Introduction
Work stress has become a global problem spreading through the workplace and adversely affecting both staff health and company productivity. In today’s busy work environment, employees often deal with stiff competition and long working hours, which leads to a high level of stress (Nanda & Nagasubramaniyan, 2023). This chronic stress can lead to very serious health problems such as physical and mental health problems, decreased performance, and more turnovers and absentees. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the deleterious effect of work stress on employee wellness and organizational performance by inspecting the multidimensional factors that make it problematic. Chronic workplace stress, driven by mounting pressures and demands in today’s fast-paced business environment, poses severe threats to employee wellbeing and organizational productivity that necessitate comprehensive solutions.
The Problem: Stress and Its Impact on Worker Wellbeing
Stress is an ever-present phenomenon in contemporary work environments where people are expected to cope with their speedy and tumultuous workplace environment (Chen, 2023). This phenomenon depicts different facets of itself, with each facet further contributing to the erosion of employee wellbeing and reduction in organizational efficiency. The ability to comprehend the workings of stress and its multi-faceted influence is pivotal for the crafting of relevant strategies that promote a healthier and sustainable work environment (Schwepker et al., 2021).
Work-related stress is known to arise in a work environment due to different causes, commonly referred to as work-related or occupational stress (Bolliger et al., 2022). This stress is the result of work-related demands and pressures, which might be experienced as excessive workload, tight deadlines, many priorities, lack of control, or difficult relationships. Besides burnout, which is the result of exposure to stressful work conditions for an extended period of time, another critical sign of stress is the depletion of a person’s emotional, physical, and mental state. It is widely acknowledged as a psychological state involving the emotions of exhausted feelings, emotional detachments, and a low sense of self-efficacy.
The number of people experiencing stress in the workplace presently is frighteningly high and has now reached an epidemic level. Based on data from a study by the American Psychological Association, more than two-thirds of the employees in the USA stated they have a high level of work-related stress, with over a third defining their stress as extreme (Canady, 2023). This somewhat tragic statistic shows that the issue is systemic and makes the need for interventions to improve employees’ wellbeing at the workplace more evident.
The psychological distortion caused by stress extends to every direction of workers’ lives, striking various aspects of an individual’s mental health. From a physical health standpoint, chronic stress can cause a variety of conditions, including different heart diseases, such as high blood pressure, an elevated heart disease risk, and stroke (Krantz et al., 2022). Further, stress is known to make the immune system weaker. Hence, such persons may easily suffer from cold and flu. Aches, pains, stomach issues, and sleeping problems are the major inconveniences in addition to stress.
Additionally, the effect of stress on mental health cannot be neglected. Chronic stress can cause the appearance of anxiety disorders, depression, and various mood-related problems. These circumstances can tremendously undermine one’s ability to execute work tasks and personal matters. In addition to that, stress can worsen the pre-existing mental health problems of people, thus making their lives complicated (De Kock & Latham, 2023). In extreme cases, stress may initiate burnout, a sickness whereby one is emotionally and physically drained, leading to the impairment of one’s overall well-being and performance.
The outcomes of stress influence not only the state of individuals but also the performance and productivity of their organizations. Employees with chronic high levels of stress are likely to show characteristics like demotivation, impairment in the case of decision-making abilities, difficulty concentrating on tasks, and low creativity. As a result, working under distressful conditions may lower overall work performance and, hence, decrease productivity. Furthermore, stress can lead to additional causes, such as absenteeism and high attrition rates, as people struggling with the contending effects may want to take time off or even more to look for another job (Al-Suraihi et al., 2021). The companies have to make financial investments that can be very considerable, including, for example, compensating lost productivity, expenditures for healthcare, and training new workforce.
A clear example is in the financial sector, where a competitive atmosphere and long working hours are often present. In 2013, a young investment banker at a top-ranked firm in London committed suicide, which sparked a broader debate on the culture of long hours that can be very damaging to mental health (The Guardian, 2013). This disastrous event woke the industry up and increased the number of inspectors looking over the work-life balance and the provision of a better support system for employees.
