Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) contemplations have recently developed as crucial components influencing financing decisions internationally. Financiers quickly acknowledge the profound effect that a company’s strategy for sustainability, social management, and administration operations can have on its long-lived financial accomplishment and general feasibility. , the standard shift contemplates a growing understanding that financial victory must be synchronized with ethical, environmental, and social management to guarantee value creation. The significance of environmental, social, and governance considerations in financing resolution lies in their capability to mitigate risks, enhance flexibility, and encourage sustainable business operations. Investors no longer hinge on short-lived financial earnings, creating immense prominence on companies committed to responsible and ethical conduct. By assigning ESG metrics to investment assessment, investors focus on adjusting their portfolios with companies with solid risk management, ethical leadership, and positive environmental and community consequences.
Rationale for Company Selection
The choice of companies for this evaluation, namely Disney and Chevron, comes from an intentional effort to compare exemplary ESG operations against those with crucial room for advancement. The two companies, Disney and Chevron, were chosen from the constituents of the Wilshire 5000 Index, a comprehensive market financial weighted index that comprises a divergent range of significant, average, and small-cap stocks.
Disney: Exemplary ESG Characteristics
Disney, an intercontinental entertainment conglomerate, consistently illustrated a commitment to ESG principles (Disney). The company has executed innovative environmental dynamism, positively influencing community obligation and upholding strong governance structures (Disney). Its position as a leader in Governance (ESG) operations makes it an engrossing case study for acknowledging how such characteristics contribute to sustained shareholder value (Disney).
Chevron: Anti-ESG Characteristics
On the contrary, Chevron, a primary participant in the energy sector, has faced investigation for its environmental effect, social operations, and government formation. Focusing on the oil and gas industry, Chevron presents an opportunity to investigate the problems connected to possible menaces with companies struggling in environmental, social, and governance contemplations. This evaluation seeks to reveal the potential risks and impacts of poor environmental, Social, and Governance achievement on shareholder value. By comparing the two companies, Chevron and Disney, with distinct ESG portrayals, this analysis seeks to give an all-embracing understanding of how ESG deliberation can influence investment results, encouraging informed decision-making among investors steering an advancing financial landscape. The investigation of Disney and Chevron will elucidate the pathways to shareholder value creation and the development of abandoning or prioritizing ESG constituents in investment approaches.
Methodology
Criteria for Identifying Exemplary and Poor ESG Characteristics
The distinguishing of companies with exemplary and poor ESG attributes incriminated an ethical process, manipulating established conduct and industry standards. The critical criteria used for this assessment are confined to three essential pillars: environmental, social, and governance factors. Environmental criteria involve evaluating companies’ environmental effects, including carbon emissions, resource management, and dedication to sustainable operations (Diligent), as well as analysis of the relevant policies, initiatives, and attachment to global environmental standards. Social criteria involve exploring a company’s social responsibility, including community commitment, labor operations, assortment and inclusion attempts (Diligent), social impact, dynamism, and contributions to societal good health. Further criteria inspect governance structures, board liberty, and fragility in decision-making procedures In addition to assessing ethical business operations, executive reimbursement, and action to hinder corruption (Diligent). These criteria were applied systematically to filter companies within the Wilshire 5000 Index, ensuring an encompassing assessment of their ESG standing. Companies high in each criterion were considered to control outstanding ESG characteristics, while those with crucial drawbacks in one or more areas were pinpointed as having poor ESG characteristics.
Description of the Wilshire 5000 Index and Company Selection Procedure
Wilshire 5000 Index, a market capitalization-weighted index, is a landmark for the universal accomplishment of the United States stock market (Wilshire). Encompassing bid, average, and small-cap stocks, it offers a snapshot of the divergent array of companies bartered on United States exchanges. The process of selecting Disney involved the following steps: First, a comprehensive review of the components of the Wilshire 5000 Index was conducted to identify suitable candidates for analysis. Secondly, screening criteria aided in predetermining ESG criteria to filter companies with exemplary and poor ESG characteristics. Thirdly, company analysis aided in shortlisting companies to validate and refine their ESG standings and exemplify the positive ESG characteristics, while Chevron exhibited areas of concern (Wilshire). The last step employs a stratified sampling approach to ensure representation from numerous market capitalization segments within the Wilshire 5000 Index (Wilshire). By adhering to the approach, the selection procedure aimed to capture a divergent range of companies and a refined analysis of ESG achievement. Disney and Chevron emerged as representative cases for exploring the effect of EASG attributes on shareholder value creation over the next decade.
