Introduction
Housing policy in the UK has been a major issue, with unmet housing requirements being a major problem throughout the region Since the 1990s. (Bailey, 2020). especially in light of rising demand, population expansion, and limited availability. With different levels of success, various governments have attempted to address the problem over the years through various policy initiatives. Since the Scottish National Party (SNP) came to power in 2007, the country’s housing policy has been characterized by an emphasis on supply-side initiatives for affordable housing. (Gibb, 2020). To increase the supply of affordable homes in Scotland, the Scottish Government has introduced several affordable housing supply programs (AHSP) since 2011. (Supply, 2019). The present third wave of the program has gone through several waves and will continue until 2031. The Scottish AHSP has been distinguished by a distinct philosophy and strategy, leading to more extensive outcomes than cheap housing programs in England. The rest of the UK can benefit from advice from a critical and fair evaluation of the Scottish AHSP on how to increase the supply of affordable housing to address unmet housing requirements.
Evolution of the Scottish AHSP
The Scottish Affordable Housing Supply Programme (AHSP) serves as a government program designed to increase Scotland’s stock of affordable housing. Since its inception in 2011, the Scottish AHSP has experienced considerable evolution through three phases. (James, Berry, and Marks, 2019). With 91,461 affordable homes delivered by March 2021, the program has been effective in achieving its goals in each phase. Through a variety of cutting-edge financing models and building methods, some of which are covered below, the program’s third phase, which is still in progress, seeks to increase the supply of affordable homes throughout Scotland, involving rural areas and areas with high levels of deprivation.
The goal of the program’s first phase, which lasted from 2011 to 2016, was to build 30,000 affordable homes throughout Scotland. £1.7 billion of the program’s funding was given to local governments and licensed social landlords to construct new homes and renovate old ones. (Dunn, 2020). 33,490 affordable homes had been provided by March 2016 as a result of the program’s success in reaching its goal. (Dunn, 2020). The program’s second phase, which lasted from 2016 to 2021, had as its goal the construction of 50,000 affordable homes. The program got $3 billion in funding, which was once more distributed to local governments and licensed social landlords. (Dunn, 2020). To promote innovation and teamwork, the program’s second phase also introduced an innovative funding plan in which funds were distributed competitively. The initiative achieved its goal, of delivering 57,971 affordable homes by March 2021.
The program is presently in its third phase, which will span the current and following Scottish Parliament terms. (2021-2026 and 2026-2031). With financing of £3.5 billion, the program’s third phase aims to build 100,000 affordable homes. The initiative seeks to increase the number of affordable homes available throughout Scotland, as well as in rural areas and deprived areas. (Dunning et al., 2020). The initiative also encourages new home construction using sustainable materials and energy-efficient practices. A new funding model has also been added to the program’s third phase, which places more of an emphasis on private-sector collaborations and creative financing methods. This initiative aims to urge private developers to collaborate with local governments and certified social landlords to provide affordable housing. (Dunning et al., 2020). The program also seeks to support community-led housing initiatives and the use of remote production and modular construction techniques to speed up and improve the efficiency of homebuilding.
AHSP in the Rest of the UK
AHSP in England
In contrast to the Scottish AHSP, English affordable housing programs have an entirely different outlook and approach compared to those in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The affordable homes program (AHP) in England intended to deliver 400,000 affordable homes by 2022, with 250,000 for affordable rent and 150,000 for affordable home ownership. (Wilson and Barton, 2021). However, England’s current affordable housing program plans to build 300,000 homes by 2022, with an emphasis on growing home ownership and private sector investment.
The program has been chastised for failing to prioritize socially rented housing and failing to handle the shortage of housing for low-income households. (Smyth, 2018). According to a National Audit Office report, the program has delivered fewer affordable homes than anticipated, with only 47% of the goal accomplished by 2019. (Wilson and Barton, 2021). The report also stated that the program was not delivering enough homes in the neediest areas and that the quality of the homes provided was not always adequate. The English program has also been chastised for failing to do enough to increase energy efficiency and cut carbon emissions. (Wilson and Barton, 2021). In response, the government has instituted the Future Homes Standard, which will require all new homes to meet a higher energy efficiency standard beginning in 2025.
