Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Comparative Analysis of Stress Management Strategies: Empirical Research vs. Pop Psychology Perspectives

Regarding stress management techniques, when compared with an empirical research article by Mendagudli et al. (2021) from the International Journal of Nursing Education and Research and a pop psychology guide article, “How Stress Impacts Your Health Guide” by Elizabeth Scott, Ph.D.. However, the empirical article provides a detailed and more complete viewpoint on stress management. It considers an array of stress triggers in addition to evidence-based methods. However, the pop-psych article focuses on the effects of stress but does not apply the same holistic and evidence-based approach as in the empirical study. This is because the Empirical Article considers different stressors and is built on strong scientific bases that form a solid foundation for stress management.

Whole-to-Whole Comparison

Main Issue, Problem, or Intention

Mendagudli et al.’s (2021) study focuses on defining specific stress management techniques for nurses. On the contrary, Scott’s (2023) study considers broad stress and health perspectives and is not limited to any particular context. Mendagudli et al. address directed approaches directed at nursing, while Scott discusses stress in different situations. This involves specialized understanding regarding a particular topic, focusing on the effect of stress on a person’s body. In contrast, the latter focuses on addressing stress as a broad topic covering all aspects of wellness and health. Their scope is different about the depth of specificity and breadth of inclusiveness.

Investigation of Various Points of View and Assumptions

Mendagudli et al. (2021). The role of stress, stressors, kinds, origins, signs, and scientific methods. Scott (2023) outlines how stress affects people, typical stressors, and general stress relief guidelines. A comprehensive approach by Mendagudli et al. (2021) includes stress and empirical proof strategies. In comparison, Scott (2023) provides a broader perspective without touching on the empirical research.

Supporting Issue with Evidence Given posture

Mendagudli et al. (2021). Supports the information using references, definitions, and examples.Scott (2023 ): Expert opinions, general information. Mendagudli et al. (2021) use citations and case-in-point to substantiate it, whereas Scott (2023) relies on experts’ opinions and facts.

Discussion of Consequences and Implications

Mendagudli et al. 2021. Implications of un-mitigated stress in nursing practice – physical and psychosocial impacts. The health impacts of stress. – Scott (2023). Mendagudli et al., 2021 talk about consequences in the context of nursing, and Scott, 2023 is specific to health consequences.

Information’s Decision-Making Utility

Mendagudli et al. (2021) provide evidence-based stress management strategies directed toward nurses, unlike Scott (2023), who provides general stress management strategies for different people. Mendagudli and others conducted an empirical study that provided specific interventions for nursing stressors and needs. However, Scott’s advice can be applied generally, although it is not specifically tailored for nurses. Mendagudli et al.’s work is specific to nursing-oriented strategies, which makes it relevant for healthcare personnel facing other sources of pressure.


In conclusion, the Empirical Research Article on Stress Management in the Nursing Context presents a more detailed and evidence-based approach than the Pop Psychology Article. An in-depth and detailed empirical study is appropriate for nursing practice because it offers guidelines on dealing with these stressors. On the contrary, the pop psychology article is informative but needs to elaborate more on personalized stress management techniques professionally. A broader lens on stress effects could favor those searching for generic knowledge about the issue. However, they are inadequate for educating nurses with actionable and evidence‐based advice. The two articles must be carefully judged, considering their intended context and the necessary clarity to successfully implement appropriate stress management methods in a healthy work setting.


Mendagudli, V. G., Sarawad, S. S., & Mahajani, V. S. (2021). Stress Management-Strategies. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 9(2), 238-241.

Scott, E. (2023, September 13). How Stress Impacts Your Health Guide: 18 Effective Stress Relief Strategies. Verywell Mind.


Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics