A social movement’s leaders have an influence on its direction, and the movement’s activities are directly proportionate to its solidarity (Bosi et al., 2016). All things considered, the common pattern of social movements, regardless of their starting point, is characteristics. A typical stirring component is the statement of moral situations, which is often utilized to urge individuals to join these initiatives. It relies significantly on the movement’s ability to mobilize social capital, devotion, and, less crucially, its authority to make advances. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. played a vital role in the twentieth-century civil rights movement, pushing for fundamental freedoms long before the Black Lives Matter movement gained popularity in the United States. As a significant supporter and leader, Alicia Garza has played an essential role in the association’s history. This review extensively examines the conditions, including the pioneers’ body language, the importance of the place, and how the audience responded to the speakers.
A Synopsis of the Speeches
Martin Luther King Jr.’s inauguration speech, given in front of an estimated 200,000 people, advocated, among other things, for racial, economic, political, and educational equality in the United States (Josiah & Oghenerho, 2015). In his speech, he urged African-Americans to maintain their faith and fight for their civil freedoms. According to Martin, since the local area was present, the bank of equity couldn’t guarantee that it was bankrupt; similarly, the bank of equity couldn’t promise that it was destroyed. He recognizes that bringing African Americans and white people together is the most crucial step toward creating a better society in the United States. He recognized this was a goal he could accomplish. Following an examination of various cases of police brutality, Alicia Garza presents the power vacuum created by the Black Lives Matter movement and its consequences (Clayton, 2018). She emphasizes the gap between how the current generation perceives change and the movement’s capacity to achieve such changes in strategy and practice.
Comparison between the Speeches
Throughout their arguments, the two speakers radiate an extraordinary amount of enthusiasm and intensity, which is infectious. After the first ten minutes of his speech, King’s voice becomes stronger and more forceful. All else being equal, it is assumed that he withdrew from the content during the speech and began speaking from the heart. He was clear and honest when it came to discussing his life and interactions. He grows increasingly animated as he expresses his desire to be in America, and he even starts to communicate via hand gestures. In a number of times, he raises himself to his toes, exhibiting much more palpable energy for the course. Martin’s glamour is evident in the way he was able to keep up with the audience’s thought process throughout his speech. His posture and remarks made it evident that he pleaded with them to retain unity and quit depending on contempt and that this prompted them to work harder and less rigorously than previously. Because the stage obscures his lower torso, he seems to be standing on solid ground (Josiah & Oghenerho, 2015).
He demands respect by keeping an elevated stance with his jaw raised and his chest thrust outwards, as well as through teaching respect. His stance and the way he stares out into the audience transmit an unmistakable impression of conviction and power to the listeners. Garza, as previously said, is also very passionate about the things she talks about throughout her speech, which comes across in the manner she delivers her message (Clayton, 2018). She emphasizes her displeasure with the wrongful deaths of African Americans by police-authorized specialists in her speech, which may be read in its full here. She has been exceptionally delighted with the Black Lives Matter movement’s success, among other things. During her speech, Garza emphasized how the civil rights movement has resulted in police being held responsible for acts that have resulted in the deaths of unarmed African Americans while being detained by authorities. Garza seems to have some control over her own power, although to a limited extent.
The distinction between her and Martin Luther King Jr. is that she talks in a very low tone throughout her speech, while King often raises his voice throughout his presentation. Unfortunately, people of color who are not scared to support themselves have a terrible public image. The term “angry black women” has been used to characterize the group of people. Consequently, African American women in positions of authority or influence may adjust their manner to avoid seeming harsh, which may diminish the significance of what they have to say or induce them to talk excessively. Garza’s words may have conveyed a more tempered feeling of strength than they otherwise would have. In summary, the two addresses call attention to the financial disparities that African Americans face and call for required changes to be enacted in their particular networks.
Speech Location Impact
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” address at the Lincoln Memorial, which was broadcast across the globe on television (Josiah & Oghenerho, 2015). Following the March on Washington, D.C., this area had a tremendous effect on the overall direction of the Civil Rights Movement. Furthermore, the monument emphasizes Lincoln’s conviction in equality of respect and opportunity, which he often articulated throughout his political career. As a consequence of this achievement, African Americans were able to build their self-esteem and autonomy in an exciting context. When Alicia Garcia delivered her speech at a Rad Talk, the bulk of the crowd included both young and elderly individuals, indicating that the concept was a success. The Black Lives Matter movement’s target audience was young people (Clayton, 2018).
Audience Reaction Comparison and Contrast
The audience at Dr. King may react to Alicia Garza’s statements with varied degrees of sympathy. In terms of the ramifications of slavery, for example, Garza investigates issues such as the bad labor market, low pay, and police violence against African Americans. While multiple speakers address the different obstacles that African Americans faced during the 1960s, Dr. King’s speech and following lectures, as well as presentations by other African American pioneers, stand out. Aside from that, the two sessions gathered a large number of people from both white and black ethnic backgrounds, which was a delightful treat in and of itself. They are united by a wish to see society evolve into one that values respect and rights for all individuals rather than concentrating on those of a particular race or ethnic group.
Conclusion
Those in positions of power in such movements have a considerable influence on the notion of social movements as a whole. Other roles include, among other things, proposing activities, accumulating assets, resolving issues, and identifying prior arrangement areas where change should be accelerated. The strength of these movements, as well as the pioneers’ character, charisma, and vigor, have an influence on people who follow them and the direction in which their movements are moving them. At different eras and ages, a few African Americans have battled for African Americans’ civil rights. Consequently, civil rights crusades have resulted in considerable changes in how African Americans are regarded, definitely making them more recognized.
References
Bosi, L., Giugni, M., & Uba, K. (Eds.). (2016). The consequences of social movements. Cambridge University Press.
Clayton, D. M. (2018). Black lives matter and the civil rights movement: A comparative analysis of two social movements in the United States. Journal of Black Studies, 49(5), 448-480.
Josiah, U. E., & Oghenerho, G. (2015). Pragmatic Analyses of Martin Luther King (Jr)’s Speech:” I Have a Dream”–An Introspective Prognosis. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17), 43-52.
write