According to (Tsaramirsis et al.,2022), crafting smart database access architecture is foundational for any DSS aimed at empowering strategic decisions around major acquisitions. The value of data is directly tied to its quality. The goal should surface holistic insights by tapping into multiple streams: current internal data, custom-built databases, and integration with external public sources. Start by connecting seamlessly to the corporation’s ERP platforms – SAP, Oracle, or others. This gets one past summarized report into direct access to transactional database tables via APIs and links (Yathiraju, 2022). This way, one can flexibly query, filter, and segment datasets on the fly rather than rely on static reporting. For example, extract granular revenue data over time and slice/dice by product lines, regions, customer segments, and sales channels – illuminating growth curves, trends, and projections.
Drilling into the ERP’s general ledger and financial modules provides the same granular visibility into costs, expenses, and profitability data for accurate modeling (Taschner et al.,2023). Analyze types of costs, variable vs fixed relationships, and profitability by business units – key details that aid scenario planning and diligence. However, the full picture requires building custom databases tailored to the DSS for acquisitions, plus integrating outside public data streams. Maintain curated candidate profiles, historic deal knowledge, executive bios, and advanced forecast models purpose-built for mergers and acquisitions. Moreover, it connects to external databases providing market trends, regulations, reputation signals, and macro forces that shape strategy.
Combining operative data at hand specialized M&A databases with external intelligence creates an additional edge to strategy. This allows multidimensional visibility to provide leadership with the information needed to understand these high-risk choices. Organized data through access and integration is the whole ground for any DSS that gears towards transformation utilizing corporate development (Bado et al.,2022). Furthermore, the balanced sheet provides a glimpse into asset position, notional liabilities, capital structure, and liquidity levels within organizations. In contrast, risk estimation and valuation consider factors like visibility into assets/liabilities and other measures.
Another vital point is to retain access to human capital management databases in employee files, salaries, organization charts, and personnel analysis. This gives priceless transparency to every takeover’s talent and points out optimizing roles and responsibilities. According to (Boxall et al.,2022), it is important first to understand the human resources aspect before cultural integration can be realized.
Unique Databases for the DSS
Even when tapping into the target company’s ERP, one must build custom databases unique to the DSS for strategic acquisitions. These specialized datasets provide intel beyond what regular corporate systems contain. For starters, one needs proprietary models that forecast future revenue, costs, and profitability based on historical data from the target. Connect ERP inputs to financial equations and algorithms that project growth rates, expenses, cash flow, and valuation – the key outputs needed for decision-making. Enable analysts to flex assumptions and rapidly mockup case models within the DSS tool.
Another crucial aspect is a database profiling potential acquisition candidates and cataloging relevant attributes like industry, location, culture fit assessment, strategic rationale, and high-level financials. This enables screen prospects to follow model requirements to smartcuts that are reasonable—establishing a knowledge base that stores and archives records of all past acquisition deals can also be extremely useful in this regard. Describe the sequence of events and insights into the way each previous corporate takeover or merger development was induced and changed with convenience in highlighting major milestones occurring therein, as well as outline problems encountered and lessons learned from the broad experience gained. This can be used to guide experts in making better plans so as not to make a repetitive error in reviewing new deals.
Accessing organizational charts and descriptions of leaders for the leadership teams at target companies can offer helpful information promptly (Schiuma et al.,2022). Know the communicational compliance structures, retention issues, and skill areas requiring a rectification process after purchase—similarly, knowing early whether management continuity smoothes out streamlines. Authentic – practices such as this involving sheathing over broader company data with DSS databases designed for these pivotal acquisitions raise intricacies and foresight. One needs to make data–driven decisions rather than go by some gut feeling.
Integration of Public Databases
Importantly, to govern the construction of database access for DSS to aid strategic acquisitions, knowledge streams should be utilized from varied angles to enable leadership to understand the totality. Feed from a core financial and operating programs system enables the use of these systems by connecting into their ERP systems by each target company. You can use these historical revenues and expenses, inventory, among other things, as the basis for forecasting and building algorithms to model future situations. Real-world financial analysts find it easy to manipulate assumptions, allowing for quick evaluation that can rapidly compare substitutes for acquisition options (Singh et al.,2022).
Also, acquiring a bespoke database to adapt to DSS is crucial. One is to profile potential acquisition target companies based on strategic lease criteria or factors, which include location, culture, industry, and financial measurements. This enables target screening towards the best targets. Add a list of past deals with information on notable mileposts, integration, hurdles, and lessons learned while working toward completion. This kind of institutional knowledge prevents us from doing the same thing repeatedly. Moreover, an org-chart database helps analyze leadership teams and structures implemented in prospective companies to assess issues regarding the continuity of management planning.
However, the information obtained is limited to internal data. This expansion of perspective from the inclusion of our productivity targets and public information can be viewed as, ‘What is this process’? Financial and industrial-based databases provide key data on market trends, credit risk profiles, and macroeconomic forces that drive acquisition platforms. With any inter-border agreement, it is advisable to consider policy frameworks developed by government databases. Moreover, monitoring news and social media to ensure that it either continually realizes or flags reputational risks, controversies, and public opinion on brand value and prospects affects goodwill (Behera et al.,2022). This people-centric perspective provides some balance against the quantitative information found in financial data.
In conclusion, the DSS does not simply end; it beckons. It calls out the CEO to a future where every judgment is informed, each purchase is tactical, and every test into the corporate scene is not only about information but also about stories that it informs, lessons it sends, and the prosperity that flows ahead. DSS is undoubtedly not an apparatus; it is the primary conductor that subtlety harmonizes strategic expertise.
References
Bado, M. F., Tonelli, D., Poli, F., Zonta, D., & Casas, J. R. (2022). Digital twin for civil engineering systems: An exploratory review for distributed sensing updating. Sensors, 22(9), 3168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093168
Behera, R. K., Bala, P. K., Rana, N. P., & Kizgin, H. (2022). Cognitive computing based ethical principles for improving organisational reputation: A B2B digital marketing perspective. Journal of business research, 141, 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.070
Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2022). Strategy and human resource management. Bloomsbury Publishing. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/vol57/iss1/84
Schiuma, G., Schettini, E., Santarsiero, F., & Carlucci, D. (2022). The transformative leadership compass: six competencies for digital transformation entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(5), 1273-1291. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0087
Singh, V., Chen, S. S., Singhania, M., Nanavati, B., & Gupta, A. (2022). How are reinforcement learning and deep learning algorithms used for big data based decision making in financial industries–A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100094
Taschner, A., & Charifzadeh, M. (2023). Digitalization and Supply Chain Accounting. In Management Accounting in Supply Chains (pp. 281-324). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41300-2_9
Tsaramirsis, G., Kantaros, A., Al-Darraji, I., Piromalis, D., Apostolopoulos, C., Pavlopoulou, A., … & Khan, F. Q. (2022). A modern approach towards an industry 4.0 model: From driving technologies to management. Journal of Sensors, 2022, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5023011
Yathiraju, N. (2022). Investigating the use of an Artificial Intelligence Model in an ERP Cloud-Based System. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers, 7(2), 1-26. https://aipublications.com/ijeec/