Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Cultural Identity and Social Responsibility

I was raised to believe that the morality and ethics you develop as a person should inform your daily actions and significant life choices. Mill, Kant, and Aristotle are three of the most influential thinkers who have offered unique insights on the problem of morality. According to Aristotle, the point of studying ethics is to improve one’s character rather than only gain theoretical knowledge about what constitutes a good life. Aristotle adds that it is not sufficient to apply the law to determine the proper course of action; instead, one must consider the specifics of the circumstance (Kraut, 2014).

According to John Mills’ Utilitarianism thesis, people should be concerned with their actions’ results since that leads to the greatest good. Unlike virtue ethics, which promotes goodness as a positive, Mills’ theory argues that one should only use the outcomes of their actions as a measure of right and wrong (Brink, 2014). A significant tenet of Kant’s theory of ethics is that God’s will is inherently good and that acts are only acceptable if their underlying maxim is consistent with the moral laws. Kant disagrees with Mill’s thesis because he thinks stealing, killing, or lying is wrong, even if doing so may make you happier than sticking to your original plan.

In my opinion, Kant’s philosophy is the one that most closely fits with my cultural identity. The church profoundly influences my way of life; as a result, people are often instructed on how to lead a good life and the consequences of not doing so. I was raised to believe that you should treat other people how you would like to be treated and that while making choices, you should always consider the outcomes of your actions. As Christians, we adhere to the Ten Commandments, which are analogous to Kant’s notion of the appropriateness or inappropriateness of a certain deed (Johnson, 2014). One may be leading a moral and ethical life if one lives their life following the commandments and regulations of the nation.

Nevertheless, all three ideas are congruent with my culture when seen from the perspective of seeking happiness and kindness via my actions. These beliefs that the activities of individuals should be evaluated based on the amount of well brought about as a result of their actions have my full support. On the other hand, my culture disagrees with Aristotle because people think the law should be administered in the same way every time, without being interpreted in light of the circumstances. I also dispute with Mill, but I agree with Kant since I think that certain dishonorable behaviors, such as homicide, stealing, and lying, should never be tolerated under any circumstances, regardless of whether or not they provide more advantages than the other available choices (Johnson, 2014).

A person’s social responsibility is affected by their cultural identity to the degree that they fulfill their moral obligations. Within the framework of a specific culture, an individual’s cultural identity will eventually decide what constitutes morality and will also decide what constitutes social responsibility. It is accurate that culture is constantly changing. Consequently, there is the likelihood that cultural heritage can benefit social obligation in a way that allows one to gain knowledge not to ignore issues that arise in one society but instead to adapt and grow reasonably to those problems to create goodness and satisfaction in the society. In addition, a person’s cultural identity influences how they will take on their responsibilities to the society they live in. A person has a greater likelihood of having a positive effect on a company if they identify with the culture of that business. On the other side, a person is more likely to depart from doing things that will help society if their environment is hostile to their practices and beliefs, resulting in a detrimental influence on society.


Brink, D. (2014). Mill’s moral and political philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.

Johnson, R. (2014). Kant’s moral philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.

Kraut, R. (2014). Aristotle’s ethics. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.


Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics