Democracy has been a prevalent form of government throughout history, and it is widely considered one of the most effective systems for ensuring equal representation and participation. However, the functioning of democracy can vary depending on the type of governance the country adopts. This essay explores three different forms of governance – Presidentialism, Semi-Presidentialism, and Parliamentarianism – and their impact on democratic processes.
Presidentialism refers to a system where power is vested in an elected President who serves as both Head of State and Government. This system has a clear separation between the legislative and executive branches of government. The president can select cabinet members, veto legislation and lead the armed forces. The United States provides an example of successful Presidentialism with its robust checks-and-balances system that ensures accountability within all branches.
One factor that helps presidential democracies function effectively is stability in leadership, which allows for more consistent decision-making without constant changes in priorities or goals. Additionally, a stable judiciary can ensure constitutional adherence while maintaining independence from other branches.
However, factors that hinder Presidentialism include the potential for authoritarian rule when control over key institutions such as the media or military is held by those in power rather than being independent entities accountable only to the law. Furthermore, gridlock may occur if parties controlling different branches have opposing views. There needs to be a strong opposition party that is essential to provide a check against the ruling party with excess power. For instance, in the United States, where the Republican Party possessed the presidency and both chambers of Congress, there was little opposition to and little oversight of the acts of the Trump administration(Jacobs & Milkis, 2023).
Semi-Presidentialism differs from Presidentialism because it divides governmental powers among two executives: a directly elected President who handles foreign affairs and national security while also serving as Head-of-State. At the same time, Prime Minister runs domestic policy through parliament under their party’s guidance. France has successfully utilized this form since 1958 (Jastramskis, 2022). Countries like France provide good examples where semi-presidential democracies function well due to balanced roles between the president & prime minister acting as counterbalances against each other, preventing domination by any one person or group within society leading better representation at times across ideological lines compared to polarized presidential administrations like the U.S.
However, some countries have experienced difficulties with Semi-Presidency, such as Romania, where political instability has led to frequent changes in leadership, leading to ineffective governance and widespread corruption.
Finally, Parliamentarianism is a form of democracy where power is concentrated in the legislature rather than being divided between branches. In this system, the Prime Minister (head of government) is selected from elected members of parliament, while the Monarch serves as
Head-of-State with a ceremonial role only(Cheibub & Rasch, 2021). U.K. & Germany have effective parliamentary democracies demonstrating stability through their multi-party systems, coalition governments, and non-polarized administration, promoting better representation for all groups involved.
In comparison with Presidentialism and Semi-Presidentialism, Parliamentarianism provides greater accountability due to collective decision-making within parliament.However sometimes hasty decisions can be made during times when there’s no clear majority or consensus among parties regarding any issue which may lead to less stable administrations, particularly when coalitions are not formed.
In conclusion, we observed that different forms of governance impact democratic processes differently. Factors such as stability in leadership, an independent judiciary, and electoral integrity contribute positively towards democratic practices under Presidentialism, while countries like France show positive examples of semi-presidential systems functioning well. When it comes to parliamentary democracies like U.K. and Germany, accountability through collective decision-making provides a more robust approach to governance than other forms discussed earlier. However, each form has limitations that their respective countries must address if they want successful implementation.
References
Cheibub, J. A., & Rasch, B. E. (2021). Constitutional parliamentarian in Europe, 1800–2019. West European Politics, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1870841
Jacobs, N. F., & Milkis, S. M. (2023). Response to Joshua N. Zingher’s Review of What Happened to the Vital Center? Presidentialism, Populist Revolt, and the Fracturing of America. Perspectives on Politics, 21(1), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722003814
Jastramskis, M. (2022). Foreign Policy Preferences and Vote Choice Under Semi-Presidentialism. Political Research Quarterly, 106591292211192. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221119201
write