Analysis of Operations Strategies of KPMG

Introduction

KPMG is a leading multinational professional services firm providing audit, tax, and advisory services to a wide range of clients across various industries. The purpose of this case study is to examine KPMG’s strategic operations management by examining the difficulties the company has encountered and proposing solutions. KPMG works in a highly competitive and fluid market, shaped by factors like new regulations, technological developments, and shifting client expectations. These variables have created serious challenges for KPMG, necessitating a thorough review of the company’s operational procedures and approaches. This report’s key goals are to assess how well KPMG’s operations add value and meet client needs, pinpoint problem areas, and suggest solutions for bettering operational performance. The goal of this report is to provide helpful insights and actionable recommendations for the future success of KPMG by looking into key parts of its operations, such as the transformation process, innovation management, and sustainability practices. The introductory section provides context on what will be examined later in the study while creating an overarching framework. Using management tools in subsequent sections, things are now, and suggest improvements to our core operations will be analyzed. KPMG’s progress towards better ethics and responsibility practices as well as advancing sustainability aims will take center stage during its transition to a Circular Economy. The last part of the report is where results will be consolidated from analyses as well as draw appropriate conclusions and make recommendations. By incorporating insights from the case study into their strategy and operations planning processes, KPMG seeks to achieve greater efficiency and long-term success against market uncertainties

Section 2: Transformation Process

KPMG knows how crucial it is to adapt quickly to the ever-changing business environment. The company has undergone a process of transformation to improve its productivity, customer service, and ability to compete in the market. In this piece, we’ll take a high-level look at KPMG’s transformation process and discuss its main features and goals (Simpson et al., 2019).

2.1 Current Operational Performance and Value Addition

Evaluating KPMG’s existing operational performance and its efficacy in providing value and meeting customer expectations is the first step in reviewing the company’s transformation process. KPMG can provide its clients with excellent service because it is flexible and uses technology effectively (Pätäri et al., 2016). The company’s global reach and deep expertise in the field allow it to offer bespoke, all-encompassing services. However, KPMG can improve its operational performance in several respects, allowing it to deliver more value to its client’s businesses.

2.2 Analysis of Transformation Process Using Management Tools

KPMG’s operational performance can be thoroughly analyzed with the use of the right management tools. These instruments help pinpoint strong and weak spots, as well as opportunities for streamlining operations. Key performance indicators (KPIs), value stream mapping, and process mapping are all examples of popular management tools. Insights into KPMG’s operational processes and a basis for data-driven recommendations can be gained through the use of these tools (Sancak 2023). First, Through the use of process mapping, KPMG can see how the many steps of the transformation fit together. KPMG can locate bottlenecks, duplications, and optimization opportunities by outlining the processes involved in client engagement, service delivery, and knowledge management. KPMG can use the data to eliminate waste, cut down on wait times, and boost productivity. Key performance indicators are another option. For example, KPIs such as client satisfaction scores, project completion rates, and knowledge-sharing metrics can provide insights into the effectiveness and efficiency of the transformation process. KPMG uses these key performance indicators to assess its performance, spot opportunities for growth, and compare its results to those of its competitors. Furthermore, management tools can be used to evaluate its efficiency and pinpoint areas for development. The McKinsey 7S Framework is one such instrument; it measures how well everything in an organization fits together (Demir and Kocaoglu., 2019). The application of the framework to KPMG emphasizes the significance of coordinating the firm’s strategy, structure, systems, skills, style, employees, and common values to facilitate the transition. In addition, KPMG’s transformation’s internal and external elements can be evaluated using a SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats). This report highlights KPMG’s strengths, shortcomings, growth possibilities, and challenges that could derail the transformation effort.

2.3 Data and Information to Support Analysis

Data and facts must be added to back up the conversation and guarantee that the analysis is based on solid evidence. KPMG’s financial statements, internal reports, and other operational data can shed light on the company’s strengths and weaknesses (Bakken, n.d). KPMG’s performance may be compared to that of its rivals, and best practices in the sector can be identified, with the help of industry benchmarks and data from market research. Further insight into KPMG’s change can be gained through qualitative data like staff comments, customer satisfaction surveys, and case studies. These resources can provide insight into the efficiency of ongoing efforts and point out any obstacles that may stand in the way of full realization.

