Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Case Study.

Introduction

Hypertension is a widely known illness and the most prevalent chronic condition that heightens cardiovascular risks, renal failures, or other ailments. Its alarming prevalence has marked it as a significant global public health concern. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), hypertension affects approximately one billion people worldwide and is responsible for at least 7.5 million deaths annually (Blood Pressure Association 2021). HBPM is a recommended therapy modality for patients to remotely monitor their blood pressure utilizing telemedicine technology devices provided by caregivers. Although HBPM has shown statistical therapeutic efficacy, it needs to be more adequately researched, leading to compromised judgments about additional courses of action. Instituting best practice guidelines that incorporate HBPM protocols into clinical management strategies can enhance outcomes significantly, re-instating trust between medical teams and ensuring optimal utilization until a consensus emerges over better ways to achieve desired results.

According to the report by Blood Pressure Association 2021, the superior efficacy of remote consultations and home-based blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in managing hypertension resulted in improved regulation of blood pressure levels and a reduction in associated cardiovascular risks. Even with this good evidence base, it remains paramount to undertake further investigations into refining implementation procedures while ascertaining these interventions’ overall effectiveness. Within our case study, we endeavor to elucidate the successful treatment protocol administered to individuals aged 55 years with preexisting poor management control despite antihypertensive medication regimens.

Patient Details

Mr. X is a male patient of 55 years who has had hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type II diabetes mellitus. He has been taking several antihypertensive drugs featuring diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and an ACE inhibitor for approximately three years. Despite his medication regime, he has not shown any significant improvement judging by the readings we received. An average systolic blood pressure reading goes to show at around 150mmHg while it being about 90 mmHg during its diastole phase. Before our examination period started, Mr.X regularly visited his primary doctor, where various medical checks were conducted — these included electrocardiogram tests (ECGs) which showed average results. Additionally, blood tests underwent also resulted in no alarming adverse reports.

Referral:

Mr. X was referred to our service by his primary care physician due to concerns about his poorly controlled blood pressure despite being on multiple antihypertensive medications. The referral included Mr. X’s medical history, medications, and previous investigations. The referral also indicated that the primary care physician had recommended HBPM and remote consultations as a possible management strategy for Mr. X’s hypertension.

Part 2. Subjective Information

During the initial consultation, Mr. X projected a feeling of general health and contradicted any specific symptoms correlated with his hypertension, like migraines or changes in vision. However, he voiced dissatisfaction about being unable to regulate his blood pressure despite consuming multiple medications. He mentioned that occasionally he undergoes vertigo, significantly when changing positions quickly from sitting or lying down, while also divulging experiences of sporadic chest discomfort characterized by a sensation comparable to compression but denied experiencing difficulties breathing or rapid heartbeats alongside this symptomology.

Hypertension conveyed by Mr. X was far-reaching in its scope, detailing the moment of diagnosis and all cures duly prescribed to him throughout his existence. He stated that he had implemented significant behavioral changes, such as reducing salt quantities and increasing physical exertion; however, there has been no notable difference regarding blood pressure readings, in addition to divulging a history of dyslipidemia alongside type 2 diabetes mellitus- both handled effectively via medication use-Mr. X expressed disheartenment while expressing concerns concerning uncontrolled high blood pressure complications.

Objective Information

During the discussion, a vast array of precise information was compiled without little inclinations.

• The automated device recorded Mr. X’s Blood Pressure, and the values from three measurements were noted as mean results. The systolic pressure – derived from the maximum point in his heartbeat sequence- was calculated to be 152 mmHg. In contrast, diastolic BP, which reflects a decrease between two heartbeats, averaged 92mm Hg numerically.
• Utilizing a finely calibrated measuring apparatus allowed for the quantification of Mr. X’s mass, with the following output indicating 85 kilograms worth in weight measurement.
• The physical height of Mr. X was ascertained using a stadiometer, which revealed the total to be 175 cm in length – an impressive display indeed!
• The assessment of Mr. X’s physical fitness was conducted through the calculation of his Body Mass Index (BMI), which resulted in a value of 27.8 kg/m², signifying that his weight surpasses what is considered ideal for an individual with a similar build to him – thus categorizing him as medically overweight.

