What sociological theories explain the current rate of gun violence in the United States?
Gun violence in the United States has reached epidemic proportions. According to the Gun Violence Archive, there have been over 40,000 gun-related deaths and over 80,000 gun-related injuries in 2020 alone. This is a staggering statistic that speaks to the need for greater gun control in the United States. The causes of gun violence in the United States are numerous and complex. Poverty, lack of access to mental health services, an overabundance of guns, and a culture of violence all contribute to the current rate of gun violence. In addition, America’s lax gun laws make it easy for people to obtain firearms, leading to an increase in gun-related crimes. For example, many states allow individuals to purchase guns without a background check. This has resulted in more people with criminal records purchasing firearms, which has led to an increase in gun-related homicides.
The rate of gun violence in the United States is a national crisis. It is a tragedy that too many innocent Americans have been victims of this epidemic, and it must be addressed. Only through a comprehensive approach, which includes both short-term and long-term measures, can we hope to reduce the rate of gun violence in the United States (Cook, 2020). The effects of gun violence in the United States are far-reaching and devastating. Gun violence has a profound impact on the mental and physical health of survivors, victims, and their families. In addition, gun violence can have a negative economic impact on communities, as businesses and services may be affected by decreased consumer confidence. Finally, gun violence can lead to increased levels of fear and distrust in society as people become more fearful of their safety in public spaces. In order to reduce the current rate of gun violence in the United States, a number of measures must be taken. For example, access to mental health services should be increased, and better background checks should be instituted. In addition, gun laws should be tightened to ensure that only those who are legally allowed to possess firearms can do so. Finally, efforts must be made to reduce poverty, as many people turn to gun violence as a means of survival. This paper will analyze the issue of gun violence in the U.S. from the perspective of three sociological theories: the biological Theory of Violence, the General Strain Theory, and then the Community Disorganization Theory (Sociology of Violence).
Gun violence in the United States
Gun violence has been a pressing issue in the United States for many years, and it continues to be a major social problem. The current rate of gun violence in the United States is alarmingly high, and it affects a wide variety of demographic groups. This issue is important to study because it affects individuals and communities across the country, and it has profound implications for public safety, public health, and public policy. Gun violence in the United States is a pervasive and critical social problem that has been of growing concern in recent years. According to the Gun Violence Archive, in 2020 alone, there were over 20,000 gun-related deaths and over 40,000 gun-related injuries in the United States (Ssentongo, Fronterre, Ssentongo, Advani, Heilbrunn, Hazelton & Chinchilli, 2021). Gun violence is a complex issue that affects individuals of all ages, genders, and ethnicities, but certain demographics are more affected by the issue than others. The history of gun violence in the United States dates back to the early 19th century, when guns were first introduced as a means of self-defense. In the decades that followed, gun violence increased due to the prevalence of firearms and the availability of weapons on the black market. In the late 20th century, gun violence began to decline as new gun control laws were enacted, and the public began to become more aware of the issue.
However, in recent years, the rate of gun violence in the United States has been steadily increasing. This is due in part to the availability of weapons and the lack of effective gun control laws. In addition, the rise of gangs and organized crime has contributed to the problem. Gun violence disproportionately affects certain demographics in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the rate of gun deaths among African Americans is nearly twice that of whites. Similarly, the rate of gun deaths among Hispanic Americans is nearly three times that of whites. Additionally, men are more likely to be victims of gun violence than women. In addition, the issue of gun violence is an important one because it affects people of all demographics and backgrounds. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the majority of those killed by firearms in the United States are young people, specifically those between the ages of 15 and 29. Gun violence also disproportionately affects communities of color; in 2018, African Americans and Hispanics made up more than 54% of gun homicide victims.
The issue of gun violence is important for many reasons. Firstly, it has a devastating impact on the lives of those affected. Gun violence results in a significant number of deaths, physical injuries, and emotional trauma (Kim, 2019). Additionally, the prevalence of gun violence in the United States has a negative impact on our nation’s economy, with the cost of medical care, criminal justice proceedings, and lost productivity due to gun-related deaths and injuries estimated to be over $229 billion annually. In order to reduce gun violence, it is necessary to develop policies that address the root causes of gun violence, such as poverty, inequality, and access to firearms. It is also important to invest in evidence-based strategies that focus on prevention, intervention, and support for those affected by gun violence. By taking action and investing in solutions, we can reduce the rate of gun violence and create a safe and healthy environment for all.
Discussion of sociological theories
Biological Theory of Violence
The Biological Theory of Violence is a concept based on the idea that biological factors, such as hormones and genetic predispositions, contribute to violent behavior. This theory is rooted in the belief that violence is a biologically driven, instinctive response to certain stimuli. It suggests that some individuals are more likely to act out violently due to their biology and that this predisposition is likely to be passed on genetically from one generation to the next. In particular, the work of Robert Hare, James Q. Wilson, and John Monahan has been particularly influential in developing this theory. These scholars have argued that certain biological factors, such as neurotransmitter levels, hormones, genetic inheritance, childhood experiences, and brain structure, can contribute to criminal and violent behavior. The Biological Theory of Violence seeks to explain why some people are more prone to violent behavior than others. It suggests that some individuals are born with a predisposition to violence and that this predisposition is likely to be passed on from generation to generation through genetics (Raine & Scerbo, 1991). It also suggests that certain hormones, such as testosterone, may be linked to violent behavior. In addition, the theory proposes that certain environmental factors, such as poverty, may contribute to violent behavior by creating a situation in which an individual is more likely to act out violently due to feelings of frustration and anger.
