Migrants are individuals who are fond of moving from one country to the other. According to some professions, for example, James, there is no clear definition of migrants. However, the more straightforward way various individuals define the term is to consider it to be the process in which individuals coming from a given state or, instead, the country migrates from one state or country to the other. The United Kingdom is comprised of various countries that joined to form the United States or the kingdom. Initially, small countries were used to make up the United Kingdom. However, because there was a rampant expansion of the state due to much business that was conducted alongside the trading activities between and among the individuals, there was the enlargement of various countries and, more so, the addition of the countries that are found within the United Kingdom (Christensen, 2020). Migrants, as the term state, are considered to be individuals moving from one region to the next or from one country to the other. The action of individuals moving from one country to the other is called the migration process.
A motion has been proposed indicating whether wealthy countries should consider the exclusion of potential migrants at any given time. Remember, the term exclusion is more about stopping individuals from migrating from one region to the next or actually from one country to another. Throughout this paper, we will major in our point of view on whether wealthy countries should consider the exclusion of migrants at any given time. Migrants sometimes need to move from one country to another for several reasons. To support this motion, we will also major our point of discussion on the answer that supports the above idea or topic, whether yes or no. The following is a rare picture showing individuals or migrants.
(Christensen, 2020)
As proposed by the question posed whether wealthy countries should consider the exclusion of migrants at any given time, I think my opinion is no. Remember, when there is the exclusion of migrants, there will be no room for the individuals to move from one country to another; in other words, individuals will not be allowed to move from one region to the next or from one country to the other. Migration of individuals from one region to the next is embarked with several reasons. When the wealthy countries form most of the white countries, especially the ones found in the United States, excluding the action of migration between and among individuals, remember that this is considered a violation of the rights and the freedom of the citizens in different countries. In the United Nations, there is a freedom that state that individuals can move freely from one point to the other or the individual can migrate from one region of the country to the next. In most of the United Nations, there is a freedom of movement between and among individuals to and from various regions and countries (McIntyre, 2015). Due to this fact, it is therefore not essential or good for wealthy countries to exclude migrants. Exclusion of the migrants provided in this situation is considered more of a violation of human freedom and right. Remember, most of the freedom and human rights are made and formulated by the state in each state government to guard and secure the living style for most citizens in any given country. For the proper running of the country at any given time, there must be a state of agreement between the government and its citizens. The majority of the United Nations have therefore signed a state of agreement that there is freedom of movement between and among individuals in any given country.
This implies that any inconvenience that comes in by trying to stop individuals or migrants from one country to the next is considered a violation of human rights. On the other hand, individuals could have stayed in a given country, having migrated from other countries. In such situations, these individuals are considered citizens of the countries they migrated into. This has been so in most of the United Nations since individuals have the freedom or right to stay at any place they find their point of interest. This has been done to ensure that individuals are comfortable with the areas they consider their central residents. Remember, different tastes and preferences exist between individuals concerning the places they could live in. Therefore, this has been made a right by the United Nations to make sure that individuals attain their living in the environments they consider to be their favourite. Excluding potential migrants will force individuals to leave areas they consider unfavourable (Braidotti, 2013). This will readily lead to a rise in crime cases in most countries because the citizens in that country consider the country not to be a favourable place to attain their living. For different countries to ensure stability in their countries and, more so, the reduction of crime cases alongside other inconveniences, individuals should, therefore, not consider the exclusion of potential migrants. This idea will comfort the individuals living in a given country by creating freedom of movement, which will generate peace in most wealthy countries. The following is a sign showing the freedom of movement, especially in the United Nations.
(Braidotti, 2013).
Several reasons are backed by the idea of not excluding potential migrants, especially in wealthy countries. Remember, several reasons make individuals migrate from one region to the next or from one country to the next. Most individuals move from one country to the next in search of jobs to satisfy their basic needs. Allowing individuals to move freely from one country to the next enables them to interact fully (Pogge, 2014). Throughout this interaction atmosphere, there is the phase of individuals securing some of the tasks outside their countries. This will help the individuals secure the chances of getting jobs outside their countries, which will help eradicate poverty in most of the United Nations. Most countries need job vacancies for several reasons, such as increased population and low amount of money that can be used to employ most individuals, especially by the state government.
Allowing individuals to move freely at any given point helps them secure a chance of getting a job in other countries, enabling them to satisfy their daily basic and human wants(Alexander-Kasparik, 2017). Most individuals in various countries have the potential to work in various sites jobs, but there needs to be more space or vacant through which they can secure the tasks. This will make it difficult for these individuals to satisfy their basic needs. The migration act is one of the main ways individuals or the country can lower poverty among its citizens. Therefore, there should be no exclusion of potential migrants, especially in wealthy countries.
Secondly, wealthy countries should not consider the exclusion of potential migrants because the process of migration is one of the ways that is utilised by the majority of individuals to escape most of the wars and epidermis that have struck most of the countries. There could be a war between and among some countries, especially in the United Nations. The way may have resulted in disagreements among countries (Patton, 2016). Therefore, this idea will make most individuals feel less comfortable leaving a given country. As a result, countries should therefore be in a position to allow individuals to move into and out of the country hence migration and be termed as migrants. This idea will therefore help the majority of the individuals to rescue their lives and save the lives of the majority of the citizens. Remember, stability in any given country is lowered when there is a war at any given time. Due to this reason, the idea of people migrating from one region to the other or from one point and country to the other will help increase the stability level in any given country. This will be facilitated due to a decrease in the level of the citizens in a country who can participate in the ongoing war. This is one of the most common ways individuals can solve wars anytime.
