Hampton Roads is a large metropolitan area located on the southeastern coast of Virginia. It is the home of the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC), an organization that works to bring together the interests of the local governments in the region. The HRPDC was created in 1967 to provide regional coordination on economic development, land use planning, environmental protection, transportation, and other issues (Gilman et al. 17). The HRPDC has been focusing on developing renewable energy sources, including offshore wind. The Hampton Roads region is well-positioned to take advantage of offshore wind energy. It has an Atlantic coastline ideal for wind turbine placement. Its location makes it relatively easy to access ports and other infrastructure necessary for constructing and maintaining offshore wind farms (Hampton Roads Planning District Commission). Additionally, the HRPDC has worked to create a supportive regulatory framework for offshore wind development in the region. It includes a policy that allows for the construction of offshore wind turbines in state waters.
The development of offshore wind has the potential to bring several benefits to the Hampton Roads region. These include increased jobs, a boost in economic activity, and a cleaner energy source that reduces air pollution, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions (Musial et al. 23). Additionally, offshore wind is a relatively inexpensive source of energy, with the cost of electricity generated from offshore turbines being comparable to or even cheaper than electricity generated from other sources.
This paper will discuss the policy approaches to support the growth of offshore wind energy in the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC). It will first provide an overview of the policy initiatives taken by the Commonwealth of Virginia to promote the development of offshore wind energy. It will then examine the policy approaches taken by the HRPDC to promote the growth of offshore wind energy in the region, including its resolutions, research initiatives, working groups, and advisory councils. Finally, the paper will analyze several potential policy approaches that could be implemented to support the growth of offshore wind energy in the HRPDC, including renewable energy targets, Feed-in Tariffs, Offshore Wind Zones, and offshore wind leasing. Finally, it will provide recommendations with intended Challenges for how these policy and planning approaches can be implemented to ensure the successful deployment of offshore wind energy in the HRPDC region.
Background
Firstly, discussing the more comprehensive overview, the Commonwealth of Virginia has taken steps to support offshore wind energy development. In 2019, Governor Ralph Northam issued Executive Order Forty-Four, which established the Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority to facilitate the development of offshore wind energy in the state (Gilman et al. 45). This executive order also includes a commitment to assist in the development of a Virginia Offshore Wind Strategic Plan to provide guidance and recommendations for the development of offshore wind energy in the state (Metcalfe). The Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority is also charged with facilitating the development of an offshore wind supply chain in the state and working with the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy to develop a comprehensive energy plan that includes offshore wind energy.
In addition to the executive order, the Commonwealth of Virginia has enacted legislation to support offshore wind energy development. In 2019, the General Assembly passed the Virginia Offshore Wind Development Act, which established the Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority and set out a process for the development of offshore wind energy projects in the state (Gilman et al. 34). This legislation also established the Virginia Offshore Wind Development Fund, which provides funding for the development of offshore wind energy projects.
The Commonwealth of Virginia has also enacted several policies to support offshore wind energy development. These include establishing an offshore wind energy tax credit, which provides tax incentives for developing offshore wind energy projects (Matthews 34). The Commonwealth has also established a renewable energy portfolio standard, which requires that 15% of electricity sold in the state come from renewable energy sources by 2025 (Musial 73). In addition, the state has established a goal of producing 5,000 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2034.
Moreover, discussing in the Hampton Roads planning district commission (HRPDC), the local government has taken a proactive approach to promote offshore wind energy. The HRPDC has developed a regional offshore wind energy initiative, which provides guidance and support to local governments and organizations in the region (Musial et al. 49). The initiative encourages local governments to develop policies to incentivize offshore wind energy development and to coordinate with regional and state partners to ensure that the benefits of offshore wind energy are realized in the region (Metcalfe). Furthermore, the HRPDC has engaged in several other initiatives to promote the use of offshore wind energy in the region, such as providing technical assistance to local governments and organizations in the region, developing an offshore wind energy development plan, and providing funding for offshore wind energy projects.
