Introduction
In this world of transforming digital reality, our manner of interacting with it becomes some basic structures that define its nature. The journal embarks on a premeditated journey with the diminution of screen time as its central theme and tells a tale that traverses several staged practices like digital dysconnectivity (Van der Nagel and Frith, 2015). This reflective journey allows the author to analyze what is woven into our digital culture because interacting in cyberspace has become a routine for us. However, this question does not limit itself to activities but also seeks to understand the sociological foundations underpinning our cyberspace behavior.
Life has changed significantly in the fast-paced world of technological innovation, particularly in terms of digital media. How we perceive information has changed; we have access to a massive variety of content at our fingertips, giving shape to our views and making us see this world differently. Similarly, we have moved into a new era where sharing life is not just easy but one that has become an everyday routine. People build and maintain their digital identities through social media and web platforms, striking the balance between honesty and performance. It is in this fast-paced environment that technology not only makes connectivity possible but also plays a significant role as an influencer of the narrative of our digital selves.
Reducing Screen Time
This tale starts with my digital journal earlier and is fabricated by conscious assimilation as follows from the purposeful restriction of screen use. This isolates us from the pervasive intellectual world and serves as our conscious attempt to navigate an omnipresent technological age more mindfully. It involves a wide range of activities, from such shallow behavior as logging out to significant actions intended to prevent the notification and effectively restrict viewing time (Haimson et al., 2021). As this completely meaningless interactivity is the ground for my digital identity, I cannot help but consider how such a deliberate, non-relevant interaction affects all online relationships.
However, digital disconnectivity is an essential issue in the battle against screen dominion. Digital disconnectivity is also the deliberate detachment from digital gadgets that offer them a much-deserved relief from notifications, social media updates and other forms of digital stimuli. It is a deliberate act of restriction in screen time that leads to an increased level of awareness and mindfulness. With the continuous network of connectivity that defines an Internet Age, detaching has become getting back time, being a human and preserving one’s mental health.
The essence of the screen-less movement is a ‘digital detox’. Digital detox is a planned and deliberate break from using electronic devices or indulging in online activities. This includes unplugging smartphones, tablets, computers, and other gadgets to make room for meditation, relaxation, and human contact. Even during a digital detox, people choose activities that have nothing to do with screens, such as reading physical books or playing outdoors and talking. It aims to achieve such a compromise between digital attachment and real human interaction in the emerging virtual world.
In the age of information, there are numerous arguments for restricting screen time that do not relate to technology. The necessity to post edited selfies on different social networks has evolved as a procedure for building your image online. It is true to say that today, people in the world of social media post their perfect pictures, which are filtered and modified; they seek a specific ideal version of any identity over the Internet. The ideally beautiful selfies make a person compare himself with deformed pictures on social networking sites and participate in discussions about the truth of virtual personality. Thus, there is a vicious cycle of having to be online all the time and feeling validated via likes/comments that affect one’s mental health. Society allures people to the alienation that leads them to give their lives away outside the cyber-sphere and build an online identity based on societal standards in a virtual environment, one which is dependent on values of beauty or success. Therefore, logging on to social media can be seen as a strategic means to overcome the limitations presented by screen usage.
Exploring the Backstage of Digital Life
But my digital journal is an essential contemplative activity that fosters purposeful minimizing of screen time behaviors. This deliberate liberation is an intentional disengagement from virtual realms, where everything in our life revolves. This active disengagement can be considered as insignificant logout actions to external-oriented ones such as notifications and time spent browsing. My virtual climate-producing purposive strategies are, therefore, of greater importance since remote ways bypass these net communications.
The backstage of the digital life world represents a front stage that offers high-quality online images, selective content, and optimum connectivity while equally important unseen. Such backstage is a metaphor, the processes that lie behind barriers and cause certain complications for digital life opening to us another side of interconnectivity. The heart of a digital infrastructure is the focal point in Myers West’s (2018) digital backstage analysis. With its hiding position at the core of our lifestyles, pressing power and speed features along with a contemporary communications network to enable digital living. This also suggests that there is a connection between cybersecurity issues and environmental impacts on digital footprints. Besides the technological complexity, a trail of online identities trickles down in digital life. On the front stage, one sees staged profiles and scripted revelation. In contrast, on the backstage, there seem to be questions about authenticity, self-presentations, and sometimes even a feeble expression of true intimacy. In a hyper-connected society, people seek to find the right balance between an ‘ideal’ digital persona and one that becomes more guarded.
