The business environment has undergone significant changes recently, with an increased focus on sustainability and ethical practices. Business objectives and sustainable leadership have become key concepts in this new environment, and the ethical implications and impacts of these concepts for stakeholders are of particular concern. This essay aims to critically evaluate the ethical implications and impacts of business objectives and sustainable leadership for stakeholders and how business leaders can engage effectively and responsibly with stakeholders to maintain competitive advantages in the post-Covid-19 business environment. The concept of sustainable leadership refers to the process of leading an organization to achieve long-term business success while also addressing the needs of stakeholders and the broader environment. On the other hand, business objectives refer to the goals and targets that organizations set for themselves to achieve success. Stakeholders are any individuals or groups that have an interest in the activities of the organization.
In this essay, we will analyze these concepts in the context of two major companies in the technology industry: Alibaba and Samsung Electronics. Alibaba, the Chinese e-commerce giant, has been recognized for its sustainable practices and commitment to environmental and social responsibility. On the other hand, Samsung Electronics has faced criticisms for its lack of transparency and ethical concerns surrounding its supply chain. By comparing and contrasting these two companies, we will better understand the ethical implications and impacts of business objectives and sustainable leadership for stakeholders in the post-Covid-19 business environment.
A literature review of existing research on the topic highlights the importance of sustainable leadership and business objectives in today’s business environment. Many studies have shown that companies prioritizing sustainability and ethical practices tend to be more successful in the long run (Carroll, 1991; Serafeim, 2013; Porter & Kramer, 2011). However, there still needs to be a gap in the literature regarding understanding the specific challenges and limitations of implementing sustainable and ethical practices in practice and the role of government, consumers, corporate culture and innovation in promoting sustainable and ethical business practices.
In order to fill this knowledge gap, this essay will adopt a qualitative research methodology, utilizing a case study approach to compare and contrast the sustainable and ethical practices of Alibaba and Samsung Electronics. The limitations of this research include the fact that it is based on publicly available information and may include a partial picture of the companies’ sustainable and ethical practices. Additionally, the scope of this analysis is limited to the technology industry and the companies selected for the case study. The thesis statement for this essay is: Sustainable leadership, business objectives, and stakeholder engagement are crucial for organizations to navigate the current business environment and meet societal and environmental demands; however, implementing these concepts in practice may pose challenges and limitations. This essay aims to examine the ethical implications and impacts of business objectives and sustainable leadership for stakeholders and provide strategies for business leaders to effectively engage and work with stakeholders to maintain competitive advantages in the post-Covid-19 business environment.
The research methodology for this essay is a qualitative analysis of existing literature on the topic, focusing on academic journals and industry reports. The scope of the analysis is limited to the impacts of sustainable leadership, business objectives, and stakeholder engagement on organizations in the post-Covid-19 business environment. However, the research needs to be improved by the availability of data and the potential for bias in the existing literature.
In today’s business environment, sustainable leadership has gained significant attention. Sustainable leadership refers to the ability of leaders to create long-term value for their organizations by balancing the economic, social, and environmental aspects of their operations (Hodgetts, Luthans, & Doh, 2016). On the other hand, business objectives refer to the specific goals and targets that organizations set for themselves to achieve success. These objectives often include financial goals such as increasing profits or market share but may also include non-financial goals such as improving the well-being of employees or the community (Hitt, Ireland, & Hoskisson, 2016). Stakeholders, in this context, refer to the groups or individuals affected by the business’s decisions and actions. This includes shareholders and customers, employees, suppliers, and the wider community (Freeman, 1984).
The engagement of stakeholders is important as it can help organizations identify and address potential risks and opportunities and build trust and reputation (Mitchell, Agle, & Wood, 1997).In the post-Covid-19 business environment, the importance of sustainable leadership and ethical business practices has been highlighted. The pandemic has brought about significant challenges for businesses. However, it has also presented an opportunity for organizations to re-evaluate their operations and strategies and to focus on long-term resilience and sustainability (Grantham & Stengel, 2020).