The diagnostics done on Mr. X follow the British Journal of Nursing, 2023 rules. They manifest his condition with diabetes, where a fresh hemoglobin A1c examination produced an exceptional score of 6.5%, indicating competent management of the disease at hand. The findings from the lipid panel disclosed vital statistics such as total cholesterol content getting to equal amounts up until 180mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) nature hovering around approximately 90 mg/Dl, which is highly significant because it has been correlated to cardiovascular jeopardy; high-density lipoprotein (HDL), although below average, was measured near levels that are devoided any health hazards- in this scenario located at about40mg/dl. Finally, he had normal triglycerides staying true to roughly 150 mg\D;l-an indispensable element for evaluating optimum metabolic functionality throughout all genders and age brackets.

An electrocardiogram – recently undertaken by Mr. X, was utilized to measure the electrical activity of his heart. It becomes apparent that Mr. X’s hypertensive ailment persists despite his steadfast adherence to various antihypertensive substances. Managing this condition optimally would necessitate comprehensive counseling and medical intervention. Furthermore, remote consultations complemented with home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) could prove beneficial moving forward. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends assessing renal artery stenosis or primary aldosteronism, given its potential effect as the secondary cause of hypertension.

Objective Information

Factual data such as physical inspections, scientific analyses, and imagery assessments are required to discern and regulate hypertension. According to Banegas et al. (2018), the individual has a recorded high blood pressure background while consistently presenting elevated readings despite consuming various antihypertensive remedies. Henceforth, it is deduced that their principal diagnosis pertains to unregulated hypertension.

There are various possible explanations for hypertension, with a couple being white coat hypertension- an elevated blood pressure reading due to clinical anxiety and masked hypertension – regular readings in the clinic but high outside it. However, given this situation’s context, Mr. X has been consistently tracking his BP at home, which provides precise results that negate the possibility of any issues related to the white-coat syndrome. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) suggests that to enhance the accuracy of identifying poorly controlled hypertension, we must consider both subjective and objective information collected from patients. From Mr. X’s perspective, he alleges not experiencing any symptoms related to his high blood pressure, such as vertigo or blurred vision, despite having a hypertensive condition; subjectively speaking that is. Objectively however, repeated recordings utilizing HBPM reflect consistently raised readings with an average systolic reading at 150mmHg while diastolic more so found at 90 mmHg- figures superseding the suggested target for individuals diagnosed with coexistent conditions like diabetes, which stands under less than130/80 mmHg in comparison to current results obtained by him on record.

It might be essential to perform supplementary laboratory examinations to discover any root causes of high blood pressure, including endocrine dysfunctions or kidney ailments. Nonetheless, given that Mr. X’s medical records confirm a prior diagnosis of hypertension, coupled with his dearth of anomalous manifestations from physical assessment and previous lab tests, additional screenings may not be indispensable currently.

There exist no indications or warnings that elicit specific apprehensions regarding the administration of Mr. X’s hypertension; nevertheless, due to his inadequately regulated blood pressure, even though he is under various antihypertensive medications, alternative methods for management, including HBPM and remote consultations ought to be evaluated. In addition, meticulous supervision and further monitoring will be essential to guarantee that Mr.X achieves optimal regulation of his blood pressure while also ensuring any potential pessimistic repercussions from treatment are identified promptly and duly managed with appropriate measures put into effect accordingly.

