Introduction
In “The Legendary Goujian Story in Ancient China,” Paul A. Cohen looks at the troubles of the spring and Autumn Periods, particularly those of the ruler of the Kingdom of Yue in the distant past. The author concentrates on the careful study of historical materials and archaeological data to gain the whole picture of Goujian’s rule, military campaigns, and diplomatic efforts. To further explore Goujian’s leadership, this essay presents a hypothetical dialogue among four prominent ancient Chinese thinkers and rulers: Mengzi, Hsun-Tzu, Mo-Tzu, and the first emperor of the Qin Dynasty. They gave their own and differing views on Goujian’s rule and strategies, thus making clear the changing society in Eastern Zhou toward the Qin Dynasty.
Mencius: The Virtuous Ruler: “I commend Goujian for his perseverance in self-transformation and the public interest,” praised Mencius at the beginning. He focused on the necessity of benevolent rulership and moral cultivation and lauded the “Wulei Kongkai” personality of Goujian as evidence of his loyalty to the doctrine under pressure. Mencius praised Goujian for perceiving that people had an innate good nature and for seeing that his role was to serve and lead his people. The way Goujian bravely refused to consummate his marriage for the sake of his ruler’s subjects is the epitome of him as a benevolent ruler. Goujian succeeded in bringing forth the belief that people will always have a good nature by endorsing this belief. For peaceful coexistence was thus ensured. Goujian’s self-sacrificing altruism towards the happiness of people instead of his interests has been recognized as the virtue of an ideal monarch by Mencius. He stressed that the ruler should always be concerned with the well-being of the people. Goujian’s reign epitomized strategic thinking and a nonchalant approach to the people. The part of his philosophy that I identify with most is ethical behavior and caring for others.
Xunzi: The Role of Ritual and Governance: “Ritual and governance are the key points for keeping social order,” Tolerance of equally legitimate government, as well as a ban on disastrous procedures of oppression, are issues of which Goujian becomes aware. Xunzi taught the need for moral regulation and education, and Goujian’s strategy of government through fear was questioned by him. While recognizing the function of rite in statecraft, however, Xunzi demanded that Goujian moderated it with benevolent rule. Xunzi acknowledged the essence of this element of Goujian’s reign, highlighting it as a significant factor that made Confucian rites legitimate. Still, he also stressed the importance of moderating punishment as an inseparable ingredient of creating and maintaining an established social order. Xunzi promotes an integrated strategy, which combines ethical regulation with gentle administration, highlighting the significance of cultivating virtue in both leaders and leaders. To ensure the necessary moderation of authoritarianism, Xunzi called upon Goujian to implement compassion in his leadership style. Such a subtle perspective shows his idea that moral education and ethical behavior are very important to create a harmonious society, and it is also a good illustration of the complexity of governance in anciënt China.However, as Goujian develops his ability to exploit rituals for his ambitions is equally as important as the maintenance of social order and control. Rituals exert social pressure in their role of social approval, yet severe corporeal punishment can turn society against itself.
Mozi: Universal Love and Utilitarianism: “Goujian, like myself, is concerned about the welfare of the people.” He admired Goujian for his ambitions towards ensuring the welfare of his people, who matched the ideals of Mozi for the use of universal love and practical ethics. However, Mo-tzu condemned the ferocious vendetta by King Goujian back at Wu as too much and suggested that forgiveness and reconciliation should pass the revenge in the place. The overall emphasis of Mozi’s statements on the extravagance in government and his stand for simplicity in government derives from his utilitarianism, resulting in the focus on the common good. Mozi saw that Goujian put more weight on the condition of his people rather than on his interest and asked him to make the social good dominant. Through his call for a strict economy in government and simplicity of administration, Mozi intended to ensure that public resources were put to good use for the benefit of the common people. He reminded the court not to have the luxurious and extravagant styles like Goujian did, as the excessive might be the reason that the state failed to meet the basic needs of common people. The practical aspect of ethics and universal love, brought to stress by Mozi, reflects the view that an ideal society is built based on equal distribution of resources and that no excess is allowed, which is in line with his ideas of justice and harmony.The idea of Mencius on the significance of compassion in the conduct of government is in tandem with my belief. Goujian’s contributions to the state are praiseworthy, however, his being driven by revenge on the ruling family of the Wu State is unfortunate.