The HRPDC has also undertaken several policy initiatives to promote the use of offshore wind energy. For example, the HRPDC has conducted several studies to assess the potential for offshore wind energy development in the region and has developed an offshore wind energy development plan (Matthews 78). The plan outlines various strategies to promote offshore wind energy development in the region, such as providing incentives for developers, encouraging collaboration between local governments and organizations, and providing funding for offshore wind energy projects (Musial 89). The HRPDC has also taken steps to ensure that the benefits of offshore wind energy are realized in the region, such as providing tax credits for developers and encouraging the development of transmission infrastructure. Moreover, The HRPDC also funded a research program to understand better the environmental, economic, and social impacts of offshore wind energy in the region (Musial et al. 45). The research program was designed to assess the potential economic and environmental benefits of offshore wind energy, as well as the potential risks and impacts associated with the technology. The research program also developed a set of best practices and guidelines for developing offshore wind projects.
Furthermore, the HRPDC has taken several steps to promote offshore wind energy development in the region. In 2017, the HRPDC approved many resolutions that made it easier for developers to pursue offshore wind projects. These resolutions included the Streamlining Offshore Wind Energy Permitting Process and the Offshore Wind Energy Site Selection Process (Musial 33). The Streamlining Offshore Wind Energy Permitting Process was designed to simplify and accelerate the permitting process for offshore wind projects. In contrast, the Offshore Wind Energy Site Selection Process was designed to identify and prioritize potential offshore wind project sites in the region.
Finally, the HRPDC established the Hampton Roads Offshore Wind Development Advisory Council in 2018. This council provides advice and guidance on the development of offshore wind projects in the region (Musial et al. 12). The council is composed of representatives from local governments, state and federal agencies, industry, non-profit organizations, and the academic community. The council is also charged with providing advice and recommendations on the state of offshore wind energy in the region and developing regional policies and best practices for developing offshore wind projects (Musial 65).
In sum, the HRPDC is taking a proactive approach to promoting offshore wind energy development in the region. Through its resolutions, research initiatives, working groups, and advisory councils, the HRPDC is making it easier for developers to pursue offshore wind projects in the region. In doing so, the HRPDC is helping to create a more sustainable energy future for the Hampton Roads region.
Alternative Analysis
One potential policy approach to support offshore wind energy growth in HRPDC is establishing a mandate for renewable energy targets. This approach, known as a renewable portfolio standard (RPS), requires utilities to derive a certain percentage of their energy from renewable sources, such as offshore wind. This approach has been successful in several states, including California, with an RPS of 60% by 2030 (Yahalom et al. 54).
A key strength of this approach is that it provides a clear and ambitious target for deploying offshore wind energy, which can drive investment and innovation in the sector (Musial 57-58). It also creates a stable policy environment that can help to attract private sector investment in offshore wind projects. Additionally, by requiring utilities to source a certain percentage of their energy from renewable sources, an RPS can help to diversify the energy mix and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
However, there are also some potential shortcomings to this approach. First, establishing an RPS can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring developing detailed regulations and creating mechanisms to track compliance. Second, an RPS can be expensive for utilities, as they may need to purchase renewable energy credits (RECs) to meet their targets. It can lead to higher electricity prices for consumers. Finally, an RPS may not be sufficient on its own to drive offshore wind energy deployment, as other factors, such as access to financing and the availability of suitable sites, can also impact the growth of the sector (Thakur et al. 45).
Another policy is the offshore Wind Feed-in Tariff. A Feed-in Tariff (FIT) is a policy that provides financial incentives for producing renewable energy. In the context of offshore wind, a FIT could be used to support the growth of the technology by providing incentives for developers to build and operate offshore wind farms (Yahalom 23). FITs can be structured in various ways, such as a fixed or variable rate for each unit of energy produced or a payment for each megawatt hour of energy produced.