One example of a company that has demonstrated sustainable leadership is Alibaba. The company strongly focuses on environmental sustainability and aims to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 (Alibaba, 2020). In addition to reducing its emissions, the company encourages its suppliers to improve their energy efficiency and reduce their carbon footprint (Alibaba, 2020). The company also prioritizes social sustainability, such as promoting education and training for employees and suppliers and supporting local communities (Alibaba, 2020).
On the other hand, Samsung Electronics, one of the world’s largest electronics manufacturers, has faced criticism for its lack of transparency and insufficient efforts toward sustainability. Samsung has been accused of failing to provide information on its suppliers and their working conditions, which led to poor labour practices, high rates of injury and death, and environmental destruction (Naughton, 2016). The ethical implications and impacts of business objectives and sustainable leadership for stakeholders can be significant. For example, when a company prioritizes short-term financial objectives over long-term sustainability, it may negatively affect employees, the community, and the environment (Carroll, 1991). On the other hand, when a company demonstrates sustainable leadership and engages stakeholders, it can build trust and reputation and identify opportunities for growth and innovation (Mitchell et al., 1997).
However, implementing sustainable and ethical practices can also present challenges for businesses. Resistance from shareholders, difficulty in measuring the impact of these practices, and lack of government support can make it easier for companies to adopt sustainable and ethical practices (Carroll, 1991). One of the biggest challenges companies may face when adopting sustainable and ethical practices is resistance from shareholders. Shareholders may be more focused on short-term financial gains. They may need to see the value in investing in sustainable and ethical practices that may not immediately impact the bottom line. For example, Samsung Electronics, a South Korean multinational electronics company, in the past has been criticized by stakeholders for labour issues in their factories; the company has since taken steps to improve working conditions and has implemented policies such as ‘no forced labour’ and ‘fair working hours,’ but still, resistance from shareholders can be a major hurdle for the company to make further advancements.
Another challenge that companies may face is measuring the impact of sustainable and ethical practices. It can be difficult to quantify the benefits of these practices, such as reduced environmental impacts or improved employee well-being, which can make it difficult to justify implementation costs. In this context, Alibaba is a Chinese multinational conglomerate holding company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. It has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions and set carbon-neutral targets by 2060. However, as the company grows and expands its operations, measuring the impact of these initiatives can be a major challenge.
In addition to these internal challenges, companies may also face external pressures and limitations. Government regulations, for example, can create barriers to adopting sustainable and ethical practices. For example, in China, the government’s strict regulations and requirements for environmental protection can take time for companies like Alibaba to implement sustainable and ethical practices at scale.
Despite these challenges, companies can still find ways to promote sustainable and ethical practices, with the help of external actors such as government, consumers and NGOs to hold them accountable. For example, the government can incentivize companies to adopt sustainable and ethical practices through tax breaks, subsidies or regulations. Consumer engagement and education can also play a key role in promoting sustainable and ethical business practices by creating demand for products and services that are produced environmentally and socially responsibly. NGOs can also hold companies accountable by monitoring their performance and addressing shortcomings.
In conclusion, while implementing sustainable and ethical practices can be challenging, companies like Alibaba and Samsung Electronics can still find ways to promote these practices with the help of the government, consumers, and NGOs. It is important for companies to continuously assess and adjust their practices to align with the changing societal and environmental demands. Despite the challenges, the benefits of sustainable and ethical practices, such as improved reputation and increased customer loyalty, can provide long-term benefits for companies and ultimately benefit society and the environment.