Factors Contributing to Workplace Stress
Workplace stress is a multifactorial problem with a wide range of stressors, which make the problem severe and a major threat to employees’ mental health. Such influencers can be defined in a general way as organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors that altogether have a solid impact on the quality of stress in the workplace. Organizational factors, being one of the major causes of stress at work, are scientifically proven (Swamy et al., 2020). The workload, the most frequently listed cause of stress in organizing, is the quantity of work that a person is required to complete within a given period of time. Too much workload prompts stress, fatigue, and loss of strike balance between personal and business life (Dominic et al., 2021). The problem of job insecurity, a huge aspect of organizational factors, comes from worries about the future of one’s job and whether it is safe. In the ever-dynamic business environment, organizational restructuring, downsizing, or technological disruptions may all be causes of enhanced job insecurity and will result in increased stress levels and anxiety among employees.
Another factor that contributes to stress at work is a lack of control over one’s workspace as well as decision-making. The absence of employee autonomy and buy-in to decisions that directly concern their work results in the employees’ sense of hopelessness and disgruntlement (Zhou, 2020). Work-life balance can also be impacted negatively by the combination of factors such as long hours, overtime, work bleed, and stressed employees can result from this.
Interpersonal elements in the working environment, too, are a critical aspect, for they influence how the employees perceive their stress. Tensions with coworkers or bosses, no matter what the situation, be it uncoordinated communications or power struggles, can really create a hostile work environment and escalate stress levels among workers (Ramadhini & Manase, 2022). An absence of a social support network from fellow workers and supervisors may elevate the level of loneliness and burnout, and it can become harder for individuals to endure work pressure and problems.
Inside the working environment, cases of bullying, harassment, and other forms of maltreatment of workers can lead to great stress among these workers. Immoral climes like bullying, slander, and harassment tend to bring a fearful and mentally unhealthy operating scenery; ultimately, it might spoil employees’ welfare and productivity (Mostafa et al., 2021). Furthermore, leadership issues and incompetent management styles can bring down interpersonal conflicts, role ambiguity, and expectations, and eventually, an atmosphere full of lack of order and chaos within the office.
Individual factors, for example, personality traits and coping skills, can also be important in determining the level of an individual’s vulnerability to work stress. From the aspect of personality traits, specific features may be the roots of overstressing. Examples are impersonal, neuroticism, or a predilection to negative thoughts (Kamushadze et al., 2021). Consequently, dysfunctional coping mechanisms are likely to stretch the negative effects of stress for a person and may reduce the effectiveness with which they are able to manage their emotions and work commitments. It is vital to remember that these factors do not act independently, but rather, they are interrelated, with some reinforcing each other in a complex web of interconnections. On the one hand, organizational factors such as work overload and job insecurity can create conflicts between employees as they fight for limited resources or have the perception of being threatened by job losses (‘Krutova et al., 2022).
In addition, an employee’s personality traits, cognitive processes, and individual characteristics can influence how he or she deals with organizational and interpersonal stress factors. Individuals with maladaptive personality traits or ineffective coping may be more vulnerable to the negative influence of the stress of work; on the contrary, people with resilient personality traits and strong coping strategies can easily live and manage a complicated working environment. The dance between those elements could contribute to the storm of workplace stress (Jia, 2021). For instance, a worker with a perfectionistic personality trait might get more stressed by an excessive workload and behave in an irritable way to coworkers, causing bad relationships due to the withdrawal. This contributes to the reduction of social support and the subsequent increase of the sense of loneliness and isolation, and the stress cycle can be made worse.
Moreover, the combined impact of these factors can be dramatic on both the individual and societal levels. Increasingly high stress levels in the workforce can cause more absences, presenteeism (physically present on the job but mentally distracted), and turnover rates. Such impacts can be detrimental financially and operationally to organizations (Ruhle et al., 2020). The disappointed and aloof workforce is less productive, less innovative, and less likely to offer top-quality customer service, consequently undermining the profitability and competitiveness of the organization.