The backstage also reveals the layers of digital wellbeing and mental health in a society mediated by social media. However, this stage is where we can think about such a deluge of information and notifications as to what it does to our mental welfare in addition to emotional stability. The most critical aspects to take into account when evaluating our relationship with technology are digital addiction, information overdose and the constant but hidden pressure of content recommendation algorithms in order to propose feasible solutions for a healthy lifestyle.
The digital gap is a huge chasm between those individuals who have comfort in cyberspace and those whose access to it is prevented. This study shows this dichotomy. This digital backstage is a place of social and economic differences, technological awareness, and infrastructural divergences. This digital divide needs to be found and removed since it will have a drastic effect on the achievement of an egalitarian society that is yet in prospect.
Lastly, the hidden part of digital life offers many revelations that enable us to see not just what can be seen but also beyond this. Analyzing the issues attached to digital infrastructure, online identities, mental health and well-being, as well as The Digital divide, allows us to get under our virtual lives’ surface veil. The moral of our digital decisions constructs a multicultural virtual age and directs us through complicated details that shape what occurs in the dark corridors of global interdependence.
The Dichotomy of Digital Relationships
As my narrative works on the digital pages of the diary, it does not only indicate a broadening of. Unfriending, friending, following, and smart use of ‘close friends’ occupy central places in the performance of making connections online.
The virtual world is an economic duet between the stage of the façade and its secret backstage, where nuances in these relationships reign. The front stage becomes a conscious choice in creating an image that maintains the online relationship, whether to friend or unfriend. It is a performative enactment of an Internet persona constrained by cultural limits and personal reasons for performance directed toward virtual audiences.
In this digital performance, ‘close friends’ are a hidden instrument—a backstage apparatus known in the framework of wider patterns regarding online relationships. Concealed from the rest of its environment, unveiling a more real self to those chosen others becomes an intentional consolation that raises what is underneath. The intentional use of the close friend’s button reflects this struggle between creating an online identity and craving real deep relationships, which occupies a stage-backstage continuum in digital connections.
This way, the story of the diary focuses on such complexities and tension in the digital realm to authenticity relations (Haimson et al., 2021). Consequently, the performative element of virtual relationships is also more evident based on the dramaturgy theory by Goffman. The challenge is, therefore, in the search for a real way to satisfy front-stage interests that resonate through the digital veil. This tension becomes the focal point, encouraging discussion of social contexts and individual goals that impact digital selfhood and connectivity (Duguay, Burgess and Suzor, 2020). The diaries in the virtual world that have been constructed artificially describe actual and important encounters. It does this by balancing between the architected virtual self and intimacy that requires more than can be achieved in e-messages. Thus, the sanctuary of ‘close friends’ backstage as a setting where friendly relations are strengthened allows expressions that flow freely without inhibiting.
The study helps to get a deeper insight into obstacles that are forced on the validity of connections by digital reality. The account does not only relate these actions but also an inquiry into the hidden emotions inside digital connections. Next, the reader is asked to understand how virtual fluid identities shift throughout human intimacy by analyzing the battle between the frontal and reverse sides of digital contacts. Consequently, the diary account becomes an intermediary work addressing topics related to digital practices and social performance and transforms into a very elaborate double-layered story of relationships (Tarleton Gillespie, 2022). These methods could be viewed through the lens of Goffman’s dramaturgy theory. Finally, the reflection raises additional questions and issues about true connectivity catalysts doubt for computational inclusion analysis.
Digital Society and Changing Norms
However, an e-journal incorporates other cognate ideas that fall under this sphere of studying social ethics in the cyber world. The following measures are often referred to as several techniques for negotiating a new setting in online communication: muting, blocking and privacy settings (Foster, 2022). These are mini-stunts in the game of choreographed digital relationships that involve exposing every level where a person creates an online identity and travels around cyber reality’s unique landscape.
The emergence of the digital society has brought about a revolutionary epoch that reshapes social norms and interpersonal relations at an unparalleled pace. This dynamic environment is rewriting the social DNA, and it’s impacting how we interact with each other. At the core of this transformation is a restructuring of interpersonal relationships, where online communication becomes an ever more integral part of how we form and maintain relations.
