Introduction
The historical trajectory of U.S. foreign policy, from the Monroe Doctrine to the dynamics of the twenty-first century, displays a complex interplay between long-term themes of national interest and power dynamics, as well as important events that have reshaped global geopolitics. While pursuing national interests is a recurring subject in this paper, techniques utilized to navigate a changing international order necessitate adaptive responses. It investigates pivotal historical events such as the Cold War containment policy, the demise of the Soviet Union, and contemporary paradigm shifts during the Trump and Biden administrations. As it deals with the issues of multipolarity, the United States’ role in defining global security, cooperative governance, and the pursuit of common international goals is characterized by the tension between historical legacies and present imperatives.
Historical context
To begin with, George Washington’s presidency signaled the adoption of an isolationist and impartial position regarding the internal affairs of foreign states. Early American political thinkers issued warnings on the establishment of prolonged alliances that detract attention from domestic affairs unless under extraordinary circumstances such as self-defense, promotion of free commerce, or addressing humanitarian issues (Lillian 2008). During the onset of World War I in July 1914, the United States adopted a policy of neutrality, with President Woodrow Wilson advising the nation to refrain from developing ideological or emotional attachments to the conflict. In 1916, President Wilson secured his re-election by advocating a policy of non-interference, which resonated with the American populace, which expressed a preference for avoiding involvement in the ongoing conflict. The phrase “He kept us out of war” was employed as a campaign slogan by President Wilson’s proponents to promote his tenure in office.
James Monroe, in 1823, during the Monroe Doctrine, was one of the presidents who played a part in shaping the U.S. foreign policy in the Western Hemisphere. The geopolitical environment in the 19th century of the Latin American independence movements and perceived the European influence in the Americas concept.
The establishment of American supremacy in the Western Hemisphere was facilitated by the implementation of the Monroe Doctrine (National Archives, 2021). By asserting its control over the Americas and actively discouraging European interference, the United States took on the primary role of ensuring peace and preserving the autonomy of the region. This event signified a significant shift in the United States foreign policy when the nation relinquished its isolationist stance and adopted a more proactive strategy for addressing regional obstacles.
U.S. involvement in major world events
The foreign policy orientation of the United States was altered as a result of the events that transpired during World War I. In 1914, with the commencement of the war, President Woodrow Wilson made the inaugural declaration of neutrality. Nevertheless, the United States’ decision to enter the war in 1917 was influenced by a multitude of causes.
German unrestricted submarine warfare targeted military and civilian watercraft, endangering American lives and interests. The 1915 RMS Lusitania shipwreck cost American lives owing to a deteriorating opinion of Germany. After receiving the Zimmermann Telegram in 1917, German soldiers felt compelled to form a cooperation with Mexico to provoke the U.S. into war. Controversial intelligence helped justify American involvement in the war and fueled anti-German sentiment. The 1917 Russian Revolution overthrew the monarchy and established a socialist government. Russia’s withdrawal gave the Central Powers a tactical advantage, making the Allies, especially the U.S., more important in ending the war.
President Wilson’s Fourteen Points sought to promote peace and address the root causes of the conflict. The League of Nations, which used collective security and diplomacy to prevent wars, was created during this time (National Archives, 2022). In April 1917, the U.S. joined WWI as an ally. The U.S. provided financial and human capital to help the Allies win.
Diplomatic negotiations following 1917 led to the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. The pact included parts of President Wilson’s Fourteen Points, which helped form the League of Nations. The League was founded to promote worldwide cooperation to prevent wars. Despite President Wilson’s efforts, the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles, preventing the U.S. from joining the League of Nations. European influence and its potential impact on U.S. sovereignty were raised in the Senate. World War I shaped U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. withdrew from European politics after the war, while the region advanced international institutions and escalated global warfare.
