Debates relating to multifaceted abortion have remained relevant from historical times to date. Proponents of pro-choice justify abortion as they highlight the significance of reproductive autonomy. Pro-choice argues that women have the right to make decisions about their bodies. On the other hand, pro-life proponents recognize that abortion involves the termination of a developing human being and raises critical questions about the rights of the unborn child. Research by Huq et al. indicates abortion involves elimination through the murder of a living being and should not be allowed anywhere in the world. Many religious articles and beliefs argue that life begins at conception immediately after fusion. The fetus is an innocent being with less ability to defend itself and should not be killed but instead protected. Abortion is depicted as ethically wrong as it destroys a future human being, denying the fetus to grow, develop and enjoy the experiences of life. Another reason abortion should be banned at global levels is that abortion also undermines the principle that all human lives should be treated with dignity. Research by the University Of Missouri School Of Medicine indicates that terminating pregnancy through abortion cuts the fetus’s potential for a fulfilling life. Every human being is entitled to respect and protection, regardless of their stage of development. With consideration of abortion as a murder of innocent life and a denial of dignity for life, abortion deserves a worldwide prohibition.
Another reason that justifies the global banning of abortion is the availability of alternative options that promote life and support the unborn baby in cases of financial hardships for the mother. Research by Chemlal and Russo states abortion has been used as the only known solution to unplanned pregnancies. However, alternatives such as adoption have made it easy for mothers who tend to justify abortion to seek other strategies to address their needs and that of their unborn children. Women who choose adoption over abortion are emotionally satisfied and patent mental peace.
Additionally, some crisis pregnancy centers help victims of unplanned pregnancies, eliminating abortion as the only choice. These centers help with financial aid, medical care, and counseling and have been empowering women to choose the life of their unborn children. Due to the availability of abortion alternatives, women are helped to raise their babies with ease, disapproving of their initial choices of abortion. An abortion ban is necessary.
Another justification for the worldwide ban on abortion is that abortion contributes to psychological, physical, and emotional harm to the women who participate in it. Abortion brings about mental-related health issues, including guilt, depression, sadness, and anxiety in women participating. The study by Pourreza and Batebi indicates that abortion is closely linked to undermined mental implications, raising crucial ethical concerns. Since society values women’s mental wellness, prevention strategies that aim at upholding women’s mental health should be implemented. Additionally, abortion should face global prohibition following potential gender disparities and gender discrimination associated with abortion. Some countries encourage selective abortion with the aim of gender balance, elimination of certain groups believed to be inferior to society, and population control.
In most cases, female pregnancies are terminated in attempts to curb gender imbalances. This behavior perpetuates gender discrimination. Considering the elimination of life and potential psychological or physical harm associated with abortion and the gender discrimination associated with abortion, abortion should not be welcomed in any part of the world.
Although the worldwide banning of abortion is recommended for upholding ethical and moral values, it may not always yield positive results. Abortions should be allowed worldwide, allowing women to make decisions about their bodies, where there is a need to deal with psychological issues that come from sexual crimes, which include rape, incest, and child abuse, and where there is a need to solve pregnancy cases that relate to fetal impairment. However, although women should be allowed to make their choices concerning their lives, it is crucial to consider the rights to the life of the developing human life. A study by Berber indicates that recognizing the moral status of the unborn human life becomes evident that protecting the sanctity of life should be a priority, which upholds the worldwide criminalization of abortion. Reproductive health services, education and therapeutic support, and other material support should be given to women facing unplanned pregnancies to support them and their unborn life. Through helping, women will reconsider their decision to abort and not necessarily need the legalization of abortions.
In conclusion, abortion is a critical global issue that has progressively attracted heated and emotional debates. Abortion should face worldwide prohibition. Abortion involves the termination of an innocent life. The arguments that support the global banning of abortion wins. Although, in some instances, abortion is necessary, the probability of those situations happening is minimal. It is, therefore, the role of individual members of society to take responsibility for their actions to avoid instances of abortion. Upon legalization of abortion, women and adolescent girls will be allowed to abort as often as they wish. This situation will lead to an increment in moral decay in our society and the potential spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Following the numerous rots that come with abortion, abortion should face a worldwide ban.
Work Cited
Allotey, Pascale, et al. “Trends in Abortion Policies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 42, no. 1, 2 Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442
Berer, Marge. “Abortion Law and Policy around the World: In Search of Decriminalization.” Health and Human Rights, vol. 19, no. 1, June 2017, pp. 13–27, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473035/.
Chemlal, Sonia, and Giuliano Russo. “Why Do They Take the Risk? A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Literature on Informal Sector Abortions in Settings Where Abortion Is Legal.” BMC Women’s Health, vol. 19, no. 1, 8 Apr. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0751-0.
Huq, M. E., et al. “Why Abortion Is Illegal? Comparison of Legal and Illegal Abortion: A Critical Review.” Mymensingh Medical Journal: MMJ, vol. 26, no. 4, 1 Oct. 2017, pp. 944–952, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29208889/.
Pourreza, Abolghasem, and Aziz Batebi. “Psychological Consequences of Abortion among the Post Abortion Care Seeking Women in Tehran.” Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011, pp. 31–6, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395931/.
University of Missouri School of Medicine. “Abortion.” Missouri.edu, 2019, medicine.missouri.edu/centers-institutes-labs/health-ethics/faq/abortion.
write