Social media is one of the key features that characterize a digital society, an environment where individuals interact online. These platforms transform the true nature of friendship and develop new rules for communication and self-representation (Cunningham and Craig, 2017). Nevertheless, infringing the traditional ideas regarding personal boundaries through different online interactions may lead to blurred public and private spheres. Social media profiles are prepared very meticulously, and users try to find a way between truthfulness as they want some kind of ideal image about themselves. Therefore, the dance of digital society’s authenticity and performativity regarding online identity has become increasingly sophisticated.
However, in the digital technology era, norms are transforming as privacy is reevaluated.
The more the taste for telling personal stories and even trivial details from one’s daily life is spreading, these boundaries between public space and privacy seem to be becoming fuzzier all of a sudden. However, this transformation results in the necessary consideration of an adequate degree of transparency and disclosure (Gillespie, 2010). They pay the price for sacrificing their lives in cyberspace when Discussing exchanges between staying connected and abandoning old concepts about individual privacy. The development of the digital society has also contributed to information democratization and amplification of different voices (Kanai, 2015). The internet provides a platform for marginalized groups to defy their identities, transmit stories, and rewrite narratives. Instead, the digital world becomes a venue for ‘norm contests’ where competing interpretations battle over what is common. In the digital age, democratized discourses become a reality because people have strong voices and, in turn, vast power to determine social norms, and challenge gatekeepers’ authority.
The second threat that society should overcome while negotiating this changing world is to determine ethical limits between digital interconnectivity and human values. Based on the idea that standards in digital society are changing quickly, ethical challenges of new technologies and limits for online behavior and personal rights should be reviewed often (Bell and Leonard, 2018). From then on, the digital age is not only a symbol of technological advancement but also an image that reflects societal preferences and values, establishing new standards in our globalized society.
Conclusion
Moreover, this diary can be attributed to a holistic account of screen time, limiting the reduced terrain between technology and humanity. The essence of performativity in online communication has been analyzed from the perspective of Goffman’s dramaturgy theory. Thus, what is condemned in the diary includes approaches to planned digital reality disconnect and detailed managing virtual relations, illustrated only as the complexity of finding one’s place among digitized resources.
Regarding the digital state, Goffman’s dramaturgy theory has been vital in explaining its intentionality behind the construction of online characters –frontstage and a more private side—backstage. This theoretical model has furnished a theoretical lens to understand the reflection of intentional actor choice by human agencies in their online self-presentation, which ensures that they provide ultimate theatre representation hidden within our digital communications. Therefore, the number of investigated practices indicates that digital space constantly changes, and new standards should be established. As mentioned, several digital role practices are behind the carefully calculated disinterest in limiting screen time, including malicious courtesy for censoring and blocking other people when changing privacy settings. All of these activities highlight the precarious tango that people dance when trying to work with their digital selves while simultaneously breaking down assumptions about how one should connect in it.
References
Bell, E. and Leonard, P., 2018. Digital organizational storytelling on YouTube: Constructing plausibility through amateurism, affinity, and authenticity network protocols. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), pp.339-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616660765
Cunningham, S. and Craig, D., 2017. Being ‘really real ‘ on YouTube: authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment. Media International Australia, 164(1), pp.71-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17709098
Duguay, S., Burgess, J. and Suzor, N., 2020. Queer women’s experiences of patchwork platform governance on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Convergence, 26(2), pp.237-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518781530
Foster, J., 2022. “It’s All About the Look”: Making Sense of Appearance, Attractiveness, and Authenticity Online. Social Media+ Society, 8(4), p.20563051221138762. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221138762
Gillespie, T., 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New media & society, 12(3), pp.347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
Gillespie, T., 2022. Do not recommend? Reduction as a form of content moderation. Social Media+ Society, 8(3), p.20563051221117552. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221117552
Haimson, O.L., Delmonaco, D., Nie, P. and Wegner, A., 2021. Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), pp.1-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479610
Haimson, O.L., Liu, T., Zhang, B.Z. and Corvite, S., 2021. The online authenticity paradox: What being” authentic” on social media means, and barriers to achieving it. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), pp.1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479567
Kanai, A., 2015. WhatShouldWeCallMe? Self-branding, individuality and belonging in youthful femininities on Tumblr. M/C Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.936
Myers West, S., 2018. Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society, 20(11), pp.4366-4383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818773059
Van der Nagel, E. and Frith, J., 2015. Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i3.5615
write