Task 1
The life journey for Alison can be examined through the lens of Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development, which posits that individuals go through a series of stages in their lifespan. The theory also posits that each stage is characterized by a unique psychosocial crisis or challenge (McLeod, 2018). The stages also encompass both nature and nurture, which signify the interplay between innate biological factors of the individual (nature) and their environmental influences (nurture) (Becket & Taylor, 2019). The experiences and challenges faced by Alison can be analyzed within the context of Erikson’s theory to shed light on her development from infancy to early Adulthood.
Stage
Infancy (0-1 year): Trust vs. Mistrust
During infancy, individuals develop a sense of trust or mistrust in the world based on their early experiences with caregivers. Alison’s early Childhood seems to have been nurturing, as she was born to loving parents in a small town near the coast (Walker, 2017). She met typical developmental milestones and formed strong bonds with her family, likely contributing to a sense of trust (McLeod, 2018).
Early Childhood (1-3 years): Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt
In this stage, children develop a sense of independence and autonomy. Alison’s active and curious nature during early Childhood suggests that she was successfully navigating this stage. Engaging in imaginative play and forming strong bonds with family and peers indicate a healthy development of autonomy.
Preschool Age (3-6 years): Initiative vs. Guilt
The preschool year of a child is the stage during which children begin to take the initiative in exploring the world around them. Alison’s enthusiasm for learning and exploration and involvement in extracurricular activities like hockey and violin lessons have demonstrated her ability to take initiative and develop a sense of purpose.
School Age (6-12 years): Industry vs. Inferiority
This stage is marked by developing a sense of competence and industry, where Alison excelled academically, was a role model at school, and was proud of her achievements. Her success in academics and extracurricular activities indicates a healthy resolution of the psychosocial crisis of industry vs. inferiority (McLeod, 2018).
Adolescence (12-18 years): Identity vs. Role Confusion
In period development, adolescence is a critical period of identity. This is seen when Allison, at 15, with her family, experienced a traumatic incident during a skiing holiday. The incident is due to the loss of her elder brother, Sam (Walker, 2017). Her critical injuries marked a significant disruption in her development through trauma and grief, which could have led to identity confusion while trying to make sense of her life and her place in the world.
Young Adulthood (18-40 years): Intimacy vs. Isolation
This stage is characterized by the desire to establish close and meaningful relationships with others, as seen from Alison’s response to the death of her brother and the subsequent emotional struggles leading to a significant impact on her ability to form intimate connections. Her withdrawal and feelings of guilt and self-blame could lead to isolation, thus making it challenging to develop healthy relationships.
Middle Adulthood (40-65 years): Generativity vs. Stagnation
This stage involves a focus on contributing to society and the next generation. Alison’s journey to university, where she hopes for a new start, is a potential opportunity for generativity. However, her experiences of low moods, confusion, and the diagnosis of premature menopause introduce additional challenges and disruptions in her developmental trajectory.
Late Adulthood (65+ years): Ego Integrity vs. Despair
When people reach late Adulthood, they look back on their lives and determine if they are depressed or have attained a sense of integrity and knowledge. Although Alison in the case study has yet to reach this point, her experiences to date have the power to influence how she views the world and how her experiences have value.
Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development
Erikson’s theory emphasizes how the interaction of nature and nurture shapes personality and psychosocial well-being. From the case study, it is evident that Alison’s early encounters with a loving family, her academic successes, and her strong bond with her brother Sam played a part in her healthy growth throughout her early Childhood and adolescence. However, her pain and the unexpected death of Sam interfered with her growth and presented major obstacles (Becket & Taylor, 2019). According to Erikson, every stage builds on the one before it and prepares the way for later phases of development. Compared to what Allison is going through, Erikson thought that conflicts like the death of a loved one mark a turning point in their development.
Alison’s journey in young Adulthood is marked by the challenges of adjusting to life without Sam and dealing with her own physical and emotional trauma (Kagan, 1984). The grief, guilt, and withdrawal she experienced can be seen as signs of the unresolved crisis of identity vs. role confusion, which is seen when she struggles to make sense of her new reality and her place in the world (Berk, 2004). This can be a common experience for individuals who face traumatic events in adolescence.
As Alison transitioned to university and moved to a different part of the country, she faced additional challenges related to her physical and mental health, like low moods and the diagnosis of premature menopause. This seriously hampered her personal growth, significantly impacted by premature menopause in both biological and psychological ways. From a biological perspective, a woman’s identity and womanhood are fundamentally shaped by her fertility (Berk, 2004). It may also have a psychological impact on her by giving her identity and self-concept a deeper level of complexity.