Assessment and Plan

Based on the information obtained, Mr. X has poorly controlled hypertension despite being on multiple antihypertensive medications. His blood pressure readings have consistently remained elevated, with an average systolic blood pressure of 152 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of 92 mmHg. Mr. X has made significant lifestyle modifications, including reducing his salt intake and increasing physical activity, but did not notice any significant improvement in his blood pressure readings. He has a history of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus, both well-controlled with medication. Mr. X denies any specific symptoms of his hypertension but reports occasional dizziness and chest discomfort.

Plan

1. Initiate Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM): Mr. X will be provided with a home blood pressure monitoring device and instructed to measure his blood pressure twice daily (in the morning and evening) for seven days per week. He will record his readings in a logbook, which will be reviewed during remote consultations.
2. Remote Consultations: Mr. X will have remote consultations with a healthcare provider every two weeks for the first month and then every four weeks. During the consultations, the healthcare provider will review Mr. X’s blood pressure logbook, assess for any adverse effects or symptoms, adjust medications as necessary, and provide education on lifestyle modifications.
3. Medication Adjustment: Medication adjustments may be necessary based on Mr. X’s blood pressure readings and any adverse effects or symptoms reported during remote consultations. The diuretic, calcium channel blocker, and ACE inhibitor Mr. X is currently taking may be adjusted, or additional medications may be added.
4. Lifestyle Modifications: According to Drink Coach 2023, Mr. X will be encouraged to continue making lifestyle modifications, including reducing salt intake, increasing physical activity, and maintaining a healthy weight. He will also be encouraged to quit smoking if he is a smoker.
5. Laboratory Tests: Mr. X will undergo additional laboratory tests to evaluate for secondary causes of hypertension, such as renal artery stenosis or primary aldosteronism. Tests may include a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, serum electrolytes, and renal function tests.
6. Referral to a Specialist: If Mr. X’s blood pressure remains poorly controlled despite medication adjustments and lifestyle modifications, he may be referred to a hypertension specialist for further evaluation and management.
7. Follow-Up: Mr. X will have regular follow-up appointments with his primary care physician and healthcare provider, providing remote consultations to monitor his blood pressure and adjust treatment as necessary. He will also be encouraged to report any adverse effects or symptoms of his medications or hypertension.

5a. Public Health

The significance of this case study lies in its ability to shed light on the prevalence and gravity of hypertension, a medical condition that profoundly impacts a substantial segment of society across regions. By embracing home blood pressure monitoring and remote consultations, we have an excellent opportunity at our disposal that can vastly enhance patients’ involvement while substantially reducing the healthcare system’s workload burden (General Medical Council, 2023). Furthermore, through detailed examination and analysis focusing on specific patient cases involving chronic conditions such as hypertension, we gain insight into potential advantages alongside issues encountered while deploying these technologies to manage said health challenges adeptly. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2021 helps provide practical guidance by illustrating how effectively incorporate home blood pressure monitoring. Regular remote consults allow improved management of hypertension overall- highlighting both strengths gained from implementing such approaches and their drawbacks.

Monitoring one’s blood pressure at home and consultations that occur remotely have become essential tools in handling hypertension. The context pertains to a case featuring an adult male aged 55 with high blood pressure, which intends to assess the efficacy of these approaches when addressing his condition. Within this framework, we will dissect the relationship between public health and clinical governance as it relates to this scenario.

According to Dena Ettehad et al., hypertension presents a pressing matter to public health that concerns about one billion individuals across the globe (2016). Uncontrolled hypertension is one of the most prevalent catalysts for cardiovascular disease, stroke, and chronic kidney ailments. In this respect, it is critical to undertake awareness initiatives to limit incidences and prevalence rates of hypertensive effectuations since they surmount severe healthcare conditions if unchecked. To curb risks associated with these medical challenges amongst patients suffering from high blood pressure (HBP), home-based blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) alongside remote consultations can be an effective strategy in facilitating necessary support towards reducing complications revolving around HBP management on the afflicted parties’ part (Dena Ettehad et al. 2016).

