Climate change is the world most pressing issue confronting the world today. The international community has identified it as a significant threat to global peace, security, and development. The Paris Agreement, created by the United Nations in 2015, intends to limit temperature increases at 1.5 degrees Celsius and greenhouse effect below two degrees Celsius higher than pre-industrial levels (United Nations, n.d.). To achieve this goal, all global governance actors must actively reduce carbon from industries. This policy paper will look at the various options that major multinational corporations have for dealing with climate change. The economic impact of multinational firms is substantial, and their operations leave a sizable carbon footprint. As a result, they must play a key part in reducing climate change. In this part, the paper will look at the potential solutions huge multinational organizations may have for resolving this issue.
Option 1: Reduce Carbon Footprint
Among the most important ways that multinational corporations can combat climate change is by lowering their carbon footprint. Energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable transportation are some strategies that can be used to accomplish this. A firm’s energy consumption and operational costs can be decreased by implementing energy-efficient technology and procedures in their operations (Zheng & Suh, 2019). These technologies can range from straightforward solutions like installing energy-efficient lighting and appliances to more complex ones like installing smart building management systems and employing data analytics to optimize energy use. More so, companies’ reliance on fossil fuels, a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, can be decreased by switching to renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, and hydropower. Installation of renewable energy infrastructure, such as solar panels or wind turbines, as well as the acquisition of sustainable energy credits or power purchase agreements from renewable energy providers, can all be part of this transformation.
Also, encouraging eco-friendly modes of transportation, including electric cars, public transportation, and cycling, can lower businesses’ carbon emissions. For instance, a business might motivate employees to use public transportation or electric automobiles by offering incentives like free or subsidized transit passes or electric vehicle charging facilities (Liljestrand et al .,2015). Corporations can save money by lowering their carbon footprint and helping combat climate change. Energy-efficient solutions can reduce power use and operating expenses, while switching to clean electricity sources can protect businesses from the instability of fossil fuel prices. In addition, supporting sustainable mobility solutions can lower employee commuting costs and enhance the company’s standing among stakeholders.
However, switching to a low-carbon economy can be expensive and may necessitate large up-front business investments. Furthermore, improving the current infrastructure to integrate energy-efficient technologies and sustainable transportation options may be necessary, which can be disruptive and time-consuming. The willingness of stakeholders and staff to implement these measures is also a factor in their effectiveness.
Option 2: Carbon Offsetting
Carbon offsetting is a mechanism that enables organizations, including multinational corporations, to reduce or remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by investing in projects that reduce or remove the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Carbon offsetting entails calculating a corporation’s carbon footprint and investing in projects that remove or reduce an equal amount of carbon emissions from the atmosphere. Carbon offset projects may include renewable energy development, afforestation, reforestation, and improvements to building and transportation energy efficiency (Gold Standard,2021).
The fundamental benefit of carbon offsetting is that it enables businesses to start acting immediately to cut their carbon emissions, even if they cannot do it immediately. Carbon offsets and environmental benefits can also boost the local economies of the towns where these initiatives are being carried out (Climate Action Plans & Business Sustainability | the Carbon Trust, n.d.). However, there are worries that carbon offsetting may be used as a license to pollute, allowing businesses to carry on as usual by merely purchasing carbon credits to make up for their emissions. The effectiveness of carbon offsetting is also a topic of discussion because certain offset projects might not reduce emissions as promised or be double credited by different parties. Generally, carbon offsetting can be a useful strategy for multinational organizations to lessen their carbon footprint, especially when immediate emissions reductions are impractical. Carbon offsetting should be utilized as a part of a larger strategy to cut emissions, not as the only response to the problem of climate change, though, as that would be vital.
Option 3: Collaborate with Governments and NGOs
Collaborating with governments and non-profit organizations is another possible strategy for multinational firms to combat climate. Collaboration among businesses among these parties can help create policies and programs to cut carbon emissions and advance sustainability. Participating in public-private partnerships is one method businesses can work with authorities and non-governmental organizations (PPPs). These partnerships make all parties accomplish shared sustainability and climate change goals. For instance, in 2014, Coca-Cola and USAID collaborated to encourage water conservation in developing countries (Coca-Cola & USAID, n.d.). The collaboration aims to increase clean water accessibility, reduce water use, and safeguard watersheds.
