Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Women’s Rights Are Human Rights

With great pride, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, serving as the First Lady of the United States of America then, confidently delivered her speech during this conference. Her message revolved around advocating for enhanced equality and opportunities for women worldwide. Being an American herself, she acknowledged issues concerning women’s rights prevalent in every nation, including her own country – the United States of America. Clinton emphasized granting women freedom and empowering them by ensuring their voices are heard loud and clear. This essay examines how Clinton utilized rhetorical techniques in her speech and demonstrates how it strongly influenced women’s rights advocates as a compelling call for action.

To create a connection with her audience, Hillary uses examples of women who have taken on significant responsibilities. She highlights that she has encountered women from diverse backgrounds, such as those in South Africa who played an integral part in ending apartheid and are now contributing towards the development of a new democratic nation, or those in India and Bangladesh, amongst others, striving by taking small loans out to buy milk cows or resources -such as rickshaws- which supports their families’ livelihoods (Clinton 2). Clinton employs repetition -starting each example with “I have met women” construction-showcasing credibility due to simultaneously meeting multiple female leaders across many sectors. Through this tactic, audiences will know that even marginalized populations of individuals may achieve capable feats despite unfair societal norms limiting them all along.

Clinton’s speech employs all three rhetorical appeals – pathos, ethos, and logos. To establish her credibility as a speaker on women’s rights during that specific period, she strategically utilizes the concept of ethos in her opening statement by declaring herself as the most qualified person to address this topic. This assertion highlights how Clinton has dedicated significant effort over several decades toward addressing issues about women and successfully instilling trustworthiness among the audience (Clinton 4). Additionally, Clinton emphasizes her extensive experience in improving various aspects of people’s lives from different backgrounds, both domestically and globally – including children and families. By showcasing this expertise, it becomes apparent why speaking about feminist principles feels natural for her while also exuding confidence when discussing them.

Moreover, her logical interpretation ensures comprehensive coverage regarding what needs attention regarding gender equality, backing up these claims with evidence supporting causation behind systematic problems faced by relevant audiences at events like hers’. She illustrates that gender-based inequities exist across almost every aspect, such as educational opportunity access or inadequate delivery systems impacting crucial areas related to social mobility and poverty levels that require personal independence(Clinton 3-4). Integrating powerful rhetoric seamlessly into discussions advocating equity between males/females always involves deeply emotional content through compelling imagery below., Hillary compassionately describes hardships experienced by millions worldwide who are denied various freedoms due to engrained oppression– ultimately humanizing those affected who would otherwise be faceless symbolic representations. These points remind re-users not only to neglect intrinsic communal values but also to ignore shared humanity.

Additionally, in her speech, Clinton emphasizes the importance of logos by arguing that a peaceful world cannot exist as long as women continue to face discrimination. She concludes with a powerful statement that highlights the pervasiveness of gender-based injustices globally: As long as discrimination and inequities remain commonplace everywhere in the world—where girls and women are undervalued, malnourished, overworked, underpaid; denied education; subjected to violence at home and beyond—the potential for creating a peaceful and prosperous global community will not be realized (Clinton 6). Clinton skillfully presents clear reasoning throughout her discourse on why securing women’s rights is crucial for fostering an improved society by establishing links between widespread instances of mistreatment against females worldwide and its detrimental effects on family structures’ integrity or stability.

In numerous sentences, she crafts hereafter within this argumentative framework – contending how it can serve beneficial functions when allowing unencumbered lives for all members irrespective of any oppressively restrictive limitations surrounding their rights. She proposes placing considerable emphasis on nurturing better livelihoods, precisely targeting these aspects impacting explicitly upon them (women), ensuring true equality emerges powerfully, enabling stronger foundations amid harmonious families, thereby generating collective conditions necessary towards fundamentally transforming attitudes toward dignified treatment devoid discernibly fallacious discriminatory biases targeted specifically against females alike (Clinton 5-6). Overall try showcasing both clarity logic emphasizing justifications behind such claims factor foremost determining pivotal necessity empowering truly equal existence following life circumstances making astute gambit cleverly deploying repetition emphasized disdainful condemnation evident from flagrant infringement abuses occurring universally endangering wellbeing overall objective persuading humanity cease violating female individuals’ entitlement progress unfettered essentially inviolate safeguarding enduring ever pertinent issue going forward paving path toward achieving tangible breakthrough engender unequal societal systemic change larger scale successful concluded struggle commends demonstration concrete verbiage chosen carry forth message brought undeniable significance repelling challenging stance pervasive violations perpetuated relentlessly ongoing harm harmed opening wherein cessation urgent emergency status quo creates impediment impeding forward even if world ostensibly progressing toward envisioned goals.

She confidently presents a comprehensive list of violations against women’s rights. She emphasizes the phrase “It’s a violation of human rights when…” by repeating it at the start of each statement (Clinton 5). This repetition expands our understanding of women’s violence worldwide as she details specific issues occurring in various corners of the globe. Moreover, through vivid illustrations depicting what women have experienced, Clinton effectively broadens and shifts audience perceptions on these global challenges females face. For instance, she cites an unfortunate example stating that genital mutilation violates young girls’ human rights (Clinton 5). Throughout her speech, Clinton employs consistent wording at sentence beginnings to shed light on both past experiences and ongoing silencing and violations suffered by women as individuals with undeniable entitlements under human rights frameworks.

In conclusion, Primarily aimed at inspiring hope among female audiences worldwide, Clinton’s “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights” speech is intended to raise awareness of gender-based global problems. By doing so during this conference and gathering international attention from worldwide nations, Clinton successfully compelled people to acknowledge equality for all genders, being presently due diligence necessities sought after with great urgency. Her position holds significant gravity within movements advocating for global recognition and protection/enforcement concerning Women’s full range Of universally granted legal protections. Additionally, she masterfully incorporates ethos, pathos, and logos appeals from start to finish. By openly expressing her disapproval of mistreatment towards women throughout the entire speech, Clinton builds credibility (ethos), evokes emotion (pathos), and employs logic-based argumentation (logos). Each word carries a profound purpose aimed at accomplishing conference objectives efficiently. The overall flow of this meaningful discourse is expertly choreographed as Clinton delivers it eloquently with an impressive wealth manner while displaying astute awareness regarding complex matters explicitly associated with significant issues influencing female fairness.


Clinton, Hillary Rodham. “Read Hillary Rodham Clinton’s ‘Women’s Rights’ Speech from 1995.” The Atlantic, 1 Sept. 2020,


Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics