Human trafficking is the accumulation, transfer, acquisition or detention of persons through fraud, intimidation, the use of force, coercion or exploitation. According to (John, 2010), human trafficking is generally linked to illicit drug sales/use, sex and work, and organ removal. According to the above definition, human trafficking first took place in the world between 1526 and 1867 and is known as the African slave trade. About 12.5 million Africans were move to America. At this point, it was legal and even subject to racism and ideas that promoted political and economic values. Human trafficking in California occurs singularly within the State and across its borders. Human trafficking strips the victims of their fundamental human rights and freedoms and violates their State’s and the United States’ guaranteed human rights. California’s perpetrators continue to exercise sophistication and organization, thus calling for equally sophisticated responses from law enforcement agencies and their partners to dismantle and disrupt the networks. This topic is important because it gives harsh reality and cruel human trafficking, this is a global crime. The aim of the paper is to systematically address the problem of human trafficking in California by proposing alternative solutions to this phenomenon and proposing possible measures to combat this threat.
The historical background of sex, child, and modern slavery activities traces back to the “white enslavement” of women for sexual-associated infringements and smuggling activities in the mid-twentieth century (Dahlstrom, 2020). California experienced a colossal sex trafficking challenge, particularly involving adolescent victims. In recent times, the State of California has taken broad steps towards tackling the challenge of human trafficking by establishing guidelines for particular organizations to assist in finding human trafficking victims. Since the United States’ Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution, all forms of slavery and human trafficking were formally abolished in the country. However, various slavery activities, including human trafficking, continue to thrive in most states, including California. The extent of the challenge is unmanageable to establish at topnotch accuracy since human trafficking is a concealment undertaking. According to conservative statistics, the scope of modern-day slavery in California discloses that the activity is prevalent (Helpingstine & Barton, 2018). Various policymakers and anti-trafficking activists have launched multiple strategies to remedy the possible perception that human trafficking does not exist in California. However, state actors and anti-trafficking activists continuously use inconsistent definitions and framings of human trafficking to portray the menace as minimally practiced in California.
Over time, participation in human trafficking in California has increased, encompassing a broader picture of subversion, sexual neutrality, and forms of victimization. Combined with the current widespread concept, slavery and human trafficking can be used together. For example, various publications define sex and child trafficking as a successful form of modern slavery (Helpingstine and Barton, 2018). There is evidence that child trafficking in particular has developed rapidly in recent years and is almost an alternative to slavery. However, the most significant and programmatic efforts to combat human trafficking focus on traditional definitions and methods of human trafficking, namely sexual violence. Power and depopulation through human trafficking and the extradition of women. Data on the causes and types of crime in California show that violent crimes, such as murder, aggravated robbery, etc., are among the different crimes and the percentage of crimes in California. Today, human trafficking is widely recognized as an important topic, and there are many organizations that are trying to prevent it. Because it is such a complex crime, the sentencing rate is low because it is difficult to track. We hope that in the future human trafficking will decrease and awareness of this problem will increase.
The state judicial system is to promote the prevention and punishment of criminal offences. California defines three types of crime: violations, and violations. Crimes in California include murder, murder, rape, murder, and aggravated assault. The California criminal justice system has four structures: criminal activity and lawful detention Enforcement, prosecution in court, and imprisonment on prison grounds. Under California law, law enforcement agencies can prosecute certain crimes, such as crimes or misdemeanors (Liles & Urquiza, 2016). In 1976, the U.S. the state introduced a new structure of criminal penalties, known as the final punishment. California criminal law defines certain crimes as violent, serious, and even both. These crimes include murder, robbery, rape or burglary. In 2011, the situation changed, an adult offender was transferred to a state prison only after his current or previous arrest. For serious or violent crimes.