On the other hand, individuals may migrate from one country to another to escape various pandemics. Some pandemics that may invade any given country and cause or make individuals to migrate include the attack of pests and diseases. When the disease attaches to any given country, there is a high chance that the majority of the individuals will therefore be infected by the disease (Risse, 2015). Disease outbreak causes much death and increases the reported death cases in any given country. When such cases arise, the citizens in a given country may opt to move to another country where there is no disease outbreak to save their lives. This can be traced as one of the common ways that any given country can reduce the cases of death due to the disease outbreak at any given time. Due to this point, it is therefore considered of no importance for wealthy countries to exclude the idea of potential immigrants. Drought is the other form of an epidemic that can occur in any given country and make individuals feel that they need to migrate from one region to the next (Davidson, 2021). Drought may result mainly when there is not enough rainfall in a given region which makes the majority of the projects, including farming, fail, which will ultimately affect or interfere with some of the activities, such as businesses and trading activities, that forms one of the most and primary sources of income for the individuals at any given time. This will make a majority of the families in a given country leave in poor lives, making them unable to access some of the primary wants, such as food, at any given time. Lack of food will therefore cause many death cases between and among individuals at any given time. Migration of these particular individuals from one country or region to the next is considered one of the most appropriate ways through which the idea of drought, which causes poverty, can be eradicated. Due to this critical factor, it is therefore considered that wealthy countries should not exclude potential migrants at any given time.
As discussed throughout this paper, migrants are used to moving from one country to the next. Most individuals are found migrating from their countries towards other countries. The collective name that can be used to describe this individual is, therefore, the migrants. As it has been said, the term migrant has no clear definition but can be described as individuals who move from one country to the next for some reason. Many emotions are held up to decide whether wealthy countries should exclude potential migrants. This idea means that the country should not allow citizens to move into and out of the country. It is, therefore, not crucial for any given wealthy country to exclude the idea of migration between and among individuals. As said, most of the United Nations have made movement between and among individuals one of the fundamental rights and freedoms (Buck-Morss, 2016). This implies that if a particular country tries to stop any other citizens of the country or its citizen from moving into and, more so, out of the country, this will be termed as the misuse or abuse of human freedom. Secondly, individuals who are fond of migrating have many reasons that make them do so. Some of the reasons, as discussed throughout this paper, include; seeking job opportunities as a result of the interactions between and among individuals from different countries.
This idea will help solve the issue of poverty that strikes the majority of the citizens since securing job opportunities between and among individuals will enable the majority to satisfy their daily basic wants. Another reason that can make individuals migrate from one country to the other may include the war between and among the countries. During wars, countries become unstable in a way which makes the individuals feel that they are not comfortable living in any given country. This idea will therefore make most individuals feel that they need to migrate from one country to the next to save their lives. Lastly, the epidermis, such as the outbreak of pests and diseases, can also make individuals migrate from one country to the next (Craven, 2013). Drought may also make the majority consider migrating from one country to the next. Due to the above number of reasons, it is therefore considered of great importance that wealthy countries should not consider excluding potential migrants.
References
Alexander-Kasparik, R. and Soulas, J., 2017. Border Issues in Education, Part 1 [and] Part 2. Sedletter, 6(3). https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/documents/access-to-justice-and-the-gcm-eng-final-march-2022.pdf
Braidotti, R., 2013. Becoming-world. After cosmopolitanism, pp.8-27. https://www.ohchr.org/en/migration?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIr6ffnJvC_AIV0tDtCh3nnweVEAAYAiAAEgKevvD_BwE
Buck-Morss, S., 2016. I was thinking past terror: Islamism and critical theory on the left. Verso Books. https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/our-campaigns/migration/
Christensen, J., 2020. Global Justice. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.amazon.com/Global-Justice-James-Christensen/dp/1137606770
Craven, C. and Davis, D.A. eds., 2013. Feminist activist ethnography: Counterpoints to neoliberalism in North America (p. 1). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/documents/access-to-justice-and-the-gcm-eng-final-march-2022.pdf
Davidson, A.C., (2021). Radical mobilities. Progress in Human Geography, 45(1), 25- https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/our-campaigns/migration/.
McIntyre, J., (2015). PART 2: Critical Systemic Praxis to Address Fixed and Fluid Identity and Politics1 at the Local, National and International Level. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(3), 223–259. https://www.fragomen.com/trending/worldwide-immigration-trends-reports/index.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIr6ffnJvC_AIV0tDtCh3nnweVEAAYASAAEgK6mPD_BwE
Patton, P., (2016). Multiculturalism and Political Ontology. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Multiculturalism (pp. 65–80). Routledge. https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/our-campaigns/migration/
Pogge, T.W., (2014). Global justice. Science and Society, 67(2). https://www.ohchr.org/en/migration?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIr6ffnJvC_AIV0tDtCh3nnweVEAAYAiAAEgKevvD_BwE
Risse, M., (2015). On global justice. In On Global Justice. Princeton University Press. https://www.fragomen.com/trending/worldwide-immigration-trends-reports/index.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIr6ffnJvC_AIV0tDtCh3nnweVEAAYASAAEgK6mPD_BwE
write