The First Emperor of Qin: Legalist Governance and Centralization: “Power requires pragmatism and centralization to be consolidated.” Goujian’s shrewdness in the amassment of power and the utilization of undercover agents and military protocols excites his emotions. Although he was against showing mercy, Sunzi feared enemies could abuse it. The First Emperor thus regarded the whole process as a nitty-gritty that was critical for creating a strong central state, and in turn, it helped to ensure peace and security. As the philosophers admired Goujian’s side- by side attitude towards centralized authority, he also recognized that ruthless tactics and strategic pragmatism, on which Goujian was through a subtle parallel with the First Emperor, Goujian’s model demonstrated the significance of a strong central governance structure in the fluid political landscape of ancient China. This common focus on centrally-based control shows that the subordination of local communities to the power of the ruler is a common denominator of the challenges faced by rulers throughout the periods of their rule. Goujian manifests a tendency to the extreme in his governing style. Dictatorial authority is necessary for preserving stability however too much cruelty could push the people up in arms.
Conclusion
The imaginary debate between Mencius, Xunzi, Mozi, and the First Emperor of Qin reveals a composite picture of Goujian’s legacy and leadership in ancient China. With the multitude of their standpoints, we attain the illumination of the intricacies of the governance system and the continually evolving social interactions from the Eastern Zhou to the Qin Dynasty. Despite their disparities, these strategists/rulers are unanimous in taking care of people and the stability of the state, even though they are different approaches and focus on virtue, ritual, universal love, and legalized governance. We can understand the reign of Goujian from multiple lenses, see his reign from different angles, and deepen our appreciation of the complex and colorful weave of Chinese political thought and its importance in being valued and studied across generations.
Bibliography
Perkins, Franklin. Heaven and Earth Are Not Humane: The Problem of Evil in Classical Chinese Philosophy.” Philosophy East and West 67, no. 2 (2017): 476-501.
Cohen, P. A. (2010). peaking to History. NIV of California Press.
Kim, J., Jeon, S., Choi, J.-P., Asta Blazyte, Jeon, Y., Kim, J.-I., Ohashi, J., Tokunaga, K., Sugano, S., Suthat Fucharoen, Fahd Al-Mulla, & Bhak, J. (2020). he Origin and Composition of Korean Ethnicity Analyzed by Ancient and Present-Day Genome Sequences. enome Biology and Evolution, 12(5), 553–565.
Zhao, Dingxin. “9 Western Han and the Advent of the Confucian-Legalist State.” In State Power in China, 900-1325, 262-294. November 2015.
Cooke, N. P., Mattiangeli, V., Cassidy, L. M., Okazaki, K., Stokes, C. A., Onbe, S., Hatakeyama, S., Machida, K., Kasai, K., Naoto Tomioka, Matsumoto, A., Ito, M., Kojima, Y., Bradley, D. G., Takashi Gakuhari, & Shigeki Nakagome. (2021). ancient genomics reveals tripartite origins of Japanese populations. cience Advances, 7(38).
Zhang, Hanmo. “From Myth to History: Historicizing a Sage for the Sake of Persuasion in the Yellow Emperor Narratives.” Journal of Chinese History 25, no. 2 (2023): 123-145. accessed February 20, 2024. URL]
Kaner, S. (2011). Beyond Ethnicity and Emergence in Japanese Archaeology. Ambridge University Press EBooks, 46–59.
Pai, Hyung Il. “Constructing Korean Origins: A Critical Review of Archaeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State-Formation Theories.” Academic Collection (EBSCOhost), printed on September 28, 2022, 2:52 AM via UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA LIBRARIES. N: 2420605.
write