In conclusion, the ethical implications and impacts of business objectives and sustainable leadership for stakeholders are significant and must be carefully considered by organizations in the post-Covid-19 business environment. By demonstrating sustainable leadership and effectively engaging with stakeholders, organizations can build trust and reputation, identify opportunities for growth and innovation, and create long-term value for all stakeholders. The challenges and limitations of implementing sustainable and ethical practices must also be addressed. In the post-Covid-19 business environment, companies face increased pressure to adopt sustainable and ethical practices to maintain their competitive advantages. This includes meeting environmental and social standards and addressing their operations’ impacts on stakeholders, such as employees, customers, suppliers, and local communities.
Business objectives, such as growth and profitability, can have positive and negative ethical implications for stakeholders. For example, companies that prioritize growth may engage in practices that harm the environment or exploit workers. In contrast, companies prioritizing profitability may cut corners on safety or skimp on employee benefits. In order to address these ethical implications, companies need to adopt sustainable leadership practices that consider the long-term impacts of their actions on multiple stakeholders.
Sustainable leadership, as defined by Avolio and Walumbwa (2008), encompasses traditional leadership practices, such as visioning and decision-making, but also involves creating a culture of ethical and responsible behaviour, encouraging stakeholder engagement, and promoting social and environmental sustainability. By implementing these practices, leaders can better align their business objectives with the long-term interests of stakeholders and thus maintain a competitive advantage.
One example of a company that has adopted sustainable leadership practices is Alibaba, China’s largest e-commerce company. The company has implemented various initiatives to reduce its environmental footprint and improve working conditions for its employees and suppliers. For example, in 2019, Alibaba committed to becoming carbon neutral by 2060 and has since taken steps to reduce energy consumption, improve energy efficiency, and invest in renewable energy (Alibaba, 2020). Additionally, the company has implemented a “Green Supply Chain” program, which helps suppliers improve their environmental and social performance (Alibaba, 2020). In recent years, Alibaba has made significant efforts to become carbon neutral by 2060. The company has set several ambitious goals to reduce its carbon footprint, including reducing its energy consumption, improving its energy efficiency, and investing in renewable energy.
One key strategy that Alibaba has implemented to reduce its energy consumption is using data centers powered by renewable energy. The company has set a goal to have all of its data centers powered by renewable energy by 2022. The company has also set a target to achieve energy savings of 20% in its data centers by 2023 through energy-efficient technologies and the optimization of its operations.
To improve its energy efficiency, Alibaba has also implemented several initiatives, including the use of energy-efficient equipment and appliances and the implementation of building energy management systems. In addition, the company has set a target to reduce its energy intensity by 30% by 2023.
Another important aspect of Alibaba’s sustainable strategy is its investment in renewable energy. The company has set a target to source 25% of its energy from renewable sources by 2025 and to achieve 100% renewable energy by 2040. This includes investing in the development of wind and solar power projects, as well as the purchase of renewable energy certificates.
In addition to reducing its carbon footprint, Alibaba has also launched several initiatives to promote sustainable development and reduce carbon emissions in its supply chain. This includes working with suppliers to improve their energy efficiency and investing in sustainable transportation solutions to reduce emissions from logistics. Overall, Alibaba has committed to sustainable leadership by setting ambitious goals and taking concrete steps to reduce its carbon footprint. This includes improving its operations, investing in renewable energy, and working with suppliers to improve their energy efficiency. The company’s efforts demonstrate that it is taking a comprehensive approach to sustainability and contributing significantly to the fight against climate change. (Alibaba Group, 2022)
On the other hand, Samsung Electronics, a South Korean multinational electronics company, has faced criticism for its lack of sustainable leadership and poor treatment of workers in its supply chain. In 2016, the company was found to have used child labour in its supply chain (Amnesty International, 2016). Additionally, the company has faced criticism for its lack of transparency in disclosing information about its environmental and social impacts (Samsung, 2020). In response to these criticisms, Samsung Electronics has implemented several sustainability initiatives in recent years. The company has set a goal to become carbon neutral by 2050 and has pledged to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2025 (Samsung, 2020). To achieve this goal, the company has committed to investing in renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, and reducing its overall energy consumption.