Alison’s reaction to the diagnosis demonstrates her challenges in adjusting and seeking a sense of agency. The individual’s emotional state of feeling overwhelmed and exhibiting withdrawal behaviors can be seen as manifestations of the psychological conflict between intimacy and isolation (McLeod, 2018). The individual’s capacity to form intimate and significant connections may be impeded by the emotional and physical obstacles she encounters (Walker, 2017). The individual’s hesitancy in embracing hormone therapy can be interpreted as indicative of internal struggles and a desire to assert autonomy over her physical being.
The interplay between nature and nurture is evident in the various aspects of Alison’s life. The individual possesses a genetic predisposition, encompassing her natural susceptibility to specific health issues, such as early menopause (McLeod, 2018). Nevertheless, the individual’s emotions and coping techniques have been influenced by her developmental experiences, interpersonal interactions, and the traumatic events she has endured (Becket & Taylor, 2019). The familial context in which she was raised throughout her formative years facilitated the cultivation of trust and independence. Nevertheless, the bereavement of her sibling and her own experiences of trauma presented notable obstacles that influenced her process of identity formation.
In conclusion, Alison’s life journey can be analyzed through Erik Erikson’s psychosocial development stages that highlight the interplay between nature and nurture in shaping her experiences. Her early life positive experiences led to successful resolutions of the initial stages. However, the traumatic loss of her brother and her subsequent struggles have introduced significant challenges to her development, thus affecting her ability to form close relationships and navigate the psychosocial crises of young Adulthood. Additionally, her diagnosis of premature menopause adds a complex layer to her development that highlights the significance of both her biological nature and her psychological responses to these challenges.
Task 2
Sigmund Freud’s psychodynamic perspective and the Biological perspective represent two distinct approaches to understanding human development and behavior. The foundation of Sigmund Freud’s psychodynamic theory is the idea that our subconscious minds’ thoughts and emotions drive human behavior (Spielman et al., 2021). Aggression is an action or behavior aimed toward another person to cause them harm. It can, therefore, take many different forms, like verbal abuse, physical harm, and threats to harm (Kagan, 1984). The psychodynamic approach, however, has come under fire for placing too much focus on an individual’s intrinsic nature at the expense of environmental factors that could make them more likely to act aggressively (Bornstein et al., 2018). This part examines Sigmund Freud’s psychodynamic theory to determine how violence came to be and compares and contrasts Sigmund Freud and Erick Erickson’s theoretical perspectives concerning Alison in the case study.
Freud’s Psychodynamic Perspective:
Freud’s psychodynamic perspective revolves around the idea that unconscious conflicts and desires deeply influence human behavior. His structural model of the mind includes the conscious, preconscious, and unconscious aspects (Spielman et al., 2021). In Alison’s case, her conscious mind would have been occupied by the immediate trauma of her brother’s accident and her injuries during the skiing holiday. The grief and emotional turmoil she experienced after her brother’s death would have been consciously manifesting in her thoughts and feelings (Sugarman, 2004). Also, the preconscious mind may have held memories of happier times with her brother, who exhibits painful recollections of his loss, thus creating a complex emotional landscape. Finally, the unconscious mind represents the repressed memories, desires, and unresolved conflicts that influence the behavior and emotions of an individual. Alison might have unknowingly suppressed feelings of guilt and self-blame due to the death of her brother, which could have shaped her responses and emotional well-being without conscious awareness.
Furthermore, Freud believed that early childhood experiences have a profound impact on an individual’s personality and behavior, as seen in Alison’s childhood experiences of loving parents and strong family bonds. Her academic success likely played a role in shaping her self-esteem and her initial resilience (Bornstein et al., 2018). However, the traumatic loss of her brother during adolescence introduced a significant disruption, which can be related to Freud’s theory, which highlights that these early life experiences leave a lasting imprint on an individual’s psyche and influence their responses to later life challenges.
Biological Perspective:
The Biological perspective offers a different lens through which to understand human behavior and development that emphasizes the crucial role of biology and genetics. This perspective asserts that many aspects of human behavior, like emotions, cognitive processes, and disorders, can be elucidated by examining the biological underpinnings (Baldassarre, 2011). For instance, when looking at Alison’s case, the Biological perspective highlights the importance of genetics and hormones in understanding her premature menopause (Berk, 2004). Fishbein (2017) argued that genetics play a pivotal role in determining the onset of menopause, and gene variations can influence the age at which it occurs. This perspective would explore the possibility that genetic factors might have accelerated Alison’s reproductive aging process, contributing to her early menopause.
Moreover, the Biological perspective delves into the influence of hormones and neurotransmitters on an individual’s psychological processes and behaviors. In Alison’s situation, this perspective could explain the emotional challenges she faces, such as low moods and confusion. The abrupt hormonal changes associated with premature menopause could disrupt her brain’s chemistry, leading to fluctuations in mood and cognitive functions (Sugarman, 2004). As a result, this perspective suggests that addressing her emotional struggles necessitates a dual approach, one that not only considers the psychosocial aspect but also the physiological aspect related to her hormonal imbalance. Understanding the interplay between biology and psychology is fundamental to comprehending the holistic picture of Alison’s experiences.