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) allows patients to observe their blood pressure levels consistently and recognize significant variations. This strategy stimulates self-management among individuals with hypertension, enabling them to manage the condition proficiently while retaining control. In addition, remote consultations through telemedicine or video conferencing cater to accessibility for those who face obstacles in attending conventional appointments physically; as a result, increasing patient access to medical care by providing support for adhering to prescribed treatment plans which can mitigate risks associated with uncontrolled high blood pressure and related complications.

Clinical Governance

The accountability of healthcare professionals for the quality of care they provide to patients is ensured by clinical governance, a vital process. The frameworks established within clinical governance are essential in ensuring the safe, effective, and high-quality management of hypertension in patients. To guarantee that our patients receive optimal care as healthcare providers, we must operate within relevant prescribing and wiser professional frameworks, equally paying attention to their effectiveness.

When concerning the patient’s well-being, it is crucial to acknowledge the legal implications. As a self-reliant medication dispenser, complying with applicable prescription guidelines–which comprise the Medicines Act and Misuse of Drugs Regulations–is paramount. Adherence also lies within overarching professional protocols elucidated in institutions like the General Pharmaceutical Council’s Standards of Conduct, Ethics, and Performance; such measures ensure that medical practitioners provide safe care that produces expected results for their patients.

When pondering the implementation of HBPM and remote consultations, one must make sure that patients give their authorization to employ these technologies. Individuals must be enlightened about the benefits and drawbacks of using such methodologies, thereby granting them an opportunity for judicious consideration before giving consent. Furthermore, ensuring the sanctity of patient data becomes indispensable by keeping up-to-date adherence to relevant data protection legislation while maintaining confidentiality as a priority.

Within the context of this scenario and more broadly in prescribing practices within a multi-disciplinary setting, numerous clinical governance policies and procedures hold relevance. An instance that exemplifies this notion is the directives established by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) which offer suggestions concerning hypertension management through measures like monitoring one’s blood pressure from home, or HBPM, in conjunction with virtual check-ins (Dena Ettehad et al. 2016). These directives can enlighten decision-making about prescriptions while ensuring patients receive care based on substantiated evidence.

HBPM and remote consultations can serve as crucial elements in the hypertension management process. Utilizing these technologies encourages self-administration while enhancing patient availability to care resources, diminishing risks from unregulated high blood pressure levels, including accompanying complications. Duarte and Cooper-DeHoff (2010) suggest that as a healthcare professional, it is pivotal that you operate within pertinent prescription guidelines alongside other related official frameworks while taking into account legal components connected with overall patient well-being. Clinical governance systems guarantee that patients are provided with safe treatment processes and efficient service delivery standards, which promote an unparalleled quality medicinal experience at all times.

Legal considerations

As a healthcare provider, I always strive to uphold the four core principles of healthcare ethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The case study puts to task the utilization of monitoring hypertension at home and virtual meetings as pivotal components in administering patient care. The patient must be made aware of both pros and cons of these procedures, allowing them to make informed choices regarding their care. Henceforth, I aim to confer maximum respect for patients’ independence while keeping them up-to-date on every available alternative. My prime responsibility is to select interventions that benefit the patient the most and avoid any associated harm. I must ensure impartiality while administering treatments without discrimination or prejudice based on individual characteristics. Therefore, I carefully analyze each case individually and provide access to resources alongside support needed by them in effectively managing hypertension.

Ethical considerations

It is of utmost importance to consider the perspective of the patient who receives medical attention and ensure that all aspects concerning their well-being center around them. To achieve this, it is essential to comprehend their health beliefs and what they anticipate from therapy. Clear instructions on taking blood pressure measurements using HBPM devices and ensuring patients understand their function are crucial in empowering remote self-care with an educational approach during virtual appointments. When choosing a mode of treatment, it becomes crucial that one considers various facets, such as: what kind of life the patient leads or his/her inclinations. If a person struggles with recollecting taking medication on time, then pursuing other alternatives like lifestyle changes would prove more efficient than adhering strictly to their suggested drug regimen, which might not suit them aptly due to its complexity (Duarte and Cooper-DeHoff, 2010).

