Question 1
Strategic management research has evolved significantly over time, becoming crucial in management scholarship. Despite the numerous accomplishments in this field of inquiry, several lacunae require addressing to enhance our comprehension of strategic management. Several crucial domains that necessitate attention to identify knowledge deficiencies include Capabilities for change: The capacity of a company to respond to changes in the business environment is referred to as its dynamic capabilities. Although dynamic capabilities have received much attention in the literature, exploring their antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes is still necessary, particularly in emerging economies.
Corporate entrepreneurship refers to the establishment of new enterprises or the development of new goods or services inside an existing firm. Despite much research on the issue, corporate culture remains unclear in order to understand how corporate entrepreneurship may be successfully managed, how it links to business performance, and how it changes across various settings. In the field of strategic management, the notion of innovation is very important. Despite current information, there is still much need for future investigation into successful methods of inventing inside organizations and the influence of innovation on company performance. Strategic leadership refers to the actions made by leaders in developing and implementing strategies. Despite the fact that there is a substantial quantity of academic literature on strategic leadership, there is still a knowledge gap about the most successful techniques for leaders to lead strategic change (Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A.2019).
Question 2
The notion that academic writing is marked by hesitancy and caution means that academic writers should avoid making absolute assertions and instead explain their arguments and evidence with care and precision. It was about Lingard, L., and Watling, C.’s (2021) study. The method recognizes the limits of the study while also allowing for the potential of additional information or alternate interpretations. While presenting study results as a PhD researcher, it is best to avoid making broad or conclusive conclusions. It is preferable to use language that appropriately expresses the degree of confidence associated with the results. Instead of declaring claims that lack complete proof, use terms such as “these observations imply” or “this data appears to corroborate the conjecture.”
Furthermore, it is critical to recognize any limits or possible sources of bias in your study and to examine alternate interpretations of your findings. This is because you have thoroughly studied the ramifications of your results and are willing to do more research and enhance your views. In essence, PhD scholars must approach academic writing with caution and caution. This strategy ensures that study results are accurately and appropriately presented while noting the complexities and uncertainties that usually define research. Firms operating in developing economies need dynamic skills because they face unique problems that involve the creation of adaptable methods to deal with changing conditions. Companies, for example, may demand agility in responding to regulatory changes, political turmoil, or customer preferences.
Question 3
“We can’t solve problems by using the same thinking we used to create them,” Albert Einstein said, emphasizing the necessity for a new viewpoint when dealing with complicated challenges. This remark emphasizes the need of using an innovative technique to handle a research topic after completing PhD research. The process of doing doctorate research comprises identifying a gap in existing knowledge and developing a fresh framework or technique to address the research topic. Researchers must think critically, creatively, and innovatively throughout this process in order to develop answers that successfully solve the research challenge. (E.2021 Sherman)
Doctoral researchers might participate in the study of various points of view, the contemplation of unique notions, and the creation of imaginative solutions to complex problems by using novel cognitive frameworks. This approach requires the researcher to have an open mind, be willing to challenge established assumptions, and be at peace with ambiguous and unclear conditions. Doctoral research requires much more than merely doing a literature study or testing a hypothesis. The goal entails pushing the boundaries of understanding and contributing to the advancement of the field via the development of fresh theories, frameworks, and approaches.
To summarize, Einstein’s remark is significant in doctorate research because it emphasizes the need of using a fresh strategy when handling complex research challenges. Doctoral researchers must use a critical, creative, and inventive technique in order to gain new insights and find novel solutions to complex research problems. To make a significant contribution to the growth of the discipline, researchers must be open-minded, question preconceptions, and welcome uncertainty and ambiguity.
Question 4
Hines, A. H. (2019) asserts that once exposed to a novel thought, the human mind is permanently affected and never returns to its previous condition, emphasizing the enormous influence that new conceptions may have on the human psyche. When people are exposed to new ideas, their pre-existing views and assumptions are challenged, causing them to reconsider their positions. Their brains are expanded throughout this process, and they begin to perceive the world in a new perspective. In a variety of ways, this claim is significant. The statement begins by emphasizing the need of continual education and exposure to new ideas. Exposure to new ideas allows people to widen their cognitive spans and nurture new perspectives, which aids in their competent management of complex situations. The second argument emphasizes the major role that education can play in effecting good change. Individuals are exposed to innovative ideas via education, which aids in the development of their analytical talents and allows them to become more educated community members.
Individuals are receptive to new ideas, however some may be resistant to change. Certain people may be quite attached to their existing views and be unable to consider new points of view. In such cases, the potential for fresh thoughts to create major change must be fully realized. Finally, Oliver Wendell Holmes’ statement highlights the transformative power of new ideas on the human mind. This remark emphasizes the importance of continuing education and learning in increasing one’s knowledge base and building the capacity to think critically. Nonetheless, the above remark acknowledges that some people may reject new ideas and oppose any changes.
Reference
D., & Makri, A. (2019) Internet communication and interaction in the distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605-632. , 65(4), 605-632.
Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2021). The Academic Hedge, Part I: Modal Tuning in Your Research Writing. In Story, Not Study: 30 Brief Lessons to Inspire Health Researchers as Writers (pp. 139-144). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Sherman, E. (2021). Two Sides of Glory: The 1986 Boston Red Sox in Their Own Words. U of Nebraska Press.
Hines, A. H. (2019). Ralph Waldo Emerson and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: The Subtle Rapture of Postponed Power. J. Sup. Ct. Hist., 44, 39.
write