The advantages of using a Feed-in Tariff to support the growth of offshore wind energy in HRPDC include that it can provide a stable and predictable revenue stream for developers, which can help to reduce financing costs and encourage investment in offshore wind energy (Thakur et al. 29). Additionally, it can provide a financial incentive for developers to build offshore wind farms and operate them more efficiently. Furthermore, FITs can be tailored to the specific needs of offshore wind energy in HRPDC, such as providing incentives for using locally-produced materials or services (Musial 78).
On the other hand, there are some potential drawbacks to using a FIT to support offshore wind energy in HRPDC. For example, FITs can be expensive, requiring public funds to finance the incentives. Additionally, FITs can be challenging to implement, as they require careful design and monitoring to ensure they provide the intended benefits (Thakur 98). Furthermore, FITs can lead to higher electricity prices for consumers, as the incentive cost is ultimately passed on to the consumer.
Offshore Wind Zones are another planning approach that can be implemented. Offshore Wind Zones (OWZs) are areas of the ocean that have been designated for the development of offshore wind energy. OWZs can be established through state or federal legislation, and they are typically divided into zones according to their environmental, economic, and social characteristics (Thakur et al. 101). OWZs can provide several benefits to offshore wind energy development, such as providing a clearly defined area for siting projects, reducing permitting delays, and minimizing conflicts with other ocean uses.
The advantages of using OWZs to support offshore wind energy in HRPDC include that they can help streamline the permitting process by providing clear guidelines for siting projects. Additionally, OWZs can help to minimize conflicts with other ocean uses, such as fisheries or shipping lanes, by providing a clearly defined area for offshore wind energy development (Yahalom et al. 39). Furthermore, OWZs can help to ensure that offshore wind farms are built with the highest environmental standards in mind, as they typically require the use of the best available technology and monitoring of environmental impacts.
On the other hand, some potential drawbacks exist to using OWZs to support offshore wind energy. For example, OWZs can be expensive to implement, requiring significant mapping, surveying, and enforcement resources. Additionally, OWZs can be challenging to modify or adjust once established, limiting the policy’s flexibility. Furthermore, OWZs can lead to conflicts between states, as adjacent states may have different policies and objectives for offshore wind energy development.
Lastly, offshore wind leasing is a policy approach involving leasing federally-owned ocean waters to develop offshore wind energy. This approach can be used to support the growth of offshore wind energy by providing an efficient and cost-effective way to access offshore wind resources (Yahalom et al. 91). Leases typically involve a competitive bidding process, in which developers submit bids for a lease, and the highest bidder is awarded the lease.
The advantages of using offshore wind leasing to support the growth of offshore wind energy include that it can provide a transparent and competitive process for awarding leases, which can help ensure that leases are awarded fairly and equitably. Additionally, it can provide a reliable source of revenue for the state, as developers are typically required to pay an annual fee for the lease in addition to any other fees associated with the project (Yahalom et al. 56). Furthermore, offshore wind leasing can help to ensure that offshore wind farms are built in an environmentally responsible manner, as leases typically require the use of the best available technology and strict environmental monitoring.
On the other hand, offshore wind leasing has some potential drawbacks. For example, leasing can be expensive, as developers must pay an annual fee for each lease. Additionally, leasing can be difficult to modify or adjust once it has been established, which can limit the flexibility of the policy (Qin et al. 34). Furthermore, offshore wind leasing can lead to conflicts between states, as adjacent states may have different policies and objectives for offshore wind energy development.
Recommendations
The HRPDC region has the potential to become a leader in the offshore wind energy industry. In order to capitalize on this potential and ensure the successful deployment of offshore wind energy in the region, the right mix of policy and planning approaches must be employed. In this context, the following recommendations are proposed. In order to ensure the success of these policies, they must be implemented in tandem with other measures, such as providing access to financing and ensuring the availability of suitable sites (Pietryk 89). Additionally, it is crucial to monitor the implementation of these policies in order to ensure that they are providing the intended benefits and are not leading to unintended consequences, such as higher electricity prices for consumers.