In addition, supporting or participating in sustainability programs is another way businesses can work with governments and NGOs. For instance, the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), a collaboration between various Organizations, promotes businesses to set science-based targets to lower greenhouse gas emissions (SBTi Climate Action in 2022 – Science Based Targets, n.d.). Since the SBTi’s debut in 2015, more than 1,000 businesses have made commitments. Firms can also manage the various regulatory systems related to climate change by working with governments. For instance, the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the complex carbon pricing structure, mandates that businesses buy permits to offset their carbon emissions. Corporations can more easily comprehend and abide by such regulatory systems by working with these parties.
The major advantage of this option is that partnerships with governments and Organizations can increase a company’s legitimacy and credibility regarding sustainability initiatives. Working with NGOs and governments can also give businesses access to new markets and clients who value sustainability. On the contrary, Cooperation can be difficult and may demand much-coordinating work. Corporations must be aware of potential conflicts of interest when cooperating with these bodies.
Option 4: Collaborative Intervention
Major international firms may also use collaborative interventions to combat climate change. To effectively solve the problem of climate change, this entails collaborating with other actors, such as governments, non-profit organizations, and other businesses. Many ways exist for firms to participate in this option. First, the company can work through sectoral initiatives. These initiatives involve businesses in a specific industry banding together to address a common issue. For instance, the Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance brings together businesses from many industries to jointly buy renewable energy and quicken the transition to a low-carbon economy (Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance, n.d). Second, companies can form public-private partnerships to develop a common solution to save climatic changes. For instance, the Climate and Clean Air Coalition collaborates with non-profit firms, businesses, and governments to minimize short-lived climate pollutants. Third, organizations may form joint ventures to create unique ways to prevent environmental pollution. In a joint venture, two or more firms join forces to create and carry out a specific solution to a problem. For example, in 2020, Microsoft and Starbucks announced a collaboration to create innovative technologies to lower the carbon footprint of the coffee sector (Starbucks Teams up With Microsoft for Blockchain-based Coffee Tracking, Predictive Ordering and More, 2020).
The major advantage of collaborative interventions is that they give businesses access to the knowledge, abilities, and networks of other players while tackling the problem of climate change. As a result, more sensible alternatives may be more effective and efficient. The reputation and social license to operate a corporation can also be improved through collaborative actions. On the contrary, this option may pose some difficulties since collaborative interventions can be difficult because they require a lot of coordination and Cooperation among actors. Corporations may also hesitate to work with third parties due to concerns about intellectual property and competitiveness.
Option 5: Debt Relief and Economic Assistance
Multinational firms can help countries shift to low-carbon economies by providing debt forgiveness and other economic aid. These initiatives can help nations create and carry out sustainable development goals by offering funding and technical support(Patchell & Hayter, 2013). The programs for debt relief can lessen the financial strain on developing nations, enabling them to finance development initiatives that reduce carbon emissions. Debt-for-climate swaps, for instance, include the cancellation or reduction of a nation’s debt in exchange for contributions to programs that reduce or prepare for climate change. This can aid in addressing both poverty alleviation and climate change (Chamon, 2022).
In addition, economic assistance programs can offer money and technical know-how to facilitate the shift to a low-carbon economy. For instance, the Green Climate Fund finances climate change adaptation and mitigation programs in underdeveloped nations (Green Climate Fund, n.d.). The Climate Investment Funds of the World Bank provide finance for low-carbon development initiatives in developing nations. More so, the backing of multinational firms can be extremely important to these initiatives. They can work with governments and Organizations to design and carry out sustainable development strategies. They can offer financial and technical assistance to help low-carbon development projects in developing nations. This could promote economic growth in developing nations while lowering their carbon footprint and opening new markets for low-carbon technologies and goods (Chamon, 2022).
However, initiatives for debt relief and financial aid may also have disadvantages. Debt relief is criticized for possibly rewarding nations for having bad economic policies and for not necessarily addressing the underlying causes of inequality and poverty. However, others contend that economic assistance programs may not accomplish their intended goals and may be prone to corruption and waste.
Option 6: Economic Reforms and Structural Adjustment
With structural changes and economic reforms, multinational firms can also tackle the problem of climate change. International financial institutions, governments, and multinational firms can collaborate to promote economic policies and reforms supporting sustainable development and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. This option entails a wide range of activities, including promoting eco-friendly investments, aiding in developing new technology, and putting carbon pricing mechanisms in place. For example, Morocco and World Bank’s solar installation partnership (World Bank Group, 2015). Multinational firms can also push to adopt laws supporting sustainable development, like building rules and renewable energy standards.
