In some instances, people fail to take note of something that is in the range of their view in a conscious state. This is perceptual blindness, referred to as inattentional blindness. As defined by Saryazdi et al. (2019), inaettentional blindness refers to the failure to notice an event or object when an individual is focusing more on something else. The complexity of the condition can be observed from factors such as the task one is initially focused on, the observer’s characteristics, and the nature of the second event. This topic is essential because it applies to everyday life, such as attention while driving, legal dealings with eyewitnesses, and forensic investigations, and it helps to study the human brain’s processing of information, perception, and attention for health research and academic purposes.
Consequently, I assert that this phenomenon can make individuals miss important information that is clearly observable in the immediate environment, which may be essential for reference later on. Therefore, it is important to understand inattentional blindness to improve observation abilities and control attentional resources to different stimuli. This paper aims to analyze this phenomenon by looking into topics of its historical background, causatives and contributing factors, application in daily life, the risks it poses to individuals, its implications in the legal system, its implication on technology, and possible control measures. The phenomenon of inattentional blindness underscores the importance of selective attention in our daily lives and the potential consequences of attentional limitations. By exploring the causes and consequences of inattentional blindness, we can develop strategies to improve our attentional abilities and reduce the risks associated with divided attention.
Inattentional blindness is a phenomenon that has been observed and studied for a long time. The study was not done in-depth and more scientifically until George Berkely, a philosopher, wrote the book,” A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Berkeley (1710) argued that people could not perceive everything that exists in the world but rather only the sensations that are relevant to their goals and interests. Later on, psychologists began to study inattentional blindness more systematically. On this topic, and popular experiments was conducted by psychologist Ulric Neisser in the 1970s. In this study, participants were asked to watch a video of people passing basketballs and count how many times the ball was passed between players wearing white shirts. In the middle of the experiment, a person wearing a gorilla suit walks through the scene, but almost half of the participants failed to notice it because they were focused on counting the passes. As cited by Wulff & Hyman (2018), the intention was to prove that people are unaware of unusual events when focused on other activities. This gave way to more studies of inattentional blindness now concerning the cognitive response.
More research and experiments have been done in recent years on the field to explore its causes and consequences. The term inattentional blindness, as used now, was coined by scholars in the 20th century. Mack & Rock (1998) found that people are more likely to experience inattentional blindness when they are engaged in a demanding cognitive task, when the unexpected stimulus is outside their focus of attention, and when they are not expecting any unusual events to occur. In this research, they coined the term “inattentional blindness” to describe this phenomenon and began conducting a series of experiments to explore its causes and consequences. Today, inattentional blindness remains an active area of research in psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science. It has important implications for many real-world situations, such as driving, aviation, and medical diagnosis, where people’s attention can be easily diverted, and their perception of critical information can be compromised. It is a common study area in different fields, such as psychology, forensic studies, and medical-related courses.
Causatives and Contributing Factors
One factor that contributes to inattentional blindness is attentional load. When individuals are engaged in a demanding cognitive task, their attentional resources are limited, and they may be unable to process all sensory information in their environment. Swallow & Jiang (2013) cite that in such situations, there is selective attention, and the more critical tasks are prioritized. As a result, individuals may fail to notice unexpected or novel stimuli that are not directly related to the task at hand. Irrelevant stimuli reach awareness when a perceptual load is low. As cited by Pugnaghi et al. (2020), perceptual load affects individuals when it is high to focus unconsciously on urgent stimuli. Also, a factor that contributes to inattentional blindness is the salience of the unattended stimulus. If the unattended stimulus is relatively subtle or unimportant, individuals may be less likely to notice it even if their attentional resources are available. On the other hand, if the unattended stimulus is highly salient or relevant, individuals may be more likely to notice it even when their attention is focused elsewhere.