Proposed Solutions
Organizational Interventions
Organizations can help deal with work-related stress through well-rounded stress management programs. Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) have become a vital resource as they provide employees with confidential counseling, support services, and resources to help them manage life’s challenges. This includes stress management (Ledden, 2022). The programs give a safety lane for the employees to seek professional support and guidance without fearing the stigma or consequences of the workplace.
Another organizational intervention that brings forth powerful results is teaching and practicing mindfulness. These programs are aimed at fostering mindfulness in this present, emotional regulation, and resilience in the face of daily stress. Mindfulness-based techniques usually consist of meditation, deep breathing exercises, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (Loucks et al., 2022). These programs purposefully teach employees the tactical strategies to deal with thinking, emotional, and physical responses to stress, providing them with the essential capability to enable them to maintain concentration, clarity, and general wellbeing, even in the midst of challenging work environments.
Another primary measure that organizations can resort to to reduce stress levels in the workplace is prioritizing work-life balance by formulating and adapting work policies and practices. Flexible work arrangements that allow employees to choose between remote jobs, shortened workweeks, and flexible timing diminishes the conflict between the duties at home and those at work (Orishede & Ndudi, 2020). Similarly, creating a work environment that allows for appropriate workloads and fosters a work-life balance is crucial for preventing overloading or stress (Kelly et al., 2020). Humanizing: Companies would make efforts to prioritize the employees’ physical and mental wellness by offering amenities like health clubs, coaching, or counseling facilities on-site to show their care and dedication towards creating a culture that supports employees’ comprehensive health.
Management and leadership skills, including the support of workers’ wellness, are indispensable for the creation of a culture in the organization that is aimed at employee wellbeing. The training that leaders and managers may invest in will have the key skills demonstrated in certain areas like empathy, communication, handling conflicts as well as creating a healthy working environment (Dimitrov & Vazova 2020). Through establishing a culture of open communication, trust, and respect, leaders will achieve an environment that is stress-free and employee involvement is at optimal points; therefore, productivity is at a high level. When workers feel appreciated, cared for, and led by management that supports them, they will be able to deal with the stress and challenges of their jobs more effectively and confidently.
Individual Interventions
While organizational interventions are critical, it is equally important to empower individuals with stress management techniques that can be integrated into their daily lives. Regular exercise and physical activity have been scientifically proven to be effective in reducing stress and improving overall wellbeing. Engaging in physical exercise not only provides a healthy outlet for stress but also releases endorphins, which can improve mood and promote a sense of wellbeing (Khan & Wei, 2023). Relaxation techniques, such as deep breathing exercises, progressive muscle relaxation, and mindfulness meditation, can also be powerful tools in an individual’s stress management arsenal. By consciously engaging in these practices, individuals can counteract the physiological and psychological effects of stress, promoting a greater sense of calm and emotional balance.
For those who are dealing with such issues as stress, anxiety, or other mental health challenges, professional therapy and counseling may offer much-needed guidance and help. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based therapeutic approach that individuals apply to recognize and modify their unhealthy thoughts and behaviors, leading to stress and anxiety (Hayes & Hofmann, 2021).
Furthermore, resilience training programs could be helpful because they are teaching people to develop psychological resilience and adaptability in the face of stress and severe pressure (Varela et al., 2020). Through these programs, participants learn how to develop mental toughness, emotion regulation abilities, and a growth mindset that ultimately helps them to cope better and recover faster when faced with difficulties and failures. By integrating very professional therapeutic support with resilience training, people can collect a comprehensive toolkit for dealing with stress and providing mental health promotion.
Evaluating Effectiveness
Research data and practical scenarios serving as proof that these measures lead to substantial stress reduction in workplaces and staff wellbeing promotion are presented. Experimental studies, including meta-analyses and systematic reviews, have demonstrated that employment assistance programs (EAPs) have been effective in meeting the target job performance, reducing absenteeism, and high productivity (Cossin et al., 2021). Contrastingly, research reveals that the act of being mindful when doing meditation in the workplace reduces work-related stress, anxiety, and emotional fatigue.
