Special obligations encompass the ethical duties and accountabilities that arise from specific positions, relationships, or commitments that individuals assume. These obligations are distinct from general moral principles that apply universally and instead pertain to the unique context and expectations associated with certain roles (Davidovic, n.d). For example, a parent has special obligations towards their children, such as providing care, guidance, and support, which may not extend to others. Likewise, doctors have special obligations towards their patients, including providing competent medical care, maintaining confidentiality, and prioritizing patient well-being. These special obligations recognize that certain roles inherently involve moral responsibilities that go beyond the general principles guiding our interactions with others in society. Role morality thus acknowledges the differentiated moral obligations that arise when individuals occupy specific roles or positions.
In military service, individuals assume unique moral obligations arising from their role’s inherent nature. These obligations encompass a range of responsibilities that distinguish military personnel from civilians. They include the duty to safeguard and defend their nation, uphold the fundamental principles and values of the military institution, and obediently follow lawful orders issued by their superiors. Such commitments often entail significant personal sacrifices and potentially jeopardize their lives while carrying out their duties. Whether on the battlefield or in support roles, service members are expected to prioritize their country’s and its citizens’ greater good, demonstrating a profound sense of duty, honor, and selflessness.
Guidelines regarding how military staff should conduct themselves fluctuate based on where they are located at any given time. Rules pertaining to adversarial service members outline specific methods for engaging with them that specify when it’s appropriate or not okay to use force against them during confrontations- aiming for fairness and minimizing impact where achievable whenever feasible. Those governing the treatment of nationals from other countries focus more strictly on keeping them safe – emphasizing welfare in its implementation. The mandate for soldiers is to take all possible measures to maintain the security of civilians while treating them with consideration and respect at all times.
Captain’s decision aboard H.M.S Alacrity has left many doubting its prudence in context with risking perilous dangers alongside their commands’ lives. Nevertheless, some people have pointed out how crucial it was for him to prioritize protecting these boats during amphibious landings and guaranteeing mission success, consequently justifying such decisions (Robinson & Woodward, 1992). All relevant facts need proper examination concerning specifics such as precise contexts or available data from that time frame while factoring in Captain’s opinion regarding probable effects, thus, giving way for a fair judgment.
Shifting to the case of “Per Diem,” special obligations come into play in the context of a friendship. The question arises regarding the special obligations one may have towards a friend, in this case, Grace. While a sense of loyalty and support may be owed to a friend, it does not necessarily justify falsifying an expense report. Special obligations should not override considerations of honesty and integrity (Skerker, n.d). Falsifying the expense report would be ethically questionable and could have consequences for one’s own integrity and reputation.
Special obligations to Grace may create tension between personal relationships and broader considerations of constraints and consequences (Skerker, n.d). While there may be a desire to help a friend, evaluating the ethical implications and potential harm that may result from compromising moral principles is essential. Balancing special obligations and broader ethical considerations requires careful deliberation and a commitment to acting with integrity.
In conclusion, special obligations and role morality are important factors to consider when examining moral questions in specific contexts. Military service entails unique moral obligations, while friendships and personal relationships may also involve special obligations. It is crucial to navigate these obligations ethically, considering the broader consequences and upholding fundamental moral principles.
References
Davidovic, J. (n.d.). Special obligations and role morality [Video]. Retrieved from [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z82EpQWx9I]
Robinson, P., & Woodward, S. (1992). Orders to HMS Alacrity. In One Hundred Days: The Memoirs of the Falkland Battle Group Commander (pp. 203). Naval Institute Press.
Skerker, M. (n.d.). Per Diem. Retrieved from [https://nautilus.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-31493-dt-message-rid-9249_1/xid-9249_1]
Walzer, M. (n.d.). Michael Walzer on Just War Theory [Video]. Retrieved from [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcBovmGZSPU]
write