By implementing economic changes and structural adjustments, multinational firms may aid in the shift to a low-carbon economy and advance sustainable development. This choice can also open up new business prospects in the expanding green economy and assist businesses in achieving their sustainability goals. On the contrary, this choice could necessitate strong political commitment and coordination between national governments, international financial organizations, and multinational enterprises. Governments and businesses that depend on fossil fuels for economic expansion can also be opposed.
Option 7: Offering incentives for forest conservation efforts
International organizations can also combat climate change by providing incentives for forest conservation activities (Patchell & Hayter, 2013). Due to their ability to control water cycles, absorb carbon dioxide from the environment, and provide habitat for various wildlife, forests are essential to the world’s sustainability. On the other hand, deforestation is responsible for around 10% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, forest preservation and protection are crucial to reducing climate change (Börner et al., 2020). Multinational firms can provide incentives for forest conservation activities to help local governments and communities conserve their forests. These incentives include financial support in the form of grants, loans, or equity investments, as well as non-financial assistance in capacity building.
More so, conservation groups can work together with these firms to carry out reforestation programs. For instance, businesses can contribute to tree-planting initiatives or spend money on sustainable forestry methods (Börner et al., 2020). These programs reduce climate change by storing carbon and benefit the local economy and society by creating jobs and enhancing access to clean water. Also, these firms can effectively combat climate change by providing incentives for forest conservation activities, but there may also be difficulties. They include safeguarding the rights of neighborhood communities, distributing rewards fairly, and assuring the long-term viability of conservation initiatives.
Conclusion
The discussion shows that a wide variety of solutions are open to participants in global governance to address global concerns. While each choice has advantages and disadvantages, the success of any strategy depends on various conditions. The precise conditions of the problem at hand, financial resources, and political will are some elements that affect an approach’s effectiveness. Notwithstanding these difficulties, thoughtful evaluation of the options and their possible effects can create globally effective policies that support peace, human rights, and sustainable development. Global governance players must continue collaborating and exploring innovative solutions to these pressing global problems, as the repercussions of lack of action could be catastrophic for the world and subsequent generations. Lastly, parties should consider a combination of approaches tailored to specific issues and contexts. Collaborations with various stakeholders, such as governments, NGOs, and corporations, may be required to achieve long-term and equitable solutions.
References
Börner, J., Schulz, D., Wunder, S., & Pfaff, A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Forest Conservation Policies and Programs. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-025703
Chamon, M. D. (2022). Debt-for-Climate Swaps: Analysis, Design, and Implementation. Imfsg. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400215872.001.A001
Climate Action Plans & Business Sustainability | The Carbon Trust. (n.d.). https://www.carbontrust.com/
Coca-Cola & USAID (n.d.). A Global Partnership on Water | Fact Sheet | U.S. Global Development Lab | Archive – U.S. Agency for International Development. https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/GlobalDevLab/fact-sheets/coca-cola-and-usaid-global-partnership-water
Gold Standard. (2021). Our Standards. https://www.goldstandard.org/our-standards
Green Climate Fund. (n.d.). Green Climate Fund https://www.greenclimate.fund/
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2020). Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/CORSIA/Pages/default.aspx
Liljestrand, K., Christopher, M., & Andersson, D. (2015). Using a transport portfolio framework to reduce carbon footprint. The International Journal of Logistics Management.
Patchell, J., & Hayter, R. (2013). How big business can save the climate: multinational corporations can succeed where governments have failed. Foreign Aff., pp. 92, 17.
Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance. (n.d.). About REBA. Retrieved from https://rebuyers.org/about-reba/
SBTi Climate Action in 2022 – Science Based Targets. (n.d.). Science-Based Targets. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/blog/sbti-climate-action-in-2022#:~:text=In%20February%2C%20the%20SBTi%20will,to%20a%20net%2Dzero%20economy.
Starbucks collaborates with Microsoft for blockchain-based coffee tracking, predictive ordering, and more. (2020, May 17). Technology Magazine. https://technologymagazine.com/data-and-data-analytics/starbucks-teams-microsoft-blockchain-based-coffee-tracking-predictive-ordering-and-more
United Nations (no date) Paris Agreement, Unfccc. Int. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement (Accessed: March 19, 2023).
World Bank Group. (2015, November 24). Morocco to Make History with First-of-Its-Kind Solar Plant. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/11/20/morocco-to-make-history-with-first-of-its-kind-solar-plant
World Bank. (n.d.). Climate Change. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatechange/brief/global-climate-fund.
Zheng, J., & Suh, S. (2019). Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics. Nature Climate Change, 9(5), 374-378.
write