The online versus in-person school classroom debate has taken center stage in education. E-learning is easily accessible, but it cannot still substitute for the real classroom practice that offers depth and power in teaching. Several factors that make in-person education relevantly effective include interactions, practical activities, and learning environments. People choose classroom education since it enhances meaningful and mutual relationships among learners through healthy interactions. In this sense, the interaction part of the traditional classroom is characterized by face-to-face discussions, lively debates, and reciprocation through interpersonal relationships, perfected through life skills such as teamwork and communication. Furthermore, in terms of social competency development, online learning through a digital interface may lead to the isolation of its learners, inhibiting interpersonal development, which is necessary for progress at the personal and professional levels.
In-person school learning provides practical experiences that are hard to replicate virtually. In this sense, during laboratory workshops and practical sessions, students do more than copy from a book studying theories (Nishimwe et al. 24). Moreover, they always have a chance to interact with physical materials using their minds. Furthermore, distancing the classroom from personal space assists the child in concentrating and being disciplined, enabling full engagement in the learning process. This participatory and experiential method bolsters comprehension and arms students with the requisite technical skills to maneuver through the byways of their respective industries. For example, in a science laboratory, students can perform experiments, witness phenomena before their eyes, and evaluate outcomes immediately. Apart from theoretical concepts, this method develops critical thinking, hands-on problem-solving, and experimentation skills necessary for scientific research.
In much the same way, in vocational workshops or technical training sessions, students can work with proper tools, machines, and apparatus that are closely relevant to their sphere of study and learn how to practice in real life and be perfected by their instructors. Through some practical hands-on activities, students obtain a better and more concrete understanding of complex concepts, get good real-life practical skills, and build their confidence in their work (Williams et al. 114). Through these experiences, students are introduced to more than just classroom learning, where they are better prepared for the challenges of their future professions with the required practical knowledge and expertise. The opportunities for hands-on learning provided through in-class instruction are thus unavoidable if one aims to prepare students to succeed in their selected fields. In contrast to these possible interruptions and diversions from home-based online learning, this intentional structuring supports the idea that without the in-person setting, holistic education will not be possible and, thus, online learning can provide flexibility as much as it is vital for the essentials of education.
Face-to-face schooling promotes full-rounded development, allowing various outlets beyond school discipline, including extracurricular activities, sports, and art classes. The physical schools are the most structured context among the various institutions that build character, develop leaders, and foster essential life skills. The absence of immersive and social experiences may limit online education’s extracurricular components, but it usually needs more things that make it holistic. Research reveals that in Romania, the students who receive common in-person classroom education have higher resilience, adaptiveness, and self-confidence, which are very important to succeed in different spheres of their lives. In addition, activities such as extracurriculars usually conducted in physical schools provide students with broad exposure to various interests and cultivate new talents spontaneously in the form of an atmosphere of social interaction outside the classroom. Moreover, through involvement in clubs and sports teams, team spirit, discipline, and time-management skills are developed, thus ensuring good education in one’s life. Also, the activities that learners engage in during in-person schooling allow students to interact with peers and mentors, presenting ample opportunities for collaboration, empathy, and leadership qualities, making learners confident and social.
Social interaction and communication play an important role during schooling. Face-to-face learning fosters essential student-teacher relationships. In most cases, in-person schooling in a typical classroom with active students who can freely discuss collaboration while maintaining personal and working (Tomasik et al.). As a result, these relationships improve learners’ understanding of the subject and life abilities. Furthermore, in-person classroom learning enhances real-time discussion of ideas, which helps develop students’ critical thinking and self-expression skills. Incidentally, impromptu interpersonal interactions inject momentum and dynamism into the classroom setting. Learning in person also encourages teamwork and problem-solving through group activities. Learners argue with different perspectives, share duties, and realize objectives as a team. As a result, learners can get ready for professional partnerships due to such experiences. Group projects and assignments contribute to developing interpersonal skills and a sense of belonging among the students. Outside of academics, the community of peers and teachers creates an atmosphere that enhances education. Through the relationships created through in-person relationships, a sense of belonging is fostered, and emotional stability is enhanced, unlike in online classrooms where interactions among the learners are limited.
In addition, in-person schooling has avenues through which the students’ moral character is nurtured, which is not possible in the online classroom. Students are taught values such as integrity, adherence, and responsibility by interacting daily with the teachers, classmates, and other school staff. The ethics of good morals are also reinforced through the school policies, rules, codes of behavior, and community services (Photopoulos et al. 116). As a result, students can behave in a corrective manner with a civic duty and a sense of social responsibility. However, online education needs more supervision, guidance, and accountability as part and parcel of physical schooling requisites for mastering valuable life skills and values. The absence of face-to-face interactions, in addition to immediate and direct feedback from the instructors and peers, can impact the online learner negatively by not obtaining the necessary skills in terms of communication, emotions, and when resolving issues (Williams et al. 114).
Furthermore, the social dimension fostered through in-person schooling contributes considerably to an individual’s wholeness because it facilitates peer relationships and helps cultivate socialization competencies and a sense of belonging and identity. As social hubs, physical schools help students interact with peers from different backgrounds, manage social relationships, and form lifelong bonds. Social networks provide emotional support, companionship, and some community to enhance mental health and well-being.
Generally, despite the convenience of ICT, online learning can never substitute the impact and power of immediate schooling. The advantage of face-to-face learning lies in its importance in socialization, hands-on work, and the developing conditions favorable to learning. Social links are the key values because of the way that life skills such as teamwork and communication are reflected through different available platforms, face-to-face interaction, dynamic discussions, and interpersonal relationships present in the traditional classroom setup. In addition, practical hands-on competencies allowing the practice to apply the theory and to develop practical skills are significantly related to face-to-face learning through demonstrative laboratories and workshops. Moreover, the open learning atmosphere in the physical schools limits students from being distracted, and they must be focused and disciplined. It, therefore, provides a favorable learning environment for learners.
Furthermore, classical education with individual training guarantees comprehensive civilizational development, reached through clubs, sports, and art programs, providing character formation, leadership formation, and the development of skills necessary in life. According to studies in Romania, students adhering to the traditional schooling mode have higher resilience, adaptability, and self-belief measures than students who engage in online studies. Face-to-face teaching has far more positive features than online learning, which is why it is an integral part of a perfect educational structure.
Works Cited
Nishimwe, Gloria, et al. “Assessing the Perceptions and Preferences between Online and In-Person Classroom Learning among University Students in Rwanda.” Journal of Service Science and Management, vol. 15, no. 01, 2022, pp. 23–34, https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2022.151003.
Photopoulos, Panos, et al. “Remote and in-person learning: Utility versus social experience.” SN Computer Science 4.2 (2022): 116.
Tomasik, Martin J., et al. “Educational Gains of In‐Person vs. Distance Learning in Primary and Secondary Schools: A Natural Experiment during the COVID ‐19 Pandemic School Closures in Switzerland.” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 56, no. 4, 24 Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12728.
Williams, Hunter, Malcolm Haynes, and Joseph Kim. “Dual teaching: Simultaneous remote and in-person learning during COVID.” Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. 2021. pp. (111–116)
write