However, the initiative has encountered several challenges, including a lack of money and available land. Since then, the government has extended the program until 2023, intending to provide 180,000 new affordable homes. (Wilson and Barton, 2021). Housing organizations have welcomed this, but some have argued that the goal is still insufficient to address the scope of the housing crisis. Increasing house ownership has been prioritized in England to help people get on the property ladder and create wealth. (Smyth, 2018). Policies like the Right to Buy program, which enables council tenants to purchase their homes at a reduced price, and the Help to Buy program, which offers equity loans to first-time homebuyers, have backed this. However, detractors contend that this strategy is not appropriate for everyone and that a variety of affordable housing choices, such as social rented housing, are required. (Smyth, 2018). They contend that socially rented housing offers a safety net for those who cannot afford to purchase or rent privately and is more affordable than other types of affordable housing.
Wales
The goal of Wales’ social housing grant scheme is to build 20,000 affordable homes by 2021. (Perry, 2022). Six thousand of these 20,000 homes were set aside, especially for social rent. (Barnes, Writer, and Hartley, 2021). Social rent homes are designed to offer safe and affordable housing to individuals with limited resources or who require extra assistance. The Welsh government’s major effort to address the lack of affordable housing in Wales is the social housing grant program. The initiative seeks to supply a variety of inexpensive housing choices, such as social rented housing, intermediate housing, and low-cost homeownership. (Barnes, Writer, and Hartley, 2021). The initiative is designed to help people and families who are struggling to find suitable and affordable housing.
In comparison to other affordable housing choices like intermediate housing or low-cost homeownership, social-rented housing is typically offered at a lower price. This makes it a crucial choice for those with low incomes who might find it difficult to obtain other types of affordable housing. (Barnes, Writer, and Hartley, 2021). In Wales, the social housing grant program’s delivery of affordable housing has benefited both people and local communities. People now have access to safe, affordable housing, which has enhanced their standard of life and supported their well-being. In particular, the availability of socially rented housing has given those needing extra support a safety net and access to a stable and secure living environment.
Northern Ireland
The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland has set a goal of providing 10,000 new social and affordable homes by 2022. (McAreavey, 2022). The provision of social and affordable housing is a top concern for the Northern Ireland government, as affordable housing is in short supply throughout the region. A variety of government efforts, including funding and planning assistance, will aid in the construction of new social and affordable homes. (Fitzpatrick, Mackie, and Wood, 2021). In addition, the government is collaborating closely with housing associations and developers to promote the construction of new affordable homes. Providing social and affordable housing is especially essential in Northern Ireland, where housing stress and homelessness are prevalent. (Fitzpatrick, Mackie, and Wood, 2021). Along with building new homes, the government is working to improve the standard of the current social housing stock. This involves spending money on repairs and maintenance and working to increase energy efficiency.
Lessons Learned
One of the largest and most effective affordable housing initiatives in the UK is the Affordable Housing Supply Programme (AHSP) in Scotland. (Serin, Kintrea, and Gibb, 2018). Even though the AHSP in Scotland and affordable housing programs in other regions of the UK vary significantly, several important lessons can be drawn from the Scottish experience, as shown below.
Prioritization of social rented housing is one of the most important lessons gained from the AHSP. The Scottish AHSP has prioritized social rented housing, in contrast to affordable housing programs in England, which have prioritized growing home ownership and private sector investment. Given that social rented housing is the most affordable option for low-income households, the program has been able to better serve the needs of the most defenseless and disadvantaged members of society as a result of this priority. (Serin, Kintrea, and Gibb, 2018). The Scottish AHSP has been effective in supplying the substantial demand for affordable housing in the nation by giving social rented housing priority. This achievement is attributable to social rented housing, which has cheaper rents and offers tenants long-term security. (Serin, Kintrea, and Gibb, 2018). Since social-rented housing offers a reliable and secure supply of affordable housing that is not impacted by market fluctuations, this strategy has also been more sustainable than depending on private investment or increasing home ownership. Additionally, putting a focus on social rented housing has assisted in addressing issues of inequality and social exclusion because it guarantees that low-income households have access to housing that is both cheap and of high quality. (Serin, Kintrea, and Gibb, 2018). The Scottish AHSP has recognized that access to affordable housing is a fundamental right and has prioritized meeting this need.
