With the increasing need for clinical innovation, the care coordination plan demands a more comprehensive emphasis. Physicians and clinical workforce members need to contemplate engaging a high expert measure in resolving the consideration requests presented to them (Kapnadak et al., 2020). Collaboration is required for proper communication and building confidence among colleagues as well as patients. The assessment scenario allows us to have a comprehensive understanding of the necessity for a well-organized multidisciplinary, coordinated effort among medical caregivers, families, and other care providers. The problem involves a patient who demands the best consideration practice, which necessitates a collaborative effort and proof consideration execution. Clinical specialists should try a progression of tests and reviews to build up and make free motions in identifying and assessing a particular analysis (Valizadeh et al., 2020). This is also accessible for the scenario analysis.
Evidence-Based Care Plan to Improve the Safety and Outcomes
The case study clearly shows that the patient needs an intensive care strategy to enhance her health. According to the case study, the patient Caitlyn has Cystic fibrosis, a health complication characterized by lung infection and trouble breathing in general. Cystic fibrosis is a health complication that demands a well-coordinated care coordination plan to analyze and determine the permissible activities that support a patient’s well-being (Kapnadak et al., 2020) If not treated early enough, Cystic fibrosis may have devastating outcomes for the patient. As a consequence, the most evident strategy for enhancing the care plan is health hygiene and ensuring that the patients are surrounded by ideal air (Okumura & Kleinhenz, 2016). Cystic fibrosis causes the thick mucus membrane to create more mucus, causing breathing to be restricted.
Consequently, the medical professional should encourage patients to work in a safe setting on a frequent basis as an evidence-based strategy. Appropriate nutrition may also be beneficial in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. Excellent nutrition helps patients’ immune systems grow, assisting in the interventional interaction of health conditions.
How an EBP model was used to help develop the care plan
Following a comprehensive review of Caitlyn’s health state, the John Hopkins EBP model was employed to aid her recovery. The John Hopkins Model, according to Okumura & Kleinhenz (2016), is more cross-over since it incorporates procedural measures such as issue identification, evaluation of the best evidence, and practice of the best evidence. The first stage of the model, issue identification, is completed by a thorough test strategy in which Dr. Copeland did a basic analysis of the patient’s evaluation with the assistance of other medical professionals. The care collaboration strategy was well-received in the early stages, and its efficacy was reflected in the patient’s well-being cycle. The next strategy in the John Hopkins Model is the evaluation of the best evidence on the identified health conditions. This information was utilized by the expert while advising other medical professionals on how to treat the health conditions.
The third strategy in the John Hopkins EBP model is the application of the best-identified model and strategy (Kapnadak et al., 2020). This third strategy was critical in that it was done in collaboration with the patients and their immediate relatives. The EBP model was utilized to determine the most fundamental requirements of the patients. Collaboration must be used in Caitlyn’s care, with nurses and medical team members working together to tackle her health problems.
Relevant Evidence in The Decision-Making Process
The care system is undertaken by making significant use of beneficial care techniques that are competently needed in the context of a certain health issue. In Caitlyn’s health scenario, many pieces of evidence were investigated and evaluated. The system maintained that the key care decision was the test done under care collaboration with interdisciplinary team members. The test on the patients was designed to elicit their true worries. The tests resulted in detailed conclusions that fulfilled Caitlyn’s principal interest. Under the leadership of Dr. Copeland, the test findings help in decision-making.
Benefits and strategies to mitigate the barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration
In the collaboration cycle, great leadership refines the success of a remote team (Butler et al., 2016). The incorporation of a transformational leadership strategy into the care collaboration plan is crucial for addressing interdisciplinary issues that may obstruct progress. The care cycle in the case study demonstrated the application of the transformational leadership strategy. Excellent communication and meetings in a care collaboration plan may also be effective in coping with interdisciplinary challenges. Individuals in the team become more cooperative due to effective communication, which aids in the achievement of crucial objectives (Valizadeh et al., 2020). Taking on interdisciplinary challenges provides a lot of benefits, including supporting interdisciplinary team members with coordination and management.
The collaboration cycle promotes satisfactory advice among team members (Butler et al., 2016). Taking care of interdisciplinary difficulties also allows for a more efficient updating process, in which nurses learn about diverse care systems from their partners (Valizadeh et al., 2020). Overall, remote collaboration assists in the shifting geographical location of patient care difficulties. Consequently, transformational leadership and a collaborative communication style should be used to address any issues that may occur as a result of such projects.
References
Butler, A., Hall, H., & Copnell, B. (2016). A guide to writing a qualitative systematic review protocol to enhance evidence‐based practice in nursing and health care. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 13(3), 241-249.
Kapnadak, S. G., Dimango, E., Hadjiliadis, D., Hempstead, S. E., Tallarico, E., Pilewski, J. M., … & Simon, R. H. (2020). Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus guidelines for the care of individuals with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 19(3), 344-354.
Okumura, M. J., & Kleinhenz, M. E. (2016). Cystic fibrosis transitions of care: lessons learned and future directions for cystic fibrosis. Clinics in chest medicine, 37(1), 119-126.
Valizadeh, L., Zamanzadeh, V., Babaei, N., & Avazeh, M. (2020). Challenges and strategies for implementing evidence-based practice in nursing: A systematic review. Research in Medical Education, 12(3), 55-67.
write