Punishment justification through deterrence is a form of punishment that seeks to prevent future criminal behavior through the threat of a harsher sentence. This punishment is based on the idea that potential criminals will change their behavior to avoid more severe punishment. The theory behind deterrence is that if people know that they will suffer a more severe consequence if they commit a crime, they will be less likely to achieve it.
Deterrence can be broken down into two types: general and specific. General deterrence is the idea that one person’s punishment will prevent others from committing similar crimes. In contrast, specific deterrence is the idea that an individual’s sentence will prevent them from committing the same crime again.
Deterrence works best when the potential punishment is severe enough to outweigh any potential benefits from committing the crime. For example, if the sentence for a crime is a hefty fine or jail time, the potential criminal may decide that the risk is not worth the reward.
There are several advantages to using deterrence as a form of punishment. First, it is a form of punishment that does not require long-term incarceration or other costly forms. Second, it can prevent future criminal behavior by making potential criminals aware that they will suffer severe consequences if they commit a crime. Finally, deterrence can deter certain types of crime, such as drug use or other criminal activity.
There are also some drawbacks to using deterrence as a form of punishment. First, it does not address the underlying causes of crime, such as poverty or social exclusion. Second, it can be challenging to ensure that potential criminals know the consequences of their actions. Finally, it can be difficult to determine the appropriate level of punishment for a particular crime.
Despite these drawbacks, deterrence is still an effective form of punishment. Research has shown that when potential criminals are aware of the possible consequences of their actions, they are less likely to commit the crime. This is especially true when the products are severe and immediate, such as harsh fines or jail time.
Deterrence is also an effective form of punishment because it can be tailored to a specific crime. For example, if a person is caught committing a drug crime, the penalty can be tailored to match the severity of the crime. This means that a person caught with a small amount of marijuana may receive a small fine, while a person caught with a large number of drugs may receive more severe punishment.
Deterrence is also an effective form of punishment because it can target specific crime types. For example, harsher penalties for drug crimes may be used to deter people from using drugs in the future. Similarly, harsher punishments for violent crimes may be used to prevent people from committing violent acts in the future.
Finally, deterrence is an effective form of punishment because it can be used to send a message to potential criminals. By setting a consequence for a crime, the criminal justice system sends a message that certain types of behavior are unacceptable and will not be tolerated. This message can have a powerful effect on potential criminals and help discourage them from committing future crimes.
In conclusion, deterrence is an effective form of punishment because it can be tailored to the specific crime, it can be used to target certain types of crime, and it can send a strong message to potential criminals. While there are some drawbacks to using deterrence as a form of punishment, it is still an effective tool for reducing crime and keeping the public safe.
References
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(2), 284.
Honderich, T., & Chester, W. (1969). Punishment: The supposed justifications (Vol. 771). London: Hutchinson.
write