2.4 Recommendations for Improving the Transformation Process

Several recommendations for boosting KPMG’s operational performance and streamlining its transformation process can be made based on the study performed.

2.4.1 Enhancing Agility and Flexibility

KPMG needs to work on increasing its responsiveness and adaptability to market shifts. This can be accomplished by investing in research and development (R&D), encouraging staff to think creatively, and promoting a culture of innovation. To further streamline operations, improve decision-making, and provide cutting-edge solutions for customers, KPMG should adopt cutting-edge technology like artificial intelligence and data analytics.

2.4.2 Strengthening Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing

KPMG should encourage teamwork and the exchange of information to fully capitalize on its worldwide reach and depth of experience (Mubako, 2019). Fostering a culture of collaboration and improving the organization’s collective intelligence can be accomplished by encouraging cross-functional collaboration, supporting regular knowledge-sharing meetings, and deploying technological platforms for seamless communication.

2.4.3 Investing in Employee Development and Training

KPMG should invest in the growth and training of its personnel because they are the company’s primary agents of change. Employees can gain the information and abilities they need to drive the transformation process if the company provides chances for professional advancement, provides specialized training programs, and promotes a culture of learning. To further ensure that KPMG’s workforce is both motivated and equipped to participate in the change, the firm should implement performance management systems that link individual goals to the organization’s strategic objectives.

2.4.4 Continuous Improvement and Process Optimization

To maximize productivity, KPMG should encourage a mindset of constant tweaking and innovation. KPMG can improve operations, lower costs, and provide services more effectively because of its dedication to routinely assessing existing processes, finding bottlenecks, and applying best practices. By eliminating inefficiencies and streamlining processes, Lean Six Sigma may boost productivity across the board.

2.4.5 Change Management and Communication

Successful transformation requires effective change management and communication strategies. KPMG should proactively manage resistance to change, provide clear communication channels, and engage stakeholders at all levels of the organization (Abbott et al., 2023). By involving employees in the transformation process, addressing their concerns, and communicating the benefits of the changes, KPMG can foster a sense of ownership and commitment, facilitating a smoother transition.

2.5 Implementation Timeline

Short-term implementation strategies for the recommended improvements in KPMG’s transformation process should focus on quick wins and low-hanging fruit. These initiatives can be implemented within a relatively short time frame, typically within six to twelve months. Examples of short-term strategies include:

• Pilot Projects: Select a specific area or department within KPMG to pilot the recommended changes. This approach allows for testing and refinement before implementing the improvements organization-wide.
• Continuous Improvement Initiatives: Establish a culture of continuous improvement by encouraging employees to identify and implement small-scale changes in their day-to-day work. This can be achieved through structured improvement frameworks like Lean Six Sigma or Agile methodologies.
• To help employees adjust to the changes and participate in the transformation process, companies should invest in training and development programs. Workshops on process optimization, tech adoption, and customer-focused service are all examples.

Larger scale changes that call for greater time, money, and organizational commitment should be the primary emphasis of long-term implementation strategies. Projects like these might take anywhere from one to three years to complete.

• Digitalization and Automation of Procedures: To save time and effort, businesses should invest in cutting-edge technology like robotic process automation (RPA), artificial intelligence (AI), and data analytics. Planning, allocating resources, and working together across departments are all essential to the success of this long-term endeavor.
• Organizational reorganization should involve delegating authority to lower-level workers, encouraging teamwork across departments, and adopting agile methods of production. A gradual approach is needed for this transformation, one that coincides with strategic benchmarks and change management initiatives.
• Foster an atmosphere of creativity, continual learning, and adaptability to drive a cultural revolution. To achieve the intended transformation, it is necessary to establish new norms, values, and behaviors. Changing a company’s culture takes time, and it helps to have the backing of upper management and constant lines of communication.

Timelines for these plans’ implementation should take into account the organization’s capabilities, its resources, and the intricacy of each suggestion. KPMG may more efficiently drive its transformation process, boosting operational efficiency, client happiness, and overall competitiveness, by embracing both short-term and long-term implementation strategies.

Section 3: Innovation Management

3.1 Overview of KPMG’s Approach to Innovation Management

The professional services sector relies heavily on innovation to maintain development, competitiveness, and long-term success. KPMG values innovation highly and has devised a strategy to encourage a dynamic environment that rewards originality, refinement, and initiative (Allio, 2021). This section discusses the importance of innovation management at KPMG and provides an outline of the company’s approach to it.

3.2 Current Innovation Management Capability and its Impact on Organizational Performance

Assessing the effect on KPMG’s performance is essential for gauging the current state of innovation management. KPMG has a solid history of providing cutting-edge solutions to its clients by combining cutting-edge technology with deep domain knowledge. Organizational advantages include responsiveness to market shifts, foresight into emerging trends, and the creation of customer-specific solutions. However, KPMG may still have room to improve several aspects of its innovation management. This includes advocating for a more organized and methodical approach to innovation, creating a culture that values and rewards original thought, and efficiently managing the innovation process to turn concepts into products.

3.3 Analysis of Innovation Management Using Management Tools

Management techniques can be used to evaluate KPMG’s innovation management and find places where it can be strengthened. The Innovation Maturity Model is one such instrument, as it evaluates a company’s capacity for innovation across multiple dimensions, including strategy, culture, process, and resources. KPMG can gain insight into its innovation maturity level and problem areas by applying this strategy. The Open Innovation methodology can also be used to evaluate KPMG’s work with clients, academic institutions, and technology suppliers to stimulate innovation (Faccia et al., 2022). Improving KPMG’s innovation management will require analyzing the efficacy of its open innovation efforts and identifying potential for additional collaboration.

3.4 Data and Information to Support Analysis

KPMG’s innovation management study might benefit from the addition of pertinent data and information. Insights into the efficacy of ongoing innovation activities can be gleaned through in-house resources such as innovation project reports, employee surveys, and performance indicators. Market research, competitor analysis, and customer feedback are all examples of external sources that can shed light on the state of innovation in the sector as well as customer expectations (Clarke and Toal., n.d). The ability of KPMG to come up with new ideas, create prototypes, and bring those concepts to market may all be gleaned from studying the firm’s case studies of successful innovation initiatives. Using these metrics and resources, we can get a fuller picture of KPMG’s innovation management prowess.

3.5 Recommendations for Enhancing Innovation Management

Several suggestions for improving KPMG’s innovation management competence and fueling organizational growth may be made based on the findings.

3.5.1 Establish an Innovation Strategy and Roadmap

KPMG needs to establish an innovation strategy that is coherent with the firm’s larger goals. Priorities for innovation, targeted markets, and resource allocation should all be laid forth in this plan. KPMG should also develop a plan for the implementation of innovative projects, including a schedule, key milestones, and clear objectives.

3.5.2 Foster a Culture of Innovation

KPMG needs to encourage and reward creative problem-solving at all levels of the company if it wants to create an innovative culture. To this end, companies might implement programs like innovation challenges, idea-creation platforms, and employee appreciation schemes (Prud’homme van Reine, 2022). Moreover, the formation of cross-functional teams and the promotion of collaboration between different departments can inspire innovation and the sharing of unique points of view.

3.5.3 Improve Innovation Process and Governance

KPMG needs to take a more methodical and organized approach to managing the creative process. Among these is the establishment of distinct phases and entryways for the creation, appraisal, development, and commercialization of new ideas (Lăzăroiu and Harrison., 2021). Effective decision-making, resource allocation, and risk management must be maintained throughout the innovation process, and this calls for the establishment of a solid governance framework. An integral part of this structure is a group or individuals tasked with managing and propelling innovation projects forward.

3.5.4 Enhance Collaboration and Open Innovation

KPMG needs to improve its attempts to collaborate with other parties if it wants to increase its innovation skills. One way to do this is through forming strategic alliances with research institutions, universities, and new businesses to gain access to innovative resources. KPMG can access a larger pool of resources and develop new ideas more quickly if it adopts an open innovation ecosystem. Internal and external stakeholders can be brought together and encouraged to share their knowledge and ideas through the use of innovation hubs, co-creation platforms, and frequent knowledge-sharing events.

3.5.5 Invest in Innovation Infrastructure and Resources

KPMG needs to set aside funds for innovation initiatives and invest in necessary resources like technology infrastructure and innovation labs. KPMG may foster a culture of innovation by equipping its staff with the means to test out novel concepts, try out cutting-edge tech, and spread that knowledge throughout the company. Training programs and workshops can be a part of this, as can encouraging a general atmosphere of lifelong learning among workers.

3.5.6 Measure and Track Innovation Performance

KPMG should set key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics to measure and track innovation performance, as was described above, to ensure the efficacy of innovation activities (Manes‐Rossi and Nicolo’., 2022. The number of new ideas, number of new services commercialized, number of new offerings sold, revenue from new products, and customer satisfaction with creative solutions are all examples of possible indicators. KPMG can evaluate the results of its innovation activities and make well-informed judgments about how to improve innovation management by keeping a close eye on and reporting on these measures.

3.6 Implementation Timeline

There needs to be meticulous planning and execution of the suggestions for improving innovation management. Short-term goals, such as encouraging a culture of creativity and improving teamwork, can be accomplished in a few months. Improvements to the innovation process and governance are examples of medium-term efforts that can be carried out over six months to a year. Spending more on things like innovation infrastructure and resources is an example of a long-term plan that may need to be phased in over a few years. The innovation management strategy will need to be evaluated and tweaked regularly to keep up with changing market conditions and customer preferences.

3.7 Summary

To sum up, KPMG’s growth, competitiveness, and long-term performance in the professional services market are all directly attributable to KPMG’s innovation management. KPMG’s current innovation management capabilities were evaluated, analyzed with management tools, and included with pertinent data and information, allowing us to pinpoint problem areas and propose solutions to strengthen innovation management. The suggestions cover a wide range of topics, such as creating an innovation strategy and roadmap, encouraging an innovative culture, refining the innovation process and governance, strengthening collaboration and open innovation, funding innovation infrastructure and resources, and monitoring and analyzing innovation outcomes. KPMG will be able to improve its innovation skills, provide more value to its clients, and keep its position as an industry leader if it follows the recommendations and sticks to the established schedule. KPMG must encourage a spirit of exploration, investigation, and modification if it is to succeed in its commitment to innovation. KPMG can stay ahead of the curve, implement significant change, and build durable competitive advantages thanks to its culture of innovation, employee empowerment, and strategic alliances.

Section 4: Ethical, Responsible, and Sustainable Operations

4.1 Importance of Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability

In today’s business landscape, ethics, responsibility, and sustainability have become crucial considerations for organizations. Ethical operations ensure that businesses operate with integrity, fairness, and transparency. Responsibility refers to an organization’s obligation to consider the interests of its stakeholders, including employees, customers, communities, and the environment (Kaptein, M., 2020).

Finally, Sustainability focuses on meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

4.1.1 Stakeholder Interests

Ethics, responsibility, and sustainability require organizations to understand and address the interests of various stakeholders. KPMG’s stakeholders include its employees, clients, investors, regulatory bodies, and the communities in which it operates. Meeting stakeholder expectations builds trust, enhances reputation, and contributes to long-term success.

4.1.2 Challenges in Ethical, Responsible, and Sustainable Operations

Organizations face various challenges when it comes to ethical, responsible, and sustainable operations. These challenges include balancing short-term financial goals with long-term sustainability objectives, navigating complex supply chains, ensuring fair employment practices, managing environmental impacts, and complying with evolving regulations and standards.

4.2 Current State of Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability at KPMG

To evaluate KPMG’s performance in terms of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability, a comprehensive analysis is required.

4.2.1 Ethical Practices

KPMG has established a code of conduct and ethics that guides its employees’ behavior and decision-making. The company emphasizes integrity, independence, and confidentiality in its engagements. However, recent scandals in the industry have raised concerns about ethical lapses, requiring KPMG to reassess and strengthen its ethical practices.

4.2.2 Responsibility towards Stakeholders

KPMG is aware of its duty to its constituents. The organization is committed to providing its employees with a safe and welcoming workplace that values diversity and encourages and rewards individuality. KPMG places a premium on its staff and is committed to their personal and professional progress. When it comes to doing right by their customers, KPMG is dedicated to providing services that not only live up to but exceed their standards (Zhou et al., 2020). To protect its clients’ interests and maintain its credibility, the firm always operates by the highest ethical standards and legal mandates. KPMG also understands the need of giving back to the neighborhoods where its offices are located. The corporation promotes employee volunteerism and gives back to the community through its corporate social responsibility activities. The end goal of these actions is to have a constructive effect on and strengthen ties to the local community. KPMG understands the significance of reducing its impact on the environment in terms of sustainability. The business has made a promise to cut back on waste, pollution, and fossil fuel use (Hoang Tien et al., 2019.) Despite these efforts, KPMG faces challenges in fully integrating ethics, responsibility, and sustainability into its operations. KPMG could have difficulties in implementing sustainability and responsibility principles.

