Introduction
The essence of this research is to provide a framework procedure that shows a comparative analysis of cost drivers in election management between Kenya and other countries.It illustrates an important aspect of election costs as it explores staff expenditures, voter education programs, technology utilization, and the scope of the existing difficulties. It fundamentally explores the diversity and the similarity of elections in the way Kenya and other nations allocate campaign expenditures by understanding these expense drivers. The project’s ultimate goal is to develop a system that will help to enhance voting procedures and provide useful information about the conservation of resources that could be used to improve integrity and fairness in voting procedures worldwide.
Background
The massive difficulty of various activities, including voter registration and the last vote tallying, is part of the election management process (Okuro, 2021). Different parameters like the size of the electorate, the location, the electoral system, and the extent of technology utilized might vary in different countries.
Statement of the Problem
Understanding the aspects of electoral management expenditures is a mandatory step towards the increased productivity and equitable allocation of resources, which underscore the functions of an election. Unfortunately, not so many comprehensive comparative studies point out why one or another country has better or worse spending on the election process.
Purpose of the Study
This study aims to appraise the election management cost drivers in Kenya and other focused countries, minimize the aspects that could cause an increase in the cost of conducting these elections, and recommend a suitable way to finance the upcoming ones.
Rationale/Justification
The work of policymakers, election officials, and other electoral process stakeholders should be noticed, and they must consider this research. Nations that apply more cost-effectiveness strategies, such as detecting and comprehending the prime cost drivers, could amplify fairness and accessibility in elections.
Research Questions
- Do we fit in the budget with the election administration of other picked nations, or what are the main reasons for costing a lot?
- Which approaches have these countries found successful in checkmating and cutting election-related spending?
Methodology
Design
The comparative case study method will be used to obtain the costs of election management in Brazil, India, and Kenya. These countries are nominated based on their distinct voting systems, geography, demography, and technology concerns.
Data Collection Methods
Secondary Data Analysis: This includes books, election reports, and financial records that election boards had already written.
Data Analysis
A comparative study method will be used to find and study cost drivers and see their differences and similarities among chosen countries.
Literature Review
The background research shows that logistics and infrastructure, technology investments, staffing budgets, and the need to educate voters are some of the high-cost things that affect election management (Okuro, 2021). However, the outcome of these variables is usually different in the elections that take place under diverse circumstances.
Significance of the Study
It is fundamental to understand how voting is conducted at various levels and how resources are distributed. Analysis of various electoral procedures is necessary in building and appreciating knowledge gathered to make elections fair, equitable, and conducive to democracy in different parts of the world.
The Timeline
- Three months for the literature review and design of the study and four months for data collection.
- Our team will conduct the survey and collect the data for three months, followed by analyzing the data and preparing the written report.
- Two months yield to present the results.
Conclusion
This paper compares Kenya, Brazil, and India, discussing why the election process in Kenya is more costly than the other two nations. The purpose of this approach, which combines polling stations around the world, is not only to keep the expenses to the minimum but also to get insights into a possible solution for the effective management of the polling stations.
References
Okuro, O. (2021). Comparative Review of E-Voting in India and Brazil: Key Lessons for Kenya. Lagos Historical Review, 21(1), 26–56.
Tyce, M. (2020). Beyond the neoliberal-statist divide on the drivers of innovation: A political settlements reading of Kenya’s M-Pesa success story. World Development, p. 125, 104621.
write