The Cold War started after World War II with geopolitical tension and rivalry between the U.S. and its Western allies and the USSR and its Eastern Bloc allies. US-Soviet power-sharing typified the Cold War’s bipolar world system. The “First World” associated with the U.S. and the “Second World” related to the USSR emerged from relationships between many states and these superpowers. Both nations possessed large militaries and worldwide influence, creating a complex power dynamic in the bipolar global system. Concerns about nuclear weapons and direct conflicts have increased caution in international interactions.
The emergence of the Non-Aligned Movement can be attributed to the deliberate decision of several states to adopt a non-alignment strategy amidst heightened geopolitical tensions that ensued after the conclusion of the Cold War. These nations made efforts to stay well-informed about the ideological conflict between the superpowers. The persistence of the international bipolar system endured until the latter half of the 1980s, during which time the Soviet Union experienced substantial internal turmoil. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked the culmination of the Cold War and the emergence of a unipolar international order, with the United States of America assuming the role of the predominant superpower. The bipolar global system was significantly shaped by the enduring geopolitical tension of the Cold War, which likewise had repercussions on alliances, international relations, and conflicts. The dissolution of the Soviet Union and the conclusion of the Cold War marked the beginning of a new era in global politics.
The Cold War and Bipolarity
U.S. containment policy
The Truman Doctrine was one of the U.S. containment strategies that were implemented before the rise of the Marshall Plan; the Marshall Plan became a great containment plan that was used by the U.S. George Marshall, a U.S. Secretary of State, who lectured at the University of Harvard on June 5, 1947on the broad plan to handle and maintain the economic problems of the European nations following World War II. The project was used to provide financial relief to the countries affected by the war, prevent communism from rising and also promote political stability.
The plan was formulated on the idea that preventing communism needed a strong and secure Western Europe. The U.S. boosted these nations to counter soviet dominance. The U.S. gave sixteen European countries around $12 billion in economic aid between 1948 and 1952. Adjusted for inflation, its value is over $100 billion now (Office of the Historian, 2019). The Marshall Plan helped European states recover and cooperate economically.
The containment policy included the Marshall Plan, which strengthened U.S. political and economic ties with Western Europe. It showed a commitment to rebuilding the war-torn continent by preventing economic catastrophe, which could lead to political instability, and resisting communism after the devastation. During the early Cold War, the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan illustrated a comprehensive containment strategy that included military, economic, and political elements. This policy aimed to stop communism and enhance Western interests.
Proxy conflicts and their impact on global stability
Partisan disputes significantly impacted the dynamics of bipolarity and the establishment of international relations during the Cold War, leading to substantial changes in the global geopolitical landscape. In the quest for ideological and strategic supremacy, the United States and the Soviet Union often abstained from confrontation. Instead, they provided support to rival governments or groups through proxy warfare. Proxy battles occurred in multiple regions, encompassing Africa, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. In order to expand their spheres of influence without engaging in direct armed conflict, the superpowers employed strategies such as providing political, economic, and military assistance to their large network of clients and allies.
The consequences of these proxy conflicts had a substantial impact on world stability. In spite of the concerted endeavors made by major global powers to hinder the dissemination of their opponent’s ideology, proxy wars frequently exacerbated internal problems and instigated prolonged battles within specific geographical areas (Venkatraj, 2019). Prominent instances encompass the Vietnam War, the Korean War, as well as the hostilities transpiring in Afghanistan and Central America. The bipolar nature of the Cold War and the potential for direct confrontation between superpowers resulted in the establishment of a complex equilibrium. However, the proxy battles also intensified the likelihood of geopolitical tensions, human distress, and instability in the region. The indirect nature of these battles had significant implications for the global distribution of power and presented obstacles in the endeavor to achieve peaceful resolutions. The enduring consequences of proxy wars, even after their answer, have had a lasting impact on the global landscape following the Cold War, posing ongoing issues in the affected regions.