When managing hypertension, it is crucial to advocate for the cultivation of one’s own self-care and effective management practices. These goals may be attained by empowering patient education and urging patients to participate actively in their care while equipping them with the resources to manage their condition effectively (Marc et al., 2019). In conducting consultations remotely, it is crucial to deliberate upon the merits and demerits compared to an in-person consultation. While remote consultations may offer convenience for patients, there must be no compromises when dealing with quality care. The methods employed during communication and counseling should be adjusted to suit a virtual format; measures such as ensuring top-notch audio and video clarity and safeguarding patient privacy on additional levels must be considered (Marc et al. 2019).

Based on the above option appraisal, Saiz et al. 2023 recommend the following for the management of hypertension in a 55-year-old male patient:

1. Implementing a home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) apparatus and offering instructions on its appropriate usage. Through this means, consistent tracking of an individual’s blood pressure levels can be achieved, and improved management of hypertension may result.
2. Arrange virtual meetings with the patient to scrutinize their blood pressure evaluations and correspondingly amend their course of action. This will diminish requirements for face-to-face visits while reinforcing expediency for patients.
3. Should lifestyle adjustments and regular surveillance prove insufficient in bringing down the patient’s blood pressure, it may be recommended to prescribe medication to manage hypertension.
4. Urge the patient to implement alterations in their everyday life, such as maintaining a consistent physical activity routine, consuming nutritious meals, and shedding unwanted weight to enhance blood pressure management.
5. Regularly assess the patient’s adherence to medication, as well as their lifestyle modifications and blood pressure levels. This is crucial in guaranteeing efficient management of hypertension.

The realization of the significance involved in carrying out a comprehensive evaluation of all dimensions related to health promotion, protection, and prevention in my field while rendering clinical decisions has been imbibed by me. I shall further strive towards maintaining up-to-date information about policies applicable on national and local levels concerning prescription methods as part of my responsibilities in clinical governance. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence suggests that moral considerations such as patient-centered care, which includes self-management training, will continue being scrutinized for any improvements necessary during reflective assessments to achieve sound decision-making within this realm.

Person-centred care

Following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2021 guide, I will allocate sufficient time to listen to patients and comprehend their expectations. This initial step shall facilitate me in recognizing any obstacles that may surface during treatment adherence, like unwelcome effects of medicine or alterations towards lifestyle choices. Furthermore, it will enable me to adjust my methodology according to the patient’s individual beliefs, which vary depending on their cultural and social backgrounds. I would engage with Mr. X in a collaborative decision-making process in managing medication. This approach involves delving into each available option’s advantages and disadvantages while illuminating any negative results that may emerge from use. I propose non-medicinal resolutions like modifications to one’s way of life. This will comprise advisements for adjustments in nutritional habits, such as diminishing salt absorption and upscaling fruit & vegetable intake. Additionally, I advise that consistent physical activity be undertaken, e.g., rapid walking or cycling, to curtail hypertension.

Implementing patient-centered care that involves attentive hearing, compassion, and high regard for self-determination would be my modus operandi in ensuring effective communication and consultation (Marc et al., 2019). In its entirety, a method of managing hypertension that prioritizes the individual necessitates customizing treatment to match their unique necessities and preferences. Such an approach involves engaging them in decision-making processes with open communication channels while conveying information transparently and delicately. Adherence would be cultivated by this person-specific methodology promoting blood pressure control optimization as a result. When it comes to maintaining ecological sustainability, Excellence 2022 contemplates the environmental repercussions of any prescribed medicine or healthcare equipment. This would necessitate a thorough evaluation of each medication and device’s carbon footprint while exploring different approaches for diminishing such an effect. As an illustration, I might select generic medicines over branded ones or suggest lower-carbon footprint devices as viable alternatives.