Proponents of the Biological Theory of Violence argue that it is necessary to understand the biological underpinnings of violent behavior in order to effectively address the issue. By understanding the biological factors that contribute to violence, it is possible to develop interventions that can be used to reduce or prevent violence. For example, research has shown that interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and family therapy can be effective in helping individuals understand and manage their violent impulses. However, the Biological Theory of Violence has been subject to criticism. Critics point out that the theory fails to take into account social and environmental factors that may also play a role in violent behavior. Additionally, critics argue that the theory can be used to justify the oppression of certain individuals, such as those who are economically disadvantaged.
General Strain Theory
The General Strain Theory (GST) is a sociological theory developed by Robert Agnew in 1992 to explain why some people commit a crime. This theory suggests that strain, or feelings of pressure and frustration, can lead to criminal behavior. GST is based on the idea that people who experience negative events such as poverty, abuse, or discrimination can become frustrated and angry, leading to criminal behavior as a way to cope with the negative emotions they are feeling. GST is based on the belief that certain life events, such as poverty or abuse, can create a “strain” or pressure on a person. This strain can lead to negative emotions such as anger or frustration, and these emotions can further lead to criminal behavior. For example, a person who experiences poverty may become frustrated and angry, leading them to commit a crime such as shoplifting or robbery (Thaxton & Agnew, 2018). Similarly, someone who has been the victim of abuse may feel frustrated and angry, leading them to commit a violent act such as assault or murder. GST also suggests that people who are exposed to certain cultural messages, such as those that glorify violence, can be more likely to engage in criminal behavior. This is because these messages can provide an outlet for the person’s frustration and anger. For example, someone who watches violent films or plays violent video games may be more likely to act out these behaviors in real life, leading to criminal behavior.
Community Disorganization Theory
The Community Disorganization Theory is an explanation of how communities become disorganized and how this disorganization contributes to higher rates of crime and delinquency. This theory was developed in the 1950s and 1960s by sociologists Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay and is sometimes referred to as the Chicago School Theory (Kubrin & Mioduszewski, 2019). The theory suggests that certain characteristics of a community can lead to disorganization, which in turn can create an environment conducive to crime and delinquency. These characteristics include poverty, high population density, high residential mobility, a large number of single-parent families, and a lack of social networks and institutions.
The Community Disorganization Theory suggests that when a community experiences these characteristics, it is more likely to have a higher rate of crime and delinquency. This is because the disorganization and lack of structure within the community, combined with a lack of resources and support, create an environment in which crime and delinquency can flourish. The disorganization of a community can result in a decrease in informal social control, meaning that there are fewer people to monitor the behavior of others and enforce norms. Additionally, when resources and services are scarce, it can lead to a decrease in the amount of formal social control, resulting in less law enforcement presence and fewer sanctions for those who break the law.
The Community Disorganization Theory has been used to explain why certain communities have higher rates of crime and delinquency than others. For example, research has found that communities with higher rates of poverty, population density, and residential mobility are more likely to have higher rates of crime and delinquency. Additionally, research has found that neighborhoods with more single-parent families and fewer social networks and institutions have higher rates of crime and delinquency.
How sociological theories explain the current rate of gun violence in the USA
Biological Theory of Violence
The Biological Theory of Violence posits that violence is caused by biological factors, such as genetic and hormonal influences, which can lead to violent behavior. In the case of gun violence in the United States, this theory holds that the propensity for violence is largely inherited and is influenced by environmental factors. Firstly, the Biological Theory of Violence suggests that some people are genetically predisposed to violence. This can be seen in the United States, where people with a history of violence or mental illness are more likely to be involved in shootings or other gun violence (Sturmey, 2022). Furthermore, research has suggested that people with a family history of violence are more likely to be victims of gun violence, as well as perpetrators. Additionally, there is evidence that suggests that certain genetic markers can be linked to an increased likelihood of violence and aggression. Secondly, the Biological Theory of Violence suggests that hormones can influence aggressive behavior.
Research has suggested that higher levels of testosterone can lead to increased aggression, which can manifest itself in violent behavior. This can be seen in the United States, where higher levels of testosterone in individuals have been linked to a greater likelihood of violence. Furthermore, research has also suggested that people with higher levels of testosterone are more likely to own guns and are more likely to use them in violent situations. Finally, the Biological Theory of Violence suggests that environmental factors can have an influence on violent behavior. In the United States, there is a strong correlation between gun violence and poverty, suggesting that people living in more disadvantaged areas are more likely to be both victims and perpetrators of gun violence. Additionally, research has suggested that people who live in areas with high levels of violence and crime are more likely to be involved in gun violence.