The Scottish Affordable Housing Supply Programme (AHSP) also teaches us valuable lessons about the value of long-term planning and funding for the effective implementation of affordable housing programs. (Gibb and Hayton, 2017). The Scottish AHSP has emphasized social rented housing, which is the most affordable form of housing for low-income households, in contrast to England, where the emphasis has been on expanding home ownership and private sector investment. (Gibb and Hayton, 2017). The program is now meeting the requirements of the most defenseless and underprivileged members of society thanks to this prioritization. Developers and local governments can plan and carry out the initiative with greater efficiency and effectiveness thanks to the Scottish Government’s dedication to funding it through the year 2031. (Gibb and Hayton, 2017).
The long-term planning and funding have also allowed for the development of a diverse range of housing options, including new build homes and the renovation of existing properties (Gibb and Hayton, 2017). This has helped to address a range of housing needs and preferences, such as accessibility for people with disabilities and the provision of affordable homes for older people.
The Scottish AHSP’s focus on sustainability and energy efficiency is another important learning. The program has established a minimum requirement for new homes’ energy performance, ensuring that they reach a high standard. (James and Tolson, 2020). To further reduce carbon emissions and lower energy expenses for residents, the AHSP has promoted the use of renewable energy sources like solar panels and heat pumps. The Scottish AHSP has supported Scotland’s overall efforts to combat climate change and decrease carbon emissions by placing a high priority on energy efficiency and sustainability. (James and Tolson, 2020). By lowering energy usage, the program has helped residents—especially those with low incomes who are more likely to battle with high energy costs—afford new homes. The Scottish AHSP promoted using regional products and suppliers, supporting regional businesses, and generating new employment. (James and Tolson, 2020). This has boosted the economy and developed a more resilient and sustainable housing industry.
However, there are some negative lessons to be drawn from the Scottish AHSP, especially in the context of English affordable housing programs. One of the most serious complaints leveled at the AHSP is that it has not done enough to address the scarcity of affordable homes for sale. (Fyfe, Hutchison, and Squires, 2023). While the program has produced a large number of socially rented houses, it has not produced a sufficient number of affordable homes for purchase. As a result, many poor and middle-income households in Scotland are still unable to enter the housing market. (Fyfe, Hutchison, and Squires, 2023).
The Scottish AHSP teaches policymakers some crucial lessons about its relevance to England. For starters, the focus on socially rented housing serves as a useful reminder of the importance of meeting the needs of society’s most vulnerable and disadvantaged members. (Dunning et al., 2020). While there is undeniably a need to encourage house ownership and private sector investment in affordable housing, it is critical not to overlook the value of socially rented housing. Second, the Scottish AHSP serves as an excellent example of long-term planning and funding. (Dunning et al., 2020). One of the most significant challenges confronting affordable housing programs in England has been a lack of long-term planning and financing, making it difficult to deliver a consistent and coherent program. The Scottish Government has been able to execute a more strategic and effective program by devoting itself to long-term planning and funding.
However, there are significant differences between the Scottish AHSP and English affordable housing schemes. The structure of the housing market is one of the main differences. (Dunning et al., 2020). Scotland’s housing market is smaller and more concentrated than England’s, allowing for more centralized planning and delivery of affordable homes. The housing market in England differs significantly by region, making it more difficult to create a consistent program. Another significant distinction is the political environment. The Scottish Government has more say over housing policy than the UK Government, allowing it to create a more unique and focused program. (Dunn, 2020). Housing policy in England is primarily controlled by the UK Government, making it more difficult to implement a consistent and effective affordable housing program.
