Introduction
To maintain social order, encourage accountability, and deter potential offenders, tougher penalties must be implemented for those who breach the law. This bibliography’s analysis of four sources looks at how they support the case for reforming the way our society views punishment. Each source is weighed for reliability and reviewed regarding how well it advances the thesis.
Thesis Statement
To maintain social order, encourage accountability, and deter potential criminals in our community, tougher punishment must be implemented for those who breach the law. The sources are:
Surmiak, A. (2020). Should we maintain or break confidentiality? The choices made by social researchers in the context of law violation and harm. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(3), 229-247.
Summary
The study by Surmiak goes into the moral conundrum that social researchers face when considering whether or not to maintain anonymity in cases involving the breaking of the law and harm to others. The author examines a variety of viewpoints on the topic of retaining or breaching secrecy, and she advocates for a middle-ground approach that takes into account the potential benefits as well as the potential drawbacks (Surmiak, 2020). The significance of finding a delicate balance between the ethical commitments of academics and the demand for justice and accountability is emphasized throughout this paper.
Credibility
The work written by Surmiak illustrates credibility and trustworthiness because it was published in the Journal of Academic Ethics, a respectable peer-reviewed journal. The source’s integrity was ensured by the fact that it was discovered through research conducted in the online database of a university library.
Usefulness
This source offers extremely helpful insights into the ethical considerations that are involved in the process of implementing tougher punishments. It underlines how important it is to balance concerns about maintaining secrecy and the need for justice and deterrence. By combining Surmiak’s arguments, it is conceivable to highlight the ethical dimension of the argument and address potential issues connected to competing values and the right to privacy.
Marceau, J. (2019). Beyond cages: Animal law and criminal punishment. Cambridge University Press.
Summary
The author presents several case studies, argues for recognizing animals as victims, and advocates for establishing an all-encompassing legal framework and sanctions for suitable perpetrator consequences. The work of Marceau brings to light the significance of recognizing the suffering of animals and keeping those responsible for that suffering accountable for their deeds (Marceau, 2019).
Credibility
Because it was published by Cambridge University Press, a well-respected academic publisher well-known for its stringent editing and peer-review procedure, this book is an excellent example of legitimacy and academic brilliance. A search in the online catalog of the university library was used to locate the source, establishing its credibility and dependability.
Usefulness
This source provides a comprehensive analysis of animal legislation and criminal punishment, crediting the contention that those who breach the law should be subjected to more severe penalties. It stresses the need to acknowledge animals as victims and argues for more stringent punishments. Using Marceau’s observations, it is possible to more effectively illustrate the necessity for more stringent punishments and emphasize the potential repercussions of mild measures.
Cauffman, E., Fine, A., Mahler, A., & Simmons, C. (2018). How developmental science influences juvenile justice reform. UC Irvine L. Rev., 8, 21.
Summary
The article written by Cauffman and colleagues investigates the impact of developmental science on the changes made to the juvenile justice system. The authors illustrate how a greater understanding of these elements has led to more effective and humane approaches to dealing with juvenile offenders by diving into the complexities of teenage brain development and behavior. They demonstrate how this understanding has led to positive changes (Cauffman et al., 2018). The importance of bringing developmental science into the legal system to foster positive outcomes is emphasized in the essay above.
Credibility
This essay is evidence of the author’s reliability and commitment to academic standards because it was published in the UC Irvine Law Review, a highly regarded legal journal subject to rigorous peer review. The source’s reliability was confirmed because it could be accessed through an online legal database.
Usefulness
Even though the topic of juvenile justice reform is the primary emphasis of this article, the reader will gain useful insights into why it is so important to consider scientific research findings while arguing for stricter punishment. This source supports the contention that tougher punishment is warranted by drawing attention to the need to address individual characteristics and patterns of behavior. Specifically, it highlights the requirement for evidence-based ways to prevent criminal activity effectively. Incorporating the findings that Cauffman and colleagues obtained will reinforce the case for more severe punishment.
Rodley, N. S. (2018). Integrity of the Person. International human rights law, 3.
Summary
Within the context of international human rights legislation, Rodley’s book chapter dives into the topic of the integrity of the person concept. The author investigates the ethical and legal components of personal integrity and the preservation of this concept within international legal systems. The chapter encourages thought on the significance of maintaining one’s integrity and steering clear of overly harsh tactics, even though it does not directly address the subject of tougher punishments (Rodley, 2018).
Credibility
Access to this chapter of a book, which is part of a larger work on international human rights law and was obtained through the ebook collection of the university library, was granted. The source’s trustworthiness is bolstered by the author’s extensive experience in the field.
Usefulness
Even though it provides an alternative point of view, this source offers insightful information regarding personal integrity from the point of view of human rights. It challenges the notion of harsher punishment by emphasizing the necessity of maintaining human rights principles while simultaneously acknowledging the need for individual rights and integrity. By embracing Rodley’s point of view, it is conceivable to address potential counterarguments linked to human rights issues while simultaneously strengthening the focus of the argument on maintaining social order and discouraging potential violators.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the annotated bibliography shows four sources contributing to the argument for tougher punishment for persons who breach the law. These sources were chosen because they provide support for the argument. In the context of punishment, these publications provide extremely helpful and insightful information regarding ethical considerations, animal law, developmental science, and personal integrity. It is possible to support the thesis statement and stress the significance of maintaining societal order, encouraging accountability, and discouraging potential offenders through tougher punitive measures if these sources are incorporated into the discussion.
References
Cauffman, E., Fine, A., Mahler, A., & Simmons, C. (2018). How developmental science influences juvenile justice reform. UC Irvine L. Rev., 8, 21.
Marceau, J. (2019). Beyond cages: Animal law and criminal punishment. Cambridge University Press.
Rodley, N. S. (2018). Integrity of the Person. International human rights law, 3.
Surmiak, A. (2020). Should we maintain or break confidentiality? The choices made by social researchers in the context of law violation and harm. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(3), 229-247.
write