Introduction
Complex, prolonged disputes present significant challenges to global peace and security because of their extended time frame, complex causes, and ingrained violence. Regional dispute resolution systems, which make use of close proximity, common interests, and cross-cultural understanding, are essential in resolving such disputes. However, there are a number of variables that can affect how effective these mechanisms are, including the type of dispute, the parties’ level of involvement, outside interventions, and the credibility and capability of the regional processes themselves. Assessing the efficacy of regional dispute resolution processes entails scrutinizing multiple case studies sourced from disparate worldwide regions. We may find out more about these processes’ function in resolving complicated, prolonged conflicts and pinpoint lessons learned for upcoming initiatives to promote peace by examining their achievements and shortcomings. The dynamics of regional conflict resolution processes, their effect on transforming conflicts, and the variables determining their success are explored, drawing on conflict resolution theory frameworks and empirical data from a variety of case studies. We will evaluate both the advantages and drawbacks of regional strategies and identify areas for improvement in handling complicated, prolonged conflicts through a comparative study of various locations and disputes. By doing this, we hope to deepen our comprehension of the role that regional mechanisms for resolving conflicts play in fostering peace as well as stability in areas affected by conflict and to offer guidance to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers working on peacebuilding and conflict resolution initiatives worldwide.
Theoretical framework
Constructivism
Constructivism holds that disagreements about identities, values, and ideas give rise to conflicts in addition to more concrete problems like resource scarcity or territorial disputes. These arbitrary elements influence how individuals view their own interests, the validity of their complaints, and the viability of possible solutions. As such, resolving conflicts necessitates addressing fundamental views, ideas, and identities in addition to financial interests.
How Constructivist Theory Informs Our Understanding of Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms:
By emphasizing the influence of ideas, norms, and identities on regional dynamics and dispute resolution procedures, constructivist theory contributes to our knowledge of regional conflict resolution mechanisms. Constructivism highlights the significance of social connections, communal identities, and shared histories in influencing regional collaboration as well as dispute resolution, in contrast to Realist viewpoints, which place a higher priority on the pursuit of power and state goals.
Regional dispute-resolution processes function within particular social and cultural scenarios, where views of confidence, safety, and collaboration among neighboring nations are shaped by past traditions, social expectations, and shared identities. The shared identities or perceived dangers of regional actors can either promote or impede collaboration in conflict resolution, as explained by constructivist theory. As evidenced by the Dayton Accords in the Balkans, common previous grievances or ethnic links among actors in the region may serve as a foundation for trust-building and conflict settlement.
Constructivism also emphasizes the significance of rhetoric and persuasion in influencing attempts to resolve regional disputes. Dialogue, negotiation, and consensus-building among heterogeneous actors with conflicting interests and perspectives are frequently involved in regional systems. Constructivist perspectives emphasize how language, symbolism, actions, and framing influence how people see legality and encourage peaceful resolutions to regional problems.
The importance of concepts, conventions, and identities in forming local dispute resolution processes is emphasized by constructivist theory. Politicians and experts can create more successful conflict resolution solutions by comprehending the subjective elements impacting regional dynamics. In this sense, regional approaches are essential because they use closeness, common interests, and cultural awareness to promote communication, collaboration, and long-term peace in areas devastated by violence.
Discussion
Importance of Regional Approaches in Addressing Complex Conflicts
Common language, culture, and historical connections between neighboring nations promote collaboration, building trust, and interaction in attempts to resolve conflicts. Since regional actors are more familiar with the distinctive circumstances and sensitivities of the area, they can customize interventions to specifically address complaints and worries. Furthermore, a number of parties with similar objectives and worries are frequently involved in regional disputes. By giving these parties a forum for discussion, compromise, and negotiation, regional institutions raise the possibility of long-lasting peace accords. Regional strategies lower the chance of a violent relapse by integrating pertinent parties in the peace process, which strengthens the legality and possession of agreements for peace. Regional systems, however, are in a better position to create all-encompassing and situation-specific solutions to intricate disputes, considering the various political, social, economic, and cultural elements involved(Pfeifer & Schwab, 2022). Regional approaches, as opposed to only treating the signs of violence, can promote long-term stability and reunification by addressing the underlying causes and causes of violence
Case Studies Representing Different Regions and Conflicts.
