Introduction
Psychology is a discipline that seeks to understand human behavior and mental processes through research and observation. Ethical considerations that guide the conduct of study and practice have had an outsized influence on the development of psychology throughout its entire history. “ethics in psychology” refers to the guiding principles and norms that determine how professionals in the field ought to behave themselves while on the job (Vandette & Gosselin, 2019). The rights of study participants, the well-being of clients, and the safety of society are all things that are protected by these guiding principles. One cannot exaggerate the significance of ethical considerations in psychology. It is imperative to have ethical rules in place to guarantee that both research and clinical practice are carried out responsibly and ethically.
Without adherence to moral standards, there is a high risk that people and society may suffer negative consequences. As a result, it is essential to investigate the historical context of ethics in psychology to comprehend the development of ethical principles and how they are applied in study and practice. This essay will explore the historical context of ethical issues in Psychology, highlighting the evolution of ethical principles and their application in research and practice. Through examining the past, this essay will provide insights into contemporary ethical challenges and emphasize the importance of ethical principles in guiding responsible and ethical behavior in the discipline.
Accepted Views of Ethics in Psychology
Ethics in Psychology refers to the principles and standards that dictate how psychologists conduct themselves (Watkins, 2020). These principles protect the rights and well-being of research participants, clients, and the wider society. The accepted view of ethics in Psychology emphasizes respecting people’s rights and dignity, acting in their best interests, treating them fairly and equitably, being trustworthy and accountable, and being honest and transparent in all aspects of one’s work. These principles are designed to promote responsible and ethical behavior in the field of Psychology and to ensure that research and practice are conducted in a respectful, responsible, and ethical manner. The American Psychological Association (APA) has established ethical guidelines that are widely accepted in the field of Psychology.
The American Psychological Association (APA) has established a set of ethical norms comprising five overarching principles: respect for people’s rights and dignity; beneficence and non-maleficence; fairness; fidelity and responsibility; and honesty (Huminuik et al., 2022). These guiding principles were developed to assist psychologists in their professional endeavors and to encourage responsible and ethical behavior among those working in the field of psychology. When conducting research or therapy, psychologists must get their patients’ informed consent, treat study participants and clients respectfully, and maintain the participant’s right to privacy and confidentiality. Following this idea, psychologists must avoid discrimination and prejudice while demonstrating sensitivity to individual and cultural variations.
Beneficence and non-maleficence are ethical principles that compel psychologists to behave in the participants’ and clients’ best interests and to refrain from causing any harm to those individuals. This principle emphasizes the significance of reducing risks, increasing benefits in research and therapy, and maintaining vigilance toward the possibility of causing harm. To practice justice, psychologists must treat people fairly and equitably, even though their histories and situations may vary greatly. This concept emphasizes the significance of avoiding discrimination and ensuring that study participants and clients have equal access to services and opportunities. Specifically, the principle states that discrimination should be avoided at all costs. Psychologists are expected to uphold high standards of honesty, responsibility, and accountability throughout their professional lives. This principle highlights the significance of preserving professional boundaries, avoiding conflicts of interest, and ensuring that study subjects and clients receive the greatest care possible.
Honesty, truthfulness, and transparency in one’s work are essential components of integrity in psychology. This concept emphasizes the significance of avoiding fraud and other forms of academic dishonesty and being open and upfront about research methods and conclusions. Specifically, it highlights the importance of academic dishonesty. The ethical guidelines of the APA provide detailed guidance on matters such as informed consent, confidentiality, and professional boundaries, in addition to these fundamental principles of ethical conduct in psychology. The purpose of these principles is to preserve the rights and well-being of research participants, clients, and society in general by ensuring that psychologists perform their work responsibly and ethically.
History of Psychology concerning Ethics
While the accepted view of ethics in Psychology has demonstrated the importance of ethical principles in guiding research and practice, it is also essential to consider the historical context of ethics in the discipline. The development of ethical principles and how those principles are used in study and practice can be better understood by looking at the history of ethics in psychology through the lens of the discipline of psychology. The philosophical underpinnings of psychology may be traced back to ancient Greece, where thinkers like Aristotle and Plato investigated questions regarding the nature of the mind and how it relates to human behavior. These early philosophers understood the significance of ethics in directing human behavior. As a result, they constructed ethical theories that strongly emphasized the value of virtue and morality. Ethical concerns were interwoven with philosophical inquiries about the nature of the mind and the soul concerning psychology.
Late in the 19th century, Wilhelm Wundt, in Leipzig, Germany, established the first psychological laboratory, which paved the way for the development of experimental psychology as a distinct subfield of psychology in the early 20th century (Lin & Li, 2021). Wundt and those who followed in his footsteps endeavored to apply scientific methods to investigate the mind and behavior. To this end, they conducted experiments investigating various perception, attention, and memory characteristics. However, some ethical considerations needed to be considered during these early trials. In the early days of experimental psychology, one of the most contentious debates concerned the appropriateness of using introspection for data gathering. Participants were asked to report their personal, subjective experiences of mental processes like thinking and perceiving as part of an introspection exercise. Introspection, on the other hand, has been called into doubt regarding its reliability and validity as a method of data collecting, in addition to raising questions over the possibility of subjectivity and prejudice.
