, representing the old habits and traditions passed down over generations. It interfaces Bahamian life on multiple levels, whether in the food consumed or the art that expresses its existence, serving as a sign of survival and vitality.
The sparkling, trendy shell of the Queen Conch, known for its beauty and strength, appears to be the most helpful art piece and jewelry creation object in Bahamian art. The IPBES report (2022) highlights that through conch-shell crafting, the artisans of The Bahamas capture nature’s elegance to produce pieces that have decorative value and epitomize their cultural identity. These works of art, sophisticated sculptures, and delicately designed jewelry are only a fraction of the proof of the magnitude of Bahamian creative and artistic hands hailed by the locals and the intrigued visitors yearning for the same. The cultural value of the Queen Conch is also set up for its aesthetic appearance, ritual, and traditions. Baleta et al. (2019) cultural significance has shown that the conch symbolizes different things, including abundance, prosperity, and unity among the Bahamian communities. People integrate the Queen Conch into their religious or ceremonial events and their usual way of life with decorative souvenirs. As the Queen Conch has been shared from one generation to the next, those items showcase the persistence of culture with which the people two generations before and two generations present are united.
Conservation Efforts:
International efforts to save the Queen Conch populations from extinction in The Bahamas, though complex, call for the implementation of several interventions such as regulatory strategies, community activities, and educational ones. Concerning the 2015 IUCN conservation mandate, a fisheries closure during certain seasons or in areas with established size limits for Naussaques was already enforced, while marine protected areas created in the near future are expected to have positive effects on the fish populations. This decision was made in order to normalize the fishing level and ensure that the queen conch populations are recovering and able to last for a long time.
Along with community-driven management systems, another vital layer needs to be considered: fostering sustainable harvesting movements and reforming people through such programs where nature resources are of priority. By drawing fishermen, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations, which are stakeholders, together for the collective good of the community so that its power in the management of natural resources can be used to make it efficient and sustainable. It is possible to echo local knowledge and combine it with other sources, for instance, conservation activities and management programs; it would not only increase the efficiency and legitimacy but also would create stakeholder benefits (for example, karunathilakeet al., 2019).
Similarly, another method is to include educational programs on Queen Conch conservation awareness at the same time for the purpose of passing the information to the public that protects this special shell-bearing marine species. Education becomes the main force for environmental conservation and sustainable natural resource-related practices in future generations, as per findings by Kazitskaya et al. (2020). Through endorsing the findings on the role of Queen Conch in marine ecosystems, the probable consequences of over-fishing and practically regular guardianship, campaigns like this disseminate ways through which individuals can conclude permanently taking responsibility for marine resources
Section 2: Argument AGAINST Sustainable Use
The Lionfish: A Menace to Native Ecosystems
The lionfish (Pterois volitans) constitutes an act of significant harm to the environment of the Bahamas marine, as Kumar and Majid (2020) have shown. Lionfish—a species native to the Indo-Pacific region—have been introduced into the Atlantic waters, probably through aquarium trade or by accidental release of live fish. The humans’ role as predators has been diminished in this environment, and the ability of these creatures to replicate themselves rapidly, thus increasing their population, contributed to their proliferation in this area, leading to a myriad of consequences on native ecosystems.
Studies by Milner-Gulland and Rowcliffe (2007) have determined the ecosystem consequences of lionfish invasions. They show the role of lionfish as avid predators and how they feed on our local fish and invertebrates. However, the chain of events escalates this predation, which causes the alterations of food webs, resulting in the decline of native species and changing the ecosystem dynamics. Strategies to combat the lionfish invasion in The Bahamas include different measures, from targeted hunting to informational campaigns to support culinary landscaping, making the consumption of lionfish popular. If one can control the proportion of lionfish, this is a difficult task because of the conception and spread of the species. Liu, Nie, and Cao (2023) indicate the requirement for interdisciplinary decollective strategies that combine science, policy interventions, and community involvement to manage lionfish and reduce their effect on native ecosystems effectively.
Invasive Predator:
The Lionfish (Pterois volitans), a native Indo-Pacific species recently invasive in the Atlantic, negatively impacts endemic ecosystems and species. With aquarium trades and accidental release being the probable cause, the invasion of this species in Atlantic waters gives rise to ecological disturbances and biodiversity loss in this region. This brain-crunching problem by Taylor & Francis Online is the most challenging issue for marine conservationists around all the oceans’ boundaries. Lionfish consume the maximum number of prey foot by foot, as discussed in Tham-Agyekum et al. (2024), which is also a great concern. The Capricorn fish engage in indiscriminate food behavior by attacking many prey species, including small fish, crustaceans, and all invertebrates. Such predators pressure the food chain and the patterns of certain prey species. They end up declining or distributed, leading to ecosystem imbalances and disruption of local food webs. The negative consequences of lionfish predatory behavior could even amplify at the ecological scale, altering the stability and resilience of fishery resources.