Case Study 1: Balkans – Dayton Accords
Background Information on the Conflict:
When Yugoslavia broke up in the early 1990s, the Balkans saw one of the bloodiest wars in Europe since World War II. Ethnic violence between Bosniaks, Serbs, and Croats defined the Bosnian War (1992–1995), leading to extensive crimes, ethnic cleansing, and population displacement.
Description of the Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanism
The Dayton Accords sought to put an end to the Bosnian War and provide a foundation for peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. They were negotiated in Dayton, Ohio, and ratified in December 1995(Vujačić, 2023). Along with global negotiators from the US and the EU, the accord featured officials from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Serbia.
Analysis of the Mechanism’s Effectiveness
Negotiation Processes
Strong attempts at diplomacy and global pressure helped to facilitate the process of negotiations that resulted in the Dayton Accords. The agreement defined boundaries for the Bosniak, Serb, and Croat populations and formed a decentralized model of leadership. Despite numerous difficulties and sacrifices during the talks, the parties were able to come to an agreement to terminate the dispute.
Implementation of Agreements
There were numerous challenges when executing the Dayton Accords, including opposition from nationalist groups, logistical issues, and conflicting interests among the participants. To supervise the implementation phase and ensure adherence to the peace agreement, the Office of the High Representative (OHR) was founded (Aboultaif, 2023). The OHR’s participation assisted in stabilizing the situation and opened the door for reconstruction following the war and reunification initiatives, despite early failures.
Role of External Actors
The United States and the European Union, in particular, were instrumental in mediating the Dayton Accords and in providing financial, military, and diplomatic assistance for their execution. Safety was maintained, and the repatriation of refugees and internally displaced people was made easier by the NATO-led peacekeeping mission, known as IFOR/SFOR. In the wake of the conflict, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s infrastructure reconstruction and economic recovery were significantly supported by foreign financial and development aid.
Long-Term Stability and Peacebuilding Efforts
Even while the Dayton Accords were successful in putting an end to the current conflicts and bringing Bosnia and Herzegovina to a precarious state of peace, difficulties still stand in the way of long-term stability and reconciliation. The nation is still sharply divided along racial boundaries, and ethnic conflict continues to exist. Reforming governing systems, addressing allegations of war crimes, and fostering interethnic communication have all been challenging and lengthy tasks (Melek Aylin Özoflu & Bora Besgul, 2023). Nevertheless, the Dayton Accords show the value of regional cooperation in resolving difficult conflicts and provide a fundamental framework for peacebuilding initiatives in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Case Study 2: Africa – African Union’s Mediation Efforts in Sudan
Background Information on the Conflict
For many years, Sudan has been troubled by internal disputes, such as the civil war between the authorities and South Sudanese rebels and the conflict in Darfur. Ethnic, religious, and socioeconomic disparities have been the driving forces behind these conflicts (Ifediora, 2020), which have left a trail of destruction in their wake and created humanitarian emergencies.
Description of the Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanism
The African Union (AU) has been actively participating in peacekeeping operations, discussions between warring parties, and conflict mediation in Sudan. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), which was signed in 2005 by the Sudanese government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A), was the result of the AU’s initiatives.
Analysis of the Mechanism’s Effectiveness
Negotiation Processes
To get the parties to negotiate, the AU-led mediation initiative in Sudan featured extensive diplomatic engagement and shuttle diplomacy. A structured distribution of wealth, power sharing, and the ultimate independence referendum in South Sudan were supplied by the CPA. Despite difficulties and disappointments during the discussions, such as breaches of agreements on ceasefire and implementation postponements, the AU’s persistence eventually produced a comprehensive peace deal.
Implementation of Agreements
The CPA was signed, but problems with its implementation continued, escalating the conflicts between South Sudanese rebels and the Sudanese government. Unresolved issues like boundary disputes, sharing of oil money, and safety measures hindered the chances of a long-lasting peace (Mangok, 2022). In order to reduce hostilities and make it easier for the peace accord to be implemented, the AU and other international players kept up their mediation efforts and peacekeeping missions.