Another early controversy in Psychology research involved the use of deception in experiments. Psychologists used deception to manipulate participants’ perceptions or behavior without fully informing them of the true nature of the study. For example, Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiments involved deceiving participants about the nature of the study, leading to concerns about the psychological harm that participants may have experienced. Ethical concerns also arose in research involving vulnerable populations, such as children and psychiatric patients. Psychologists conducted experiments on these populations without fully informed consent or consideration of the potential risks and benefits. The ethical issues raised by early Psychology research led to the development of ethical guidelines and principles to guide research and practice. The establishment of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the Belmont Report in the 1970s marked a turning point in the field’s approach to ethical considerations, emphasizing the importance of informed consent, privacy, and protection of vulnerable populations.
Limitations
While ethical problems and disputes marked the early history of Psychology, substantial progress has been achieved in establishing ethical principles and norms to govern research and practice. On the other hand, critical methods highlight the limitations of the existing ethical framework in the sector and the necessity of continual examination and revision of ethical principles. [Critical approaches] The current approach to ethics in psychology is biased toward the Western world, which is one of its limitations. The ethical norms of the American Psychological Association (APA) are founded on the philosophical and cultural traditions of the Western world, which may or may not be applicable or relevant to the traditions of other cultures. It has been underlined that one of the essential aspects of ethical research and practice is the requirement for cultural sensitivity as well as the consideration of individual diversity.
An additional limitation is the possibility that power dynamics will affect ethical decision-making. Researchers can be swayed by their personal biases and interests, as well as by pressures brought on by institutions and financial sources, which may directly oppose ethical ideals (Huminuik et al., 2022). It has been stressed how crucial it is for transparency and accountability in research and practice as significant precautions against these potential conflicts. In addition, technological technologies and social media have produced new ethical difficulties for the field of psychology, which may need the development of new ethical principles or the revision of existing ones. In the context of online research and data gathering, for instance, concerns about the security of personal information and privacy and obtaining informed consent have acquired a growing amount of importance.
Another concern that is brought to light by critical approaches is the possibility that ethical guidelines could be manipulated in order to justify behavior that is not ethical. Studies like the Milgram experiment and the Stanford Prison experiment are two examples of studies that, despite being conducted in accordance with ethical rules, may have violated fundamental ethical precepts. Both of these experiments were carried out at Stanford University. It has been emphasized that one of the essential aspects of ethical research and practice is the significance of holding individuals and institutions accountable for their actions and the requirement for constant examination and updating of ethical principles. Additionally, it has been emphasized that one of the most important aspects of ethical research and practice is the need for constant examination and updating of ethical principles.
Future Directions in Ethics and Psychology
The discipline of psychology and the ethical issues that guide research and practice within the discipline are continuously changing. Future directions in ethics and psychology need to address the ongoing need for evaluating and revising ethical guidelines, the potential impact of emerging technologies on ethical issues, and the importance of addressing ethical issues in psychology education and training. These are the three main areas that need to be addressed. The necessity of continually evaluating and updating ethical principles is an essential component of the routes that will be taken in the future in ethics and psychology. The American Psychological Association (APA) has developed a set of ethical principles and guidelines; nevertheless, these need to be examined on a regular basis and kept up to date in order to account for developments in the industry and the appearance of new ethical concerns (Huminuik et al., 2022). This may include resolving concerns over the privacy and security of data, the utilization of emerging technology, the requirement for cultural sensitivity, and taking individual characteristics into consideration.
Emerging technologies such as virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and social media create new ethical challenges for Psychology. For example, virtual reality in therapy raises questions about informed consent and the potential for harm. Artificial intelligence in decision-making may raise concerns about bias and fairness. The need for ethical guidelines to address these issues is critical to ensuring that the use of emerging technologies in Psychology is responsible and beneficial. In addition to updating ethical guidelines, future directions in ethics and Psychology must also address the importance of addressing ethical issues in Psychology education and training. This includes teaching students about ethical principles and guidelines and providing them with practical training in ethical decision-making. The development of ethical sensitivity and decision-making skills among Psychology students is critical to promoting responsible and ethical behavior in the field.
Conclusion
Ethical issues are essential for ensuring that Psychology research and practice are responsible, courteous, and beneficial to individuals and society. History shows how ethical considerations have changed, emphasizing the need for ongoing psychology ethics dialogues. History can teach us about ethical dilemmas in psychology. By studying the historical background of ethical considerations, we can better apply ethical principles and norms in present research and practice. This is crucial given psychology’s continuously changing world, with new technologies and research methods posing new ethical issues. Ethics in psychology must be discussed and debated, which includes evaluating and revising ethical rules and creating new ones to address growing ethical issues. Promoting ethical behavior and decision-making among psychology researchers and practitioners can help us understand human behavior and well-being. By prioritizing ethical principles and guidelines, we can ensure that research and practice in Psychology are responsible, respectful, and beneficial to individuals and society. This encompasses data privacy and security, evolving technology, cultural sensitivity, and individual variances.
References
Huminuik, K., O’Connor, M., Dockett, K., Kallivayalil, D. J., McFarland, S. G., & Wyndham, J. M. (2022). Moving human rights to the forefront of psychology: Summary of the final report of the APA task force on human rights. American Psychologist, 77(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000897
Lin, Z., & Li, N. (2021). Global diversity of authors, editors, and journal ownership across subdisciplines of psychology: Current state and policy implications. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/snj2e
Vandette, M., & Gosselin, J. (2019). Conceptual models of clinical supervision across professions: A scoping review of the professional psychology, social work, nursing, and medical literature in Canada. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 60(4), 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000190
Watkins, H. M. (2020). The morality of war: A review and research agenda. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619885872
write