Exemplary ESG Characteristics
Environmental operations are one of the attributes Disney has continuously illustrated a commitment to surrounding sustainability through a multivariable approach aimed at reducing its ecological footprint (Disney). There are distinct operations that Disney has put in place, which include the company’s commitment to attaining carbon neutrality, showing their proactive goal to mitigate climate change. Additionally, implementing waste reduction programs like theme parks and using renewable energy supplies like solar energy has aided in environmental stability as they align with global environmental trends and reflect a forward-looking strategy (Disney). The second attribute is social influence attained through community engagement programs aimed at positive social change and diversification and inclusion efforts in hiring operations and representation in content creation to encourage fairness in opportunities (Disney).
Moreover, Disney’s governance structure encourages transparency and accountability, which is attained through operations such as strong anticorruption policies to enhance integrity, and the presence of an independent board ensures a balance in decision-making. Lastly, Disney’s alignment with the market trends and investor expectations as the company prioritizes companies with robust ESG profiles and Disney ESG operations aligning with those of financiers show the acknowledgment of the long-lived value of the company (Disney).
Anti-ESG Characteristics
Environmental influence is the first attribute, as Chevron’s operation in the oil and gas sector threatens the surroundings. Chevron relies on fossil fuels, emitting massive amounts of carbon, a peril to the general community. In addition to environmental accidents such as oil spillage, Chevron’s restricted investments in renewable energy indicate the primary environmental concerns (Chevron, Enabling Human Progress 2022 Corporate Sustainability Report). Additionally, the social operations of Chevron have faced criticism, as there is the existence of strained relationships with the communities near the extraction sites and the increasing human rights concerns where the allegations of human rights abuse are rising, making their ethical business conduct questioned. Moreover, the overnice structure of Chevron needs scrutiny as there is a limited divergence in the board composition, raises concerns about the company’s commitment to governance in addition to the level of shareholder influence and rights within the governance structure (Chevron, Enabling Human Progress 2022 Corporate Sustainability Report). The last attribute is the possible dangers connected with poor ESG accomplishment, which is brought about by the operational dangers due to increased public perception, which can harm Chevron’s identification as a brand, in addition to increased regulation supervision, which means more possible fines on the company activities.
Comparative Analysis: ESG vs. Anti-ESG
The comparison of Disney and Chevron’s ESG scores and rankings underscores the profound impact of ESG considerations on financial performance, long-term sustainability, brand reputation, and customer loyalty (Disney). Disney’s exemplary ESG characteristics not only position it as a financially resilient entity but also enhance its brand image and foster customer loyalty. In contrast, Chevron’s anti-ESG characteristics pose significant risks to its financial standing, long-term viability, and brand reputation, necessitating strategic shifts to align with evolving market expectations. The analysis reinforces the integral role of ESG considerations in shaping corporate success in today’s conscientious business landscape. Disney’s financial achievement is from the company’s investments in renewable energy, and waste reduction may lead to cost efficiencies and long-term financial stability (Disney).
On the other hand, Chevron’s poor ESG performance poses financial risks, including regulatory scrutiny, potential divestment, and higher capital costs, which can influence revenue streams. Disney’s sustainable practices contribute to long-term viability, enhancing Disney’s resilience against environmental and societal challenges (Disney). In contrast, Chevron’s lack of commitment to ESG principles poses a threat to Chevron’s long-term sustainability. For brand reputation, Disney’s exemplary ESG practices bolster Disney’s reputation as a socially responsible and environmentally conscious entity (Disney). Conversely, Chevron’s anti-ESG characteristics may lead to reputational damage, eroding public trust and undermining the company’s brand reputation. Regarding purchaser loyalty, Chevron’s environmental controversies and social issues may lead to customer dissatisfaction and potential shifts toward competitors with better ESG profiles (Disney). Unlike Disney’s positive social practices, diversity initiatives and environmentally friendly policies contribute to solid customer loyalty.
Financial Performance and Shareholder Value
Analysis of Historical Financial Performance
Disney has shown a recommendable revenue growth over the years as their divergent businesses drive it, including theme parks and stream parks. In addition, the shareholder returns in Disney through dividends are commendable as the rise in stock prices is favorable to the company’s ability to generate value (The Walt Disney Company). Disney’s profitability and robust operating margins, supported by victorious franchises like Marvel, called for sustained financial attainment. Oil price volatility considerably influences Chevron’s financial attainment, influencing the revenue sources from the upstream operations. In addition, Chiron has a history of consistent dividend payments, which are susceptible to the prevailing market conditions (Chevron Policy, Government, and Public Affairs). Furthermore, the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry has led to periods of strong earnings and downturns, influencing the general financial stability of the company.
