Like the manufacturing industry, the healthcare industry looks explicitly looks forward to promptly serving healthcare consumers. In this case, different healthcare sectors coherently work together to counter the demand for healthcare services. In preparation for offering quality care, healthcare facilities in advance sought out the professional healthcare practitioners efficiently deliver quality care to the healthcare consumers (McLean et al., 2017). Healthcare facilities preferentially ensure that demand and supply off healthcare regimens are equitably and effectively offered to healthcare consumers through quality improvement. Dictated by the revenue creation aspects of the manufacturing industry, the healthcare industry seeks to establish better and enhanced healthcare outcomes imperative to customer satisfaction. Client feedback in the caregiving process is significantly considered to allow for plans in the caregiving process. Therefore, the healthcare industry follows the footsteps of the manufacturing industry, which demands clients’ complaints and feedback to better plan in meeting the customers’ needs and specifications. Therefore, the healthcare fraternity is cautious in implementing patient-oriented stratagems that allow sustainable developmental necessities in the caregiving process through detailed questioning of the standardization techniques’ viability.
Explicitly, the manufacturing industry is the leading in terms of innovation and technology that significantly contributes to the accurate and efficient production of quality products with minimized errors. Dictated by the technological advancements globally, the manufacturing industry greatly strives to match consumers’ needs and specifications by integrating technological advancement in producing the final high-quality products (McLean et al., 2017). In this case, each manufacturing industry applies different technological advances to make unique products from other manufacturing industries. Implementation of the technological advancements in the production process enlists reduced burnout of the employees since most activities are automated. Thus, the manufacturing industry depicts to be on a trajectory path of ensuring customer satisfaction through the production of high-quality products (Khan et al., 2019). In the same way, the healthcare industry has incorporated different technological advancements over the last years of quality caregiving. Defined by the scope of work mandated to healthcare practitioners, the standardization technique is extensively applied to create room advancements vital in the caregiving process. The healthcare industry explicitly employs technological advances such as electronic recording to offer quality care with minimal errors. Electronic recording within the healthcare facilities reduces burnout emanating extensive paper envisaged in the traditional record-keeping method. This advancement within the healthcare setting can smoothen data communication between healthcare practitioners, reducing the time taken to offer healthcare services.
Standardization regimen within the healthcare fraternity enumerates different impacts based on the implementation challenges. On the beneficiary principles of standardization, manufacturing industries use the same processes to produce the same final product. In this case, the manufacturing industry buys the inputs in bulk to reduce per piece cost imperative of better and affordable products at a lower cost. On the other hand, the healthcare industry incorporates standardization to augment the effectiveness and efficacy of each caregiving element. Outputs within the healthcare facilities entail patient outcome that is essential in defining the point of the process used in the caregiving process. The healthcare provider-patient relationship is a salient component in the caregiving process in determining patient outcomes. Therefore, caregiving processes are guided by the different rules and regulations to enhance patient outcomes vital in achieving sets of standards of quality care. Supplies and equipment essential in the caregiving process are thus obtained based on the set goal and objectives of offering quality care (Smętkowsk & Mrugalska, 2018). The set standards within the healthcare setting significantly contribute to specific guidelines as the necessary and sufficient requirements of realizing better health outcomes as the final products within the healthcare industry.
The manufacturing industry employs the continuous improvement of people methods to efficiently update the employees to current information vital for an enhanced and smooth transition and efficacy in service delivery. Continuous improvement enumerates the growth and development of the employees to meet the job standard in producing enhanced outcomes. The healthcare industry incorporates the constant improvement of healthcare practitioners’ aspects to care for the patients efficiently. In this scenario, healthcare organizations implement residency programs within the healthcare facilities to adequately cater for continued learning by the healthcare practitioners. The establishment of new residency programs confirms the significance of continuous improvement to exercise the quality of care given to patients. Therefore, like the manufacturing industry, the healthcare industry fully utilizes the continuous improvement stratagem to plan, experiment, reflect and adjust other caregiving processes. Thus, the healthcare industry is significantly incorporating the continuous improvement technique to address various barriers such as poor staffing, incompetent leadership, poor decision making, adversity among healthcare providers, and lack of teamwork (Henrique Godinho, 2020). Thus, quality improvement within the healthcare fraternity is a necessary and sufficient requirement if better and enhanced health outcomes have to be achieved. Despite the challenges emanating from the actualization stage of continuous improvement within different healthcare facilities, implementation of the standardization processes is imperative for the substantial transformation of patients’ and facilities’ outcomes.
References
Henrique, D. B., & Godinho Filho, M. (2020). A systematic literature review of empirical research in Lean and Six Sigma in healthcare. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(3-4), 429-449. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14783363.2018.1429259
Khan, S. A., Kaviani, M. A., Galli, B. J., & Ishtiaq, P. (2019). Application of continuous improvement techniques to improve organization performance: A case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijlss-05-2017-0048/full/html
McLean, R. S., Antony, J., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2017). Failure of Continuous Improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments: a systematic review of the evidence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(3-4), 219-237. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14783363.2015.1063414
Smętkowska, M., & Mrugalska, B. (2018). Using Six Sigma DMAIC to improve the quality of the production process: a case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 590-596. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042818300697
write