Post-Cold War Era: Unipolarity and Challenges
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the conclusion of the Cold War, there were significant changes in world geopolitics. The United States exerted substantial influence on a considerable amount of the emerging global order that materialized in the post-Cold War era (Reza, 2022). Given its position as the only remaining superpower on a worldwide scale, the United States undertook the critical responsibility of leading the transition from a bipolar to a unipolar power structure. The strategy of the American authorities, particularly during the presidency of George H.W. Bush, was marked by a dedication to peacekeeping and a cautious approach to diplomacy.
The stance taken by the United States of America regarding the reunification of Germany represented a matter of considerable concern. Despite the reservations voiced by certain sectors, the United States government earnestly endeavored to achieve the nonviolent reunification of East and West Germany (Alnawafleh, 2021). The decision was made in response to their acknowledgment of the crucial need to preserve tranquility in Europe. Moreover, through the utilization of its diplomatic prowess, the United States effectively assisted the departure of armed soldiers deployed by the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe. As a result, the United States played a substantial role in facilitating a cohesive and organized transition in the region.
The United States of America supported the advancement of economic integration among states formerly affiliated with the Soviet bloc, with the aim of facilitating their reintegration into the global economy. Moreover, the United States provided financial and extra resources to support these nations in their efforts to implement free-market reforms. The initiation of a more extensive trajectory marked by enhanced economic collaboration and deregulatory measures was set in motion with the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) by the United States, Canada, and Mexico in 1994 (Villarreal & Fergusson, 2020). Moreover, this event marked the beginning of an era characterized by unhindered commerce in the North American region.
Following the end of the Cold War, there was a substantial global shift toward democratic ideals and liberal values, with the United States playing a critical role in their diffusion and support. The United States has put a high value on democratic administration, individual liberty, and adherence to the rule of law in its international system. Eastern European nations and other regions that had previously adhered to communist ideas aided democratic movements.
Overseas, the U.S. exhibited its support for democratic administration through diplomatic channels, active engagement in international organizations, and financial assistance. The choice to prioritize democracy in foreign policy was based on the belief that democratically run states would be more likely to participate actively in efforts to improve global stability and prosperity.
Challenges to unipolarity
Large multinational firms conduct global activities, and their economies might rival that of certain entire countries. Their actions may have an impact on diplomatic ties, international trade, economic policy, and even state-to-state interests. The ability of a single superpower to make unilateral decisions may be hampered by the economic interdependence fostered by these corporations. Terrorist organizations that are not nations, such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS, have demonstrated their ability to destabilize international peace and challenge a unipolar power’s long-standing military superiority. Traditional military methods struggle to address the issues raised by asymmetric warfare tactics and cross-border operations.
International cooperation is frequently required for R2P and humanitarian projects attempting to avert or prevent mass crimes. When the international community insists on shared responsibility for dealing with humanitarian crises, unipolarity’s ability to enforce its will unilaterally may be curtailed. Regional powers or alliances seeking to preserve dominance and protect their interests may be opposed to the concept of unipolarity. Geopolitical tensions can occur as a result of perceived unilateral or interventionist actions by the dominant power, which can exacerbate regional conflicts.
Shifting Dynamics and New Challenges in the 21st Century
One of the main events that led the U.S. to the war on terror was the 9/11 terrorist attack that happened on September 11, 2001. The U.S. swiftly mobilized to address the threat, which was one way of preventing such future acts of terrorism. The attack was caused by the extremist group Al-Qaeda, which led to the death of 3000 lives. On September 20, 2001, President George W. Bush commented on the best strategies to combat terrorism globally. This response included the use of intelligence operations, military actions and disruptions of the financial support of the terrorists (Demir & Guler, 2023). The U.S. also requested international support by forming alliances that could stay together and help during the transnational terrorism and also urged the importance of collective security in the face of a common threat or terrorist.