One of Samsung Electronics’ key sustainability initiatives is its Eco-Management System (EMS), which aims to minimize the company’s environmental impact and promote sustainable production. The EMS is based on the principles of the ISO 14001 international standard for environmental management and includes implementing a range of measures to reduce energy consumption, waste, and emissions (Samsung, 2020). The company also has a circular economy management that supports recycling, reusing and recovering products and resources.
In addition to its environmental initiatives, Samsung Electronics has implemented many programs to address labour rights issues in its supply chain. The company has established a Supplier Code of Conduct, which sets out guidelines for fair labour practices and prohibits the use of child labour (Samsung, 2020). It has also established a Supplier Human Rights & Labor Compliance Program to conduct audits of its suppliers and address any identified issues (Samsung, 2020). Samsung also has initiatives to engage with consumers and increase sustainability awareness, such as the Samsung Sustainable Growth Roadmap, which outlines the company’s vision and goals for sustainable growth.
Samsung also has a sustainability report published annually to provide transparency on the company’s sustainability performance and progress. Despite these efforts, Samsung continues to face criticism for its lack of transparency and slow progress in achieving its sustainability goals (Bran, 2020). It is worth noting that Samsung is one of the largest companies in the world and has a vast supply chain, which makes it difficult to achieve sustainability goals fully. Therefore, there is always room for improvement in terms of sustainable leadership.
These examples illustrate the importance of sustainable leadership in addressing the ethical implications of business objectives and engaging effectively with stakeholders. Companies like Alibaba that prioritize sustainable leadership practices are more likely to maintain a competitive advantage in the long term by balancing the needs of multiple stakeholders. This goal aligns with the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. It reflects a commitment to address the ethical implications of the company’s business objectives and environmental impacts. In order to achieve this goal, the company has implemented several initiatives to reduce energy consumption, improve energy efficiency, and invest in renewable energy. These include building green data centers, increasing the use of electric vehicles in its logistics fleet, and promoting sustainable agriculture practices in its supply chain. On the other hand, companies like Samsung that fail to address these issues can face reputational damage and negative impacts on their bottom line.
However, it is important to note that implementing sustainable and ethical practices is challenging. Companies may face resistance from shareholders who prioritize short-term financial gains over long-term sustainability, or they may need help to measure the impact of their actions. Additionally, government policies and regulations and consumer and investor pressure play a significant role in promoting sustainable and ethical practices. Furthermore, developing a strong corporate culture that prioritizes sustainability and ethical behaviour can also be challenging.
Business leaders can engage effectively and responsibly with stakeholders to maintain competitive advantages in the post-Covid-19 business environment by implementing several strategies. Firstly, transparency and communication are crucial in building trust with stakeholders and ensuring their needs and concerns are addressed. For example, Alibaba has committed to being a transparent and responsible company, publishing annual environmental and social reports, and holding regular stakeholder engagement sessions (Alibaba, 2020). This level of transparency and communication helps build trust with stakeholders and ensures that their needs and concerns are heard and addressed.
Secondly, sustainable leadership and corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices can help business leaders balance multiple stakeholders’ needs and create long-term value for their organization. For example, Alibaba has committed to becoming carbon neutral by 2060 and investing in renewable energy to reduce energy consumption and improve energy efficiency (Alibaba, 2020). This commitment to sustainable leadership addresses the ethical implications of business objectives but also helps to create long-term value for the company and its stakeholders. On the other hand, Samsung has faced criticism for its lack of sustainable leadership and poor treatment of workers in its supply chain (Amnesty International, 2016; Samsung, 2020). This lack of sustainable leadership has led to reputational damage and negative impacts on Samsung’s bottom line.