Comparison of the Perspectives:
Nature vs. Nurture:
- Freud’s Psychodynamic Perspective: Freud’s theory is more nature-oriented as it highlights the impact of early childhood experiences and innate drives on an individual’s behavior and personality development (Spielman et al., 2021).
- Biological Perspective: The Biological perspective leans heavily towards nature, emphasizing the influence of genetic factors, brain structures, and physiological processes on behavior.
Role of the Unconscious:
- Freud’s Psychodynamic Perspective: Freud places significant importance on the unconscious mind and its role in shaping an individual’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.
- Biological Perspective: The Biological perspective does not directly address the concept of the unconscious; it primarily focuses on observable biological processes.
Focus on Trauma and Emotional Development:
- Freud’s Psychodynamic Perspective: Freud’s theory is particularly relevant when examining how traumatic events in Childhood, like the loss of Alison’s brother, can lead to emotional struggles and unresolved conflicts.
- Biological Perspective: While the Biological perspective acknowledges the role of brain chemistry in emotional regulation, it does not offer a detailed framework for understanding the psychological impact of trauma (Baldassarre, 2011).
Evaluation of the Theories about Alison:
Freud’s Psychodynamic Perspective
Freud’s theory offers valuable insights into Alison’s experiences, particularly in understanding the emotional impact of the traumatic loss of her brother, Sam. The concept of unresolved conflicts and the influence of early childhood experiences can explain her withdrawal, feelings of guilt, and difficulty in forming close relationships (Spielman et al., 2021). The psychodynamic approach helps in recognizing the deep-seated emotional struggles that Alison may be facing and the need for addressing them through therapy. However, Freud’s focus on unconscious processes is a limitation in Alison’s case as it may not provide concrete solutions for her physical health issues, such as premature menopause (Traylor et al., 2022). Additionally, Freud’s emphasis on sexual and aggressive drives may not fully encompass the complexity of Alison’s situation, which involves both psychological and biological factors.
Biological Perspective:
The Biological perspective contributes to our understanding of Alison’s physical health challenges, such as the diagnosis of premature menopause. It highlights the role of hormones and genetics in her condition. This perspective offers a more concrete framework for addressing the biological aspects of her health, including the option of hormone therapy (Baldassarre, 2011). However, the Biological perspective does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the emotional and psychological impact of Alison’s experiences which may not fully address her emotional struggles like grief and guilt hence requiring a more psychosocial approach to therapy (Berk, 2004). Also, this perspective may not account for the potential interplay between biological and psychological factors in her overall well-being.
Conclusion:
In evaluating Freud’s psychodynamic perspective and the Biological perspective about Alison, it is clear that each perspective has its strengths and limitations. Freud’s psychodynamic theory is valuable in understanding the emotional and psychological aspects of her experiences, like the impact of trauma and unresolved conflicts. Also, the Biological perspective is instrumental in addressing the biological aspects of Alison’s health, like her premature menopause, which may not fully encompass the emotional and psychological dimensions of her struggles. The interplay between these two perspectives highlights the complexity of human development and behavior. It emphasizes the need for a holistic approach that integrates both psychological and biological factors in understanding and supporting individuals like Alison.
Bibliography
Baldassarre, G., 2011, August. What are intrinsic motivations? A biological perspective. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (Vol. 2, pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Becket, C. & Taylor, H. 2019 Human Growth and Development. London. Sage
Berk, L. E. 2004. Development throughout the Lifespan (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Bornstein, R., Maracic, C.E. and Natoli, A.N., 2018. The psychodynamic perspective. Sage Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences.
Fishbein, D.H., 2017. Biological perspectives in criminology. In Biosocial Theories of Crime (pp. 3-48). Routledge.
Kagan J 1984 Behavioural inhibition to the unfamiliar. Child Development 2212 – 2225
McLeod, S., 2018. Erik Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Simply psychology, 3.
Spielman, R.M., Dumper, K., Jenkins, W., Lacombe, A., Lovett, M. and Perlmutter, M., 2021. Freud and the Psychodynamic Perspective. Psychology-H5P Edition.
Sugarman, L., 2004. Lifespan development: Frameworks, accounts, and strategies. Routledge.
Traylor, J., Overstreet, L. and Lang, D., 2022. Psychodynamic Theory: Freud. Individual and Family Development, Health, and Well-being.
Walker S 2017 Effective social work with children, young people, and families: Putting systems theory into practice. London Sage.
write