Tiwari (2023) argues about the harmful consequences of lionfish predation on the native fish habitats and communities and considers them the prima facie cause of local fish population reduction. This threat extends to native species that can be defensive-less against the lionfish predator attack. Similarly, lionfish unchecked proliferation may cause a significant decline in biodiversity, which ultimately makes the environment in the sea not balanced, thus breaking marine ecosystem services. For instance, invasives like the lionfish are at the top of the list for more demanding challenges, as identified by Tiwari (2023). The effects of the call for lionfish invasion need concerted steps by local, regional, and international authorities, for example, by implementing elimination campaigns, monitoring programs, and information outsourcing. The stakeholders can raise the issue and promote conservation approaches that consider the damaging potential of invasive species to the environment. Stakeholders will, therefore, mitigate the impacts of invasive lionfish and ensure the sustenance of marine life in the future.
Anthropogenic Interventions:
The rise of the lionfish invasion in the Atlantic water has forced humans to take different practical measures geared towards control of their population and their ecological imprints. As Tiwari has it, divers and fishermen must perform elimination work within these endeavors. Among them are the ones who hunt lionfish with spears, traps, and other equipment designed specifically for lionfish capture, which help them eliminate these fishes from the marine ecosystem and its destruction. These wreckage operations are focused on decreasing lionfish populations, which plays an important role in reducing the lionfish’s predation effect on native species. Similarly, the Introduction of campaigns like those done by Robert A. Tiwari et al. (2021) are now known as innovative approaches to tackle the lionfish invading waters. As this product serves as a sustainable seafood alternative, the campaigns focus on the best way for consumers to add it to their regular diet and other types of fish. Through this proposal, lionfish will be targeted, meaning that these fishermen would get paid a fair portion to catch lionfish, and the population becomes continuously small, leading to the decline of ecological impact.
The recent UNEP report (2018) stresses the vital role that participatory communities play in biodiversity conservation and management, which is one of the pressing issues today due to the detrimental impact of invasive species such as lionfish. Working out partnerships of local communities in lionfish eradication and consumption campaigns creates a sense of community and ownership over marine resources, motivating people to excel in conservation through meaningful roles played individually. The existing programs should be extended to include all the stakeholders, such as government departments, nonprofit organizations, and local communities. Then, the effectiveness and Sustainability of lionfish management techniques can be further improved.
By the end of the discussion, though humans mediate, the nature of the intervention of lionfish invasion in the Atlantic remains essential. Humanized Version: Eradication operations by divers and fishermen, accompanied by campaigns that aim to eat lionfish to control them periodically, represent not just proactive strategies to prevent them from attacking native ecosystems but also decrease the number of lionfish.
Challenges:
While the battle of Pterois volitans (Lionfish) is the sole incentive, many other considerations must be taken seriously for a successful combat. Uncontrolled growth in the birth rate of the lionfish species creates difficulties in the termination plan of such predators, as UN 2015 says. Lionfish are reproducing birds, and the mating process of female lionfish can produce more than a thousand eggs in one reproductive event. This elevated reproductive rate, in turn, makes it possible for the lionfish to repair their declining numbers even after substantial removal operations, thus posing an ongoing threat to eliminating the infestation.
On the other hand, the interplay of maintaining sustainable control with the ethical circumstances faced while dealing with the lionfish invasion compounds the issue’s complexity. According to the World Bank Group (2021), carefully negotiated eradication methods are expected to contribute to preserving other marine species’ lives and ecosystems. The ethical issues may be connected with methods and strategies applied during lionfish removal, including spearguns or other substances (Guhaa et al., 2023). To find a point in staying clear from using eradication and ethical-related problems, there is a need to understand the aspects of such and the meaning of various eradication strategies.
Besides, the socioeconomic factors influencing the efforts to control lionfish also contribute to the difficulty l envision. Abdullah et al. (2022) argued that leadership styles and environment organization variables can initiate conservation success in invasive species control. Moreover, Aryal et al. (2022) consider the attitudes of the local communities and the tourists as relevant and on-point, which might involve the lionfish problem solution program. Therefore, national concerns about lionfish invasion should be addressed through a multidisciplinary framework that considers economic, ethical, and ecological views. Through the conjoining scientific studies, policy interventions, community involvement, and ethical considerations, stakeholders can create a comprehensive solution that will prevent further problems caused by the lionfish invasion while saving the sea’s vessels (ecosystems and livelihoods).