Projection of Future Financial Performance based on ESG considerations
For Disney, the commendable investment in renewable energy and sustainability innovations may lead to innovative revenue streams that align with the changing customer inclinations (The Walt Disney Company). In addition, Disney as a brand is robust, enabled by the positive ESG operations that lead to customer loyalty and drive revenue growth. The company expects to attain about $7.5 billion in cost savings, $2 billion more than the original aim (Frank). Moreover, Disney’s exemplary ESG operations lead to risk mitigation and long-lived sustainability, potentially lowering costs connected with environmental compliance and social controversies, for example, using 30% recyclable content (The Walt Disney Company). For Chevron, the company’s long-lived viability enabled by a commitment to ESG considerations is essential for the company’s adaptation to the energy transition in a changing energy landscape.
Furthermore, addressing environmental issues and boosting social operations may incur costs, influencing the company’s short-lived profitability with a set strategy of allocating $8B in lower carbon investments by 2028 and $2B in lowering carbon (Chevron, Enabling Human Progress 2022 Corporate Sustainability Report). Chevron targets 100 mbd of renewable fuels, 40,000 mbtu/d renewable gas, 150 mtpa hydrogen, and 25 mmtpa carbon capture and offsets by 2030 (Chevron, Enabling Human Progress 2022 Corporate Sustainability Report). Lastly, the poor ESG accomplishments expose Chevron to regulatory risks, possible legal problems, and market volatility; therefore, transitioning towards cleaner energy sources may require essential investments.
Correlation between ESG Operations and Shareholder Value Creation
Disney’s alignment with ESG expectations enhances Investor confidence, attracting ESG-conscious investors seeking sustainable and socially responsible opportunities (Disney). In addition, the company’s exemplary operations contribute to positive brand perceptions, purchaser loyalty, and risk mitigation, influencing long-lived shareholder value creation. On the contrary, Chevron’s poor ESG achievement poses risks to shareholder value creation, including possible divestment, increased capital costs, and reputational damage (The Walt Disney Company). In addition, the company’s market increasingly values ESG considerations, and Chevron’s failure to address these concerns may result in a diminished market standing and influence its shareholder value.
Market Trends and Investor Sentiment
Examination of current Market Trends favoring ESG-Conscious Investing
There is increasing ESSG integration as the considerations have transitioned from niche to mainstream investing, with institutional and retailer investors increasing integration of the ESG factors into their decision-making processes (Washington). In addition, regulatory bodies in various jurisdictions promote ESG disclosure and reporting, further emphasizing the significance of sustainable and responsible business operations like recycling (The Walt Disney Company). Moreover, investors acknowledge that companies with robust attributes are better positioned for long-term value creation. The service revenue from advertising increased from $2.5 billion to $61.8 billion in 2021 (Washington). Lastly, SG-conscious investing is viewed as a form of risk management. Companies with robust ESG practices are seen as better equipped to navigate environmental, social, and governance risks, leading to improved financial performance.
Investor Sentiments Towards Companies with Strong ESG Characteristics
Companies with Positive environmental, social, and governance practices contribute to a resilient brand reputation and stakeholder trust. ESG-conscious investors are drawn to companies prioritizing sustainability, ethical practices, and social responsibility. Moreover, Investment managers are incorporating ESG factors into their portfolio construction strategies. Additionally, Investors are committing to sustainable investing as part of an extensive crusade towards responsible capitalism as ESG-conscious companies are perceived as forward-thinking.
Potential Impact on Stock Prices and Market Capitalization
For stock prices companies with strong ESG characteristics often experience positive momentum in stock prices, and the positive news related to ESG initiatives, such as renewable energy investments or community engagement programs, can influence market perception. Moreover, ESG-conscious companies may receive a valuation premium for market capitalization compared to their peers with weaker ESG profiles, as investors may be willing to pay a higher price for shares of companies deemed more sustainable and socially responsible. In addition, the correlation between ESG practices and risk mitigation can lead to more stable and predictable returns, contributing to sustained market capitalization growth. Lastly, companies adapting to ESG trends will likely attract a broader investor base, positively influencing market capitalization. Companies lagging in ESG considerations may face challenges sustaining or growing market value.