Role of External Actors
The AU-led mediation efforts in Sudan have been greatly aided by external parties, such as surrounding nations, regional agencies, and foreign mediators. Peace discussions and peacekeeping activities were supported diplomatically, financially, and logistically by the United Nations, the European Union, and the United States(Tawfik, 2023). Troops from nearby nations, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda, have also been deployed to Sudan as part of AU-led peacekeeping operations.
Long-Term Stability and Peacebuilding Efforts
The AU’s attempts at mediation in Sudan have contributed significantly to the resolution of the long-running conflicts in the nation, despite difficulties and disappointments. The 2011 independence of South Sudan was made possible by the CPA, despite ensuing difficulties with development, government, and security. The necessity of consistent regional and global assistance for peacebuilding initiatives in Sudan is highlighted by the ongoing attempts to address the underlying causes of violence, foster reconciliation, and establish government institutions.
Case Study 3: Middle East – Arab-Israeli Conflict
Background Information on the Conflict
One of the longest-running and most complicated wars in contemporary history is the Arab-Israeli conflict, which is fueled by rival nationalist ambitions, historical grievances, and geographical disputes. With the founding of the State of Israel in 1948 and the ensuing Arab-Israeli wars, annexations of territory, and peace talks, the conflict had roots in the late 1800s.
Description of the Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanism
The goal of numerous regional and global initiatives, such as the Camp David Summit, the Oslo Accords, and the Arab Peace Initiative, has been to use negotiated agreements on peace and settlement to put an end to the Arab-Israeli conflict(Khatib, 2022). Regional players who have been active in promoting peace proposals and backing Palestinian statehood include the Arab League.
Analysis of the Mechanism’s Effectiveness
Negotiation Processes
Conflicting reports, recurrent cycles of brutality, and a great deal of distrust have all been features of the Arab-Israeli conflict’s negotiation procedures. Although historic accords like the Oslo Accords and the Camp David Summit offered foundations for peace, their efficacy was compromised by challenges with implementation and political hurdles (Ricarte, 2023). Controversial issues like borders, refugees, Jerusalem, and safety measures continued to impede efforts to reach an all-encompassing peace accord.
Implementation of Agreements
Even while peace treaties, such as the Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), have been signed, political impasse and implementation issues have hindered efforts to reach a definitive conclusion. The quest for peace has been weakened by violence, the growth of settlements, and unilateral measures by both sides (Ricarte, 2023). Core problems like Jerusalem’s position and Palestinian refugees’ right of return have not been addressed, which has prolonged the conflict and impeded attempts to find a solution that involves two states.
Role of External Actors
External parties have been essential in resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict and advancing peace talks, among them the United States, the European Union, and the United Nations. A number of regional players, including Jordan and Egypt, have worked with Israel on national peace initiatives that have resulted in the signing of accords for normalization and agreements on peace. However, attempts at external mediation have frequently been difficult, and peace efforts have been hampered by geopolitical rivalry, opposing interests, and internal conflicts.
Long-Term Stability and Peacebuilding Efforts
There are still unsolved tensions in the region and periodic outbursts of hostility related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. A broad and long-lasting resolution has proven problematic despite sporadic peace agreements and peace negotiations, underscoring the difficulties in resolving deeply ingrained past disagreements and geopolitical forces. There are still major barriers standing in the way of a Middle East peace settlement, despite ongoing efforts to foster communication, mutual recognition, and confidence-boosting initiatives.
Case Study 4: Asia – South China Sea Disputes
Background Information on the Conflict
Rival territorial disputes in the South China Sea are made by a number of nations, including China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei. Because of its productive waters for fishing, possible petroleum and natural gas reservations, and vital shipping routes, the area has strategic importance.
Description of the Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanism
Initiatives for marine safety partnership, international discussions, and diplomatic mediation are examples of regional dispute resolution methods in the South China Sea (Nguyễn Hồng Thảo, 2023). Among claimant nations, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has been significant in promoting communication and initiatives aimed at fostering confidence.
Analysis of the Mechanism’s Effectiveness
Negotiation Processes
Claimant countries have been engaged in multilateral consultations and diplomatic negotiations to resolve conflicts in the South China Sea. The goal of ASEAN-led processes like the ongoing discussions for a Code of Conduct (COC) and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) is to encourage amicable resolution and avoid escalation of tensions (Cheeppensook, 2020). But things have moved slowly, and there are still disparities on important matters like exploiting resources, national sovereignty, and liberty in navigation.