Research from credible organizations like the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that high satisfaction with job and balance of lifestyle, plus lower turnover intention, are associated with flexible work schedules (White & Maniam, 2020). Moreover, systematic reviews in the Journal of Applied Psychology have pinpointed that physical activity interventions designed for the workforce significantly cut down perceived stress levels and generally improve employees’ wellbeing, an outcome that is consistent with results from the studies explored.
The Aetna healthcare company, which is one of the leaders in this field, introduced a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for their employees (Gordon, 2020). The results were very encouraging, yielding a 28% drop in stress levels, a 20% rise in sleep quality, and an average productivity gain of $3,000 per employee. This realistic case suggests how mindfulness-based interventions could bring about the desired outcomes for the employees’ wellness and productivity in the organization. Additionally, “Search Inside Yourself,” Google’s popular initiative that addresses emotional intelligence and mindfulness, has gained increased popularity (Caporale-Berkowitz et al., 2021).
Conclusion
Controlling workplace stress requires addressing the overall factors like organizational, interpersonal, and individual contributors. Utilizing proven methods like employee assistance programs, mindfulness training, flexible work settings, and leadership development within organizations will be helpful in facilitating an environment that focuses on the employees’ wellbeing. Moreover, offering stress management techniques, counseling resources, and resilience training allow people to meet the requirements. Studies point to the effectiveness of these different approaches that go all the way to alleviate stress, cut down loss of man-hours, boost productivity, and create a mentally healthy workforce.
References
Al-Suraihi, W. A., Samikon, S. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2021). Employee Turnover Causes, Importance and Retention Strategies. European Journal of Business and Management Research (EJBMR). http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.893
Bolliger, L., Lukan, J., Colman, E., Boersma, L., Luštrek, M., De Bacquer, D., & Clays, E. (2022). Sources of occupational stress among office workers—a focus group study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031075
Canady, V. A. (2023). APA poll: Demand for care, worker burnout, putting strain on psychologists. Mental Health Weekly, 33(47), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/mhw.33239
Caporale-Berkowitz, N. A., Boyer, B. P., Lyddy, C. J., Good, D. J., Rochlen, A. B., & Parent, M. C. (2021). Search inside yourself: investigating the effects of a widely adopted mindfulness-at-work development program. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(6), 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1108%2Fijwhm-08-2020-0139
Chen, P. Y. (2023). Occupational stress. Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. http://doi.org/10.1027/00508-000
Cossin, T., Thaon, I., & Lalanne, L. (2021). Workaholism prevention in occupational medicine: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(13), 7109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137109
De Kock, J. H., & Latham, H. A. (2023). Will we ever be the same again? The mental health impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on health care staff and institutions. Cytopathology. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13242
Dimitrov, Y., & Vazova, T. (2020). Developing capabilities from the scope of emotional intelligence as part of the soft skills needed in the long-term care sector: presentation of pilot study and training methodology. Journal of primary care & community health, 11, 2150132720906275. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132720906275
Dominic, C., Gopal, D. P., & Sidhu, A. (2021). ‘It’s like juggling fire daily’: Wellbeing, workload and burnout in the British NHS-A survey of 721 physicians. Work, 70(2), 395-403. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/74705/Gopal%20’It’s%20like%20juggling%20fire%20daily’:%20Well-being,%20workload%20and%20burnout%20in%20the%20British%20NHS%20-%20A%20survey%20of%20721%20physicians.%202021%20Accepted.pdf?sequence=2
Gordon, F. (2020). The Impact of Work-Based Mindfulness Programmes on Employee Health (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland). https://norma.ncirl.ie/4794/1/francesgordon.pdf
Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2021). “Third‐wave” cognitive and behavioral therapies and the emergence of a process‐based approach to intervention in psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 20(3), 363-375. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20884