The first is establishing a regulatory framework and developing a site assessment program. The first step in developing offshore wind energy in HRPDC should be to establish a regulatory framework (Firestone et al. 34). This framework should provide a clear set of rules and regulations that govern the development of offshore wind energy projects. This framework should include regulations on the types of projects that can be developed, the locations of projects, the types of technology that can be used, and the environmental impacts of the development. However, in order to ensure that the development of offshore wind energy is done safely and efficiently, it is essential to develop a program that assesses potential sites for offshore wind development (Daudani et al. 19). This program should include an assessment of environmental impacts, including potential impacts on local wildlife, aquatic life, and coastal ecosystems. It should also include an assessment of potential safety and security risks, such as the potential for accidents, terrorism, and sabotage.
Develop a Financing Program and establish a program for public education and engagement. In order to ensure that the development of offshore wind energy is economically viable, it is essential to develop a financing program. This program should include incentives for private investment in offshore wind energy, such as tax credits, grants, and loans. It should also include incentives for utilities to purchase offshore wind energy, such as long-term contracts and performance-based payments (Firestone et al. 34). However, in order to ensure that the development of offshore wind energy is done in a way that is beneficial to the public, it is crucial to establish a program for public education and engagement. This program should include public forums and awareness campaigns informing the public about offshore wind energy’s benefits and addressing potential concerns (Qin et al. 76).
Establish a Permitting Process and Monitoring program. In order to ensure that the development of offshore wind energy is done promptly, it is essential to establish a permitting process (Daudani et al. 49). This process should include an environmental review process that takes into account the potential impacts of the development, as well as a process for public input and engagement. However, it is essential to develop a monitoring program to ensure that offshore wind energy development is done safely and efficiently (Pietryk 67). This program should monitor the performance of the offshore wind farms and the impacts of the development on local wildlife, aquatic life, and coastal ecosystems.
Additionally, a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) should be implemented to ensure that a specific portion of the state’s electricity is sourced from renewable sources. It would provide a clear and ambitious target for deploying offshore wind energy, which can drive investment and innovation in the sector. Additionally, an RPS would create a stable policy environment that can attract private sector investment in offshore wind projects. Also, a Feed-in Tariff (FIT) should be implemented to provide a stable and predictable revenue stream for offshore wind developers, which can help to reduce financing costs and encourage investment in offshore wind energy (Qin et al. 78-79). Additionally, FITs can be tailored to the specific needs of offshore wind energy, such as providing incentives for using locally-produced materials or services.
Lastly, offshore wind leasing should be used to provide a transparent and competitive process for awarding leases, which can help to ensure that leases are awarded fairly and equitably (Hatcher et al. 56). Additionally, offshore wind leasing can provide a reliable source of revenue for the state, as developers are typically required to pay an annual fee for the lease in addition to any other fees associated with the project. Finally, Offshore Wind Zones (OWZs) should be implemented to streamline the permitting process and ensure that offshore wind farms are built with the highest environmental standards in mind (Loftis et al. 89). OWZs can help to minimize conflicts with other ocean uses, such as fisheries or shipping lanes, by providing a clearly defined area for offshore wind energy development.
Despite the potential benefits, several limitations and challenges are associated with the abovementioned recommendations. First, implementing these policies requires significant financial resources, which can be challenging in the current economic climate (Loftis 76). Additionally, in order to be successful, these policies need to be implemented in a coordinated manner, which requires collaboration between different stakeholders, such as government agencies, industry, and the public (Firestone et al. 71). Furthermore, there is the potential for unintended consequences from the implementation of these policies, such as increased electricity prices for consumers. Finally, the success of these policies also depends on the availability of suitable sites for offshore wind energy development, which can be limited depending on the local geography and marine environment.
