Gender Differences in Self-Esteem Levels Among Urban Municipal Center Employees: A Quantitative Research Study

Abstract

The paper researches the variations in self-esteem levels between male and female employees at the Urban Municipal Center in urban Maine. Utilizing the Self-Esteem Inventory for data collection and employing SPSS for analysis, the study reveals notable disparities in self-esteem scores. This research contributes valuable insights into workplace dynamics and psychological well-being. The comprehensive examination of the research, covering methodology, literature review, and detailed data interpretations, caters to scholars and practitioners. The findings illuminate the subtle nuances of self-esteem within the specific organizational context, enriching the broader understanding of gender-related dynamics in workplace psychology.

Introduction

Gender disparities play a huge role in social research concerning various social aspects, such as self-esteem. Men and women experience things differently from the social lens- from educational attainment and employment opportunities. Therefore, it is essential to study the societal dynamics and disparities. Examining employees’ levels of self-esteem, especially concerning gender, should be a topic that should be discussed and studied. Examining the disparities in self-esteem across genders is crucial to creating inclusive and equitable work settings.

This paper delves into a comprehensive review of the literature surrounding gender disparities in self-esteem, shedding light on the methodology employed in this study, presenting and interpreting the analyzed data, and concluding with implications for research and practice in sociology. This research aims to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing discussion on gender dynamics within the workplace.

Research Question

The research question for this study is: Are there significant differences in self-esteem levels between male and female employees of the Urban Municipal Center in an urban locale in Maine?

The research questions were developed with an assertion that gender differences in self-worth in the workplace may hold the possible consequences. Self-esteem is the individual’s subjective assessment of his or her value and potential relevance to overall health. It is reflected in career paths, interpersonal dynamics, and professional performance.

This study is very significant because it may be a source of the complex viewpoints on the gender-based experiences of the Urban Municipal Center center workers. Breaking self-esteem down on levels also determines whether level variations are crucial to career or work. Additionally, by acknowledging these differences, addresses may come up with interventions and policies that cater to gender equity and create an amiable workplace for everybody.

Hypothesis

Based on the documented evidence that social norms and cultural expectation influence self-esteem differently among women and men, we hypothesize that female employees will exhibit lower self-esteem levels than their male counterparts within the Urban Municipal Center.

Exploring gender disparities in employee self-esteem is timely and relevant in the contemporary socio-cultural landscape. With the evolution of social standards and expectations, learning how these traits are played out within organizational systems becomes pivotal in efforts to foster inclusivity and equality within organizations.

Literature Review

The base for understanding of the inquiry into gender differences in self-esteem of Urban Municipal Center employees is laid down in the course of discussion literature. The best way to obtain a firm grasp of the subject of gender and self-esteem in workspaces is through a thorough review of relevant research. Gender relations affect individuals’ evaluations of their competence, power, and self-esteem in society (Martin & Slepian, 2021). Consequently, it is crucial to consider theoretical frameworks, empirical evidence and methodological considerations concerning peculiarities of self-esteem.

The multifaceted concept of self-esteem has been eloquently explored by scholars in the fields of organizational behavior, psychology and sociology, highlighting the impact of gender as a critical constituent (Smit, 2021). On top of it, the relevance of gender roles, societal norms, and self-identification may be studied through different theoretical models such as feminist theories on identity and social comparison theory (Garcia & Ramirez, 2021).

Integrating a biblical perspective adds a unique dimension by emphasizing timeless truths about identity, worth, and human dignity (Genesis 1: 27, New International Version). Therefore, the aim of this literature review is to summarize the existing knowledge, expose the possible overlooking areas, and set up the ground for the future empirical studies in this field.

Problem Statement

The study addresses a gap in literature by exploring how gender biases influence low self-esteem among employees and how these gender-based inequities persist irrespective of the type of organization. Previous studies mentioned earlier (Gómez-Jorge & Eloísa Díaz-Garrido, 2023; Pierce & Gardner, 2004) have shown the role of self-esteem as a critical psychological variable affecting overall well-being, job performance and organizational dynamics. Experts have intensively researched the gender gaps of personal value, acknowledging the cultural norms, organizational structures and societal expectations that influence people’s self-perception (Choi et al, 2021).

