Introduction
When someone has been arrested and prosecuted for a crime, they are held in a detention center. The fundamental goal of prisoner categorization systems is to distinguish between inmates who require different levels of security, custody, and treatment and varying levels of correctional supervision and involvement.
The Importance of Intake and Discharge in the Criminal Justice System
Even individuals charged or guilty of the same crime are not a uniform group. Consequently, they necessitate a personalized assessment approach capable of identifying their exceptional risk and need a profile in identifying the type of correctional facilities that manage any risks they might present to themselves or others while also promoting their social reintegration.
Safety and protection
Maintaining the safe and secure environment of criminals, prison staff, other people in prison facilities, and the broader public is a fundamental obligation correctional system.
Over classification occurs when the cost-effectiveness of operating prisons’ objective approaches to prisoner categorization is compromised, resulting in more criminals being located in high-security settings than is necessary to ensure the safety and security of the person, other prisoners, prison officers, and the general public. (Wormith and Bonta, 2000).
Detention of convicts in a humane manner the use of the minimum-security section or level continuous with the requirements of individual safety and control for the safeguard of prisoners, prison officers, and the general public is a crucial element for making sure the care to ensure and safekeeping of prisoners in correctional facilities that are consistent with the principles and norms.
Consequences of Gross mismanagement Admission and Release from Correctional Facilities
Barriers to Obtaining Health Care, when Incarcerated People Have Traditionally Been Exempt from Medicare and Social security. After being released from prison, a person’s capacity to secure fundamental requirements, including health, housing, and job, is harmed. Issues associated with returning to disadvantaged neighborhoods and delicate connections with communities and support networks exacerbate these barriers.
People who return to the community also have difficulty finding work, with unemployment rates five times higher than the overall population.
Although families can give social assistance, the link between family engagement and readmission is complicated. Helping a returned family member is often described as a stressful, taxing, and draining experience.
Conclusion
Efficient release planning is a difficult task. Correctional services must evaluate and incorporate an offender’s strengths, limitations, and needs into a single comprehensive report that the convict can understand and follow. They may come across inmates who are unwilling or unable to carry out their discharge arrangements. Employees may believe that their time is spent on something else. Partnership with community agencies has been limited in the past, which could interfere with future collaborations. Finally, even the most successful release plan may be hampered by significant time limits, limited resources, and state and federal policies.
Needs and Recommendations for Improving Correctional Facility Intake and Discharge
Correctional officials should screen for every prisoner as soon as possible after their enrollment to a correctional facility to recognize any immediate security risks should oversight prison inmates until testing and carry measures are completed.
Upon admittance to a correctional facility, correctional officials should screen each prisoner as quickly as possible to identify issues that require recommended to identify or awareness, such as disease, contagious diseases, mental health issues, alcohol or drug excessive drinking or detachment, continuing hospital attention, suicide risk, or special education qualifications.
While intake testing recognizes a need for urgent comprehensive assessment, new or proceeding pharmacotherapy or other therapeutic interventions, suicide prevention measures, or shelter that takes into account a prisoner’s unique needs, the disciplinary authority should take acceptable responsive measures without delay.
Provide transportation for releasees from either the correctional institution to their discharge destination, and assess if the releasee will still have access to services, work, or other sites specified in their release strategy.
Education and Employment —Ascertain those relevant assessments and recommendations that have been made to aid in the job search and retention process.
References
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2000). Level of service/case management inventory: LS/CMI. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Kuo, I., Liu, T., Patrick, R., Trezza, C., Bazerman, L., Uhrig Castonguay, B. J., … & Beckwith, C. G. (2019). Use of a mHealth intervention to improve engagement in HIV community-based care among persons recently released from a correctional facility in Washington, DC: a pilot study. AIDS and Behavior, 23(4), 1016-1031.
Pace, S. (2017). From correctional education to school reentry: How formerly incarcerated youth can achieve better educational outcomes. Tex. J. on CL & CR, 23, 127.
Swan, H., O’Connell, D. J., Visher, C. A., Martin, S. S., Swanson, K. R., & Hernandez, K. (2015). Improvements in correctional HIV services: A case study in Delaware. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 21(2), 164-176.
write