Another causative factor contributing to inattentional blindness is the nature of the individual involved. Individual differences in attentional abilities can play a role in assessing the condition. If they have low working memory, then it works as a causative factor for inattentional blindness. A study by Kreitz et al. (2015) shows that individuals have different cognitive responses and respond to stimuli differently because they have unique processing abilities. For example, individuals with higher working memory capacity may be more resistant to inattentional blindness because they can better allocate attentional resources to both the primary task and other stimuli in the environment. Similarly, individuals with better inhibitory control may be less susceptible to inattentional blindness because they are better able to suppress distracting stimuli and maintain focus on the primary task. Various factors, including genetics, early experiences, and environmental factors, such as education, training, and lifestyle, can influence these individual differences in attentional abilities.
Understanding inattentional blindness is applicable in daily life, such as sports, driving, and forensics. The first case, it can occur in sports, particularly when athletes are focused on a specific task, such as catching a ball or scoring a goal. As Furley et al. (2010) cited, basketball athletes experience visual awareness problems in a real-world basketball setting, especially under pressure. Critical aspects of visual processing are affected by inattentional blindness in this case. For example, a basketball player may overlook a teammate who is wide open for a pass because they are focused on dribbling the ball. Inattentional blindness can occur while driving, especially when the driver is distracted or has a high cognitive load. For example, a driver may overlook a pedestrian crossing the street, a stop sign, or a red light when they are conversing or using their phone.
Inattentional blindness can have severe consequences in forensic contexts, affecting eyewitness testimony or the perception of evidence. For example, a witness to a crime may fail to notice important details about the perpetrator or the scene of the crime if their attention is focused on a weapon or a specific feature of the perpetrator’s appearance. A study by Smith et al. (2015) discusses how inattentional blindness can affect eyewitness testimony in criminal cases. The authors conducted a series of experiments to test the impact of inattentional blindness on eyewitness memory. They found that participants asked to complete a challenging visual search task while watching a crime scene video was less likely to notice a salient and unexpected event and were less accurate in identifying the perpetrator in a subsequent lineup. These findings suggest that inattentional blindness can significantly impact the reliability of eyewitness testimony in criminal cases. The condition can also occur in medical contexts, such as in radiology. Radiologists may fail to notice subtle changes in an X-ray or a CT scan if they are focusing on a particular area of the image, which can lead to misdiagnosis or delayed treatment.
Risk to Individuals
Inattentional blindness has significant safety implications, particularly when divided attention is required. Divided attention happens when one attends to multiple tasks or stimuli simultaneously, and it is often necessary for many high-risk and safety-critical situations operating heavy machinery or monitoring complex systems. Research by de Pontes Nobre et al. (2020) shows that the overall effects of awareness changed depending on how demanding a process is or visual stimuli. inattentional blindness can occur when the demands of multiple tasks or stimuli exceed our attentional capacity. This can lead to a failure to notice important and potentially dangerous events or stimuli, resulting in accidents or injuries. For example, drivers distracted by their phones or other devices may fail to notice pedestrians or other hazards on the road, leading to accidents. Similarly, workers who are multitasking or distracted may need to be aware of critical safety information or notice hazardous environmental conditions.
Another risk that individuals face due to inattentional blindness is the potential for fatal accidents or injuries for large groups of people in high-risk, safety-critical professions and ones where the individual serves many people, such as aviation, healthcare, or emergency services. Inattentional blindness can occur when professionals must attend to multiple tasks or stimuli simultaneously, leading to a failure to notice critical information or hazards. According to White & O’Hare (2022), recognition accuracy among pilots is greater when there are no distractions from anywhere. When there is a distraction, this triggers inattentional blindness which lowers their abilities to adequately respond to simple tasks such as taking off. For example, pilots distracted by cockpit duties may fail to notice a warning light or other vital information that could indicate a potential safety issue. Similarly, healthcare providers managing multiple patients or tasks may overlook critical information, such as a change in a patient’s condition or medication order, leading to medical errors or adverse events. Emergency responders focused on a specific task or goal may overlook other hazards in the environment, such as live electrical wires or unstable structures, leading to injuries or fatalities.