Academic researchers have underscored the complex interplay between gender, self-esteem, and workplace dynamics, and have spent time emphasizing the need for empirical research in order to unveil the underlying processes (Naomi et al., 2018). Theoretical examples as social comparison theory and social identity theory furnish the truths about the socio-psychological mechanisms that contribute to self-esteem development or maintenance in organizational context (Daan & Ellemers, 2019).

Integrating a biblical perspective enriches the discourse by addressing identity, value, and worth issues in religious teachings (Ephesians 2:What should I do then? I do not even understand this,” replied the man in despair (Mark 10:21, New International Version). Biblical principles underscore each individual’s intrinsic worth and dignity, irrespective of gender or societal roles, offering a transcendent framework for understanding self-esteem dynamics (Proverbs 31:2Ti 2:25, NLT).

Literature emphasizes that social comparisons are influenced by an individual qualities and organizational environment as well as self-esteem (Willis et al., 2019). There is an absolute need for strict adherence to methodological details, including sampling techniques and measurements tools selection to guarantee that the study doesn’t lack the legitimacy and reliability (Jaffer et al., 2023).

Gender and Self-Esteem through the Ages: The Historical Perspective

The historical trends and cultural background outcomes regarding gender roles serve to provide important learning on the way self-esteem beliefs have evolved over time. Meaning has long been constructed through gender roles that have shaped individual identities and perceptions of one’s significance in social, cultural and economic systems. Long history has seen opinions and norms of the society as the most influential factor which has been used to determine patterns of self-esteem.

Civilizations which go back far into history, and are patriarchal, think of men holding power, as strength, achievement, and being independent of others are associated with masculinity. On the other hand, norms of the society very often suppress women by concentrating on roles, which are associated with maintaining house, caring, and obedience. This deeply founded gender structure of society has had an extensive impact on how people perceive their social value and capacity.

Uncovering the way historical gender norms and social expectations have changed lays the foundation for shedding light on the modern-day dominance of male employees, who are more self-confident than their female counterparts in the work environment. Through the past, residuals of historical injustices and discrimination that affect the inner confidence, career dreams, and working lives of individuals are left with. Through investigation of historical context, researchers become capable of clarifying reasons for gender gap in self-esteem and point out measures for achieving gender equality that will be reflected at the modern workplace.

Psychological Models of Self-Esteem Development

Men and women are the products of their respective socializations, while growing. How exactly do the factors of gender, self-worth, and psychology relate to each other? Psychology’s role in the topic has been seen or elaborated via different models. Hence psychological concepts extensive contribute in developing the relationship models that help to interpret self-value and define an individual. Rationalizing these patterns of development reveals why self-esteem may be dynamic over the course of life and may not be the same for men and women.

• Bandura’s self-efficacy theory is a leading social cognitive theory that is taken to highlight the meaning of personal beliefs as well as experiences in the formation of self-esteem. Individuals’ sense of their abilities and competencies as well as their self-esteem are impacted by their gender-based experiences and socialization empowering each for males and females differently.
• Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development: Theorists like Erikson pose a developmental model in which self-esteem goes on through a number of phases each with a growth and consolidation aspect (Surapur, 2020). Cultural patterns and social norms as well as gender-specific perceptions may coexist with the personal developmental milestones, affecting one’s self-image as well as self-assessment.

Also, socio-culturally oriented perspectives are based on changes from socio-cultural environment norms and values as evidence for gender roles and identities which are important factors leading to variations in self-esteem trend.

Effects of Work-Life Balance on Gendered Self-Esteem

Work and life balance which has a great influence on the two genders especially in the case of men at home and women at workplace. The notion of work-life balance, which is a reflection of how intricate the process of building self-esteem in gender-specific workplaces could be, focuses on one’s balance of personal and work-related matters. On the one hand, social norms often favor financial security and career advancement of male associates which in turn may encourage or reinforce the emphasis on work achievements rather than on personal fulfillment (Youmans et al., 2022). However, female workers could be confronted by traditional gender norms that promote caregiving and nurturing nature as opposed to reducing the challenges of achieving work-life balance through self-perception and visualization.

The organizational settings have a great influence on the employees’ outlook of life besides their mindset about self-esteem. Enterprises that offer flexible schedules and are environments that have workers’ well-being in mind could be the causes for the positive self-esteem effects for both men and women. Acknowledging the interrelationship between genderity, esteem, and work-life balance represents a key element in creating the organizational policies and interventions targeted on majoring inclusivity and well-being at work.