Risks and Challenges
The risks connected with Disney’s ESG operations include one of the perils of overreliance on Intellectual property, where changing consumer preferences pose risks to financial performance. Risk mitigation is mitigated by diversifying strategies, continuous innovation, and strategic partnerships (Nancy McLendon Scott). In addition, Disney’s theme parks face operational challenges, including natural disasters, global events, or changes in travel patterns. Robust risk management, contingency planning, and investments in technology to enhance operational efficiency can aid in mitigating possible disruptions (Nancy McLendon Scott). Lastly, despite positive ESG practices, Disney may face controversies or criticisms related to social, environmental, or governance issues, influencing its reputation and customer loyalty, which can mitigated through transparency and proactive communication (Nancy McLendon Scott). The challenges from Chevron’s Anti-ESG stance include its resistance to embracing cleaner energy sources, which poses challenges in adapting to the global transition towards renewable energy, potentially leading to reduced market relevance (Chevron, Managing Climate Change Risks a Perspective for Investors). In addition, the company’s stance may result in reputational damage, strained community relations, and challenges in maintaining a social license to operate (Chevron, Managing Climate Change Risks: a Perspective for Investors). Lastly, this stance may expose the company to increased regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges.
Conclusion
The comprehensive analysis of Disney and Chevron’s ESG characteristics reveals distinct trajectories in their potential to create shareholder wealth over the next decade. With its exemplary ESG practices, Disney stands poised to capitalize on evolving market trends and investor preferences, positioning itself for sustainable financial success. In contrast, Chevron, grappling with anti-ESG challenges, faces significant hurdles that may affect its long-term viability and shareholder value creation. Ultimately, shareholder wealth creation hinges on a company’s ability to align with market expectations, adapt to emerging trends, and proactively address ESG considerations. As investors increasingly prioritize responsible and sustainable investments, companies integrating ESG principles into their core strategies are better positioned to thrive, contributing to enduring shareholder value creation.
Recommendations
Investors should carefully navigate the evolving landscape, recognizing the significance of ESG considerations and potential shifts in market dynamics and regulatory environments. In comparison, Disney presents a robust long-term investment opportunity with its exemplary ESG profile, which aligns with market trends and investor inclination. Therefore, Disney should accumulate more shares for its long-term investment plan, continuously monitor its ESG accomplishments, and make any adjustments to ensure that it aligns with the evolving market. Caution is advised with Chevron, given that their anti-ESG challenges pose risks, which include reputational damage and possible challenges in the energy transition. Therefore, Chevron should keep a close eye on its operations to transition towards cleaner energy and consider a cautious approach due to the perils connected with its anti-ESG stance. Additionally, staying informed about emerging opportunities in renewable energy, technology, and sectors aligning with sustainable practices is crucial for optimizing investment portfolios in a dynamic and ESG-conscious market.
Works Cited
Affairs, Chevron Policy, Government and Public. “An Overview of the ESG Reporting Landscape.” Chevron.com, 7 July 2022, www.chevron.com/newsroom/2022/q3/an-overview-of-the-esg-reporting- landscape.
Chevron. Enabling Human Progress 2022 Corporate Sustainability Report. 2022, www.chevron.com/-/media/shared-media/documents/chevron-sustainability- report-2022.pdf.
—. Managing Climate Change Risks a Perspective for Investors. www.chevron.com/- /media/shared-media/documents/climate-risk-perspective.pdf.
Chevron Policy, Government and Public Affairs. “2018 Chevron Annual Report.” Chevron.com, 2018, www.chevron.com/annual-report.
Diligent. “What Is ESG? An Environmental, Social and Governance Guide – Diligent Insights | Diligent Corporation.” Diligent Corporation, 2020, www.diligent.com/resources/guides/esg.
Disney. “ESG Reporting.” Social responsibility, 2022, impact.disney.com/esg-reporting/.
Frank. “Statement from the Walt Disney Company.” The Walt Disney Company, 30 Nov. 2023, thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-statement/. Accessed 2 Dec. 2023.
Nancy McLendon Scott. “Disney’s Success Strategies and How It Manages Risk.” ToughNickel, ToughNickel, 6 Oct. 2022, toughnickel.com/industries/The-Disney- Company-Success-Strategies-and-Risk-Factors.
The Walt Disney Company. Charitable Giving Approach World of Belonging. 2022, thewaltdisneycompany.com/app/uploads/2023/03/2022-CSR-Report.pdf.
Washington, D. UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K. 2022, thewaltdisneycompany.com/app/uploads/2022/01/2021- Annual- Report.pdf.
Wilshire. “Fact Sheet – Wilshire 5000 Index Fund | Wilshire.” Www.wilshire.com, 30 Sept. 2023, www.wilshire.com/product-literature/wilshire-5000-index-fund-fact- sheet. Accessed 2 Dec. 2023.
write