Section 6: Plan

To commence, I intend to administer an antihypertensive drug to our patient per local and national prescribing protocols. Choosing which medication will be contingent on their health records, possible concurrent conditions they may have, in addition to scientific guidelines that pertain to hypertension treatments. The HBPM method shall aid me in observing how the patient reacts towards this medicine with a particular mark for blood pressure at <130/80mmHg (Cushman et al.1998). To promote self-care and management, the patient will receive knowledge on lifestyle modifications, including diet changes and exercise.

Given that remote consultations will be employed, my responsibility is to ensure the patient can efficiently obtain a dependable technological device. I must also provide clear guidance on establishing a connection for this consultation. The conversation held during these remote consultations should have an unwavering focus on the patient’s demands, taking into account their fears and aspirations to ensure they receive personalized care while being treated remotely. Furthermore, detailed accounts regarding any interventions or assessments conducted during each session must be recorded precisely.

Part 7:

The significance of hypertension management has been emphasized in a case study, where various factors such as sustainable environment, telemedicine practices, and corroborated medicine usage were considered. As a medical practitioner, you must take an individualized approach by considering their unique circumstances and predilections (Marc et al., 2019). The evaluation of options has revealed the significance of adhering to regional and nationwide protocols for hypertension treatment. To provide optimal care, it is imperative as a medical practitioner that one keeps abreast with current evidence-based regulations. Good communication is integral during remote consultations, warranting access for patients to dependable technology and lucid instructions on how they can connect with the consultation. For a successful remote consultation experience, patient-oriented communication should be prioritized while addressing concerns regarding expectations and goals (Cushman et al.1998). The significance of maintaining uninterrupted patient care across multiple healthcare providers and facilities has been potently emphasized through the case study. In one’s role as a prescriber, it is crucial to communicate excellently with all members of the patient’s clinical team while offering explicit guidance to patients on when they should reach out for medical assistance if complications emerge.

In conclusion, it is imperative to maintain recurring follow-up sessions to oversee the patient’s reaction toward therapy and implement any required modifications accordingly. As a medical professional who prescribes medication or treatment regimen, utmost priority must be placed on ensuring that all alterations made are adequately recorded without compromising the safety of patients. The examination highlights important revelations concerning hypertension management via HBPM and remote consultations. By adopting a patient-oriented outlook encompassing facets such as eco-friendliness, empiricism, and correspondence, medical experts can guarantee high-quality care for patients.

References

Blood Pressure Association 2021. How to measure your blood pressure at home. [Internet]. London: Blood Pressure UK; c2021 [updated 2021 Apr; Cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.bloodpressureuk.org/your-blood-%20pressure/how-to-lower-your-blood-%20pressure/monitoring-your-blood-pressure-at-%20home/how-to-measure-your-blood-pressure-at-%20home/

Banegas JR, Ruilope L, de La Sierra A, Vinyoles E, Gorostidi M, de La Cruz JJ et al. Relationship between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Measurements and Mortality [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Feb 05]; 19;378 (16):1509-1520 Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1712231

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management [A] Evidence review for diagnosis. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2019 Aug; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/evidence%20/a-diagnosis-pdf-6896748206

General Medical Council. Remote consultations. [Internet]. London: General Medical Council; c2023 [updated 2022 Apr; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-hub/remote-consultations

General Pharmaceutical Council 2023. Standards for pharmacy professionals. [Internet]. London: General Pharmaceutical Council 2023; c2023 [updated 2022 Apr; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/standards/st%20andards-for-pharmacy-professionals

General Medical Council. Decision-making and consent. [Internet]. London: General Medical Council; c2023 [updated 2022 Apr; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/decision-making-and-consent

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Shared decision-making. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2021 Apr; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197