Thirdly, business leaders can engage effectively with stakeholders by developing a strong corporate culture that prioritizes sustainable and ethical behaviour. A strong corporate culture can ensure that sustainable and ethical practices are integrated throughout the organization and not just viewed as an add-on or separate initiative. For example, Alibaba’s corporate culture prioritizes sustainability and ethical behaviour, focusing on innovation, collaboration, and social responsibility (Alibaba, 2020). This culture helps to ensure that sustainable and ethical practices are integrated throughout the organization, ultimately leading to competitive advantages.
Lastly, business leaders can engage effectively with stakeholders by implementing effective stakeholder engagement models and governance structures. This can include setting up stakeholder councils, creating stakeholder engagement guidelines, and implementing a code of conduct. For example, Samsung established the Samsung Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee in 2002, responsible for addressing the company’s environmental and social impacts and implementing sustainable business practices (Samsung, 2020). This governance structure helps to ensure that sustainable and ethical practices are integrated throughout the company, ultimately leading to competitive advantages.
In conclusion, business leaders can engage effectively and responsibly with stakeholders to maintain competitive advantages in the post-Covid-19 business environment by implementing strategies such as transparency and communication, sustainable leadership, corporate culture, and effective governance structures. As demonstrated by the case studies of Alibaba and Samsung, the companies that prioritize sustainable leadership and ethical practices are more likely to create long-term value and maintain a competitive advantage in the long run. In conclusion, this essay has critically evaluated the ethical implications and impacts of business objectives and sustainable leadership for stakeholders and how business leaders can engage effectively and responsibly with stakeholders to maintain competitive advantages in the post-Covid-19 business environment. Through the examination of relevant academic theory and contemporary business insights, and specific examples from Alibaba and Samsung Electronics, it has been demonstrated that sustainable leadership is crucial in addressing the ethical implications of business objectives and effectively engaging with stakeholders.
The analysis has shown that companies like Alibaba that prioritize sustainable leadership practices are more likely to maintain a competitive advantage in the long term by balancing the needs of multiple stakeholders. On the other hand, companies like Samsung that fail to address these issues can face reputational damage and negative impacts on their bottom line. Additionally, the essay has discussed the challenges and limitations of implementing sustainable and ethical practices and the role of government, consumers, corporate culture, and innovation in promoting these practices.
Furthermore, the essay has offered effective strategies for business leaders to engage and work with stakeholders to maintain competitive advantages in the post-Covid-19 business environment. These strategies include transparent and open communication with stakeholders, establishing a strong corporate culture that prioritizes sustainability and ethical behaviour, and continuously assessing and adjusting practices to align with changing societal and environmental demands. In light of these findings, it is recommended that future research continues to investigate the link between sustainable leadership, business objectives, and stakeholder engagement, focusing on best practices for implementing sustainable and ethical practices in the post-Covid-19 business environment.
Additionally, further research could examine the role of government and other external actors in promoting sustainable and ethical business practices and the relationship between sustainability and innovation. (Kolk, A. and Van Tulder, R. (2009). Business Strategies for a Sustainable Economy, Journal of World Business, 44(4), pp.355-366. Moffat, M., and McEwan, W. (2018) Exploring stakeholder engagement and its impact on corporate sustainability, Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), pp.641-654. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), pp.39-48.)
References
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Friedman, A. L. (2019). The business case for stakeholder engagement. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 17(1), 30-37.
Gao, X., & Wang, X. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 923-931.
Hoffman, A. J., & Breen, J. (2016). Incorporating sustainability into strategic management. Business Horizons, 59(1), 21-31.
New York Times. (2020, April 30). Amazon’s Covid-19 Response: Fulfillment Centers and Criticism. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/30/technology/amazon-coronavirus-response.html
Pan, Y., & Cheng, G. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic and Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 915-922.
Patagonia. (2020). Patagonia’s Fiscal Year 2020 Report. Retrieved from https://www.patagonia.com/fiscal-year-2020-report/
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of a business is to increase its profits—the New York Times Magazine.
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2020). Exploring corporate strategy: Text and cases. Pearson.
write