Article Strength
The article’s title explains the research’s primary aim: to evaluate EEG correlates of corporate decision-making processes. The research title correlates well with the research’s core gist: decision-making at a corporate level (Balconi et al., 2024). The study is timely as it is conducted about problems faced by groups of non-managers and non-managers during real complicated problem-solving procedures. The researchers propose that there is a possibility to unravel socially sustainable work environments through neuro-scientific studies. The issue is supported by Schiuma (2021), who proposes the need for digital transformation leadership in the workplace. The conditions are significant in promoting organizational innovation and creativity and the essence of teamwork when solving organizational issues.
The article starts with an abstract that gives a general study overview. Balconi et al., 2024 used a quantitative data collection technique. In this context, data was airily gathered from non-mangers and managers in isolation and group settings. A muse Electrophysiological headband (EEG) was applied to managers and non-mangers during natural work environments. The experiment was conducted while managers were working in groups and in isolation.
The authors apply credible data sources. The use of primary data gives first-hand data. The data gathered is in numerical form to fulfill scientific standards: objective, accurate, quantifiable, and rational. The collected data was then analyzed and mapped to obtain the appropriate information. The quantitative approach is based on variance. The exogenous variables used include work environments and innovativeness.
The article’s application of an integrative literature review is a notable strength. The literature section is organized in terms of relevant sub-topics rather than chronology. The strategy is ideal for developing a research topic that involves work environment leadership and innovativeness. The concept is also supported by research by Gremial et al. (2023) on integrative literature reviews and avenues.
Another strength of the article is the use of current and reliable academic sources. The recent articles present updated data on the research topic. The researchers used updated and credible academic sources that add value and quality to the research. The researcher is apt to use different resources to support core details. The resources are a mix-up of journal articles and websites related to the topic area. It is suggested that the researcher apply consistent research formatting standards. Indeed, appropriate referencing standards add value to the research work.
The researchers applied purposeful sampling using particular criteria such as age. The participants are drawn from persons aged 21- 54 years. The inclusion criterion was normal, while the exclusion criterion was identified as follows: presence of cognitive therapies and history of psycho-neurotic diseases. The article clearly describes the research methodology through the use of EEG.
Weaknesses of the Article
Although the article’s objectives are realized, one of the notable areas for improvement in the article is the use of professional terms that are fully understood by non-professionals. The researchers were keen to use medical jargon heard by the non-professionals. For example, the article contains terms such as cognitive focus, Realistic common problem task, and EEG, among others. Also, the ranches use small samples. In future research, the sample should be enlarged to present conclusive outcomes. A large sample size is ideal for generalizing the outcomes to the general population of corporate managers. Also, the research needs to consider personal psychological traits.
Overlap of functional areas concerning higher level functions is regarding. The pre-frontal cortex plays a decisive role in creativity. However, the background noise from the other functions of the pre frontal cortex must be accounted for. Functions such as working memory, personality and social expression are similarly constantly being undertaken by the pre-frontal cortex (Henry Gray, 2020). The pre-frontal cortex is constantly firing for a normal person, and isolating for creativity is a difficult task. No attempt was made to isolate creativity individually, at least for a control group, to create a check for spurious correlation by mapping the EEG when being creative compared to resting EEG for the same individual. The data probably needed to be more vast to enable multiple control groups.
The pre-frontal cortex excitation may have been from increased creativity demand, as assumed, but it also could have been from the emotional toll induced by the workload. The attitude towards the task and comfort within the group are similar valid explanations for the pre-frontal cortex data. The study’s credibility suffers if there are multiple reasonable interpretations of the data, barring discriminatory criteria. Considering alpha waves limits possible explanations but does not sufficiently disqualify emotions and social profiles individually. A great opportunity was missed, which could have complemented the group study where a sufficient control group was established.
Group analysis mitigates the shortcomings of individual data points, which is a strength of the study. Fundamentally, grouping data reduces uncertainty, allowing stronger observations. Outliers play a decreasing role as the group expands, allowing general observations to be made that apply most of the time. The study had a reasonable quantity of data points evenly split based on gender. The cohort was sufficiently diverse concerning age as it was a roughly normal distribution in the 21 to 54 years range. There were enough managers and non-managers, and the participant qualification protocol was relevant and adequate for the two main study groups. For instance, five years of managerial experience is a reasonable trade-off between the size and quality of the managerial group. Eliminating candidates with cognitive deficits and questionable neurological profiles cleans the data from unwanted variables. It was commendable for the study to respect its novelty and set a high threshold for significant results, which lends credibility.
Validity and Reliability
The validity and reliability of the results suffer due to the abstract nature of creativity. That said, the design confers credibility to the conclusions, considering that the technology was good and the sampling was normal. Managers being more creative in individual tasks than group tasks is reasonably explained. However, the reduced EEG reading could arise from managers being comfortable with colleagues. Note, the study largely failing to prove increased creativity from managers in a group setting should not be conflated for the alternative.
The research used credible research methods that make the work reliable and credible. The researcher should use consistent referencing systems that enhance research reliability and credibility. However, the researcher could have used a pilot study to make the work extra credible and reliable. The researcher has used academic references that correlate with the research topic. Therefore, the research presents appropriate data for future research work. Resources present significant data for further research on the study area.
Overall Assessment
The article evaluates EEG correlates with corporate decision-making processes. The study is timely as it is conducted about problems faced by groups of non-managers and non-managers during real complicated problem-solving procedures. The research is conducted both in groups and in isolation. The researchers applied purposeful sampling using particular criteria such as age. The research used credible research methods that make the work reliable and credible. The researcher should use consistent referencing systems that enhance research reliability and credibility. Overall, the research is well structured and framed. The study discussed the importance of creativity when deciding to manage context.
In conclusion the article highlights importance of group decision making in management filed. The article places more emphasis on the use of group managers who are more likely to critically influence creativity and innovation in an organisational context. The study depicts the ability to utilize group thinking rather than self-thinking, which individual reinfoindividuals study suggests that of group manager condition was more effective in making creative decision making. However, the study had some limitations : small sample size, use of individual differences, and focus on complex situations. some of the recommendation gathered is the use of a larger sample size , which includes the fact that individual managers contribute to the creation of new ideas, group managers serve more importance in collaboration and creating creative tasks. The article’s title gives an idea of the main aims of the research; the literature uses credible sources and applies credible data sources that provide primary data and first-hand data. However, the study’s weakness is that creating more emphasis on group manager analysis mitigates the shortcomings of individual data points, which is a strength of the study. Also, the article uses medical jargon that is heard by the non-professionals. Overlap of functional areas concerning higher level functions is regarding. The pre-frontal cortex plays a decisive role in creativity.
In management, the decision-making ion-making concept is discussed with this relevance. The study addressed the importance of creativity when deciding to manage context.
References
Balconi, M. Vandelli, G.W. & Angioletti, L. (2024). Be creative to innovate! EEG correlates group decision-making in managers. Sustainability. 16:2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052175
And Organizations. 4 (4): 61-82. Doi:10.22146/jlo.71846
Gray, H. c. (2020). Gray’s Anatomy. London.
Gremial, N.S. Kanbach, D. K. & Chelaru, M. (2023). Virtual teams and transformational leadership: An integrative literature review and avenues for further research. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. 8 (2). Doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100351
Schiuma, G. Schettini, E. Santarsiero, F. & Carlucci, D. (2021). The transformative leadership compass: six competencies for digital transformational entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0087
write