Implication on the Legal System
In legal system investigations, inattentional blindness can have significant implications for eyewitness testimony, particularly when individuals are required to attend to multiple stimuli or events simultaneously. Eyewitness testimony is often a critical component of criminal investigations and legal proceedings, and inaccuracies in testimony can have serious consequences. According to Wulff & Thomas (2020), this blindness is also worsened by acute stress that directly affects victims of crime or any other witnesses. Therefore, they may fail to notice important environmental details or events. This can lead to inaccurate recollections of events, as they may have yet to notice essential information that could be relevant to the case. For example, a witness distracted by a loud noise or other stimuli may have missed essential details about a crime, such as a perpetrator’s appearance or the direction they fled.
In addition to missed details, inattentional blindness can lead to inaccuracies in eyewitness identification. When individuals are presented with a lineup or photo array, they may not recognize the perpetrator if they do not notice their appearance during the crime. This can lead to misidentifications and wrongful convictions, which can have severe consequences for both the innocent individuals who are falsely accused and the criminal justice system. Research by Wulff & Hyman (2022) on this case shows that individuals are more likely to accuse an innocent person of a crime falsely. In this experiment, the scholars observed that most people were likely to accuse a bystander of a crime just because they were now conscious of it.
Implications on Technology
One major factor that has significantly contributed to inattentional blindness is technology through electric devices. For example, notifications from smartphones or computers can interrupt people’s focus on a particular task, leading to a failure to notice important information in the environment. Chen & Pai (2018) cite that smartphone activities such as texting and talking on the phone while walking are one issue that impairs peoples’ awareness of their surroundings. Also, phones distract with notifications even when not using them. The continued use of these electronic devices creates competition among developers, and it is exploited as a strategy (Xiang & Chae, 2022). This can be particularly problematic in safety-critical situations, such as driving or operating machinery. Its implication on technology is the production of these electronic devices with unique features. Technology designers should consider how to minimize distractions that can lead to inattentional blindness. For example, they can provide options to turn off notifications or use less intrusive modes of communication, such as vibrations instead of audible alerts. Additionally, designers can employ techniques like ‘progressive disclosure,’ where information is revealed gradually to reduce the cognitive load on the user.
Another implication that inattentional blindness has on technology is application in crucial areas where humans are likely to be affected by this condition. One of the crucial areas is the health sector. Research by Park et al. (2018) shows that inattentional blindness is prevalent in nursing situations and can put a patient’s life in danger. Technology can monitor and track health metrics, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and sleep patterns. Wearable devices like fitness trackers and smartwatches can collect this data and provide insights to users and healthcare professionals. This way, the patient’s safety is assured even when the attention of the health worker is lost. These technology devices can also help alert health workers when a situation requires urgent attention and monitor the patient’s health progress. Additionally, telemedicine technology can enable remote consultations with doctors and other healthcare providers, improving access to care for people who cannot visit a medical facility in person.
Mindfulness can be a helpful technique for reducing the occurrence of inattentional blindness. Mindfulness is practicing paying attention to the present moment with non-judgmental awareness. This involves being fully present and engaged in the current moment without being distracted by thoughts, worries, or external stimuli. A study by Pandit et al. (2022) in an experiment showed that mindful-based intervention among health practitioners provided better results in their practice regarding mental focus. By practicing mindfulness, individuals can develop greater awareness and control over their attentional focus. This can help reduce the likelihood of inattentional blindness by allowing individuals to focus better on the task at hand while still being open to unexpected stimuli. Also, improving attentional control through training or practice can help individuals be more adept at focusing their attention on specific tasks while ignoring distractions. This can help reduce the likelihood of inattentional blindness in situations where attentional control is critical.