Ethical Implications
The ethical dilemmas concerning sustainable resource use are complicated, necessitating looking at the environmental issues from different angles to find a middle point between long-term conservation goals and social and economic objectives. Clemence (2021) focuses on the ethical problem people face when creating a sustainable world, asking whether Sustainability can harm global environmental conservation. This paradigm impresses upon us the complexity behind sustainable resource management and the possible tradeoffs accompanying the task. It is essential to mention that ethics is a significant issue in international wildlife conservation and invasive species management. The ethical concerns are always at the heart of such a decision. Collado et al. (2022) note the criticality of ethical regulations in fostering Sustainability within the hospitality and tourism sector, which require tourism managers to be environmental custodians. Ethical dilemmas concerning species conservation appear when diversifying targeted species, e.g., Queen Conch or lionfish, whether the most reasonable specimen is prioritized, and the methods used for partial control.
Kotagama (2021) focuses on the changing pattern of conservation procedures and seeks to integrate ethical aspects centra. This means the ethical guidelines should be adjustable according to the same evolving environmental and socioeconomic issues to ensure conservation solutions/frameworks remain relevant and efficient. In the next place, they (the author(Tanveer et al., 2021) assess the interrelationship between the Sustainability of the environment and financial performance. In that regard, resource management can be a way to achieve economic rewards. Based on this vantage, ecological, economic, and moral affairs gain global importance in sustainable development. Moreover, Weber and Barron (2023) indicate the significance of embracing indigenous knowledge systems and viewpoints in conservation activities. Often, local indigenous communities possess helpfulness, and oral code is the basis for broader and more culturally acceptable management frameworks.
Conclusion
In the end, the controversial environmental ethics of sustainable resource use is a broad issue, and there is a need for an integrated approach that considers the complex interaction between biological stability, social welfare, cultural values and ethics, and ethical regulations. The factors related to sustainable development, such as striking a balance between the target to conserve nature and human populations’ needs, clearly show how complex the sustainability process is. Nonetheless, amidst all the difficulties, the point to be noted is that ethics has to be seen as a requisite in any long-term success and Sustainability of conservation initiatives. As a result, people can be placed in an ethical dilemma, which is prioritizing space and time for conservation while, at the same time, some activities will affect them and their way of life. In this context, more than merely setting the balance between the preservation of biodiversity and the sustainable usage of natural resources, it is essential to be sensitive to all kinds of views and needs of stakeholders, such as indigenous people and those who are oppressed.
Moreover, one conceivable reason in the ethics of invasive species management suggests that considering native and non-native species is always pivotal. The control or even attempted eradication of non-natives is, on the one hand, a sustainable way to cut back on native ecosystems’ disadvantages. On the other hand, many scholars argue that the decision to decrease or eliminate invasives can be seen as an attack against nature. Therefore, humanely treating invasive species becomes a second issue to be addressed. Furthermore, the collateral damage caused by extermination measures toward undesirable habitat types should be monitored appropriately. Finally, ethics goes beyond the notion of conservation actions to the consideration of broader socioeconomic and environmental justice issues. Sustainable natural resource management is intended to reduce inequality, discrimination, and discrimination; these should remain critical focal areas when looking at deprived and isolated communities. Looking at an indigenous sense of biodiversity and realizing the mutual involvement of the human system and biological ecosystem is a step towards holistically perfect ethics towards Sustainability.
References
Abdullah, H., Atshan, N., Al-Abrrow, H., Alnoor, A., & Bayram, G. (2022). Leadership styles and sustainable organizational energy in the family business: modeling non-compensatory and nonlinear relationships. Journal of Family Business Management, 13(4), 1104-1131. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-09-2022-0113
Abulebdah, A., et al. (2024). Integrative Approach for Optimizing Construction and Demolition Waste Management Practices in Developing Countries. Sustainable Environment, 3(1), 45–58. DOI: 10.1007/s42835-023-00088-5
Allen, C.M. & Edwards, S.R. (1995). The sustainable-use debate: observations from IUCN. Oryx, Vol 29, No 2, pp. 92–98. Read more.
Aryal, B., Chhetri, V., & Khanal, P. (2022). Perception of local people and visitors towards ecotourism development in Jagadishpur reservoir. International Journal of Environment, 11(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.3126/ije.v11i2.44768
Baleta, J., et al. (2019). Unsustainable Energy Practices: A Global Perspective. Energy Policy, 134, 110961. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110961
Bloor, M. (Ed.). (2024). Sustainable Environment.