Implementation of Agreements
Difficulties include enforcement actions, differing interpretations of global law, and oversight of compliance have made it difficult for regional mechanisms to effectively implement agreements in the South China Sea. Instances of maritime conflicts, the fortification of islands, and unilateral acts by claimant governments keep hindering efforts to secure an extensive and long-lasting agreement, despite commitments to the DOC and current discussions for a COC.
Role of External Actors
The South China Sea conflicts have included external parties, such as the United States, either as mediators assisting regional conflict resolution attempts or as participants with strategic objectives in the region. The United governments of America has heightened hostilities and complicated attempts to calm down disputes by conducting freedom of navigation operations (FONOPs) and offering military backing to claimant governments (Cheeppensook, 2020). A non-violent solution to the maritime conflicts through negotiation and conformity with global law has been sought for by other external actors, including Europe, Australia, Japan, and others.
Long-Term Stability and Peacebuilding Efforts
The South China Sea conflicts continue to be a cause of unpredictability and uncertainty in the region, with ramifications for economic growth, marine security, and political rivalry in the Asia-Pacific area. There are nevertheless numerous barriers in the way of establishing mutually beneficial and peaceful marine throughout the region, despite continuous efforts to foster communication, confidence-building initiatives, and legislative structures for resolving disputes.
Comparing and Contrasting the Effectiveness of Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms
Effectiveness in Achieving Peace Agreements
Despite persistent racial division, the Dayton Accords successfully ended the Bosnian War and created a foundation for peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Although the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and South Sudan’s ultimate independence were brought about by the AU’s mediation attempts, difficulties still exist in putting the agreements into practice and resolving the ongoing hostilities in Darfur and other areas. However, occasional attacks and impasses continue to exist in the Arab-Israeli conflict as a result of the failure of regional dispute resolution institutions in the Middle East, such as the Oslo Accords and the Arab Peace Initiative, to bring about an all-encompassing and long-lasting settlement (Clayton & Dorussen, 2021). In addition, there has been little progress in resolving the South China Sea conflicts through regional forums like the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) and negotiations headed by ASEAN, and hostilities and disagreements over territory are still rising.
Role of External Actors
The United States and the European Union, in particular, were instrumental in mediating the Dayton Accords and lending assistance to peacekeeping and rebuilding endeavors. The AU also received political, monetary, and logistic help from other parties, such as the UN, the EU, and nearby nations, for its attempts at mediation in Sudan. Furthermore, outside parties like the US and the EU have supported peace talks and mediated the Arab-Israeli conflict; nevertheless, their efforts have frequently been hampered by political rivalry and conflicting interests. Finally, other parties have also been active in the South China Sea issues, such as the United States and Japan (Väyrynen, 2022). Their engagement has occasionally increased tensions, either as mediators assisting attempts to resolve regional disputes or as participants with strategic objectives.
Common Challenges
The efficacy of regional conflict resolution processes has been impeded by implementation difficulties in every case study. These challenges include discrepancies in accord interpretation, enforcing procedures, and oversight of compliance, which further impede attempts to establish enduring peace. Furthermore, regional actors’ disparities in politics and national interests have frequently hampered their ability to work together and forge consensus, which has resulted in impasses and defeats in attempts to resolve disputes. Additionally, Regional attempts to resolve conflicts have been made more difficult by political rivalry and outside interventions; conflicting interests and rivalries for power heighten conflicts and impede peace efforts. However, social and cultural factors have molded local dynamics and dispute resolution processes, making it difficult to promote peace and establish trust (Väyrynen, 2022). These elements include legacy of history, racial strife, and politics of identity.
Success Factors
In every case study, the role of global aid and engagement has been crucial in enabling negotiations for peace, offering diplomatic, monetary, and logistic assistance, and encouraging measures aimed at fostering confidence-building between parties involved in violence. Furthermore In order to establish trust, promote partnership, and get beyond barriers to conflict resolution, regional parties have needed to get involved in ongoing communication with one another with the assistance from global mediators (Castro-Arce & Vanclay, 2020). Additionally The implementation of comprehensive measures that encompass all pertinent stakeholders, such as women, marginalized groups, and organizations of civil society, has proven crucial in tackling the underlying causes of disputes and advancing lasting peace.