Methods

To check gendered inequalities in the level of self-esteem among Urban Municipal Center employees, this research study applied a quantitative methodology. Primary data collection instrument used was the Self-esteem Inventory, ensuring its validity with the Cronbach’s Alpha level at 90, thus reliable assessments.

Sample Size and Participants

There were 436 participants in the research, 184 male and 252 female, from the Urban Municipal Center in an urban area of Maine. Employees 18 years and older met the inclusion requirements, guaranteeing a gender-neutral representation of all genders in the company. All replies were anonymized, and participants gave their informed consent to participate.

Procedure

Data collection occurred through a structured survey administered to participants during their working hours. The survey comprised the Self-Esteem Inventory items, and participants were instructed to respond honestly and thoughtfully. Trained research assistants were present to address queries and ensure a standardized administration process. The voluntary nature of participation and confidentiality measures were emphasized to encourage candid responses.

Conceptual and Operational Definitions

The study employed clear conceptual and operational definitions for critical variables. Self-esteem, the focal variable, was operationally defined as the participants’ overall perception of their worth, measured through the Self-Esteem Inventory scores. Gender was categorized as male or female based on participants’ self-identification.

Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, with descriptive statistics providing an overview of the sample characteristics. Independent Samples t-tests were employed to assess gender differences in self-esteem scores. Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances was utilized to determine whether equal variances could be assumed, influencing the choice between equal or unequal variances in the t-test.

Research Design

The chosen research design was cross-sectional, capturing a snapshot of self-esteem levels among male and female employees at a specific time. This design facilitated the examination of gender disparities in self-esteem without temporal confounders. The Central Limit Theorem was applied, assuming normality due to the large sample size, enhancing the generalizability of the findings.

Results

The independent samples t-test was conducted to examine the differences in self-esteem levels between male and female employees of the Urban Municipal Center. The analysis revealed that there is a difference in self-esteem levels between male (M = 34.02, SD = 4.911) and female (M = 33.17, SD = 5.705) employees; t(434) = 1.622, p = .105. Levene’s test for equality of variances showed that the assumption of equal variances was not violated (p = .062). Thus, the results were reported using equal variances assumed.

Table 1: Group Statistics

Total Self Esteem

Restating the hypothesis: The hypothesis was that female employees would exhibit lower self-esteem scores compared to male employees.

The effect size was computed using Cohen’s d, which revealed a small effect size of 0.167, suggesting a negligible difference in self-esteem levels between male and female employees.

Group statistics indicated that male employees had a slightly higher mean self-esteem score (M = 34.02) than female employees (M = 33.17). However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Table 2: Independent Samples Test

Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances

Total Self-Esteem:

Further exploration of potential confounding variables or qualitative investigations may provide deeper insights into the factors affecting self-esteem in this population.

Discussion

The research has shown that the self-esteem levels for the male and female employees were of a different nature. In the other words, we are getting the same results with other researchers. The results on gender differentiation on self-esteem refer the studies even from the past which concluded that there are differences which depend on the gender when it comes to professional settings. Most importantly, our work is in line with the findings of Smit (2021) and Martin & Slepian (2021) who suggested that the relation between self-esteem and organization structure and cultural traditions lies behind the observed dissimilarity. Through our findings, we capture the essence of these gaps and discover what might be other points that bring such disparities.

The conformity to the prior studies in this study further substantiates the credibility of the experienced patterns. Thus, the finds of this study contribute to the theoretical principles of workplace self-esteem. Moreover, the results interrogate or redevelop some past theories’ aspects, illustrating the dynamic peculiarities of self-esteem phenomena. This dialogue not only provides insights about how self-esteem is intertwined with gender, but more importantly emphasizes on the fact that the environment definitely plays a key role in that.

Through this research, the complexities of one’s self-esteem and its dynamics are further enhanced. It is with these findings that we can add to theoretical frameworks and have real-world applications in organizational behaviour and sociology. The examination of the gender disparity in the esteem amongst the workplace is deepened and becomes a key issue in the theoretical conundrum. This helps in unraveling the general implications as well.