4.3 Challenges and Opportunities in Sustainability and Responsibility

While striving for sustainability and responsibility, KPMG may encounter challenges that require careful consideration and proactive measures(McKenna et al., 2022). Some of the common challenges include:

4.3.1 Changing Regulatory Landscape

The regulatory landscape surrounding sustainability and responsibility is continuously evolving. KPMG should stay updated on emerging regulations and standards related to ESG reporting and compliance. By proactively adapting to these changes, KPMG can mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities.

4.3.2 Stakeholder Expectations

Stakeholders, including clients, employees, investors, and the public, are increasingly demanding organizations demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and responsibility. KPMG should closely monitor stakeholder expectations and engage in meaningful dialogue to understand their concerns and priorities. By aligning its sustainability efforts with stakeholder expectations, KPMG can strengthen its reputation and maintain its competitive edge.

4.3.3 Integration of Sustainability into Business Strategy

Integrating sustainability and responsibility into the core business strategy may require a shift in mindset and organizational culture. KPMG should foster a culture that values sustainability and encourages innovative thinking to embed sustainability considerations across its operations. This can involve engaging employees, providing training and education on sustainability topics, and incentivizing sustainable behaviors and outcomes.

4.3.4 Measuring and Evaluating Impact

Measuring the impact of sustainability and responsibility initiatives can be challenging, as it often involves qualitative and subjective assessments. KPMG should develop robust measurement frameworks and methodologies to quantify the outcomes and impacts of its sustainability efforts. This can include conducting lifecycle assessments, social impact assessments, and stakeholder surveys to gather relevant data and feedback.

4.4 Recommendations for Enhancing Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability

To enhance KPMG’s performance in ethics, responsibility, and sustainability, the following recommendations are proposed:

4.4.1 Strengthen Ethical Practices

• Enhance ethics training programs to raise awareness among employees about ethical standards and provide guidance on ethical decision-making.
• Establish mechanisms for reporting ethical concerns, ensuring anonymity and protection for whistleblowers.
• Regularly review and update the code of conduct to align with changing ethical landscapes and industry best practices.
  • Enhance Stakeholder Engagement

• Conduct regular stakeholder engagement exercises to understand their evolving expectations and concerns.
• Develop transparent communication channels to foster dialogue with stakeholders and address their feedback.
• Establish formal mechanisms for stakeholder involvement in decision-making processes, such as advisory committees or focus groups.

4.4.3 Embrace Sustainable Practices

• Conduct a comprehensive environmental impact assessment to identify areas for improvement and set ambitious sustainability targets.
• Invest in renewable energy sources, energy-efficient technologies, and waste management systems to reduce environmental impacts.
• Integrate sustainability considerations into procurement practices, promoting responsible sourcing and supply chain transparency.

4.4.4 Embed Responsible Business Practices

• Implement diversity and inclusion programs to foster a diverse workforce and ensure equal opportunities for all employees.
• Strengthen human rights due diligence processes throughout the supply chain, ensuring fair labor practices and responsible sourcing.
• Engage in partnerships with non-governmental organizations and industry peers to collectively address social and environmental challenges.

4.5 Implementation Timeline

The implementation of sustainability and responsibility initiatives should be phased and aligned with the organization’s priorities and resources. Short-term actions, such as establishing a sustainability strategy and setting diversity targets, can be initiated within the first year. Medium-term actions, such as strengthening environmental management systems and enhancing diversity and inclusion initiatives, can be implemented over two to three years. Long-term actions, such as embedding sustainable practices throughout the value chain and advancing ethical governance, should be part of an ongoing commitment.

4.6 summary

Sustainability and responsibility are crucial aspects of KPMG’s operations and overall business strategy. By assessing its current sustainability practices, analyzing them using management tools, and incorporating stakeholder perspectives, KPMG can identify areas for improvement and develop a comprehensive strategy to enhance its sustainability and responsibility performance (Kücükgül et al., 2022). By adopting ethical and sustainable practices, engaging stakeholders, strengthening reporting and transparency, and continuously monitoring and evaluating performance, KPMG can contribute to a more sustainable future while enhancing its reputation, attracting clients, and driving long-term business success. Embracing sustainability and responsibility will position KPMG as a leader in the professional services industry and help create positive impacts on society and the environment.