General Strain Theory
The General Strain Theory (GST) is a criminological theory that explains why some people may engage in criminal behavior. In particular, the theory suggests that criminal behavior is caused by the strain that people experience when they encounter negative events or conditions. In the case of gun violence in the United States, there are numerous strains that could be contributing to the current rate of gun violence. One strain that could be contributing to the rate of gun violence is the strain of economic inequality. There is a large degree of economic inequality in the United States, with a significant portion of the population living in poverty and lacking access to basic resources. This economic strain could be a factor in the current rate of gun violence, as those who are economically disadvantaged may be more likely to resort to criminal behavior as a way of obtaining resources or financial gain.
Another strain that could be contributing to the rate of gun violence is the strain of cultural norms. In the United States, there is a culture of violence and aggression in which violence is often seen as an acceptable response to conflict (Agnew & Brezina, 2019). This cultural strain could lead some individuals to respond to conflict with violence, leading to an increase in gun violence. Furthermore, the strain of a lack of access to quality education could also be a contributing factor to the rate of gun violence in the United States. Those who lack access to quality education may have difficulty finding employment, which can lead to feelings of desperation and frustration. This strain could lead some individuals to resort to criminal behavior, such as gun violence, as a way of obtaining resources or financial gain. Finally, the strain of a lack of access to mental health services could also be a contributing factor to the rate of gun violence in the United States. Those who do not have access to quality mental health services may not receive the help they need to cope with stress, trauma, or other mental health issues. This strain could lead some individuals to resort to criminal behavior, such as gun violence, as a way of releasing their frustration or anger.
Community Disorganization Theory
This theory suggests that the prevalence of gun violence is linked to a lack of social cohesion in certain communities, leading to a breakdown of social norms and an increase in criminal behavior. At the heart of the Community, Disorganization Theory is the concept of social capital. Social capital is the collective resources, such as networks of relationships, that people have access to in a community. As social capital decreases, the stability of the community is weakened, leading to an increase in criminal activity. This is especially true in communities that lack economic and educational opportunities, as poverty and low levels of education are associated with an increase in gun violence (Lynch & Barrett, 2018). The Community Disorganization Theory suggests that gun violence is a product of a weak social fabric, as communities that are more socially cohesive are less likely to experience gun violence. This can be seen in the fact that many communities with high levels of gun violence are characterized by poverty, inequality, and limited educational and economic opportunities. Without the presence of strong social networks and the resources they provide, individuals in these communities may turn to criminal behavior as a means of survival.
In addition to poverty and inequality, the Community Disorganization Theory also suggests that a lack of social control plays a role in the prevalence of gun violence. Social control refers to the ability of individuals and organizations to regulate and direct behavior in a community. Without effective social control, individuals may feel emboldened to engage in dangerous and criminal behavior, including the use of guns. The Community Disorganization Theory provides a compelling explanation for the current rate of gun violence in the United States. By understanding the factors that lead to a breakdown of the social fabric in certain communities, we can begin to develop strategies to reduce gun violence. This includes addressing the underlying causes of poverty and inequality, as well as strengthening social control mechanisms. Ultimately, these strategies can help create a stronger and safer society for all.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the United States has been plagued by gun violence for years, with homicides and other gun-related deaths climbing steadily in recent years. The Biological Theory of Violence, the General Strain Theory, and the Community Disorganization Theory each provide useful insights into the causes of gun violence in the United States. Each of these theories offers a different perspective on the issue, allowing us to better understand the underlying causes of gun violence and develop effective strategies for preventing and reducing gun violence in our communities.
References
Agnew, R., & Brezina, T. (2019). General strain theory. In Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 145-160). Springer, Cham.
Cook, P. J. (2020). Thinking about gun violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(4), 1371–1393.
Kim, D. (2019). Social determinants of health in relation to firearm-related homicides in the United States: a nationwide multilevel cross-sectional study. PLoS medicine, 16(12), e1002978.
Kubrin, C. E., & Mioduszewski, M. D. (2019). Social disorganization theory: Past, present, and future. In Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 197-211). Springer, Cham.
Lynch, M. J., & Barrett, K. L. (2018). Social disorganization theory. In The Routledge companion to criminological theory and concepts (pp. 100–104). Routledge.
Raine, A., & Scerbo, A. (1991). Biological theories of violence. In Neuropsychology of aggression (pp. 1–25). Springer, Boston, MA.
Sturmey, P. (2022). Psychological and Sociological Theories of Violence and Aggression. Violence and Aggression, pp. 215–232.
Ssentongo, P., Fronterre, C., Ssentongo, A. E., Advani, S., Heilbrunn, E. S., Hazelton, J. P., … & Chinchilli, V. M. (2021). Gun violence incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic is higher than before the pandemic in the United States. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1-8.
Thaxton, S., & Agnew, R. (2018). When criminal coping is likely: An examination of conditioning effects in general strain theory. Journal of quantitative criminology, 34(4), 887–920.
write