Despite the initial support of many nations for these military interventions, they quickly became divisive and were subject to criticism. There have been raised concerns regarding the efficacy of military approaches employed to address the intricate challenges posed by terrorism and insurgency in Afghanistan and Iraq. Furthermore, the battles underscored the challenges associated with nation-building and emphasized the criticality of comprehending the unique dynamics of post-conflict societies. Commencing as a reaction to a distinct and imminent menace, the War on Terror has since transformed into an extensive and intricate undertaking that has exerted an influence on United States foreign policy and the interplay of worldwide security in the twenty-first century.
The ascendance of China as a powerful economic force has been a conspicuous characteristic of the current century, playing a considerable role in the rebirth of a global power structure marked by several influential actors. China has emerged as the second-largest economy internationally due to its rapid economic growth, which market-oriented reforms and increased integration into the global economy have enabled. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which was established in 2013, acts as a representation of China’s ambitious ambition to augment its economic influence on a global scale (Gong, 2019). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) comprises significant infrastructure development projects, substantial investments, and trade agreements reaching across Asia, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. These programs develop economic ties that enhance China’s sphere of influence and extend its worldwide reach.
The expansion of China’s economy has posed a substantial challenge to the traditional importance of Western nations, most notably the United States, in dictating global economic agendas. The development of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the New Development Bank (NDB) underscores China’s ambitions to reorganize the global financial framework, presenting alternative options to incumbent institutions largely influenced by Western nations. The economic impact of this phenomenon bears diplomatic repercussions as governments seek to maintain a delicate equilibrium in their connections with both the established Western powers and the increasing influence of China.
The proactive strategy pursued by China in the development and strengthening of its military capabilities has profoundly altered the worldwide distribution of power. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has adopted important reforms and conducted extensive modernization attempts, directing resources toward the development of cutting-edge technology, boosting naval capabilities, and developing a formidable missile inventory. China’s dedication to extending its military power beyond its national limits is evident in its endeavors to create military bases in the South China Sea, a blue-water fleet, and developments in cyber and space capabilities.
The escalation of military participation in territorial disputes, represented by the South China Sea wars, has provoked worry at both regional and global levels regarding China’s strategic ambitions (Ιωαννίδου, 2020). The United States, as a well-established military force, has taken measures to alter its military attitude in the Indo-Pacific area. This involves aggressively participating in regional partnerships and establishing alliances in order to combat China’s expanding military dominance.
The rise of China as a significant military force presents various challenges to the global security paradigm, potentially altering arms proliferation, regional balance, and the established supremacy of Western military coalitions. The rise of multipolarity, marked by the forceful ascent of China, provides both difficulties and opportunities for the global community as it adapts to a shifting geopolitical landscape in the 21st century.
The Trump Administration and a Paradigm Shift
The America First policy of the Trump Administration, which assumed power in January 2017, represented a substantial deviation in the trajectory of United States foreign policy. Under the leadership of President Donald Trump, this policy prioritizes a transactional and nationalistic approach to international relations (Haass, 2021). The principle of “America First” prioritized the safeguarding of American interests and sovereignty above considerations of trade imbalances, economic factors, and diminished dependence on international institutions.
The government advocated for a protectionist stance on trade as part of its economic strategy to rectify perceived imbalances and safeguard American industry (Salamah & Rajesh, 2019). Protests involving the renegotiation of trade agreements, exemplified by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) succeeding the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), exhibited a dedication to transforming economic relations in the United States favor
The approach known as America First had extensive ramifications for the United States’ allies as well as the global governance arena. In regard to burden-sharing, conventional alliances, including NATO, came under growing scrutiny from the administration, which advocated for increased expenditure on collective defense by allies. The international order, which the West primarily led, encountered scrutiny regarding the cohesiveness and efficacy of long-standing relationships.
Although the America First strategy garnered support from certain domestic voters, it incited apprehension among allies and partners who scrutinized the United States’ enduring dedication to global cooperation. The paradigm shift initiated by the Trump Administration prompted a reassessment of the interplay of worldwide power and the United States’ capacity to shape the trajectory of future international relations.
