External emergency services are anticipated to play a substantial role in disaster recovery. Throughout this process, the workers’ and other affected persons’ health and effects are prioritized, minimizing the emergency itself, removing or minimizing the potential of further injury or harm, and restoring external utilities such as power, telecommunications, and water. Long-term recovery after catastrophes is a huge challenge for impacted communities, and it necessitates good measures to restore people’s health and livelihoods. This paper explores the recovery operations of the current worldwide approach for the COVID-19, including; strengthening health services and socioeconomic influences.
Resilient Recovery from Socio-Economic Impacts
The disaster’s implications on food production, income, and the capacity to satisfy basic requirements are widely understood in many situations, and the most vulnerable groups are disproportionately affected. According to Sadri et al. (2017), authorities intervene in these socioeconomic repercussions and aid in recovery. However, there may often be gaps in this intervention or circumstances where authorities lack the capacity or resources to address all demands. Authorities help communities recover in these situations by providing adequate specialized food security and economic support, allowing vulnerable people to meet necessities while also recovering or diversifying their livelihoods. Daniel (2020) shows that these recovery initiatives use monetary and voucher modalities wherever possible. Another area where governments focus is the necessities of urban populations, primarily unplanned settlements, and long-term displacement sites. Due to shelter and settlement concerns, dwellers in these neighborhoods may find it hard to adapt to ongoing COVID-19 outbreaks and continue with normal activities. Governments leverage existing population engagement or programs to discover specific vulnerabilities and intervene to speed up adoption. Most entities already work with specific vulnerable populations, including regions recovering from disasters and epidemics, communities now experiencing other upheavals and crises, migrants, displaced populations and refugees, urban slum residents, etc. These serve as access points for COVID-related restoration help.
Support and Strengthening Health Services
This differs significantly based on each state’s health and care mission, whether they deliver clinical or paramedical care and the kind of public health programs they conduct. The plan is for entities to use their existing community health networks to help maintain or restore key health care services that the epidemic has disrupted. Promoting vaccination is currently ongoing, and several populations have received their vaccines. Governments are also providing community-level access to medical care for chronic illnesses. Entities connect populations with care providers and where public health workers and volunteers may give services. All of this can aid in the healthcare service’s early recovery and help avoid the increased morbidity and death that can occur when the reaction to COVID-19 overburdens the healthcare system and health personnel.
Some existing population health programs, such as CBHFA, can be developed or expanded to incorporate pandemic contingency planning effectively or to broaden their scope to handle some of this ‘task-shifting.’ Chen et al. (2020) show that by broadening surveillance activities into harder-to-reach groups, community-based activities, like as surveillance programs and outbreak management for individuals, can contribute significantly to a strong and sustainable health system. Furthermore, these are components that must be maintained throughout the operation since it aids communal recovery in various ways that add to community stability and livelihood restoration.
Conclusion
Upon a natural or human-caused disaster, disaster recovery entails a range of strategies, techniques, and processes that permit the preservation of critical systems and population well-being. Emergency recovery concentrates on the systems that support vital human processes while also keeping all critical components of various organizations running despite substantial disruptions. Emergency recovery presupposes that the primary habitat is unrecoverable and is a process of restoring normalcy.
References
Chen, Z., Marin, G., Popp, D. C., & Vona, F. (2020). Green stimulus in a post-pandemic recovery: The role of skills for a resilient recovery. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3653943
Daniel A. (2020, April 29). Social Capital in Disaster Mitigation and Recovery. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7A8m0zQ6T8&ab_channel=FEMA
Sadri, A. M., Ukkusuri, S. V., Lee, S., Clawson, R., Aldrich, D., Nelson, M. S., Seipel, J., & Kelly, D. (2017). The role of social capital, personal networks, and emergency responders in post-disaster recovery and resilience: A study of rural communities in Indiana. Natural Hazards, 90(3), 1377-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0