Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Argumentative Essay: How the Constitution of the United States Is Unique

The United States Constitution is an incredible piece of writing. It was a daring trial in democracy over 200 years ago, and it has proven to be both robust and durable enough to sustain and stay viable in a globe very distinct from one where it was published. The reason for establishing is threefold. First, it sets a national government with a parliamentary, executive, and judicial system, as well as rounds with checks and balances. Second, it divides authority between the states and the federal government. Finally, it safeguards various personal liberty of American citizens. The blueprint of the Constitution owes its existence to the heritage that led up to its creation. The restrictions imposed on the national government and each of its sections were a response to the dictatorship of British rule, particularly the dictatorship of a single ruler. However, the broadening of the federal state’s prerogatives was a corrective to the Articles of Confederation’s dysfunctional government, which had proven ineffectual of uniting the thirteen initial states into one state. As a result, the Constitution Of The united states is unique in human history inside a variety of ways.

First, unlike most other less-stringent democratic constitutions, the U.S Constitution is exceedingly difficult to officially amend. In total, there are four basic formal amendment practices: two variants from each of the two major amendment tracks (Albert 660). The Law guarantees Congress to agree by a two-thirds majority in the senate to recommend a proposal for evaluation by the nations, three-quarters among which then must accept the suggestion in legislatures or convention delegates, as Legislature directs, for the amendment to become law. The second pair authorizes a two-thirds quorum of nations to petition Congress to call a constitutional change, where the gathered body will suggest modifications which must be passed into law by three-quarters of legislative bodies, again as Senate selects, if they are to be become rule. In American history, only the first of these two amendment paths were ever used effectively. It is difficult to assess the relative solidity of documented constitutional provisions with any degree of accuracy (684). Despite their flaws, research findings of amendment complexity strengthen the perception that the United States Constitution is one of, though not the, most tough democratic constitutions to modify.

The constitution allows people to have too much freedom. The high court and the charter of rights safeguard the people’s political fundamental liberties. They have a good chance of succeeding in America because they are truly free to explore their own fantasies ((Eisgruber and Sager 56). They are independent since they are protected by the US Constitution’s guarantee of fundamental individual rights. Because the US laws protect their liberties, they do not have to worry about a voracious, arbitrarily chosen government getting involved with their matters, or harsh regulatory burdens that will eventually drown their business (72). Personal rights, of course, brings monetary freedom, or the liberty to engage in income activities. Economic success is more likely when energized users interact in ventures without the perpetual terror of random obstacles thrown in their path by a tyrant, unelected authorities. As a result of achieving Freedom from Oppression, Americans were able to unleash their cohesive Freedom to Do, allowing private creative thinking to flourish. And, as we all know, inventiveness frequently led to new ideas and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and the ambition of financially successful innovation have transformed millions of Americans into effective experts and business shareholders over moment (92).

In addition, the United States has put rights in place the rights that has governs and protects the lesbianism, gayism, bisexual and trans gender (LGBTQ). This is contrary to other countries because homosexuality is prohibited in many states LGBTQ Americans are entitled to protection in a variety of settings, including their place of employment, housing, and access to public property. Adoption of children by homosexual spouse has also been lawful since 2015, thanks to a Supreme Court decision (Beer and Cruz-Aceves 5). Thanks to a federal law that penalized those who discriminated against homosexual people. Moreover, in other countries the transgender society, particularly transgender people of color, faces significant discrimination. Fighting and racial violence, joblessness, economic hardship, sexual abuse, discrimination in housing, job discrimination, harassment, bullying, disproportionately high costs of arrest and prison sentences, incarceration and immigration violence and mistreatment, airport security indignity, Aids and health imbalances, and governing beaurocratic obstacles to shift are some examples of discriminatory practices and other systems of discrimination faced by the tr (20).

