Evolution of the ethical concept
The concept of ethics has evolved, with different societies and civilizations having unique perspectives on what is considered morally right or wrong. In ancient cultures, such as those in Greece and Rome, ethics were closely tied to religion and the belief in a set of gods who imposed specific moral codes on human behavior (Latapí Agudelo, Jóhannsdóttir & Davídsdóttir,2019). The concept of virtue was also crucial in these societies, with individuals striving to live virtuous lives to achieve happiness and fulfillment.
During the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church played a significant role in shaping ethical thought, with the Church’s teachings heavily influencing society’s moral codes. The Church’s emphasis on sin and redemption also influenced how individuals viewed their moral behavior. During the Enlightenment, philosophers such as Immanuel Kant and Jean-Jacques Rousseau began to shift the focus away from religion and toward the individual in their ethical thought (Vallaster et al.,2019). They emphasized the importance of rationality and the ability of individuals to make moral decisions for themselves rather than relying on religious doctrine or tradition.
In more recent times, the field of ethics has become increasingly diverse and complex, with various perspectives and approaches employed. Utilitarianism, which advocates for the most important overall happiness for the greatest number of people, and deontology, which emphasizes the importance of moral duty, are just two examples of the many different ethical theories that have been developed (Vallaster et al.,2019). The field of ethics also continues to evolve with the changing times and the emergence of new issues and challenges, such as the ethics of artificial intelligence and biotechnology.
Theories of ethics
In the article “Ethics and Social Responsibility in Justice Decision Making” by José Poças Rascão, the author discusses the various theories of ethics that are relevant to decision-making in the justice field. The author argues that several ethical theories apply to justice decision-making, including consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, and care ethics.
Consequentialism is an ethical theory that emphasizes the importance of considering the consequences of one’s actions. In the context of justice decision-making, this means that decision-makers should consider the potential consequences of their decisions on all parties involved, including victims, offenders, and society as a whole (Rascão, & Poças,2019). This theory is often criticized for its focus on the ends rather than the means, which can lead to morally questionable actions being taken in the name of achieving a desirable outcome.
Deontology is an ethical theory that emphasizes the importance of following moral rules regardless of the consequences. In the context of justice decision-making, this means that decision-makers should always follow established laws and procedures, even if doing so may lead to less-than-ideal outcomes (Rascão & Poças,2019). This theory is often criticized for its lack of flexibility, making it difficult to adapt to changing circumstances.
Virtue ethics is an ethical theory emphasizing the importance of developing and cultivating moral virtues. In the context of justice decision-making, decision-makers should strive to be virtuous individuals with qualities such as fairness, compassion, and integrity (Rascão, & Poças,2019). This theory is often criticized for being too subjective, as different people may have different ideas about the most important virtues.
Care ethics is an ethical theory that emphasizes caring for others. In the context of justice decision-making, this means that decision-makers should be attentive to the needs and concerns of all parties involved, including victims, offenders, and society. This theory is often criticized for being too focused on the individual and needing more on the community.
The author also discusses that these ethical theories are not mutually exclusive and can be combined in various ways to create a more comprehensive approach to decision-making in the justice field. He also argues that social responsibility should be considered when making decisions, as justice decision-making has an impact on the entire society (Rascão, & Poças,2019). He concludes that decision-makers should strive to make ethically sound and socially responsible decisions to ensure that justice is served in a fair and equitable manner.
The concept of ethics has evolved from ancient societies to modern-day society. How society views what is morally right or wrong is shaped by various factors, including religion, tradition, and the moral codes of society. With new issues and challenges, the field of ethics continues to evolve and adapt. In conclusion, the article “Ethics and Social Responsibility in Justice Decision Making” by José Poças Rascão provides a comprehensive overview of various ethical theories relevant to decision-making in the field of justice. The author argues that a combination of these theories, along with a focus on social responsibility, can help decision-makers make fair and equitable decisions that serve the best interests of all parties involved.