Due to California’s large immigrant population and vast international and national borders with other states, this is a successful target for human trafficking in the United States. Depending on the scope of the study, the results of various studies suggest many alternatives to uncontrolled human trafficking in California. While all options are valid, it depends on the timing and scope of the study and the target audience, but this report uses a variety of options, including removing the notion that human trafficking is primarily child trafficking and recognizing that modern slavery is negative (Liles & Urquiza, 2016). It applies to all genders, races and age groups. Services include shelter or housing; mental health food; medical, as well as dental services; translator/interpreter services; social services encouragement; criminal justice victim sponsorship; literacy education; legal services; as well as employment support. With therapeutic counseling and health planning, the organization has the most comprehensive practice to help solve this problem. Second, the review of public attitudes toward human trafficking needs to be improved and replaced by awareness-raising activities, including compliance with Article 10 of the U.S. Constitution. The need for three additions (Salas & Didier, 2020). Third, California NGOs need adequate funding to provide services to victims of human trafficking, including legal support, case managers, health care, defense services, translation services, and community-based activities. sufficient.
A number of laws have been introduced to combat human trafficking, such as the State Act of 2013 and Section 52.6 under the California Civil Code (Salas & Didier, 2020). development and recognition of human rights. As another proposal to strengthen the existing regulations, Salas and Didier (2020) propose that all machines support the victims of the trade in materials and services. From a procedural point of view, some improvements have been made to the existing legislation in order to enhance the role of public authorities, including local authorities, in adopting and implementing legislation on child trafficking and the prevention of new gender or oppression (Salas & Didier, 2020).
To prevent trafficking most young people and their victims need to be involved on an ongoing basis in the discussion on cybersecurity. This can be achieved by continuously monitoring their use of social media, although they may be reluctant to cooperate. In addition, teens should always avoid sharing personal information with guests or avoid communicating with suspicious guests altogether. In addition, raising public awareness by providing information on human trafficking (Dahlstrom, 2020). While California and the U.S. State Department are thwarting numerous attempts to rescue victims of human trafficking, the mandate is encouraged because perpetrators can harm victims and rescuers.
First of all, I believe this is an evidence-based human trafficking practice in California and a tradition of comprehensive services for victims of human trafficking in California. This evidence-based approach has been chosen over others because direct research on prevalence shows that research to understand and curb human trafficking is neglected and unfunded, and that there is a need to understand the demographics of a sex trafficking site in California. California is considered the largest human trafficker in the United States, and more importantly, there is no complete study of the number of victims per year, or even an examination of the nature of work, sexual abuse, or even the gender distribution of victims in some parts of California.
While the proposal may create some hurdles, such as political and regulatory constraints, such as differences between states in terms of human trafficking laws, its adoption will provide a positive shift in California’s human and child frustration statistics. The report recommends that California create temporary housing and increase the number of emergency shelters to meet the needs of sex and child trafficking (Dahlstrom, 2020).
Overall, California must develop key strategies to end human trafficking by fighting poverty, poor working conditions, and the elimination of sexuality. As described in the previous parts of the paper, these problems are the main causes of child and adolescent trafficking in areas with a large number of vulnerable groups. In California, there is a simplified requirement that is implemented through corporate procedures and administration. Public authority must approve, supervise and monitor a Code of Conduct to ensure that humanitarian policies and procedures for work are applied through government channels. Nature and Extent of Human Trafficking in California Although no national prevalence studies have been conducted in California, two prevalence studies have been conducted. Sheldon Zhang in San Diego County and Dr. Sheldon. Dr. Jamie Gates and “San Diego Gang Involvement” Amy Carpenter on nature and human greatness trade for the purpose of coexistence. Although this research focuses on only one county, it helps estimate the cost of a national study of sex trafficking in California to stop crime and find the best ways to meet the needs of victims of human trafficking.
Dahlstrom, J. (2020). The Elastic Meaning(s) of Human Trafficking. California Law Review, 108(2), 379–.
Helpings tine, C., Boyd, B., & Barton, A. (2018). Further Considerations for Research on Human Trafficking. American Journal of Public Health (1971), 108(2), e8–e8.
John, W. (2010). Serving California’s Human Trafficking Victims and Refugees. Policy & Practice, 68(6), 14–.
Liles, B., Blacker, D., Landini, J., & Urquiza, A. (2016). A California Multidisciplinary Juvenile Court: Serving Sexually Exploited and At‐Risk Youth. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(1), 234–245.
Salas, R., & Didier, K. (2020). California Adds Human Trafficking Prevention Training to its 7-12 Grade Curriculum: Should Other States Follow? The Clearing House, 93(1), 12–18.