Furthermore, the United States provides funding to organizations that work to motivate Segregation and minority societies and to defend the dignity of people who are routinely denied basic freedoms (Matsuda 24). Initiatives help to fund domestically led measures to counter all forms of racial – cultural hate and bigotry, as well as to expedite the fairness for abused children. People who experienced persecution since of their transgender, sexuality, incapacity, race or culture, faith, or ethnic origin benefited from intersectional programs. The United States nominated Professor Gay McDougall to start serving on the international convention on the elimination of Racial Discrimination, a body of 18 scientific researchers that supervises State parties’ adherence to the Conference on the Elimination of Violence Against women of Systematic Racism. Her appointment demonstrates the importance of the Commission’s work to the Palin administering (36). Combating institutional racism necessitates immediate action to address the same constructions, regulations, and procedures that contribute to income disparities, health disparities, and disparities in educational attainment, outcomes, and other areas. Today, on the event of the World Body’ (UN) International Year with the Eradication of Systematic Racism, the United States reiterates its commitment to addressing these obstacles at home and abroad, and to demonstrating to the universe that nations with a strong commitment to fair treatment do not need to cover up their possess failures – those who confront them truthfully, openly, but with a determination a correct the situation (51).

One ‘s constitution does not provide for accepted method of the nationwide, condition, or local councils to anyone wounded by their agencies. For example, if an urban law enforcement officer in the U.s makes a legitimately or unlawful arrest and inflicts serious injuries on a citizen during the course of such detainment, the wounded citizen can only sue the cop who committed the mistake, but he has no assertion against the city, although under their founding document, such a harmed citizen may obtain harm from the town (Frost 1065). This is contrary to other countries including Russia and Germany which protects the rights of citizens from police brutality.

Finally, the premise for equal representation varies by country. Whenever a major party is vanquished in the U.s, it is likely to have no legislators at all or a number of delegates far fewer than the commensurate number of votes for the beaten party, that is, presuming that the popular public election’ all over the nation added up to 12 million, while the Conservative vote amounted to thirteen billion and billions, under our system it will not be essential (Krehbiel 427). This is particularly especially true for small stakeholders that have a million or more votes but do not have a single individual in our Legislature. While in other constitutions’ proportionate representation systems, minority parties are given proper representation roughly attributable to the size of their ballot (434).

Conclusively, in everyday politics, the Law is all too often used as a blunt weapon. People activate it in the hope that it will have nuclear weapons, decimating any policy arguments advanced by the opposing party. And it frequently wields extraordinary power to silence debate or force the opponents to raise its own propaganda to match the based on the constitution level. Due to the obvious Constitution and bill of rights authority status in mainstream America, that strategy has the potential to stifle the voices of poor and marginalized citizens. Political forces invoke America’s fundamental law because of the mass it conveys not only as a technological legal matter, but also in culture as a whole. One new material is that enshrined in the constitution debate in everyday politics is frequently purely ceremonial and unconnected to the subject matter of the Constitution. The distinction between the US constitution and the international constitutions is not so much a difference in disposition as it is a difference in time. The US constitution was promulgated at a time when trendy innovative thought was aimed against the surplus electricity of a did inherit gentry or nobility, whereas recent revolutions have been directed against the excess wealth, whether acquired or obtained.

Work Cited

Albert, Richard. “Amending constitutional amendment rules.” International journal of constitutional law 13.3 (2015): 655-685.

Beer, Caroline, and Victor D. Cruz-Aceves. “Extending rights to marginalized minorities: Same-sex relationship recognition in Mexico and the United States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 18.1 (2018): 3-26.

Eisgruber, Christopher L., and Lawrence G. Sager. “Religious freedom and the constitution.” Religious Freedom and the Constitution. Harvard University Press, 2009.54-100

Frost, Amanda. “In Defense of Nationwide Injunctions.” NYUL Rev. 93 (2018): 1065.

Krehbiel, Keith, Adam Meirowitz, and Alan E. Wiseman. “A theory of competitive partisan lawmaking.” Political Science Research and Methods 3.3 (2015): 423-448.

Matsuda, Mari J. “Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story.” Words that wound. Routledge, 2018. 17-51.


Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics