Analysis of Tesla’s Approach to Selling Electric Cars in Europe

Problem Definition:

Client and Industry: The client for this project is Tesla, Inc., a leading American electric vehicle (EV) and clean energy firm headquartered in California. The firm designs, develops, and manufactures electric vehicles, battery energy storage systems, and solar energy solutions. Tesla is pioneering sustainable mobility in the automobile and clean energy sectors. The primary audience for this project report is the Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of Tesla, who oversees strategic initiatives and market expansion efforts.

Situation and Complications: Tesla has successfully established itself as the market leader in electric vehicles in the United States, where, according to Mangram (2012), it has a strong presence and brand recognition. However, the European market presents new challenges and opportunities for Tesla. Environmental concerns, government incentives, and strong regional competition have accelerated EV adoption in Europe. Thus, Tesla’s European market share has declined.

Nonetheless, Stringham and Clark (2015) observed that the complications for Tesla in the European market include:

1. Increasing competition from established European automakers, who are now producing their own electric vehicles.
2. Regulatory complexities and differences in incentives for EV adoption across European countries.
3. Differences in consumer preferences and charging infrastructure development.

Objective: This project’s main goal is to identify and analyze Tesla’s European market challenges and opportunities and build a market entry plan to help the business reclaim and grow its market share.

Boundaries and Constraints: These include:

1. Financial limitations: Tesla must balance its investment in the European market with other global expansion efforts, research and development, and production capacity improvements.
2. Regulatory and legal considerations: Tesla must navigate the regulatory landscape in Europe, including variations in tax incentives, emissions standards, and import/export restrictions.
3. Supply chain and production capabilities: As Tesla expands into Europe, the company must ensure that it can meet the increased demand for its products without compromising quality or delivery times.
4. Cultural differences: Tesla must adapt its marketing and product offerings to suit the diverse preferences and expectations of European consumers.

Success Criteria: Stringham and Clark (2015) advised that the successful resolution to the problem can be measured and judged against the following criteria:

1. Increased market share: Tesla’s market share in the European EV market should grow, demonstrating the effectiveness of its entry strategy.
2. Improved brand recognition: Enhanced awareness and positive perception of Tesla among European consumers, resulting in increased sales and customer loyalty.
3. Competitive advantage: Tesla’s ability to differentiate itself from its competitors and capitalize on unique selling points in the European market.

Scalability and adaptability: The market entry strategy should allow Tesla to scale its operations in Europe and adapt to evolving market conditions and consumer preferences

Commentary for Initial Logic Tree:

Summary

Tesla has a strong presence and brand recognition in the United States, but the European market presents new challenges and opportunities for Tesla. The initial logic tree breaks down the factors affecting Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe into four layers: competitive, regulatory, consumer, and production landscapes. The competitive landscape is a crucial factor in Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe. Established European automakers have started producing their own electric vehicles, and regional competitors are also emerging. These competitors could potentially challenge Tesla’s market share in the region.The regulatory landscape is another important factor affecting Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe. Variations in tax incentives, emissions standards, and import/export restrictions in different European countries could pose regulatory challenges for Tesla. The consumer landscape also presents challenges for Tesla in Europe. The adoption of electric vehicles might vary depending on consumer preferences and the availability of charging infrastructure. The manufacturing environment may potentially have an impact on Tesla’s European market entry plan. Supply chain limitations and production capacity constraints could affect the company’s ability to meet the demand for its products in the region.

Introduction:

Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe is an important area of focus for the company. Tesla is well-known in the US, but Europe brings new challenges and opportunities. We will use credible industry and academic literature, facts, and theory to expand on the logic tree and provide additional insights into Tesla’s European market entry strategy.

Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape is a crucial factor in Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe. Established European automakers, such as BMW, Audi, and Mercedes-Benz, have started producing their own electric vehicles. European automakers launched 40 new electric vehicles in 2020, compared to 17 in the US (Mathews et al. 2020). European automakers intend to launch over 100 electrified cars by 2025 (Mathews et al. 2020). These rivals may threaten Tesla’s regional market share.

Furthermore, emerging regional competitors, such as Chinese automaker NIO, are also entering the European market. NIO is known for its advanced battery technology and has gained a strong following in China. The company has announced plans to expand into Europe in 2021 (Person, 2022). This could potentially impact Tesla’s market share in the region, as NIO offers competitive pricing and a strong brand reputation in the electric vehicle market.

Regulatory Landscape:

The regulatory landscape is another important factor affecting Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe. Variations in tax incentives, emissions standards, and import/export restrictions in different European countries could pose regulatory challenges for Tesla. For example, the Netherlands provides generous incentives for electric vehicle owners, such as exemption from road tax and parking fees. Tesla may struggle in the UK due to proposals to decrease electric vehicle incentives (Rook 2022).The EU also requires automakers to lower their vehicles’ average CO2 emissions. Failure to meet these standards could result in hefty fines for automakers (Rook 2022). Tesla must comply with European vehicle manufacturing and sales standards despite its zero-emission automobiles.

Consumer Landscape:

Challenges for Tesla in Europe also stem from the consumer environment. The adoption of electric vehicles might vary depending on consumer preferences and the availability of charging infrastructure. For example, in Germany, consumers are more likely to purchase electric vehicles with a longer range, while in the United Kingdom, consumers prioritize affordability (Jingchao 2021).

Charging infrastructure is another important consideration for Tesla. While the company has built a strong network of Superchargers across Europe, there is still a need for more charging stations in certain regions. According to a report by Jingchao (2021), the lack of public charging infrastructure is one of the biggest barriers to electric vehicle adoption in Europe

Production Landscape:

In the same vein, the production landscape could also impact Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe. Supply chain limitations and production capacity constraints could affect the company’s ability to meet the demand for its products in the region. According to a report by Automotive News Europe, Tesla is facing supply chain challenges in Europe, as the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted global supply chains (Jingchao 2021).

Insights Gained

The initial logic tree provides a comprehensive overview of the factors affecting Tesla’s market entry strategy in Europe. It highlights the importance of understanding the competitive, regulatory, consumer, and production landscapes in the region. By breaking down each factor into its component parts, we can identify specific challenges and opportunities that Tesla may face in the European market. Using this initial logic tree as a guide, we can now produce a more complete logic tree of the drivers of the problem solution to see potential pathways to solve the problem.

The European electric vehicle (EV) market faces three key challenges: increasing competition, regulatory complexities, and differences in consumer preferences and charging infrastructure development. This commentary will draw on theory, academic literature, and industry trends to provide insight into these challenges.

Automakers have faced tremendous rivalry in the European EV market in recent years. Competition has increased as European automakers and Chinese and other foreign companies enter the EV industry. The presence of regional players with strong brand recognition and innovative business models is also driving competition in the market. According to the Porter’s Five Forces framework, competitive rivalry is one of the five forces that shape industry competition. The increasing number of players in the market has intensified the competition, resulting in price wars, reduced profitability, and decreased innovation (Isabelle et al. 2020). As a result, automakers need to innovate constantly and differentiate themselves to remain competitive in the market.

Despite the intense competition, established automakers have certain advantages that can help them offset the threat of new entrants. Their strong brand recognition and loyal customer base provide a significant advantage over new players (Song 2022). Established automakers have already established dealer networks and sales channels that new players need to build from scratch. In the early stages of EV brand building, government financing and subsidies are essential. To sustain market share, established automakers must innovate and cultivate customer loyalty. The literature suggests that building a brand image and customer loyalty is crucial for success in the automotive industry, particularly in the EV market where trust and reliability are essential attributes of a successful EV brand. Thus, established automakers must adjust to market shifts and use their strengths to compete.

Variations in EV buyer tax incentives complicate European EV market regulation. Studies have suggested that tax incentives have a significant impact on consumer behavior and purchasing decisions, making them a crucial factor in the adoption of EVs (Jingchao 2021). Tax incentives can fluctuate and vary by country, which can confuse buyers and automakers. Tax incentives should be reliable, long-term, and focused on the most cost-effective technology (Jingchao 2021). Tax incentives should not incentivize expensive EVs over cheaper ones, either.

Differences in emissions standards and regulations, as well as import/export restrictions and tariffs, are also factors contributing to the regulatory complexities in the European EV market Policymakers must create a uniform regulatory framework that promotes EV adoption while addressing stakeholder concerns to overcome these issues. This may include incentives for cleaner technology development, EV subsidies, and higher emissions requirements. According to Muratori and others (2021), policymakers need to ensure that the regulatory framework is transparent, predictable, and consistent across different countries to encourage investment and innovation in the European EV market.

The differences in consumer preferences also pose a challenge for the European EV market. This difficulty is caused by consumer views toward EVs, model and feature choices, and purchasing power. McKinsey found that customer preferences and views about EVs varied greatly across Europe, with some nations indicating strong interest and others low. In nations with low EV interest, consumers may need incentives to buy EVs (Muratori et al. 2021). Moreover, differences in EV models and features preferred by consumers pose a challenge for automakers. The preferences of consumers in different countries for EVs vary depending on their cultural background, geography, and economic conditions. For instance, consumers in urban areas may prefer smaller and more affordable EV models, while those in rural areas may prefer larger and more powerful models. To address this challenge, automakers need to develop EV models that cater to the preferences of consumers in different countries.

Another factor contributing to the differences in consumer preferences is the availability of EV charging infrastructure. A study by Muratori and others (2021) found that the availability of charging infrastructure is a critical factor in determining the adoption of EVs. Countries with a higher number of charging stations per capita have higher EV adoption rates. This indicates that investment in charging infrastructure is crucial for the widespread adoption of EVs. Also, the development of charging infrastructure can also create job opportunities and stimulate economic growth in the region.

Governments can play a crucial role in incentivizing the development of charging infrastructure through funding and regulatory support. For instance, Zhang and others (2014) opined that governments can help in various aspects such as technology development, providing financial impetus, all the in the quest of enhancing infrastructure related to EVs. Moreover, governments can also provide subsidies and tax incentives to encourage the adoption of EVs, particularly in countries with lower levels of interest in EVs (Zhang et al. 2014).

In conclusion, the European EV market faces several challenges, including increasing competition, regulatory complexities, and differences in consumer preferences and charging infrastructure development. Policymakers, automakers, and stakeholders must work together to solve these issues. Policymakers must standardize regulations to promote EV adoption while resolving stakeholder concerns. They also need to promote EV adoption by subsidizing charging infrastructure and offering tax advantages. Automakers need to innovate constantly and differentiate themselves to remain competitive in the market. They must also design EVs to suit international tastes. Additionally, they need to build a brand image and customer loyalty to maintain their market share. EV innovation and expansion in Europe face many challenges. Stakeholders can encourage the adoption of EVs and contribute to a more sustainable future by addressing these issues and cooperating.

Prioritization of solution pathways

Tesla, a leading electric car manufacturer, has struggled to enter the European market due to stringent regulations, strong competition, and diverse consumer preferences. Tesla must identify and prioritize routes to a strong European presence to fix this. With so many options, it can be hard to choose. One effective approach to prioritize the potential pathways is by using a prioritization matrix. The prioritization matrix consists of two main factors, namely impact and feasibility (Banduka et al., 2020). Impact assesses the solution’s prospective outcome, whereas feasibility gauges its implementation simplicity. Each prospective pathway is scored 1–5 for both characteristics, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest. 1 is little impact while 5 is big impact. Each pathway’s impact score considers sales, brand awareness, and customer satisfaction. It considers risks like higher expenses and regulations. If Tesla adds charging stations across Europe, the impact score will weigh user convenience against increasing costs and regulations.

The feasibility score assesses the ease of adopting each approach, including resource availability, solution complexity, and stakeholder support (Banduka et al., 2020). If Tesla decides to develop a manufacturing factory in Europe, the feasibility score will evaluate land and labor availability, and the complexity of building a new plant and acquiring permits and approvals. Each potential pathway’s ultimate score is obtained by multiplying its impact score by its feasibility score. Tesla will prioritize pathways with higher final scores.

To address the problem of Tesla’s market entry in Europe, it is crucial to consider the situation and complications that the company faces. Tesla leads the US market with excellent brand recognition and dedicated customers. However, the European market presents new challenges and opportunities that Tesla needs to address.

Pathway 1

One potential solution pathway is to increase Tesla’s marketing efforts in Europe. Tesla can attract European customers prepared to pay more for advanced technology and performance by highlighting these aspects. Due to growing competition from European automakers making electric vehicles, this strategy may be ineffective.

Pathway 2.

Another potential solution is to develop a wider range of electric vehicle models that cater to the diverse preferences of European consumers. European trends include smaller, cheaper urban-driving vehicles. New model development is costly and may take time to build production and supply chain capabilities.

Pathway 3.

Another option is developing charging infrastructure. Tesla might cooperate with local governments and other companies to win financial and regulatory backing for charging station shortages. However, legislative complexity and EV adoption incentives throughout Europe may make this method difficult.

Pathway 4.

Improving production capabilities by establishing a local manufacturing plant in Europe is another potential solution pathway. This could speed delivery and reduce supply chain and import/export constraints. This method demands considerable financial inputs and effort to establish.

Pathway 5.

Finally, Tesla may collaborate with other firms to extend its charging station network and enhance renewable energy access. This could help Tesla stand out in Europe. Cultural and regulatory variations may complicate this approach.

Tesla’s financial, regulatory, legal, supply chain, and cultural constraints must be considered while choosing the best solution. Market share, brand recognition, and competitive advantage indicate market entry strategy success. The market entry approach must be scalable and adaptive to changing market conditions and consumer preferences.

Prioritization matrix table for Tesla’s market entry problem in Europe

Commentary of the prioritization matrix

The prioritization matrix helps assess Tesla’s European market entry options. The matrix evaluates each solution pathway’s impact and feasibility, providing a more complete assessment of its prospective outcomes. The solution pathway with the highest final score in the prioritization matrix is improving production capabilities. This solution pathway has a high impact and feasibility score, indicating that it can have a big result and be implemented easily. Tesla can improve customer satisfaction and loyalty by opening a European manufacturing site to alleviate supply chain constraints, import/export restrictions, and delivery times. Tesla can also meet European demand by investing in production. This can help Tesla regain market share and grow in Europe.

The prioritization matrix’s second-highest solution pathway is charging infrastructure. This solution pathway has a high effect score and a high feasibility score, indicating that it can produce a big result and be implemented easily. Tesla’s European market debut is hindered by a lack of charging infrastructure. Tesla can solve this problem by investing in charging infrastructure, especially in underserved areas. Charging infrastructure may be made more accessible by working with local governments to get financing and regulatory support (Al-Hanahi et al., 2021). Customer satisfaction and Tesla’s European market share may increase.

The prioritization matrix’s third-best solution is Tesla’s marketing. This solution pathway has a high effect score but a lower feasibility score, suggesting it could have a big influence but be harder to implement. Tesla can offer its superior technology and performance to European consumers ready to pay a premium for these benefits. Tesla can gain European market share by targeting the relevant audience and raising brand awareness (Al-Hanahi et al., 2021). However, marketing is expensive, and Tesla may struggle to adapt its techniques to European consumers’ various preferences and expectations.

The fourth-highest scoring solution pathway in the prioritization matrix is developing a wider range of EV models. This solution pathway has a high effect score but a lower feasibility score, meaning it might have a big influence but be harder to implement (Al-Hanahi et al., 2021). Tesla can satisfy European consumers’ different tastes by making urban-friendly EVs smaller and cheaper. This might boost Tesla’s European market share, especially in smaller automobile markets. However, according to Al-Hanahi et al. (2021), developing new EV models is time-consuming and expensive, and Tesla may have trouble modifying its production capacities.

Collaborating with other companies scored lowest in the prioritisation matrix. This solution pathway may be easier to implement but less effective due to its lower impact score and higher feasibility score. Collaboration can grow Tesla’s charging station network and enhance access to renewable energy, improving consumer happiness and market share. This solution pathway may not separate Tesla from its competitors, and the advantages may not warrant the cost.

Work Plan

To ensure that the analysis of the prioritized solution pathways was comprehensive and systematic, there was development of a workplan that outlines the research questions and analyses for each solution pathway. The workplan was structured in a table format that allowed for clear identification of the research questions, hypotheses, data sources, and analysis techniques for each solution pathway. By breaking down the workplan in this manner, there was a possibility of establishing a clear framework for testing each solution pathway and determining its effectiveness in addressing Tesla’s market entry problem in Europe. The table provided below summarizes the workplan developed for each solution pathway.

Solution Pathway 1: Improving Production Capabilities

Solution Pathway 2: Investing in Charging Infrastructure

Solution pathway 3: Increasing Marketing Efforts

Solution pathway 4: Developing a Wider Range of EV Models

Solution pathway 5: Collaborating with other companies

Each solution pathway has a detailed workplan to evaluate logic tree hypotheses. Research questions led our solution pathway testing in the workplan. These study questions were aimed to help in understanding Tesla’s European market entry dilemma and find solutions. Each solution pathway had research questions, hypotheses, data sources, and analytic methods. We organized this information into a structured workplan table to track our progress and ensure rigorous and systematic assessments. Market research papers, customer surveys, and Tesla data were used for the analyses. Online databases, industry groups, and Tesla’s data systems provided these data sources. Statistical, regression, and market segmentation analyses to analyse data were employed. These methods helped in finding data trends and test the hypothesis about Tesla’s European market entry difficulty.

References

Al-Hanahi, B., Ahmad, I., Habibi, D., & Masoum, M. A. (2021). Charging infrastructure for commercial electric vehicles: Challenges and future works. IEEE Access, 9, 121476-121492.

Banduka, N., Aleksić, A., Komatina, N., Aljinović, A., & Tadić, D. (2020). The prioritization of failures within the automotive industry: The two-step failure mode and effect analysis integrated approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 234(12), 1559-1570.

Isabelle, D., Horak, K., McKinnon, S. and Palumbo, C., 2020. Is Porter’s Five Forces Framework Still Relevant? A study of the capital/labour intensity continuum via mining and IT industries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(6).

Jingchao, P., 2021. Development marketing strategy of Tesla Motor (on the example of China).

Mangram, M. E. (2012). The Globalization of Tesla Motors: a strategic marketing plan analysis. Journal of Strategic Marketing 20(4), 289-312.

Matthews, T., Hirve, M., Pan, Y., Dang, D., Rawar, E. and Daim, T.U., 2020. Tesla Energy. Innovation Management in the Intelligent World: Cases and Tools, pp.233-249.

Muratori, M., Alexander, M., Arent, D., Bazilian, M., Cazzola, P., Dede, E.M., Farrell, J., Gearhart, C., Greene, D., Jenn, A. and Keyser, M., 2021. The rise of electric vehicles— 2020 status and future expectations. Progress in Energy, 3(2), p.022002.

Person (2022) China’s NIO to make power products for Europe at its first overseas plant, Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- transportation/chinas-nio-make-power-products-europe-its-first-overseas-plant-2022-08- 01/ (Accessed: April 13, 2023).

Rook, A., 2022. Driving Factors: The Effects of State Tax Incentives on the Market Penetration of Electric Vehicles.

Song, J., 2022, March. Quantitative Analysis of Tesla Inc. in the Context of the Covid-19. In 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022) (pp. 662-666). Atlantis Press.

Strinham , E. P. Mille, J. K., & Clark, J. R. (2015). Overcoming barriers to entry in an established industry: Tesla Motors. California Management Review, 57(4), pp. 85-103.

Zhang, X., Xie, J., Rao, R. and Liang, Y., 2014. Policy incentives for the adoption of electric vehicles across countries. Sustainability, 6(11), pp.8056-8078.