In support of a return to multilateralism, the Biden Administration, which assumes office in January 2021, has declared a distinct departure from the “America First” stance of its predecessor. President Joe Biden has underscored the importance of rebuilding relationships and collaborating productively with international counterparts in order to tackle worldwide issues. The United States re-joined the Paris Climate Agreement shortly after Biden assumed office, reiterating its dedication to global initiatives aimed at combating climate change.
The Biden Administration has demonstrated a steadfast dedication to international collaboration amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The inclusion of the United States in the COVAX initiative ensures equitable worldwide distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. In light of the interconnectedness between economic and global health issues, the administration has additionally extended financial assistance to international initiatives aimed at mitigating the economic repercussions of the pandemic (Biden, 2022). The approach taken by the Biden Administration in comparison to the preceding administration is notably dissimilar. It actively engages in addressing global issues, advocates for a re-establishment of multilateralism, and pursues an informed perspective on the dynamics of power in the twenty-first century. The administration demonstrates a determination to reestablish the United States as a cooperative and ethical participant on the international stage while maintaining a degree of continuity.
Conclusion
A complex picture emerges when significant events and actions in U.S. foreign policy, including the Cold War, the Monroe Doctrine, the paradigm shifts of the Trump Administration, and the current trajectory under the Biden Administration, are examined. The Monroe Doctrine established the foundation for American regional hegemony and anticipated the United States’ expanding global influence. Containment was a strategic effort to develop a bipolar world order during the Cold War; it subsequently determined American engagement for an extended period.
The evolution of U.S. foreign policy illustrates the intricate relationship between continuity and change. Historical trends that endure include the pursuit of national interests and the distribution of authority. The ever-changing global environment, nevertheless, demands the ability to adapt. The United States’ position on the international stage will persistently be shaped by the interaction between historical legacies and current imperatives as it confronts the complexities of a multipolar world. Balancing the requirements of an interdependent and interconnected world with national interests while promoting stability, collaboration, and the pursuit of common global objectives is a formidable task.
References
Alnawafleh, I. M. (2021). The Phenomenon of War in the Post-Cold War Era. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Issues, 24, 1.
Biden, J. R. (2022). Biden-Harris White House National Security Strategy, October 2022. Collections, 2022, 10-12.
Demir, M., & Guler, A. (2023). The effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on suicide terrorism. Behavioral sciences of terrorism and political aggression, 15(1), 24-41.
Gong, X. (2019). The Belt & Road Initiative and China’s influence in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 32(4), 635-665.
Haass, R. (2021). The age of America first: Washington’s flawed new foreign policy consensus. Foreign Aff., 100, 85.
Lillian Goldman Law Library. (2008). Avalon Project – Washington’s Farewell Address 1796. Avalon.law.yale.edu. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp#:~:text=It%20is%20our%20true%20policy
National Archives. (2021, June 25). Monroe Doctrine (1823). National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/monroe-doctrine#:~:text=The%20Monroe%20Doctrine%20is%20the
National Archives. (2022, February 8). President Woodrow Wilson’s 14 Points (1918). National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-woodrow-wilsons-14-points
Office of the Historian. (2019). The Truman Doctrine, 1947. History.state.gov. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine
Reza, A. R. (2022). Post-Cold War Instabilities: Debates and Challenges. Available at SSRN 4149255.
Salamah, A., & Rajesh Babu, R. (2019). 5. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Disputes.
Venkatraj, K. (2019). Rising Conflicts: An Analysis Of Cold War Proxy Wars And Their Modern Application. Plan II Honors Theses-Openly Available.
Villarreal, A. M., & Fergusson, I. F. (2020). NAFTA and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Congressional Research Service Report.
Ιωαννίδου, Κ. (2020). China’s rise and its contradictory foreign policy.
write