How ethics is related to social responsibility
Ethics and social responsibility are closely related concepts that deal with the moral obligations of individuals and organizations towards society and the environment. Both are essential for the well-being of individuals, organizations, and society. Ethics refers to the principles and values that guide the behavior of individuals and organizations. It involves making moral judgments about right and wrong and determining what actions should be taken in different situations (Zhenzaho,2021). Ethics provides a framework for decision-making, helping individuals and organizations to determine what actions align with their values and principles.
Social responsibility, on the other hand, refers to the obligations that individuals and organizations have to the broader society and the impact of their actions on others. It is the idea that individuals and organizations should not only consider their interests but also the interests of society. Social responsibility is a fundamental aspect of citizenship and ethical behavior, as it involves taking into account the impact of one’s actions on others and making decisions that contribute to the greater good.
One way ethics and social responsibility are related is through the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). CSR is the idea that businesses are responsible for generating profits and considering the impact of their actions on society and the environment. It is rooted in the belief that companies have an ethical obligation to be good corporate citizens and contribute to the well-being of the communities in which they operate (Zhenzaho,2021). CSR encompasses various activities, including environmental sustainability, community development, and responsible business practices. Companies that prioritize CSR tend to be more socially responsible, which helps to build trust and reputation with its stakeholders.
Another way ethics and social responsibility are related is through the concept of sustainable development. This is the idea that economic development should not be pursued at the expense of the environment or social well-being. It requires balancing economic growth with the protection of natural resources and the needs of future generations. It is rooted in the belief that meeting the basic needs of the present should not compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (Ibodullaevich,& Bahromovna,2020). Sustainable development is an ethical principle that demands that we use resources responsibly, consider the impact of our actions on the environment, and think about the long-term consequences of our decisions.
In conclusion, ethics and social responsibility are closely related concepts that are essential for the well-being of individuals, organizations, and society as a whole. Ethics provides a framework for decision-making and guides individuals and organizations in determining what actions align with their values and principles (Ibodullaevich & Bahromovna,2020). Social responsibility, on the other hand, requires individuals and organizations to consider the impact of their actions on others and make decisions that contribute to the greater good. Ethics and social responsibility provide a foundation for responsible and sustainable behavior.
Conclusion
Over time, the idea of ethics has changed, with each group and civilization having their distinctive views on what is ethically correct or bad. Just two of the many distinct ethical theories established are utilitarianism and deontology. The author explores the numerous ethical theories that are pertinent to decision-making in the area of justice in the article “Ethics and Social Responsibility in Justice Decision Making.” An ethical philosophy called deontology emphasizes the significance of upholding moral standards despite the repercussions. This means those who make decisions about justice should aspire to be moral people who exhibit fairness, compassion, and integrity.
References
Ibodullaevich, K. K., & Bahromovna, T. D. (2020). Corruption: Concept, Genesis, Evolution And Survival Trends. International Journal Of Discourse On Innovation, Integration And Education, 1(5), 409-413. http://summusjournals.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi
Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1-23. https://jcsr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y?uc=racialjustice
Rascão, J. P., & Poças, N. G. (2019, July 1). Ethics and Social Responsibility in justice decision making. International Journal of Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making (IJRLEDM). Retrieved January 24, 2023, from https://www.igi-global.com/article/ethics-and-social-responsibility-in-justice-decision-making/264440
Vallaster, C., Kraus, S., Lindahl, J. M. M., & Nielsen, A. (2019). Ethics and entrepreneurship: A bibliometric study and literature review. Journal of Business Research, 99, 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.050
Vieweg, S. H. (2021). Ethics for Non-philosophers: Basis of Ethics and Ethical Perspectives. In AI for the Good (pp. 3-21). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-66913-3_1
Zhenzaho, N. (2021, September). Ethical Literary Criticism: Sphinx Factor and Ethical Selection. In Forum for World Literature Studies (Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 383-399). Wuhan Guoyang Union Culture & Education Company. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA686260256&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=19498519&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E398991d7
write