Conclusion
The Commonwealth of Virginia and the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission are taking a proactive approach to promoting offshore wind energy development in the region. Through the implementation of executive orders, legislation, and policies, the Commonwealth of Virginia is working to facilitate offshore wind energy development in the state. Additionally, the HRPDC is taking several steps to promote offshore wind energy use in the region, such as providing technical assistance and funding for offshore wind projects. A variety of policy approaches can be used to support offshore wind energy deployment in HRPDC, such as renewable portfolio standards, feed-in tariffs, and offshore wind leasing. Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages, and it is essential to consider the specific needs and objectives of the region before selecting a specific policy approach. Furthermore, to capitalize on this potential, it is essential to implement the right mix of policy and planning approaches. It includes establishing a regulatory framework and site assessment program, developing a financing program, establishing a program for public education and engagement, establishing a permitting process and monitoring program, implementing a Renewable Portfolio Standard, a Feed-in Tariff, and offshore wind leasing, and implementing Offshore Wind Zones.
Works Cited
Daudani, R. (2020). Examining the market and regulatory dynamics behind the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).
Firestone, Jeremy, et al. “Maryland’s Offshore Wind Power Potential.” 2017.
Gilman, Patrick, et al. “HRPDC/National Offshore Wind Strategy.” HRPDCVA.gov, 2021, www.hrpdcva.gov/uploads/docs/National%20Offshore%20Wind%20Strategy.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec. 2022.
Hampton Roads Planning District Commission. “Offshore Wind.” HRPDCVA.gov, 2022, www.hrpdcva.gov/departments/planning/offshore-wind/. Accessed 14 Dec. 2022.
Hatcher, P. G., Miles, J. J., Newbold, K. F., Hagerman Jr, G. M., & Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium. (2017). Virginia Offshore Wind Studies.
Loftis, J. D., Mitchell, M., Atkinson, L., Hamlington, B., Allen, T., Forrest, D., … & Bushnell, M. (2018). Integrated ocean, earth, and atmospheric observations for Hampton Roads, Virginia resilience planning. Marine Technology Society Journal, 52(2).
Matthews, Michael R. “Analyzing the Potential for Interstate Collaboration to Catalyze the Offshore Wind Industry in the US Southeast.” 2020.
Metcalfe, Trevor. “Hampton Roads Plan to Bring Offshore Wind Supply Chain to Region Gets GO Virginia Funding.” The Virginian-Pilot, 2020, www.pilotonline.com/inside-business/vp-ib-wind-grant-0914-20200914-id6gmqhmmbahjb22xr5vvc4rw4-story.html. Accessed 14 Dec. 2022.
Musial, W., Beiter, P., Spitsen, P., Nunemaker, J., Gevorgian, V., Cooperman, A., … & Shields, M. (2020). Offshore Wind Technology Data Update (2019)[Slides] (No. NREL/TP-5000-77411). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
Musial, Walter, et al. “2018 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report.” HRPDCVA.gov, 2018, www.hrpdcva.gov/uploads/docs/2018%20Offshore%20Wind%20Technologies%20Market%20Report.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec. 2022.
Pietryk, S. (2017). Virginia Offshore Wind Technology Advancement Project (VOWTAP) DOE EE0005985 Final Technical Report Rev 1a. Dominion, Richmond, VA (United States).
Qin, Chao, Gordon Saunders, and Eric Loth. “Offshore wind energy storage concept for cost-of-rated-power savings.” Applied Energy 201 2017: 148–157.
Russell, A., Bingaman, S., & Garcia, H. M. (2021). Threading a moving needle: The spatial dimensions characterizing US offshore wind policy drivers. Energy Policy, 157, 112516.
Thakur, S., Abhinav, K. A., & Saha, N. (2018). Load mitigation using slotted flaps in offshore wind turbines. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 140(6).
Yahalom, Shmuel, et al. “Offshore Wind Development Research [UTRC Region 2].” 2018.
write