Jia, Q. (2021). Taiwan: Can a perfect storm be averted?. China International Strategy Review, 3, 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00080-0
Kamushadze, T., Martskvishvili, K., Mestvirishvili, M., & Odilavadze, M. (2021). Does perfectionism lead to wellbeing? The role of flow and personality traits. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.5964%2Fejop.1987
Kelly, M., Soles, R., Garcia, E., & Kundu, I. (2020). Job stress, burnout, work-life balance, wellbeing, and job satisfaction among pathology residents and fellows. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 153(4), 449-469. DOI: 10.1093/AJCP/AQAA013
Khan, Z., & Wei, L. (2023). Exploring the Link Between Physical Activity and Mental Wellbeing: Implications for Health Promotion. Journal Of Psychology, Health And Social Challenges, 1(02), 116-131. http://jphasc.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/10
Krantz, D. S., Shank, L. M., & Goodie, J. L. (2022). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a systemic disorder: Pathways to cardiovascular disease. Health Psychology, 41(10), 651. https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fhea0001127
Krutova, O., Turja, T., Koistinen, P., Melin, H., & Särkikoski, T. (2022). Job insecurity and technology acceptance: an asymmetric dependence. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 20(1), 110-133. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/143400/Job_insecurity_and_technology_acceptance.pdf?sequence=1
Ledden, V. (2022). The Efficacy of Employee Assistance Programs: Connecting HR & EAP Practitioners in the Irish Context (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland). https://norma.ncirl.ie/5887/1/victorialedden.pdf
Loucks, E. B., Crane, R. S., Sanghvi, M. A., Montero-Marin, J., Proulx, J., Brewer, J. A., & Kuyken, W. (2022). Mindfulness-based programs: why, when, and how to adapt?. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 11, 21649561211068805. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/gam
Mostafa, A. M. S., Farley, S., & Zaharie, M. (2021). Examining the boundaries of ethical leadership: The harmful effect of coworker social undermining on disengagement and employee attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 174, 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04586-2
Nanda, P. K., & Nagasubramaniyan, G. (2023). Development of a comprehensive stress assessment tool for Indian public sector employees. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00262-9
Orishede, F., & Ndudi, E. F. (2020). Flexible work arrangement and employee performance: A review. Journal of Resources & Economic Development, 3(1), 86-103. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francis-Ndudi/publication/354682319_FLEXIBLE_WORK_ARRANGEMENT_AND_EMPLOYEE_PERFORMANCE_A_REVIEW/links/6146101fa3df59440b97db91/FLEXIBLE-WORK-ARRANGEMENT-AND-EMPLOYEE-PERFORMANCE-A-REVIEW.pdf
Ramadhini, C., & Manafe, L. A. (2022). The Leader Effective Communication in Solving Employee Conflict; REACH Analysis. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 3(2), 172-188. http://repository.stiemahardhika.ac.id/3890/2/Turnitin%2013%20-%20The%20Leader%20Effective.pdf
Ruhle, S. A., Breitsohl, H., Aboagye, E., Baba, V., Biron, C., Correia Leal, C., … & Yang, T. (2020). “To work, or not to work, that is the question”–Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 344-363. https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/38757/1/1234278_Whysall.pdf
Schwepker Jr, C. H., Valentine, S. R., Giacalone, R. A., & Promislo, M. (2021). Good barrels yield healthy apples: organizational ethics as a mechanism for mitigating work-related stress and promoting employee wellbeing. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04562-w
Swamy, L., Mohr, D., Blok, A., Anderson, E., Charns, M., Wiener, R. S., & Rinne, S. (2020). Impact of workplace climate on burnout among critical care nurses in the Veterans Health Administration. American Journal of Critical Care, 29(5), 380-389. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2020831
The Guardian. (2013). Moritz Erhardt: the tragic death of a City intern. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/oct/05/moritz-erhardt-internship-banking
Varela, S. M., Hanrahan, S. J., DeCano, P., Cook, C. R., & Barrett, P. M. (2020). Promoting positive development: Coaches as trainers in sports‐based resilience programs. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 28(2), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJR.12626
White, C., & Maniam, B. (2020). Flexible working arrangements, worklife balance, and working women. Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(1), 59-73.
Zhou, E. (2020). The “too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect of job autonomy and its explanation mechanism. Psychology, 11(2), 299-313. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.112019
write