Legal systems also suffer from individuals, such as eyewitnesses giving wrong statements due to inattentional blindness, which can cause wrongful convictions. This can be controlled by simply being aware of the phenomenon of inattentional blindness, which can help in being more mindful and vigilant in situations where they need to be alert. Knowing that it is possible to miss something even if it is clearly visible can prompt considerations of other possibilities in an investigation. According to Hyman et al. (2018), eyewitnesses are affected by conditions such as memory problems that make it unreliable to depend entirely on eyewitness statements. Providing education and training to jurors and judges about the limitations of eyewitness testimony and the factors that can influence its accuracy can also help them make more informed decisions. In this case, jurors should also be provided with clear and accurate instructions about the limitations of eyewitness testimony and how to evaluate it to help ensure that they make informed decisions.
In conclusion, inattentional blindness is a fascinating and potentially dangerous aspect of human perception that has implications across various fields. It can have far-reaching implications for safety, eyewitness testimony, and technology design. It is crucial to recognize the potential risks associated with divided attention and develop strategies to reduce them, whether through increased awareness, training, or technology design. Additionally, the potential for inaccuracies in eyewitness testimony highlights the need for caution when relying on memory and the importance of considering the influence of inattentional blindness in legal proceedings. A greater understanding of inattentional blindness can also lead to safer, more efficient, and more effective practices in various contexts.
Berkeley, G. (1710). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.
Chen, P. L., & Pai, C. W. (2018). Pedestrian smartphone overuse and inattentional blindness: an observational study in Taipei, Taiwan. BMC public health, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6163-5
de Pontes Nobre, A., de Melo, G. M., Gauer, G., & Wagemans, J. (2020). Implicit processing during inattentional blindness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 119, 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.005
Furley, P., Memmert, D., & Heller, C. (2010). The dark side of visual awareness in sport: Inattentional blindness in a real-world basketball task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1327
Hyman, I. E., Wulff, A. N., & Thomas, A. K. (2018). Crime blindness: How selective attention and inattentional blindness can disrupt eyewitness awareness and memory. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218786749
Kreitz, C., Furley, P., Memmert, D., & Simons, D. J. (2015). Inattentional blindness and individual differences in cognitive abilities. PLOS one, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134675
Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness. MIT Press.
Pandit, A. S., de Gouveia, M., Horsfall, H. L., Reka, A., & Marcus, H. J. (2022). Efficacy of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention in Ameliorating Inattentional Blindness Amongst Young Neurosurgeons: A Prospective, Controlled Pilot Study. Frontiers in Surgery, 640. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916228
Park, J., Park, M. M., & Kim, K. J. (2018). Inattentional Blindness as Experienced by Hospital Nurses: A Focus Group Study. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 30(6), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.6.586
Pugnaghi, G., Memmert, D., & Kreitz, C. (2020). Loads of unconscious processing: The role of perceptual load in processing unattended stimuli during inattentional blindness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 2641-2651. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-01982-8.
Saryazdi, R., Bak, K., & Campos, J. L. (2019). Inattentional blindness during driving in younger and older adults. Frontiers in psychology, 880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00880
Smith, R., Smalarz, L., & Most, S. B. (2015). No one saw it happen: Inattentional blindness and eyewitness testimony. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1306-1313. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0871-8
Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2013). Attentional load and attentional boost: A review of data and theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00274
White, A., & O’Hare, D. (2022). In plane sight: Inattentional blindness affects visual detection of external targets in simulated flight. Applied Ergonomics, 98, 103578. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103578
Wulff, A. N., & Hyman Jr, I. E. (2022). Crime blindness: The impact of inattentional blindness on eyewitness awareness, memory, and identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3906
Wulff, A. N., & Thomas, A. K. (2021). The dynamic and fragile nature of eyewitness memory formation: Considering stress and attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 666724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666724
Xiang, Y., & Chae, S. W. (2022). Influence of perceived interactivity on continuous use intentions on the danmaku video sharing platform: Belongingness perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(6), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1952803