Conclusion
Since 2011, the Scottish Affordable Housing Supply Programme (AHSP) has been able to deliver affordable homes in each of its three stages, exceeding its goals for doing so. The affordable housing initiatives in England, on the other hand, have come under fire for failing to prioritize socially rented housing and failing to provide enough homes in the areas with the greatest need. The English strategy has been to prioritize increasing home ownership, while the Scottish AHSP has prioritized increasing the supply of affordable homes throughout Scotland, including in rural areas and areas with high levels of deprivation. However, a variety of affordable housing choices are required to address the housing crisis for low-income households across the UK. To increase the supply of affordable homes across the UK, the government must prioritize and invest in affordable housing initiatives, as well as innovative financing models and building techniques. Furthermore, to achieve the goal of constructing more sustainable and environmentally friendly homes, the government must concentrate on reducing carbon emissions and increasing energy efficiency in new home construction.
Reference list
Bailey, N. (2020). Poverty and the re-growth of private renting in the UK, 1994-2018. PLOS ONE, 15(2), p.e0228273. doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228273.
Barnes, E., Writer, T. and Hartley, C., 2021. Social housing in New South Wales.https://www.vinnies.org.au/content/Document/NSW/Social%20Justice/CSI%20UNSW%20Social%20Housing%20Contemporary%20Analysis_20210617.pdf
Dunn, L., 2020. Rapid Rehousing Transition Plans: A Scottish Overview. With Practice.
Dunning, R., Moore, T., Ferrari, E., Hoolachan, J., Keskin, B., Powell, R. and Obrien, P., 2020. Affordable Housing Need in Scotland Post 2021.
Fitzpatrick, S., Mackie, P. and Wood, J. (2021). Advancing a Five-Level Typology of Homelessness Prevention. International Journal on Homelessness, 1(1), pp.79–97. doi https://doi.org/10.5206/ijoh.2021.1.13341.
Fyfe, A., Hutchison, N. and Squires, G., 2023. The Role of the State in Encouraging the Supply of senior housing: a looming welfare crisis? Property Management.
Gibb, K. (2020). Divergent approaches to affordable housing supply in a devolved policy system: Scotland and England after 2010. International Journal of Urban Sciences, pp.1–23. doi https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1730935.
Gibb, K. and Hayton, J., 2017. Overcoming obstacles to the funding and delivery of affordable housing supply in the European States. Policy Scotland at the University of Glasgow.https://acash.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018.10.22_overcoming_obstacles_to_the_funding_and_delivery_of_affordable_housing_supply_in_european_states_1.pdf
James, G. and Tolson, S. (2020). Delivering more homes and better places Lessons from policy and practice in Scotland. [online] Available at: https://www.landcommission.gov.scot/downloads/5f7dcf4b3e91f_CaCHE%20-%20Delivering%20More%20Homes%20and%20Better%20Places%20-%20October%202020%20FINAL%20reduced.pdf.
James, G., Berry, K., and Marks, A., 2019. Alternative Housing Tenures. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body.
McAreavey, R., 2022. Looking back to go forward. A review of Rural Development Funding in Northern Ireland. Cookstown: Northern Ireland Rural Community Network and Northern Ireland Rural Women’s Network. https://www.ruralcommunitynetwork.org/app/uploads/2022/03/A_Review_of_Rural_Development_Funding_Web_jun22.pdf
Perry, J. (2022). Chapter 4 Housing expenditure plans Section 2 Commentary. [online] Available at: https://www.ukhousingreview.org.uk/ukhr21/commentaries-pdf/UKHR-2021-Commentary-Ch4.pdf.
Serin, B., Kintrea, K. and Gibb, K., 2018. Social housing in Scotland. Glasgow: UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bilge-Serin/publication/329075600_Social_housing_in_Scotland/links/5bf4782c4585150b2bc4b064/Social-housing-in-Scotland.pdf
Smyth, S. (2018). Embedding financialization: a policy review of the English Affordable Homes Programme. Housing Studies, pp.1–20. doi https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1442561.
Supply, A.H. (2019). Independent Review of Affordable Housing Supply Final Report. [online] Available at: https://omghcontent.affino.com/AcuCustom/Sitename/DAM/118/Affordable_Housing_Supply_Review_-_REPORT_-_FINAL_COMPLETE_V.pdf
Wilson, W. and Barton, C., 2021. Social rented housing (England): past trends and prospects. House of Commons Library, London.
write