Lessons Learned and Implications for Future Conflict Resolution Efforts
In order to resolve intricate, prolonged disagreements, extensive strategies that go past the simple end of warfare are necessary. These strategies have to tackle core complaints, encourage peacemaking, and create organizations that are robust. In order to guarantee legitimacy, long-term viability and efficacy, regional actors must also control and steer regional dispute resolution organizations with assistance from the global community. Additionally, dialogue and negotiation are still essential strategies for resolving disputes; however, they still require persistence, patience, and a willingness to make concessions from all sides. Furthermore, even while outside parties can be helpful in promoting regional attempts to resolve disputes, their participation must be constrained by a neutral position, fairness, and regard for sovereign in order to prevent increasing hostilities and undermining regional control (Moylamova, 2023). Additionally, Building lasting peace and resolving the underlying causes of conflict require comprehensive and gender-sensitive strategies that include all pertinent parties, including women and those who are marginalized.
Although regional dispute resolution methods have demonstrated potential in resolving intricate disputes, their implementation and maintenance of peace present considerable obstacles. Legislators, experts, and scholars may improve the efficacy of regional methods and support long-term peace and stability in regions affected by conflicts by drawing lessons from the past, recognizing shared obstacles, and utilizing success characteristics.
Challenges Facing Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms
The human, monetary, and physical assets required to successfully mediate disputes and carry out peace accords are sometimes lacking from regional organizations. Their limited capacity makes it more difficult for them to help with post-conflict reconstruction attempts, send out peacekeeping operations, and offer emergency assistance. Furthermore Regional players’ rivalries in politics and divisions can impede efforts to resolve problems by escalating hostilities and preventing collaboration and building consensus (Väyrynen, 2022). Regional groups may be unable to pursue cooperative solutions to disputes and show a united front due to conflicting interests and past hostilities.
By enforcing foreign agendas, escalating divisions, or prolonging wars for political objectives, powerful governments and world organizations can weaken regional dispute resolution organizations by external interference. Resolution attempts may be made more difficult by nearby nations who may try to use regional disputes to accomplish their own geopolitical goals. Regional disputes are also shaped by social and cultural factors, which can make resolution attempts more difficult (Väyrynen, 2022). These variables include past complaints, racial conflicts, and politics of identity. Dialogue, peacemaking, and collaboration between disputing parties may be impeded by long-standing animosities, prejudices, and distrust.
Opportunities for Strengthening Regional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms
Regional organizations can improve their building capacity attempts, educational programs, and sharing information platforms to improve their dispute resolution capacities. The efficacy and efficiency of regional dispute resolution processes can be enhanced by funding growth of institutions, which includes the creation of specialized mediation teams and conflict evaluation institutes. Furthermore, by creating warning systems, keeping an eye on the dynamics of conflict, and tackling the underlying causes of conflicts earlier than they worsen, local organizations can take an anticipatory approach to conflict avoidance. It is possible to reduce conflicts and stop disputes from breaking out by making investments in mediation, building trust initiatives, and diplomatic prevention. Furthermore, promoting comprehensive discourse and the involvement of all pertinent parties—including women, young people, and underrepresented groups—can strengthen the credibility and long-term viability of dispute resolution procedures (Smidt, 2019). Encouraging local players and civil society groups to take part in reconciliation and decision-making processes can help impacted communities feel more invested and buy-in.
Increasing the level of regional solidarity and collaboration between adjacent nations can help to develop mutual trust and confidence and cooperative methods for dispute resolution. Regional entities have the capacity to utilize pre-existing processes, including security alliances or economic integration programs, to foster stability, peace, and growth in areas affected by violence. In order to help regional attempts at resolving disputes, regional organizations should also positively engage foreign actors and make use of their assets, expertise, and political power. Creating strategic alliances with powerful nations, global bodies, and funding organizations can protect regional projects from outside influence while offering vital support. Effective dispute resolution also requires acknowledging and resolving the cultural and social components of disputes. To reduce barriers and advance comprehension, local groups should support cross-cultural interaction, acceptance, and reconciliation (Smidt, 2019). Across racial, religious, and cultural boundaries, spending on education, cross-cultural interaction efforts, and community-based initiatives can help dispel prejudices, foster compassion, and strengthen unity in society.