Dena Ettehad, Connor A Emdin, Amit Kiran, Simon G Anderson, Thomas Callender, Jonathan Emberson, John Chalmers, Anthony Rodgers. Blood pressure lowering for cardiovascular disease and death prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Internet]. 2016 [Cited 2023 Feb 05]; 387 (10022): 957-967 Available from URL doi: https://doi.org/10/1016S0140-6736(15)01225-8

British Journal of Nursing. How to take manual blood pressure. [Internet]. London: British Journal of Nursing; c2023 [updated 2019 Jan; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.britishjournalofnursing.com/content/cl%20inical/how-to-take-manual-blood-pressure/%2014)%20National%20Institute%20for%20Health%20and%20Care

Excellence. Hypertension in adults (update) [J] Evidence review for blood pressure targets. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2022 Mar; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/evidence%20/j-blood-pressure-targets-pdf-11008446878

Saiz LC, Gorricho J, Garjón J, Celaya MC, Erviti J, Leach L. Blood pressure targets for treating people with hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 05]; Issue 9. Art. No.: CD010315. Available from DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010315.pub4.

Cushman WC, Cutler JA, Hanna E, Bingham SF, Follmann D, Harford T, Dubbert P, Allender PS, Dufour M, Collins JF, Walsh SM, Kirk GF, Burg M, Felicetta JV, Hamilton BP, Katz LA, Perry HM Jr, Willenbring ML, Lakshman R, Hamburger RJ. Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension Study (PATHS): Effects of an alcohol treatment program on blood pressure. Arch Intern Med. [Internet] 1998 [cited 2023 Feb 05]; 158 (11): 11971207 Available from: 10.1001/archinte.158.11.1197

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension. Prescribing information. Thiazide-like-diuretics. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2022 Mar; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/hypertension/prescri%20bing-information/thiazide-like-diuretics/

Duarte JD, Cooper-DeHoff RM: Mechanisms for blood pressure lowering and metabolic effects of thiazide and thiazide-like-diuretics. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2023 Feb 05]; 8(6): 793-802 Available from: 10.1586/erc.10.27

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension – management. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2022 Mar; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/hypertension/manag%20ement/management/

Marc A Suchard, Martijn J Schuemie, Harlan M Krumholz, Seng Chan You, RuiJun Chen, Nicole Pratt, Christian G Reich, Jon Duke David Madigan, George Hripcsak, Patrick B Ryan. Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis [Internet]. 2019 [Cited 2023 Feb 05]; 394(10211): 1816-1826 Available from: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(19)32317-7

Alcohol Support. [Internet]. Chichester: West Sussex County Council c2023 [updated 2022 Apr; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://chichester.westsussexwellbeing.org.uk/topics/alcohol/book-an%20appointment#:~:text=Alcohol%20support%20&text=If%20you%20feel%20you%20need,%20our%20Specialist%20Alcohol%20Wellbeing%20Advisor

Drink Coach. [Internet]. Durham: Human Kind Charity c2023 [updated 2022 Apr; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://drinkcoach.org.uk/west-sussex-alcohol-test

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management [F] Evidence review for step 2 and step 3 treatment. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2019 Aug; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/evidence%20/f-step-2-and-step-3-treatment-pdf-6896748211

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. How do I control my blood pressure? Lifestyle options and choice of medicines Patient decision aid. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2019 Aug; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/resource%20s/how-do-i-control-my-blood-pressure-lifestyle-%20options-and-choice-of-medicines-patient-%20decision-aid-pdf-6899918221

Wenjing Liang, Hui Ma, Luxi Cao, Wenjiang Yan, and Jingjing Yang. Comparison of thiazide- like diuretics versus thiazide-type diuretics: a meta-analysis. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 05]; 21 (11): 2634-2642 Available from URL doi:10.1111/jcmm.13205

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management [A] Evidence review for diagnosis. [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; c2021 [updated 2019 Aug; cited 2023 Feb 05]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/evidencela-diagnosis-pdf-689674820