Report on S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions and Stock Price Reactions

Abstract

The S&P 500 index is a commonly used benchmark in the financial markets, and investors and analysts frequently pay close attention to movements in the stocks that make up the index. This research looks into the stock market responses to two significant S&P 500 index-related events: the inclusion of new businesses and the deletion of existing ones. Using an event research approach, we examine the reaction variations between additions and deletions and determine whether stock prices show statistically significant reactions to these occurrences.

Introduction

Background

In the global financial system context, the Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) index occupies a significant place. The index, which consists of 500 of the most prominent American publicly traded firms, serves as a crucial benchmark for investors and offers information on the overall performance of the American stock market. Events of great significance are modifications to the S&P 500’s member firms, notably their additions and removals.

When a firm satisfies the requirements to be included in the S&P 500, frequently because of its market size, liquidity, and sector representation, it is added to the index. In contrast, deletions refer to removing a firm from the index, frequently due to elements such as declining market capitalization or modifications to the fundamentals of the company’s operations. These occurrences may have far-reaching effects on the directly impacted companies and the larger investment community.

Research Purposes

This paper aims to accomplish the following research goals:

1. Determine whether there are any notable stock price reactions to additions and deletions to the S&P 500 index.
2. Examine how stock price responses to additions and deletions vary from one another and look into any differences that may exist.
3. Investigate whether the observed reactions are permanent or transitory and offer insights into the variables influencing these dynamics.
4. Determine whether stock price reactions to additions and deletions are symmetric or asymmetric, then investigate any market variables responsible for these variations.

Research Review

The methodology used in this study is based on event study analysis, a tried-and-true method for analyzing how particular occurrences affect financial markets. An understanding of how stock prices respond to various business events, such as mergers and acquisitions, earnings reports, and changes in index composition, has been gained via prior studies in event studies.

Methodology

The methodology methodology used in this study intends to use event study methodologies to analyze the price implications of changes to the S&P 500 index. Data collection, event window definition, abnormal return computation, and estimation of cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) are the methodology’smethodology’s main steps.

1. Data collection: Data on daily stock returns are acquired from the CRSP via WRDS, while information on risk factors is taken from the website of Professor Kenneth French. Additionally, historical S&P 500 index constituents are used from the supplied dataset and their start and end dates (indicated by PERMNO). From July 1962 to November 2013, the sample period is comprised.
2. Event dates are referred to as Day 0 in the event window definition. The study looks at several event windows, including Day 0, Day 1, Day -1 to 1, Day -5 to 5, and Day -10 to 10.
3. Calculation of Abnormal Returns: For each event, abnormal returns are calculated by comparing the actual and expected returns. Expected returns are calculated using various models with a 180-day estimating period, including market returns (S&P 500 index’s total return or CRSP value-weighted index return), CAPM returns, and FF3 model returns.
4. Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns (CAAR): CAAR is calculated by averaging abnormal returns over event windows. The CAAR shows the total effect of the event on stock prices.
5. Statistical Analysis: The study evaluates the statistical significance of the aberrant Results. To assess the importance of CAAR and identify whether stock price reactions are statistically different from zero, the t-statistic is computed.

Results

Based on an event study analysis, the findings of this study offer insights into the stock price responses to additions and removals in the S&P 500 index. The analysis evaluated multiple event windows, including the inclusion day (Day 0), the next day (Day 1), Day -1 to 1, Day -5 to 5, and Day -10 to 10, throughout a sample period spanning from July 1962 to November 2013. Below is a discussion of the main findings:

a) Reactions in Stock Prices:

According to the analysis, stock prices do alter in response to changes in the composition of the S&P 500 index. For additions and deletions, these reactions take on different characteristics.

• Stock prices have a statistically significant positive response when a stock is added to the S&P 500 index. This implies that the market perception of inclusion in the index is favorable, increasing stock prices.
• Removals: In contrast, stock prices have a statistically significant adverse reaction when a stock is removed from the index. Stock prices fall due to the market’s perception of deletion as bad.

(b) Temporariness vs. permanence:

According to the analysis, price responses to index changes are mainly transient. While the inclusion or deletion day (Day 0) significantly impacts stock prices, the effects tend to fade over time. It is evident from several event windows that aberrant returns rebound to near-zero values after a few days. As a result, it is possible that the early market reactions are essentially transient and that stock prices will eventually reach a new equilibrium level.

(c) Reaction Symmetry:

The study examined the symmetry of the responses to additions and deletions. The reactions were discovered to be asymmetrical. Positive abnormal returns are produced by index additions, and negative returns are produced by index deletions. Deletions frequently show more significant adverse reactions than positive replies, and these reactions varied in intensity as well. The market’s perception of the effects of index changes is to blame for these asymmetries.

(d) Analysis’s limitations:

Despite the insightful conclusions drawn from this investigation, specific restrictions exist. First, the study claims market efficiency that may only sometimes hold in practice. The research does not consider the potential effects of other events or macroeconomic variables that might affect stock prices during the event window. The selection of estimate models (such as CAPM or FF3) can also add variation to the outcomes. The study also concentrated on short-term price reactions; a long-term investigation might show different dynamics.

Discussions

The findings of this study provide some crucial new information about how stock prices respond to changes in the makeup of the S&P 500 index. First, the results show that stock prices respond strongly to index additions and cancellations. Such reactions may have significant ramifications for investors and portfolio managers who follow and trade S&P 500 constituents.

The imbalance in price reactions between additions and removals is one of the most startling findings. The market’s excitement about the company’s addition is reflected in the positive and statistically significant reaction when a stock is added to the index. Deletions, conversely, elicit negative responses from the market, indicating fear about the company’s withdrawal from the esteemed index. The market’s interpretation of the effects of index changes, which views additions as a positive endorsement and deletions as a negative evaluation, can be blamed for this disparity.

Conclusion

This study looks at how stock prices respond to changes in the S&P 500 index, both positive and negative. It demonstrates how strongly stock prices react, with additions producing positive reactions and deletions producing negative ones. These responses, however, are transient and quickly return to near-zero levels after the incident. The market’s assessments of the effects of index changes are seen in the disparity in reactions.

References

Chen, N. F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. Journal of Business, 383-403.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.

Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Das, S., & Hlavka, M. (1993). Efficiency with costly information: A reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolios. The review of financial studies, 6(1), 1-22.

Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 159–178.

Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The journal of finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3–56.