Clémençon, R. (2021). Is sustainable development bad for global biodiversity conservation? Global Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.14
Collado, A., Vijande, M., Gómez‐Rico, M., & Madera, J. (2022). Sustainability in hospitality and tourism: a review of key research topics from 1994 to 2020. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(8), 3029-3064. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2021-1305
IPBES report. (2022). Sustainable Use of Wild Species. Read the Introduction and explore the graphics on pp. XXII, XXIV, XXX (text box), and XXXVIII.
IUCN SULI. Livelihoods and sustainable use. Retrieved from IUCN.
IUCN. (2015). The trade-in wildlife: a framework to improve biodiversity and livelihood outcomes. Geneva: International Trade Centre. Explore here.
Karunathilake, H., et al. (2019). Energy Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 484–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.001
Kazitskaya, N., et al. (2020). Sustainable Development Management: Actors and Institutions in the Post-Industrial Era. E3S Web of Conferences, 170, 01001. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202017001001
Kazitskaya, N., Prusova, V., & Bochkov, S. (2020). Sustainable Development Management: Actors and Institutions in the Post-Industrial Era. E3S Web of Conferences, 170, 01001. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202017001001
Kotagama, S. (2021). The changing conservation scene. University of Colombo Review, 2(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.4038/ucr.v2i2.45
Kumar, A., & Majid, M. R. (2020). Energy Use Trends in Developing Countries. Energy, 197, 117228. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117228
Liu, M., Nie, Z., & Cao, L. (2023). Change in Groundwater Table Depth Caused by Natural Change and Human Activities in the Shiyang River Basin, Northwest China. SCI TOTAL ENVIRON.
Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Rowcliffe, M. (2007). Conservation and Sustainable Use. Available in the library Shelfmark: 333.9516 MIL.
Rosen, M. A. (2021). Energy Sustainability with a Focus on Environmental Perspectives. Earth Systems and Environment, 5(2), 217–230. DOI: 10.1007/s41748-021-00210-4
Tanveer, A., Anwer, M., & Mai, M. (2021). The impact of environmental sustainability and financial resources utilization on firm financial performance: the mediating role of leadership styles. Annals of Social Sciences and Perspective, 2(2), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.52700/assap.v2i2.46
Taylor & Francis Online. (n.d.). Sustainable Environment. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/venv20/current
Tham-Agyekum, E. K., et al. (2024). Finding the Nexus Between Associative Mechanisms and Cocoa Farmer Resilience Against Natural Hazards in Ghana. Sustainable Environment, 3(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s42835-023-00087-6
Guhaa, S., Tiwaria, R. K., & Zhangb, G. (2023). Heterogeneous Glacier Mass Balance in the Garhwal Himalayan Region, India on a Temporal Scale. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Supratim-Guha/publication/376596988_Heterogeneous_Glacier_Mass_Balance_in_the_Garhwal_Himalayan_Region_India_on_a_Temporal_Scale/links/657f4ce28e2401526ddf2d56/Heterogeneous-Glacier-Mass-Balance-in-the-Garhwal-Himalayan-Region-India-on-a-Temporal-Scale.pdf
Tiwari, I. (2023). Environmental Sustainability: A Major Component of Sustainable Development. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372909752_Environment_and_Sustainable_Development
Tiwari, I., & Gupta, B. (2021). Environment and Sustainable Development. Sakshi Publishing House. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369764825_Environmental_Sustainability_A_Major_Component_of_Sustainable_Development/fulltext/642c26ccad9b6d17dc353f26/Environmental-Sustainability-A-Major-Component-of-Sustainable-Development.pdf
UNEP report. (2018). Wildlife, Wild Livelihoods: Involving Communities in Sustainable Wildlife Management and Combatting the Illegal Wildlife Trade. See the Executive Summary and Introduction sections. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323655746_Wild_Life_Wild_Livelihoods_Involving_Communities_in_Sustainable_Wildlife_Management_and_Combating_the_Illegal_Wildlife_Trade
United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Weber, E. and Barron, E. (2023). Coloniality and indigenous ways of knowing at the edges: emplacing earth kin in conservation communities. New Zealand Geographer, 79(2), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12367
World Bank Group. (2021). Energy Use and GDP Growth: A Comparative Analysis. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-2195
Hussain, M., Mir, G.M., Usman, M., Ye, C. & Mansoor, S. (2022). Analyzing the role of environment-related technologies and carbon emissions in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable development. Environmental Technology, 43(3), 367–375.https://www.academia.edu/download/101655722/09593330.2020.178817120230430-1-g892t1.pdf
write