Legislators, experts, and participants can become more effective in resolving complicated disputes and advancing the maintenance of stability and peace in regions affected by conflicts by tackling these bigger issues and taking advantage of chances to fortify regional dispute resolution processes. Regional groups can play a crucial role in avoiding, handling, and solving disputes and promoting an increasingly harmonious and prosperous world through coordinated efforts, inclusive methods, and collaboration among regions.
Conclusion
We have looked at how well regional dispute resolution processes work in handling complicated, protracted disputes in various locations. We have examined case studies from the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and the Balkans, examining the accords’ execution, the role of outside parties, and the long-term viability of stability and initiatives for peacebuilding in each region. Success characteristics like global assistance, continuous participation, and encompassing methods have been found, alongside common obstacles like scarce funds, political differences, impact of external actors, and social and cultural factors.
Using proximity, common interests, and cultural comprehension among adjacent nations, regional dispute resolution techniques are essential in resolving complicated disputes. We have investigated the efficacy of regional structures in ending prolonged disputes through a comparison of case studies from various regions, taking into account elements like the negotiation process, agreement implementation, and role of external actors, long-term stability, and peacebuilding initiatives. While certain regional initiatives demonstrate assurance, there are still difficulties in the way of attaining lasting peace and reconciliation, which emphasizes the necessity of ongoing communication, collaboration, and involvement between regional players and the wider global community.
References
Aboultaif, E. W. (2023, October 19). Armies in Consociational, Semi-Consociational, and Post-Conflict Societies: The Quest for Stability. Brill.com; Brill. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004687080/BP000017.xml
Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010
Cheeppensook, K. (2020). ASEAN in the South China Sea conflict, 2012–2018: A lesson in conflict transformation from normative power Europe. International Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-020-00477-z
Clayton, G., & Dorussen, H. (2021). The effectiveness of mediation and peacekeeping for ending conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 59(2), 002234332199007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343321990076
Ifediora, O. F. (2020). Formulative Strategy: Why the African Union-led International Mediation in South Sudan Failed to Prevent Atrocity Crimes. International Studies Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa019
Khatib, I. (2022). Can democratic values bring the parties to the table in a protracted, Middle Eastern conflict? The attitudes of youth in the context of the Arab- Israeli conflict. Democratization, 29(4), 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2006638
Mangok, M. T. (2022). The Impact of Political Accommodation on Peacebuilding in Post-conflict States: the Case of South Sudan, 2006 – 2020. Erepository.uonbi.ac.ke. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/162550
Melek Aylin Özoflu, & Bora Besgul. (2023). A Critical Analysis of the Neoliberal State-Building in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Gap Between Aims and Achievements. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2023.1.6
Moylamova, G. (2023). The OSCE and the Mediation of Armed Conflicts in the Post-Soviet Space. Dspace.khazar.org. http://dspace.khazar.org/handle/20.500.12323/6923
Nguyễn Hồng Thảo. (2023). South China Sea: Battle of the Diplomatic Notes among China and Non-Claimant States. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, 8(1), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1163/24519391-08010007
Pfeifer, H., & Schwab, R. (2022). Politicising the rebel governance paradigm. Critical appraisal and expansion of a research agenda. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2022.2144000
Ricarte, J. (2023). The Impact of Protracted Peace Processes on Identities in Conflict: The Case of Israel and Palestine. In library.oapen.org. Springer Nature. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/60137
Smidt, H. M. (2019). United Nations Peacekeeping Locally: Enabling Conflict Resolution, Reducing Communal Violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(2-3), 002200271985963. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719859631
Tawfik, R. (2023). Regional Mediation in African Transboundary Rivers Conflicts : Assessing the African Union’s Role in the Renaissance Dam Negotiations. International Negotiation, -1(aop), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-bja10096
Väyrynen, R. (2022). To Settle or to Transform: Perspectives on the Resolution of National and International Conflicts. Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13627-6_11
Vujačić, I. (2023). The United States in the Western Balkans: Reluctant, Late and Distant Involvement vs. Quick Radical Fix. New Perspectives on South-East Europe, 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32205-1_7
write