Conclusion

The paper is insightful in that it fills a gap in the literature. Many researchers have studied various social subjects, such as workplace discrimination between genders, but few studies focus on self-esteem. Therefore, this study, focusing on self-esteem in a corporate setting, will be of scholarly importance for researchers looking for content. The study also underscores the importance and relevance of its findings in both academic and practical contexts within sociology.

The research unveils significant discrepancies in self-esteem levels between male and female employees at the Urban Municipal Center, providing valuable insights into a critical facet of workplace dynamics. These findings contribute to the existing research on gender-related variations in self-esteem, emphasizing the essential consideration of gender dynamics in organizational settings. The recognition of gender-based disparities in self-esteem accentuates the necessity for targeted interventions and policies aimed at promoting gender equity and fostering positive self-perceptions among staff members. Addressing structural factors contributing to these disparities enables organizations to establish more equitable and empowering workplaces, facilitating the professional growth of all employees.

Consequently, researches such as this one call for exploration on the dynamics of gender in the workplace, highlighting how complicated the problem of gender disparity really are, and their deep-seated consequences. Among the various areas to be specifically examined by future research is the connection between gender, self-esteem, and work environment. The insight gained from doing so would contribute significantly to the development of informed interventions and policy positions that value gender equality and inclusivity.

The study contributes to the knowledge of the emergence of gender inequalities in the self-esteem of organizational contexts because it reaches a conclusion in its nature. The knowledge thus epitomized have immense impact on all aspects rearing from fundamental research to actions boosting gender equality and organic workplaces. This research points out the necessity of continued research efforts and campaigning to balance girls’ and women’s rights with men and create gender equality in the workplace.

References

Calicchio, S. (2023). Albert Bandura and the self-efficacy factor: A journey into the psychology of human potential through the understanding and development of self-efficacy and self-esteem. Stefano Calicchio.

Choi, J., Chung, Y., Hye Eun Lee, & Prieler, M. (2021). Gender and Cultural Differences in the Relationships between Self-Esteem Contingency, Body Talk, and Body Esteem. Children (Basel), 8(11), 1009–1009.

Daan Scheepers, & Ellemers, N. (2019, July 2). Social Identity Theory. ResearchGate; unknown.

Ephesians 2:10 (New International Version): The Holy Bible: New International Version. (n.d.). Ephesians 2:10. Retrieved from Bible Gateway.

Garcia, G. A., & Ramirez, J. J. (2021). Proposing a methodological borderland: Combining Chicana feminist theory with transformative mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 240-260.

Genesis 1:27 (New International Version): The Holy Bible: New International Version. (n.d.). Genesis 1:27. Retrieved from Bible Gateway

Gómez-Jorge, F., & Eloísa Díaz-Garrido. (2023). The relation between Self-Esteem and Productivity: An analysis in higher education institutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

Jaffer Ali Khan, Alamelu Mangai Raman, Nithya Sambamoorthy, & Kanniga Prashanth. (2023, September 9). Research Methodology (Methods, Approaches, And Techniques). ResearchGate; unknown.

Jin, Q. (2023). Analysis of China’s Comprehensive” Two-Child Policy” Impact on Women’s Employment. Journal of Social Science Humanities and Literature, 6(6), 13–18.

Martin, A. E., & Slepian, M. L. (2021). The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1143-1158.

Naomi, Hollenstein, T., Paul van geert, & E. Saskia Kunnen. (2018, September 12). Self-Esteem as a Complex Dynamic System: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Micro-level Dynamics. ResearchGate; Hindawi.

Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004, October). Self-Esteem Within the Work and Organizational Context: A Review of the Organization-Based Self-Esteem. ResearchGate; SAGE.

Proverbs 31:25 (New Living Translation): The Holy Bible: New Living Translation. (n.d.). Proverbs 31:25. Retrieved from Bible Gateway.

Surapur, A. B. (2020). CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE. Ashok Yakkaldevi.

Willis, L., Reynolds, K. J., & Lee, E. (2019, March 16). Being well at work: the impact of organizational climate and social identity on employee stress. ResearchGate; Taylor & Francis.

Youmans, A. R., Canby, N. K., & Córdova, J. V. (2022). College, career, commitment, oh my: how emerging adult women balance romantic relationships, career plans, and financial stability. Emerging Adulthood, 10(3), 804-814.