Section 5: Conclusion

In this case study, the strategic operations management of KPMG, focusing on three key areas has been examined: the transformation process, innovation management, and sustainability and responsibility. Through the analysis, valuable insight has been gained into the challenges faced by KPMG and provided recommendations to improve its operational performance and address these challenges. The transformation process analysis highlighted the importance of leveraging technology, embracing digitalization, and optimizing operational efficiency. By implementing automation, streamlining processes, and adopting agile methodologies, KPMG can enhance its competitiveness, deliver high-quality services, and meet evolving client demands. Also, innovation management played a vital role in driving growth and differentiation for KPMG. By fostering an open innovation ecosystem, KPMG can tap into external expertise, collaborate with clients, and leverage emerging technologies to develop innovative solutions and stay ahead in a rapidly changing business landscape. The sustainability and responsibility analysis emphasized the significance of integrating ethical and sustainable practices into KPMG’s operations. By prioritizing environmental stewardship, social impact, and ethical business conduct, KPMG can enhance its reputation, build trust with stakeholders, and contribute to a more sustainable future. Generally, strategic operations management is critical for the success of organizations like KPMG. By continuously improving its transformation processes, embracing innovation, and enhancing sustainability and responsibility practices, KPMG can strengthen its competitive position, drive long-term growth, and create positive impacts on society and the environment. Implementing the recommendations provided in this case study will enable KPMG to navigate challenges, seize opportunities, and build a sustainable and responsible future for itself and its stakeholders. With a clear strategic vision and a commitment to operational excellence, KPMG is well-positioned to thrive in a dynamic and rapidly changing business landscape.

References

Abbott, L.J., Barber, R., Buslepp, W. and Sapkota, P., 2023. Is Audit Partner Identification Useful? Evidence from the KPMG “Steal the Exam” Scandal. AUDITING: A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 42(2), pp.1-22.

Allio, M.K., 2021. Driving strategic innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 49(2), pp.41-43.

Bakken, C., Shedding Light on Sustainable Shipping.

Clarke, P. and Toal, A., KPMG Consulting.

Hoang Tien, N., Thuong, T.M., Minh Duc, L.D. and Hoang Yen, N.T., 2019. Enhancing independence of local auditing services by profiting from experiences of the Big4 group (KPMG, Deloitte, PWC E&Y) operating in Vietnam market. Cogent business & management, 6(1), p.1605702.

Kücükgül, E., Cerin, P. and Liu, Y., 2022. Enhancing the value of corporate sustainability: An approach for aligning multiple SDGs guides on reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, p.130005.

Lăzăroiu, G. and Harrison, A., 2021. Internet of things sensing infrastructures and data-driven planning technologies in smart sustainable city governance and management. Geopolitics, History & International Relations, 13(2).

Manes‐Rossi, F. and Nicolo’, G., 2022. Exploring sustainable development goals reporting practices: From symbolic to substantive approaches—Evidence from the energy sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), pp.1799-1815.

McKenna, F., Pevzner, M., Sheneman, A. and Zach, T., 2022. Corruption in the Auditor Inspection Process: The Case of KPMG and the PCAOB. Issues in Accounting Education.

Mubako, G., 2019. Internal audit outsourcing: A literature synthesis and future directions. Australian Accounting Review, 29(3), pp.532-545.

Pätäri, S., Tuppura, A., Toppinen, A., & Korhonen, J., 2016. Global sustainability megaforces in shaping the future of the European pulp and paper industry towards a bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics, 66, 38-46.

Prud’homme van Reine, P., 2022. Learning from the History of Innovation. Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3).

Silva, M.J., Azevedo, G. and Oliveira, J., 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management (pp. 1-11). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Simpson, C., Kemp, E., Ataii, E. and Zhang, Y., 2019. Mobility 2030: Transforming the mobility landscape. KPMG Int.

Zhou, J., Chen, F., Berry, A., Reed, M., Zhang, S. and Savage, S., 2020, December. A survey on ethical principles of AI and implementations. In 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 3010-3017). IEEE.