Many people, especially young adults, use technology in today’s world. This has made people worried about how it might affect their emotions and social skills. The fact that digital devices are everywhere makes us think about what happens when we use them too much. This review looks at a few articles from experts who studied how too much technology affects young adults’ feelings and social lives. This review looks at the many sides of the problem and explains the difficulties caused by being constantly surrounded by technology. It also aims to help us understand how it might affect the emotions of young people who have grown up using technology.
The resources we chose cover many different topics in scholarly research, like environmental toxicology, chemistry, educational technology, and psychological studies. While these sources are about different things, they all together give us ideas that can be combined to understand topics like being honest in science, predicting success in school, how people use social media for information, the process of reviewing other people’s work, and judging if something is trustworthy in different situations.
Mebane et al. did a research study. The report in 2019 raised concerns about honesty in environmental toxicology and chemistry research. It stressed the need to make research more reliable, trustworthy, and clear. This focus on research honesty is important for all academic subjects and connects with the idea of keeping high standards in scholarly work. Verleysen and Engels (2014) study how books in social sciences and humanities are published and shared internationally, including those that are reviewed by peers and those that are not. This view adds to the talk about research spreading around the world and the importance of looking at different sources of academic communication.
Alyahyan and Düştegör (2020) are studying how to predict if students will be successful in college. Their review of books and articles gives ideas on how to help students do well in school. This is important for schools that want to create a good learning environment for students to succeed. Alhoori and his team’s research. The study in 2019 looks at how scholars use social media for academic purposes. It is important to know how researchers share information on social media and other digital platforms because it is a big part of how academics communicate now.
Lu and others. The year 2023 will provide a psychological view on building up resistance to false information by studying the effectiveness of psychological inoculation. This will help people decide what to believe and what not to believe. This study explains how our minds decide what information is important, especially in the age of too much digital information. Holt and Spence (2012) wrote about the peer-review process for sport and exercise psychology. Their ideas are important to talk about because they relate to how reliable and accurate the peer-review process is in making sure that academic research is high quality and trustworthy.
Grant and others. In 2013, there was a focus on making sure that social and psychological intervention trials were reported with good quality. It was important to follow the guidelines for reporting. Making sure that all information is clear and complete in reports is very important for using the best evidence and making good policies. Kleinheksel and others. In 2020, researchers made content analysis easier to understand and use for people in all fields of study. Their work is useful for researchers who want to study and understand written information in a structured way.
Curry and Lillis (2019) wrote about the problems that scholars who speak more than one language face when they try to publish their work in English. This brings a social and language dimension to the combination, highlighting how important it is for different people and ideas to be included in academic discussions. Marsh et al. (2008) focus on making the process of reviewing grant applications by peers better. It deals with problems like accuracy, fairness, and how well the results can be applied to other situations. This study is important for making sure that money is distributed fairly for research.
Koppes and King (2020) talk about how the science of landscapes is changing and exploring new ideas. Their work shows that science is always changing, and researchers must be able to adjust to new ways of thinking. Finally, Rubin and Liddy (2006) look at how believable weblogs are, which helps us understand how trustworthy information is on the internet. This research is important because people are using the internet more to get information. Young adults who spend much time on their phones and computers might talk to people less. This can make them feel lonely and alone. Being alone a lot can stop you from learning how to talk with people and understand your feelings when you’re growing up.
In short, looking at all these resources together shows how issues like being honest in science, sharing knowledge, doing well in school, finding information, reviewing other people’s work, and judging if it’s credible are all connected. This paper gives a full view of the problems and chances in academic research. It talks about how important it is to keep high-quality standards in research and communication. As people increasingly use technology, it’s very important to deal with these worries. To help young people grow up happy and well-adjusted, we must look at how their parents and society affect their behaviour, not just what they do themselves. In the future, researchers should study technology use more closely, looking at different ways people use it and how different factors can influence it. By understanding that the issue is complex, teachers, parents, and leaders can work together to make a good and helpful place for young people to grow socially and emotionally.
References
Mebane, C. A., Sumpter, J. P., Fairbrother, A., Augspurger, T. P., Canfield, T. J., Goodfellow, W. L., … & Verslycke, T. A. (2019). Scientific integrity issues in environmental toxicology and chemistry: improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 15(3), 320-344.
Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. (2014). Internationalization of peer-reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 101, 1431-1444.
Alyahyan, E., & Düştegör, D. (2020). Predicting academic success in higher education: literature review and best practices. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-21.
Alhoori, H., Samaka, M., Furuta, R., & Fox, E. A. (2019). Anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of academic social media platforms. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 20, 369-389.
Lu, C., Hu, B., Li, Q., Bi, C., & Ju, X. D. (2023). Psychological inoculation for credibility assessment, sharing intention, and discernment of misinformation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e49255.
Holt, N. L., & Spence, J. C. (2012). A review of the peer review process and implications for sport and exercise psychology. Athletic Insight, 4(1), 31.
Grant, S. P., Mayo-Wilson, E., Melendez-Torres, G. J., & Montgomery, P. (2013). Reporting quality of social and psychological intervention trials: a systematic review of reporting guidelines and trial publications. PloS one, 8(5), e65442.
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Demystifying content analysis. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(1), 7113.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2019). Unpacking the lore on multilingual scholars publishing in English: A discussion paper. Publications, 7(2), 27.
Marsh, H. W., Jayasinghe, U. W., & Bond, N. W. (2008). Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. American psychologist, 63(3), 160.
Koppes, M., & King, L. (2020). Beyond x, y, z (t); Navigating New Landscapes of Science in the Science of Landscapes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(9), e2020JF005588.
Rubin, V. L., & Liddy, E. D. (2006, March). Assessing Credibility of Weblogs. In AAAI spring symposium: computational approaches to analyzing weblogs (pp. 187-190).
write